94-12305. Application for an Order Under the Investment Company Act of 1940  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 97 (Friday, May 20, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-12305]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: May 20, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Rel. No. IC-20295 ; No. 812-8734]
    
     
    
    Application for an Order Under the Investment Company Act of 1940
    
    May 13, 1994.
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'').
    
    ACTION: Notice of Application for an Order under the Investment Company 
    Act of 1940 (``1940 Act'').
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    APPLICANTS: Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (``Fortis Benefits''), 
    Variable Account C of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (``Fortis 
    Benefits Account''), First Fortis Life Insurance Company (``First 
    Fortis''), Variable Account C of First Fortis Life Insurance Company 
    (``First Fortis Account'') and Fortis Investors, Inc. (``Investors'').
    
    RELEVANT 1940 ACT SECTIONS: Order requested under section 6(c) of the 
    1940 Act for exemptions from the provisions of sections 2(a)(32), 
    22(c), 26(a)(2)(C), 27(a)(3), 27(c)(1), 27(c)(2) and 27(d) and Rules 
    22c-1, 6e-3(T)(b)(12), 6e-3(T)(b)(13) and 6e-3(T)(d)(1)(ii) thereunder.
    
    SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants seek an order to the extent 
    necessary to permit them to issue flexible premium variable life 
    insurance policies (``Policies'') that enable Fortis Benefits and First 
    Fortis (the ``Insurers'') to: (1) Credit the Policy owner's account 
    with ``Policy value advances'' and later recover the Policy value 
    advances from the assets of the Fortis Benefits Account and the First 
    Fortis Account; (2) include in the surrender charge any premium tax 
    charge not previously recovered; and (3) deduct sales charges in a 
    manner that may result in deductions in one period being considered to 
    be higher than deductions taken out in a subsequent period.
    
    FILING DATE: The application was filed on December 17, 1993.
    
    HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
    will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested 
    persons may request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and 
    serving Applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. 
    Hearing requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on June 7, 
    1994, and should be accompanied by proof of service on Applicants in 
    the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. 
    Hearing requests should state the nature of the requester's interest, 
    the reason for the request and the issues contested. Persons may 
    request notification of a hearing by writing to the Secretary of the 
    SEC.
    
    ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 5th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. 
    Fortis Benefits, the Fortis Benefits Account, and Investors, 500 
    Bielenberg Drive, Woodbury, Minnesota 55125. First Fortis and the First 
    Fortis Account, 220 Salina Meadows Parkway, suite 255, Syracuse, New 
    York 13220.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy Finck Friedlander, Senior 
    Attorney (202) 942-0682, or Wendell Faria, Deputy Chief (202) 942-0670, 
    Office of Insurance Products, Division of Investment Management.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following is a summary of the application; 
    the complete application is available for a fee from the SEC's Public 
    Reference Branch.
    
