99-12248. Methacrylic Copolymer; Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 19, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 27182-27185]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-12248]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [OPP-300848; FRL-6077-7]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Methacrylic Copolymer; Exemption from the Requirement of a 
    Tolerance
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
    of a tolerance for residues of the methacrylic copolymer when applied 
    to growing crops, to raw agricultural commodities after harvest or to 
    animals when applied/used as an inert ingredient in the pesticide 
    formulations. Rohm and Haas Company submitted a petition to EPA under 
    the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Food 
    Quality Protection Act of 1996 requesting an exemption from the 
    requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to 
    establish a maximum permissible level for residues of methacrylic 
    copolymer.
    
    DATES: This regulation is effective May 19, 1999. Objections and 
    requests for hearings must be received by EPA on or before July 19, 
    1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
    docket control number [OPP-300848], must be submitted to: Hearing Clerk 
    (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. Fees accompanying objections and hearing requests 
    shall be labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA 
    Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees) and 
    forwarded to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, OPP 
    (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. A copy of any 
    objections and hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk identified 
    by the docket control number, [OPP-300848], must also be submitted to: 
    Public Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources 
    and Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    In person, bring a copy of objections and hearing requests to Rm. 119, 
    Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA.
        A copy of objections and hearing requests filed with the Hearing 
    Clerk may be submitted electronically by sending electronic mail (e-
    mail) to: opp-docket@epa.gov. Copies of electronic objections and 
    hearing requests must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of 
    special characters and any form of encryption. Copies of electronic 
    objections and hearing requests will also be accepted on disks in 
    WordPerfect 5.1/6.1 file format or ASCII file format. All copies of 
    electronic objections and hearing requests must be identified by the 
    docket number [OPP-300848]. No Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
    should be submitted through e-mail. Copies of electronic objections and 
    hearing requests on this rule may be filed online at many Federal 
    Depository Libraries.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Bipin Gandhi, Registration 
    Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
    Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office 
    location, telephone number, and e-mail address: Rm. 713J, Crystal Mall 
    #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA, 703-308-8380, 
    gandhi.bipin@epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of November 20, 1998 
    (63 FR 64478) (FRL-6042-4), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408 
    of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, as 
    amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-170) 
    announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance petition (PP 8E4952) by 
    Rohm and Haas Company, 100 Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 
    19106-2399. This notice included a summary of the petition prepared by 
    the petitioner Rohm and Haas Company. There were no comments received 
    in response to the notice of filing.
        The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by 
    establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for 
    residues of methacrylic copolymer.
    
    I. Background and Statutory Findings
    
        Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
    exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
    pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
    the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) defines ``safe'' to 
    mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
    from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including 
    all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which 
    there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
    drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include 
    occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) requires EPA to give 
    special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the 
    pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure 
    that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to 
    infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical 
    residue...''
        EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from 
    aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the 
    toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide 
    through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as 
    a result of pesticide us in residential settings.
    
    II. Toxicological Profile
    
        Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the 
    available scientific data and other relevant information in support of 
    this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability 
    and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also 
    considered
    
    [[Page 27183]]
    