    Applicant's Representations
    
        1. Fortis Benefits, a Minnesota corporation, is qualified to sell 
    life insurance in the District of Columbia and in all states except New 
    York. It is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Fortis, Inc., which 
    is itself indirectly owned 50% by N.V. AMEV and 50% by Compaignie 
    Financiere et de Reassurance de Group AG. Fortis, Inc. manages the 
    United States operations for these two foreign companies. First Fortis, 
    a New York corporation, is qualified to sell life insurance in New 
    York. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of N.V. Amev.
        2. The Insurers established the Fortis Benefits Account and the 
    First Fortis Account (the ``Accounts`') under the laws of Minnesota and 
    New York, Respectively, as segregated investment accounts for the 
    purpose of funding variable life insurance policies, including the 
    policies. The Fortis Benefits Account is registered as unit investment 
    trust under the 1940 Act. First Fortis intends to register the First 
    Fortis Account prior to the time it offers any Policies for sale. Each 
    Account currently consists of six subaccounts (``Subaccounts''), each 
    of which invests, or intends to invest, exclusively in shares of a 
    corresponding portfolio of Fortis Series Fund, Inc., a registered 
    management investment company.
        3. Investors, also an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Fortis, 
    Inc., is the principal underwriter for the Policies. Investors is 
    registered as a broker-dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 
    1934.
        4. The Policies may be issued either on a group or individual 
    basis. The forms of Policy that are the subject of this application are 
    Fortis Benefits' VUL-100 Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance 
    Policy and First Fortis' VUL-500, VUL-200, and VUL-100 Flexible Premium 
    Variable Life Insurance Policies. The First Fortis VUL-500 and VUL-220 
    Policies permit the Policy owner to select, and change from time to 
    time, between two death benefit options. One of these options, under 
    which the ``Policy value'' is added to the Policy's face amount of 
    insurance coverage for purposes of computing the death benefit, is not 
    available under the VUL-100 Policies. The owner of any of the Policies 
    also may change the face amount from time to time, subject to certain 
    restrictions.
        5. The Policy owner may allocate the Policy value to one or more of 
    the Subaccounts and/or to the general accounts of the Insurers.
        6. The Policies may be fully surrendered at any time for their 
    surrender value and, generally after the first Policy year, the policy 
    owner may make a partial withdrawal of the surrender value once a year. 
    The Policy owner also may take out loans and may vary the frequency and 
    amount of premium payments.
        7. The Policy will not lapse for a specified number of years if 
    certain minimum premium payment requirement is based on monthly minimum 
    premiums, which are also used, among other things, to make certain 
    sales charge and policy value advance computations. While different 
    monthly minimum premiums may be used for different purposes, in no case 
    will the sum of twelve monthly minimum premiums with respect to a VUL-
    500 OR VUL-220 Policy exceed the guideline annual premium with respect 
    to such Policy, as defined in Rule 6e-3(T)(c)(8).
        8. Unless prohibited by applicable state insurance law, a Policy 
    may be eligible for a credit in the form of a Policy value advance 
    (``Advance'' on the last day of the ninth year (twelfth year in Oregon) 
    and each subsequent Policy year. Except in Oregon, where there are no 
    premium payment requirements for an Advance, eligible Policies may 
    receive an Advance only if, as of the date of the credit, (1) The 
    cumulative amount of premiums paid over the life of the Policy, less 
    any outstanding policy loans, and less the cumulative amount of partial 
    withdrawals taken by the Policy owner, at least equals (2) the 
    cumulative monthly minimum premium payments to date. No further 
    Advances will be paid if the premium requirement is not met for any 
    credit.
        9. Advances paid at the end of the ninth (twelfth year in Oregon) 
    and each subsequent Policy year will equal ten percent (five percent in 
    Oregon), of the average of the total minimum monthly premiums for each 
    year to date. Advances at the foregoing rate are not guaranteed, and 
    the Insurers reserve the right to reduce them, subject to guaranteed 
    minimum rates. The guaranteed rates are based on the insured's age at 
    Policy issue, as follows: ages 0-40, 10%; ages 41-43, 9%; ages 44-46, 
    8.25%; ages 47-50, 7.5%; ages 51-55, 6%; ages 56-60, 5.5%; and ages 61-
    70 (and all ages in Oregon), 5%. These guarantees apply through the 
    19th (21st in Oregon) Policy year, but not thereafter.
        10. Advances will be allocated among the general account and the 
    Subaccounts on a pro rata basis in proportion to the amount of Policy 
    value in each, exclusive of amounts transferred to the general account 
    as a result of Policy loans. Following such allocation, these amounts 
    will be credited with investment performance and otherwise be treated 
    the same as any other amounts of Policy value.
        11. The Insurers will notify Policy owners that they may be 
    forfeiting Advances by failing to make sufficient premium payments. An 
    annual statement will inform each Policy owner of the dollar amount 
    that must be paid for the year, plus any unpaid amounts from prior 
    years, to be eligible for Advances, or if no such premiums must be 
    paid.
        12. Unless prohibited by applicable state insurance law, a VUL-500 
    or VUL-100 Policy may be eligible for an increase in Policy value in 
    the form of a ``cash value bonus'' (``Bonus'') on the last day of the 
    ninth and each subsequent Policy year. The amount of any Bonus is a 
    percentage of the surrender value at the date of the Bonus, as follows:
    
         Bonus as a Percent of Surrender Value at the End of Policy Year    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               9 to 19        20 and later  
      Surrender value of date of bonus   -----------------------------------
                                          VUL-500  VUL-100  VUL-500  VUL-100
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Less than $50,000...................     .00%     .00%     .00%     .00%
    $50,000 to $299,999.................      .10      .30      .10      .30
    $300,000 to 499,999.................      .55      .50      .55      .50
    $500,000 or more....................      .55      .50      .80      .50
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Bonuses at the foregoing rates are not guaranteed, and each Insurer 
    retains the right, with respect to its Policies, in its sole discretion 
    to reduce or discontinue Bonuses upon one year's notice. Bonuses will 
    be credited with investment performance and otherwise will be treated 
    the same as any other amounts of Policy value. Bonuses will be 
    allocated among the general accounts and the Subaccounts on a pro rata 
    basis and will be fully vested.
        13. A premium tax charge is assessed in the amount of 2.3% of all 
    premium payments through monthly deductions from Policy value under the 
    VUL-500 and VUL-220 Policies and daily deductions from Policy value 
    under all Policies. Any portion of such amounts that is not recovered 
    by the Insurers pursuant to the monthly and/or daily deductions may be 
    deducted as part of the surrender charge.
        14. A sales charge also is assessed in the amount of 7.5% of all 
    premium payments through monthly deductions from Policy value under the 
    VUL-500 and VUL-220 Policies and daily deductions from Policy value 
    under all of the Policies. Any amount of the sales charge that is not 
    recovered by the Insurers through these monthly and/or daily deductions 
    may be deducted as a contingent deferred sales charge as part of the 
    surrender charge.
        15. The monthly deduction under the VUL-500 and VUL-220 Policies 
    for premium tax and sales charges totals $4.00 per month, and the daily 
    deduction under all of the Policies is at an aggregate annual rate of 
    .27% of the value of the Policy's net assets in the Accounts. These 
    deductions will be waived to the extent that the cumulative amount of 
    all such deductions would exceed 9.8% (7.5% for sales charges and 2.3% 
    for premium tax charges) of all premium payments made to date. Premium 
    tax and sales charge deductions will not be made at any time when 
    similar deductions for Advances are being made.
        16. As part of the surrender charge, the VUL-500 and VUL-220 
    Policies impose an additional contingent deferred sales charge 
    (``CDSC'') in the amount of 22% and 12%, respectively, of premium paid 
    in the first two Policy years that are not in excess of the sum of 
    twelve monthly minimum premiums.
        17. An additional CDSC also will be payable under the VUL-500 and 
    VUL-220 Policies on certain total surrenders or Policy lapses following 
    an increase in face amount requested by a Policy owner. The maximum 
    additional CDSC will be 22% and 12%, respectively, of the lesser of: 
    (1) The sum of twelve monthly minimum premiums for the face amount 
    increase or (2) the amount of actual premium payment deemed 
    attributable to the increase which are made not later than two years 
    after the date of this increase. Any such additional CDSC arising from 
    a face amount increase is payable only as part of the surrender charge.
        18. A charge for other Policy issuance expenses also is imposed 
    under certain Policies. This charge is $5.00 per thousand dollars of a 
    Policy's initial face amount and also will be imposed following any 
    increase in face amount. This charge is deducted only under the VUL-500 
    and VUL-200 Policies and only as part of the surrender charge. 
    Applicants represent that this charge will not exceed the amount 
    permitted by Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(13)(iii)(A).
        19. The surrender charge may be assessed upon the lapse or full 
    surrender of a Policy before the eleventh Policy anniversary or the 