    available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities 
    of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and 
    children. The nature of the toxic effects caused by methacrylic 
    copolymer are discussed in this unit:
        In the case of certain chemical substances that are defined as 
    ``polymers'', the Agency has established a set of criteria which 
    identify categories of polymers that present low risk. These criteria 
    (described in 40 CFR 723.250) identify polymers that are relatively 
    unreactive and stable compounds compared to other chemical substances 
    as well as polymers that typically are not readily absorbed. These 
    properties generally limit a polymer's ability to cause adverse 
    effects. In addition, these criteria exclude polymers about which 
    little is known. The Agency believes that polymers meeting the criteria 
    noted above will present minimal or no risk. Alkyl (C12-
    C20) Methacrylate copolymer conforms to the definition of a 
    polymer given in 40 CFR 723.250 (b) and meet the following criteria 
    that are used to identify low risk polymers:
        1. Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer is 
    not a cationic polymer, nor is it capable of becoming a cationic 
    polymer in the natural aquatic environment.
        2. Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer 
    contains as an integral part of its composition the atomic elements 
    carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.
        3. Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer 
    does not contain as an integral part of its composition, except as 
    impurities, any element other than those listed in 40 CFR 723.250 
    (d)(2)(iii).
        4. Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer is 
    not designed, nor is it reasonably anticipated to substantially 
    degrade, decompose or depolymerize.
        5. Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer is 
    not manufactured or imported from monomers and/or other reactants that 
    are not already included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory or 
    manufactured under an applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
        6. Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer is 
    not a water absorbing polymer with a number average molecular weight 
    greater than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
        7. The minimum number-average molecular weight of Alkyl 
    (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer is  
    15,000 daltons. Substances with molecular weights greater than 400 
    generally are not absorbed through the intact skin, and substances with 
    molecular weights greater than 1,000 generally are not absorbed through 
    the intact gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Chemicals not absorbed through 
    the skin or GI tract generally are incapable of eliciting a toxic 
    response.
        8. Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer has 
    a minimum number average molecular weight of  15,000 and 
    contains less than 2% oligomeric material below molecular weight 500 
    and less than 5 percent oligomeric material below 1,000 molecular 
    weight.
        9. Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer 
    does contain aliphatic ester groups as reactive functional groups. 
    However, these reactive groups are not intended or reasonably 
    anticipated to undergo further reactions under usual environmental 
    conditions.
    
    III. Aggregate Exposures
    
        In examining aggregate exposure, FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to 
    consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticide 
    residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures, including 
    drinking water from groundwater or surface water and exposure through 
    pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other 
    indoor uses).
    
    A. Dietary Exposure
    
        1. Food. Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate 
    copolymer is not absorbed through the intact gastrointestinal tract and 
    is considered incapable of eliciting a toxic response.
        2. Drinking water exposure. Based upon the aqueous insolubility of 
    Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer, there is 
    no reason to expect human exposure to residues in drinking water.
    
    B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure
    
        Typical use of Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate 
    copolymer is in the oil industry as a wax and viscosity modifier at 
    very low use rates. In these uses the primary exposure rate would be 
    dermal, however, Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate 
    copolymer with a molecular weight significantly greater that 400 is not 
    absorbed through the intact skin.
    
    IV. Cumulative Effects
    
        There is data to support cumulative risk from Alkyl 
    (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer, since polymers 
    with molecular weights greater than 400 generally are not absorbed 
    through the intact skin, and substances with molecular weights greater 
    than 1,000 generally are not absorbed through the intact 
    gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Chemicals not absorbed through the skin or 
    GI tract generally are incapable of eliciting a toxic response. 
    Therefore, there is no reasonable expectations of increased risk due to 
    cumulative exposure.
    
    V. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and 
    Children
    
        1. U.S. population. Alkyl (C12-C20) 
    Methacrylate copolymer causes no safety concerns because it conforms to 
    the definition of a low risk polymer given in 40 CFR 723.250 (b) and as 
    such is considered incapable of eliciting a toxic response. Also, there 
    are no additional pathways of exposure (non-occupational, drinking 
    water, etc.) where there would be additional risk.
        2. Infants and children. Alkyl (C12-C20) 
    Methacrylate copolymer causes no additional concern to infants and 
    children because it conforms to the definition of a low risk polymer 
    given in 40 CFR 723.250 (b) and as such is considered incapable of 
    eliciting a toxic response. Also there are no additional pathways of 
    exposure (non-occupational, drinking water, etc.) where infants and 
    children would be at additional risk.
        Based on the information in this preamble, EPA concludes that there 
    is a reasonable certainty of no harm from aggregate exposure to 
    methacrylic copolymer residues. Accordingly, EPA finds that exempting 
    methacrylic copolymer from the requirement of a tolerance will be safe.
    
    VI. Other Considerations
    
    A. Endocrine Disruptors
    
        There are no evidence that Alkyl (C12-C20) 
    Methacrylate copolymer is an endocrine disrupter, where as substances 
    with molecular weights greater than 400 generally are not absorbed 
    through the intact skin, and substances with molecular weights greater 
    than 1,000 generally are not absorbed through the intact 
    gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Chemicals not absorbed through the skin or 
    GI tract generally are incapable of eliciting a toxic response.
    