    eleventh anniversary of a face amount increase. No surrender charge is 
    deducted upon a partial withdrawal of Policy value or a face amount 
    decrease. The maximum surrender charge is the sum of: (1) Any portion 
    of the current 2.3% premium tax charge and the 7.5% sales charge that 
    has not yet been collected through the monthly and/or daily deductions; 
    (2) any additional CDSCs with respect to the VUL-500 or VUL-220 
    Policies; and (3) the charge for other Policy (or increase) issuance 
    expenses with respect to the VUL-500 or VUL-220 Policies.
        20. The entire surrender charge is subject to an overall upper 
    limit or ``cap,'' based on the insured's age and the face amount or 
    face amount increase, as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Overall   
                                                                ``Cap'' on  
                                                                 surrender  
                                                                charge (per 
     Insured person's age at time of policy issuance or face     thousand   
                     amount increase (years)                    dollars of  
                                                              face amount or
                                                              of face amount
                                                                 increase)  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0-30 Years..............................................           $9.00
    31-40...................................................           10.00
    41-45...................................................           12.00
    46-50...................................................           14.00
    51-55...................................................           16.00
    56-60...................................................           21.00
    61-65...................................................           28.00
    66-70...................................................           40.00
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    The cap decreases on the fifth and each subsequent Policy anniversary, 
    or face amount increase, anniversary until it reaches zero on the 
    eleventh Policy anniversary or increase anniversary. There is no 
    surrender charge on surrenders or lapses as of the later of the 
    eleventh Policy anniversary or the eleventh anniversary of any face 
    amount increase.
        21. The amount of any Advance paid by the Insurer is subject to 
    recovery through the following deductions made after the payment of the 
    Advance: $4.00 per month (as part of the monthly deduction) under the 
    VUL-500 and VUL-220 Policies, plus a daily deduction under all of the 
    Policies at an annual rate of .27% of the value of the Policy's net 
    assets in the Accounts. These deductions continue until their 
    cumulative amount equals the cumulative amount of Advances actually 
    credited to the Policy.
        22. The monthly deduction from Policy value includes: (1) Premium 
    tax and sales charges or recovery of Advances; (2) the cost of 
    insurance charge; (3) a monthly charge for the guaranteed death benefit 
    in the amount of $.01 per thousand dollars of face amount under the 
    Policy or any optional riders; (4) the charge for optional insurance 
    benefits added by riders; and (5) the monthly administrative expense 
    charge of $4.50 per Policy. The Insurers reserve the right to raise the 
    monthly administrative expense charge to not more than $7.50 per month 
    and to impose an additional monthly administrative expense charge of up 
    to $.13 per thousand dollars of face amount then in force. Applicants 
    represent that this charge will not exceed the amount permitted by Rule 
    6e-3(T)(b)(13)(iii)(A).
        23. A daily charge at an annual rate of .90% of the average daily 
    value of the net assets in the Account that are attributable to the 
    Policies is made for mortality and expense risks assumed by the 
    Insurers.
        24. The Insurers reserve the right to deduct (1) Charges to defray 
    their administrative expenses in effecting transfers of Policy value or 
    partial withdrawals and (2) charges for any federal income taxes that 
    the Insurers may incur.
    
    Applicant's Request for Relief and Legal Analysis
    
        1. Applicants request exemptions from sections 26(a)(2)(C) and 
    27(c)(1) of the 1940 Act to the extent necessary to permit the 
    deduction of monthly and/or daily charges to recover Advances.
        2. Section 27(c)(2) provides that an investment company may not 
    offer periodic payment plan certificates unless, among other things, 
    the proceeds of all payments (other than the sales load) on such 
    certificates are deposited with a trustee or custodian having the 
    qualifications prescribed in section 26(a)(1) and are held by the 
    trustee or custodian under an indenture or agreement containing, in 
    substance, the provisions required by section 26(a)(2).
        3. Section 26(a)(2)(C) provides that no payments to the depositor 
    of, or principal underwriter for, a registered unit investment trust 
    (or any affiliated person or agent of such depositor or principal 
    underwriter) shall be allowed the trustee or custodian as an expense, 
    except for payment of a fee not exceeding such reasonable amount as the 
    Commission may prescribe, for performing bookkeeping and other 
    administrative services of a character normally performed by the 
    trustee or custodian.
        4. Applicants submit that the recovery of all or part of an Advance 
    returns to the Insurer its own assets and that such recovery is not a 
    payment of the sort addressed by section 26(a)(2)(C). Applicants state 
    that, in this respect, deductions to recover Advances are similar to 
    the removal from separate account assets of amounts necessary to secure 
    Policy loans, or to secure additional Policy loans that are made 
    automatically in order to ``capitalize'' loan interest that the Policy 
    owner has not otherwise paid. Similarly, Applicants submit that 
    deductions to recover Advances may reasonably be viewed as capital 
    adjustments rather than a charge or expense subject to section 
    26(a)(2)(C).
        5. Section 27(c)(2) requires only that the ``proceeds'' or 
    ``payments'' (i.e., amounts paid by the investor) be deposited with a 
    trustee and held subject to the requirements of section 26. Applicants 
    believe that the statutory language lends support to the conclusion 
    that recovery of Advances is outside the ambit of those provisions, 
    insofar as the Advance does not constitute ``proceeds'' of ``payments'' 
    made by an investor, but is rather an advance made by each Insurer from 
    its own funds.
        6. Advances provide a significant potential benefit to eligible 
    Policy owners by increasing the amount available to earn a return for 
    the Policy owner. In many cases, an Advance will not be recovered or 
    will be partially recovered because no CDSC for unrecovered Advances is 
    imposed upon death of the insured, surrender, partial withdrawal or 
    lapse. The total amount deducted to recover Advances under any Policy 
    will never exceed the amount of Advances actually paid.
        7. The Policy owner receives a further benefit during the time when 
    deductions for Advances are being made because similar monthly and/or 
    daily deductions for premium taxes and sales charges are suspended. 
    Deferred premium tax and sales charges are equal to the monthly and/or 
    daily deduction for Advances, assuming the 9.8% maximum on the monthly 
    and/or daily premium taxes and sales charge deductions otherwise would 
    not have been reached.
        The monthly and/or daily deductions for premium taxes and sales 
    charges resume after Advances have been fully recovered, unless total 
    deductions for premium taxes and sales charges have reached 9.8% of all 
    premiums paid to date. The Policy owner is not deemed to have ``paid'' 
    any deferred periodic premium tax and sales charges that otherwise 
    would have been deducted during the period when deductions to recover 
    Advances were being made. The deferral of these charges enhances the 
    value of the Advance feature by tending to offset the deductions made 
    to recover Advances.
        8. An Advance will increase Policy value and, consequently, may 
    increase the amount of certain charges that are deducted on the basis 
    of a percentage of Account for Fortis Series' assets: i.e., the 
    mortality and expense risk charge and the Fortis Series' investment 
    advisory fee. The increased asset-based charges are the price paid for 
    the opportunity of having accounts attributable to the transaction 
    participate in the investment performance of the Accounts. Increased 
    asset-based charges can be avoided in each case by allocating the 
    Policy value to the Insurer's general account, rather than to the 
    Accounts.
        9. There is no assurance that separate account investment 
    performance earned on Advances will be sufficient to offset the 
    additional asset-based charges resulting from the Advances. The timing 
    of the Advances and the deductions to recover them are factors that 
    indirectly determine the amount of return that would be credited. A 
    Policy owner who wants to be assured of earning a rate of return 
    greater than the rate of asset-based charges can allocate amounts 
    attributable to Advances to the Insurer's general account.
        10. Advances involve various costs to the Insurers, including the 
    costs of amounts advanced and developing and administering the Advance 
    feature. Each if the development and administration costs are 
    disregarded, Applicants assert that there is no reasonable set of 
    assumptions under which (1) the value to the Insurers of (a) the 
    revenues from deductions for Advances plus (b) any increased mortality 
    and expense risk charge and advisory fee revenues resulting from 