    B. Analytical Method(s)
    
        Rohm and Haas has petitioned that Alkyl (C12-
    C20) Methacrylate copolymer be exempt from the requirement 
    of a tolerance based upon the low risk polymer as per 40 CFR 723.250. 
    Therefore, an analytical method to determine residues of Alkyl 
    (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer in raw 
    agricultural commodities has not been proposed.
    
    C. Codex Maximum Residue Level
    
        The Agency is not aware of any country requiring a tolerance for 
    Alkyl (C12-C20) Methacrylate copolymer. Nor have 
    been there been any CODEX
    
    [[Page 27184]]
    
    Maximum Residue Levels (MRL's) established for any food crops at this 
    time. 
    
    VII. Objections and Hearing Requests
    
        The new FFDCA section 408(g) provides essentially the same process 
    for persons to ``object'' to a regulation for an exemption from the 
    requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408(d) and 
    as was provided in the old section 408 and in section 409. However, the 
    period for filing objections is 60 days, rather than 30 days. EPA 
    currently has procedural regulations which governs the submission of 
    objections and hearing requests. These regulations will require some 
    modification to reflect the new law. However, until those modifications 
    can be made, EPA will continue to use those procedural regulations with 
    appropriate adjustments to reflect the new law.
        Any person may, by July 19, 1999, file written objections to any 
    aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those 
    objections. Objections and hearing requests must be filed with the 
    Hearing Clerk, at the address given under the ``ADDRESSES'' section (40 
    CFR 178.20). A copy of the objections and/or hearing requests filed 
    with the hearing clerk should be submitted to the OPP docket for this 
    rulemaking. The objections submitted must specify the provisions of the 
    regulation deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections (40 
    CFR 178.25). Each objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed 
    by 40 CFR 180.33(i). EPA is authorized to waive any fee requirement 
    ``when in the judgement of the Administrator such a waiver or refund is 
    equitable and not contrary to the purpose of this subsection.'' For 
    additional information regarding tolerance objection fee waivers, 
    contact James Tompkins, Registration Division (7505C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. Office location, telephone number, and e-mail 
    address: Rm. 239, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., 
    Arlington, VA, (703) 305-5697, tompkins.jim@epa.gov. Requests for 
    waiver of tolerance objection fees should be sent to James Hollins, 
    Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460.
        If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a statement 
    of the factual issues(s) on which a hearing is requested, the 
    requestor's contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence 
    relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing 
    will be granted if the Administrator determines that the material 
    submitted shows the following: There is a genuine and substantial issue 
    of fact; there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence 
    identified by the requestor would, if established resolve one or more 
    of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking into account 
    uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and resolution of the 
    factual issues(s) in the manner sought by the requestor would be 
    adequate to justify the action requested (40 CFR 178.32). Information 
    submitted in connection with an objection or hearing request may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance 
    with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the information 
    that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public 
    record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed publicly 
    by EPA without prior notice.
    
    VIII. Public Record and Electronic Submissions
    
        EPA has established a record for this regulation under docket 
    control number [OPP-300848] (including any comments and data submitted 
    electronically). A public version of this record, including printed, 
    paper versions of electronic comments, which does not include any 
    information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection from 8:30 a.m. 
    to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The public 
    record is located in Room 119 of the Public Information and Records 
    Integrity Branch, Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), 
    Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Crystal 
    Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA.
        Objections and hearing requests may be sent by e-mail directly to 
    EPA at:
    
        opp-docket@epa.gov.
    
    
        E-mailed objections and hearing requests must be submitted as an 
    ASCII file avoiding the use of special characters and any form of 
    encryption.
        The official record for this regulation, as well as the public 
    version, as described in this unit will be kept in paper form. 
    Accordingly, EPA will transfer any copies of objections and hearing 
    requests received electronically into printed, paper form as they are 
    received and will place the paper copies in the official record which 
    will also include all comments submitted directly in writing. The 
    official record is the paper record maintained at the Virginia address 
    in ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document.
    
    IX. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
    
    A. Certain Acts and Executive Orders
    
        This final rule establishes an exemption from the tolerance 
    requirement under section 408(d) of the FFDCA in response to a petition 
    submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
    exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 
    12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 
    1993). This final rule does not contain any information collections 
    subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 
    U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any 
    unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 
    Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Nor does it require any 
    prior consultation as specficed by Executive Order 12875, entitled 
    Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership (58 FR 58093, October 28, 
    1993), or special considerations as required by Executive Order 12898, 
    entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority 
    Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994), 
    or require OMB review in accordance with Executive Order 13045, 
    entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and 
    Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
        In addition, since tolerances and exemptions that are established 
    on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the 
    exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed 
    rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 
    U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. Nevertheless, the Agency previously 
    assessed whether establishing tolerances, exemptions from tolerances, 
    raising tolerance levels or expanding exemptions might adversely impact 
    small entities and concluded, as a generic matter, that there is no 
    adverse economic impact. The factual basis for the Agency's generic 
    certification for tolerance actions published on May 4, 1981 (46 FR 
    24950), and was provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small 
    Business Administration.
    
    B. Executive Order 12875
    
        Under Executive Order 12875, entitled Enhancing the 
    Intergovernmental Partnership (58 FR 58093, October 28, 1993), EPA may 
    not
    
    [[Page 27185]]
    
    issue a regulation that is not required by statute and that creates a 
    mandate upon a State, local or tribal government, unless the Federal 
    government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
    costs incurred by those governments. If the mandate is unfunded, EPA 
    must provide to OMB a description of the extent of EPA's prior 
    consultation with representatives of affected State, local, and tribal 
    governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of any written 
    communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the 
    need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 12875 
    requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected 
    officials and other representatives of State, local, and tribal 
    governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development 
    of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.''
        Today's rule does not create an unfunded Federal mandate on State, 
    local, or tribal governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable 
    duties on these entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) 
    of Executive Order 12875 do not apply to this rule.
    
    C. Executive Order 13084
    
        Under Executive Order 13084, entitled Consultation and Coordination 
    with Indian Tribal Governments (63 FR 27655, May 19, 1998), EPA may not 
    issue a regulation that is not required by statute, that significantly 
    or uniquely affects the communities of Indian tribal governments, and 
    that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on those communities, 
    unless the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the 
    direct compliance costs incurred by the tribal governments. If the 
    mandate is unfunded, EPA must provide OMB, in a separately identified 
    section of the preamble to the rule, a description of the extent of 
    EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected tribal 
    governments, a summary of the nature of their concerns, and a statement 
    supporting the need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive 
    Order 13084 requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting 
    elected officials and other representatives of Indian tribal 
    governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development 
    of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or uniquely affect 
    their communities.''
        Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
    communities of Indian tribal governments. This action does not involve 
    or impose any requirements that affect Indian tribes. Accordingly, the 
    requirements of section 3(b) of Executive Order 13084 do not apply to 
    this rule.
    
    X. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
    
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
    provides that before a rule may take effect, the Agency promulgating 
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
    to each House of the Congress and the Comptroller General of the United 
    States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
    Representatives and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
    to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
    ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
    
        Dated: April 30, 1999.
    
    James Jones,
    
    Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
        Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I, part 180 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 180-[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321q, 346a and 371.
    
    
        2. In Sec. 180.1001, the tables in paragraphs (c) and (e) are 
    amended by adding alphabetically the following inert ingredient to read 
    as follows:
    
    Sec. 180.1001   Exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance.
    
    *    *    *    *    *
        (c) *    *    *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Inert ingredients             Limits                 Uses
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     
             *        *        *        *        *        *        *
    Methacrylic Copolymer (CAS     ................  Inert
     Reg. No. 63150-03-8),
     minimum number average
     molecular weight (in amu)
     15,000.
     
             *        *        *        *        *        *        *
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    *    *    *    *    *
        (e) *    *    *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Inert ingredients             Limits                 Uses
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     
             *        *        *        *        *        *        *
    Methacrylic Copolymer (CAS     ................  Inert
     Reg. No. 63150-03-8),
     minimum number average
     molecular weight (in amu)
     15,000.
     
             *        *        *        *        *        *        *
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 99-12248 Filed 5-18-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/19/1999
Published:
05/19/1999
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-12248
Dates:
This regulation is effective May 19, 1999. Objections and requests for hearings must be received by EPA on or before July 19, 1999.
Pages:
27182-27185 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
OPP-300848, FRL-6077-7
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
99-12248.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.1001