    Advances would exceed (2) the Insurers' additional cost associated with 
    Advances. Advances and related charges thus could not be said to 
    involve any ``back door'' attempt to impose additional charges to 
    Policy owners.
        11. Deductions for Advances are designed to reimburse the Insurers 
    for amounts advanced out of their own funds to the Policy owner. 
    Applicants represent that deductions for Advances do not contain hidden 
    charges, are not intended to finance sales expenses, and do not result 
    in profits to the Insurers. Such deductions, as well as the possibility 
    of increased asset-based charges, will be fully disclosed in the 
    prospectus for the Policies.
        12. Applicants submit that life insurance policies are typically 
    unprofitable to an insurance company in the policies' early years 
    because of high initial issuance costs and relatively small asset-based 
    revenues. Advances and Bonuses are benefits intended to attract 
    prospective purchasers and encourage Policy owners to retain and make 
    regular premium payments in order to enhance the Insurers' financial 
    strength and stability. To the extent that the objectives of the 
    Advances and Bonuses are achieved, the Insurers may not need to raise 
    their charges for cost of insurance and administrative expenses for 
    certain Policy features; rather, the Insurers may be able to offer 
    additional investment options or reduce charges under the Policies in 
    the future. Policy owners also may benefit from lower expense ratios of 
    the management investment company funding the Policies as a result of 
    increased assets.
        13. Applicants submit the Advances and Bonuses also will promote 
    fairness between persisting and surrendering Policy owners. Persisting 
    Policy owners make substantial premium payments and accumulate 
    substantial amounts of cash value and, thus, generate greater profits 
    for the Insurers. It is therefore equitable for persisting Policy 
    owners to receive additional benefits in the form of Advances and 
    Bonuses.
        14. The Insurers have designed Advances and Bonuses and their 
    method of operation so as to address state regulatory concerns. All 
    sales illustrations used by the Insurers specifically will disclose the 
    amount of any Advances and the rate of any Bonuses that are assumed by 
    any illustrations.
        15. Applicants also request exemptions from sections 2(a)(32), 
    22(c), 27(c)(1) and 27(d) and Rules 6e-3 (T)(b)(12), 6e-3(T)(b)(13) and 
    22c-1 to the extent necessary to permit the amount of any premium tax 
    charges that have not been previously collected by means of a deduction 
    from Policy value to be included in the Surrender Charge.
        16. Sections 2(a)(32), 27(c)(1) and 27(d) prohibit Applicants from 
    selling interests under a Policy unless they are redeemable securities 
    entitling a Policy owner, upon surrender, to receive his or her 
    proportionate share of the Account's current net assets. Section 
    2(a)(32) defines a ``redeemable security'' as any security which 
    entitles the holder, upon its presentation to the issuer, to receive 
    approximately a proportionate share of the issuer's current net value, 
    or the cash equivalent thereof. Section 27(c)(1) provides that no 
    issuer of a periodic payment plan certificate shall sell such 
    certificate unless the certificate is a ``redeemable security.'' 
    Section 27(d) requires that the holder of a periodic payment plan 
    certificate be able to surrender the certificate under certain 
    circumstances and recover certain amounts of sales charges.
        Rule 22c-1 prohibits Applicants from redeeming interests under a 
    Policy except at a price based on the current net asset value that is 
    next computed after receipt of the request for full or partial 
    redemption of interests under the Policy.
        Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(12) and 6e-3(T)(b)(13) provide exemptions from 
    sections 22(c) and 27(c)(1), and Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(13) provides an 
    exemption from section 27(d), to the extent necessary for the payment 
    of a flexible contract's cash value to be regarded as satisfying the 
    requirements of those provisions if specified conditions are satisfied. 
    Applicants represent that the Policies satisfy all such conditions.
        17. The method adopted under the Policy for deducting all or part 
    of the charges for premium taxes on a basis other than from premium 
    payments is more favorable to investors because more Policy value is 
    available to earn a return for the investor. Applicants represent that 
    (1) No premium tax charge will be designed to yield a profit, (2) the 
    total amount charged for premium taxes, including any amounts that may 
    subsequently be deducted from premium payments, will be no greater than 
    if all such charges were taken from premiums when paid, and (3) the 
    premium tax charges will not take into account the ``time value'' of 
    money, which would increase the charge to factor in the investment cost 
    to the Insurers of deferring collection of the charge.
        18. Applicants further request an exemption from the ``stair step'' 
    requirements of section 27(a)(3) and Rules 6e-3(T)(b)(13)(ii) and 6e-
    3(T)(d)(1)(ii).
        19. Section 27(a)(3) prohibits the sale of Policies if the sales 
    load deducted from any one of the first twelve monthly payments thereon 
    ``exceeds proportionately the amount deducted from any other such 
    payment, or the amount deducted from any other subsequent payment.''
        20. Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(13)(ii) provides an exemption from Section 
    27(a)(3) provided that the proportionate amount of sales load deducted 
    from any payment shall not exceed the proportionate amount deducted 
    from any prior payment. Rule 6e-3(T)(d)(1)(iii)(A) provides that, with 
    respect to sales charges deducted other than from premiums (excluding 
    asset-based sales charges), Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(13)(ii) is deemed satisfied 
    if ``the amount of sales load deducted pursuant to any method . . . 
    does not exceed the proportionate amount of sales load deducted prior 
    thereto pursuant to the same method.'' Rule 6e-3(T)(d)(1)(ii)(B) 
    provides comparable relief for asset-based sales charges, provided that 
    ``the percentage of assets taken as sales load does not exceed any of 
    the percentages previously taken pursuant to the same method.''
        21. Applicants request an exemption from these ``stair step'' 
    requirements because of the following three aspects of the Policies. 
    First, part of the $4.00 monthly charge deducted pursuant to each 
    Policy is a sales charge. While this charge will not change from month-
    to-month, it will vary from month-to-month as a percentage of premiums 
    paid and as a percentage of the Policy value. Assessing part of the 
    sales charge as a flat monthly deduction rather than deducting it from 
    premium payments is beneficial to Policy owners because (1) a greater 
    amount is available to earn an investment return, (2) deductions will 
    be more predictable than deducting the entire sales charge through a 
    daily percentage charge, and (3) there will be an enhanced ability to 
    make plans based on expected amounts of sales charge deductions.
        22. Second, the monthly and/or daily sales charge deductions may 
    cease for certain periods of time and subsequently be resumed. These 
    charges are suspended when deductions to recover Advances are being 
    made and when the maximum amount of such charges, as a percentage of 
    premium payments, has been reached. Sales charges also will cease if 
    additional deductions would cause sales charges to exceed permitted 
    maximums, as a percentage of premiums actually paid. These situations 
    create a question regarding compliance with the requirements of Rule 
    6e-3(T)(d)(1)(ii) (A) and (B), respectively, that the proportionate or 
    percentage amount of sales charges deducted not exceed the 
    proportionate or percentage amount previously deducted pursuant to this 
    same method.
        23. Applicants assert that, if section 27(a)(3) and the related 
    provisions of Rule 6e-(3T) are interpreted to prevent the resumption of 
    sales charge deductions from contract assets, the utility of policy 
    designs providing for such deductions would be greatly reduced. 
    Deducting part of the sales charges from Policy value, rather than from 
    premium payments, is advantageous to Policy owners because more assets 
    are put to work as Policy value with the potential of earning a return 
    for the Policy owner's benefit.
        24. Third, Rule 6e-3(T)(c)(4) defines ``sales load'' for any 
    contract period as the excess of premium payments over changes in 
    ``cash value'' (other than from investment performance) and certain 
    enumerated charges. An increase or decrease in a Policy's cash value 
    resulting from the payment of an Advance or a Bonus or from subsequent 
    deductions to recover an Advance could be deemed to result in an 
    increase or decrease in the otherwise applicable sales load for the 
    contract period in which the transaction occurs. The stair step 
    provisions could apply because the operation of the Advance or Bonus 
    could cause such sales load to be at a higher rate than in a preceding 
    period or at a lower rate than in a subsequent period. Applicants 
    submit that the Advances and Bonuses provide a significant potential 
    benefit to Policy owners and that the Policies' charge structure 
    complies with Rules 6e-3(T)(b)(13)(ii) and (d)(1)(ii).
        25. The stair step issues under the Policies result from the 
    imposition of deferred sales charges in the form of monthly and/or 
    daily deductions and, in the case of Policies that are surrendered or 
    lapse before a certain time, the surrender charge. The stair step 
    issues under the Policies do not result from early deduction of front-
    end charges. No sales charges will be deducted from premiums. Although 
    sales charges will be deducted through several different types of 
    deductions, the rate of these charges will never increase.
    
    Conclusion
    
        Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act, in pertinent part, provides that the 
    Commission may, by order upon application, conditionally or 
    unconditionally exempt any person, security or transaction, or any 
    classes thereof from any provisions of the 1940 Act or rules 
    thereunder, if and to the extent that such exemption is necessary or 
    appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection 
    of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and 
    provisions of the 1940 Act. For all the reasons set forth above, 
    Applicants submit that their requested exemptive relief meets these 
    standards for exemptive relief under section 6(c) and, therefore, 
    should be granted.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-12305 Filed 5-19-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/20/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of Application for an Order under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``1940 Act'').
Document Number:
94-12305
Dates:
The application was filed on December 17, 1993.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: May 20, 1994, Rel. No. IC-20295, No. 812-8734