94-12392. Smith Barney Shearson Unit Trusts and Smith Barney Shearson Inc.; Notice of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 97 (Friday, May 20, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-12392]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: May 20, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Rel. No. IC-20297; 812-8934]
    
     
    
    Smith Barney Shearson Unit Trusts and Smith Barney Shearson Inc.; 
    Notice of Application
    
    May 16, 1994.
    
    agency: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'').
    
    action: Notice of Application for Exemption under the Investment 
    Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    applicants: Smith Barney Shearson Unit Trusts (``SBSUT'') (formerly 
    known as Shearson Lehman Hutton Unit Trusts) (on behalf of Principal 
    Return Trust I of SBSUT) and Smith Barney Shearson Inc. (``Smith Barney 
    Shearson'' or the ``Sponsor'').
    
    relevant act sections: Exemption requested under section 6(c) from 
    sections 12(d)(1), 14(a), and 22(d) and under section 17(d) and rule 
    17d-1.
    
    summary of application: Applicants request an order to amend a previous 
    order (the ``Prior Order'') that let SBSUT and the Sponsor (a) invest 
    in portfolios consisting the zero-coupon obligations and shares of 
    certain investment companies, (b) publicly offer units of the unit 
    investment trusts without previously placing at least $100,000 of 
    units, (c) waive a deferred sales load under certain circumstances, and 
    (d) engage in certain affiliated transactions. The present order is 
    necessary because of the sale of the assets of Shearson Lehman Brothers 
    (``Shearson'') to Primerica Corporation and Primerica's subsidiary, 
    Smith Barney Shearson, formerly Smith Barney Upham & Co. Inc. (``Smith 
    Barney'').
    
    filing date: The application was filed on April 11, 1994.
    
    hearing or notification of hearing: An order granting the application 
    will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
    request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving 
    applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing 
    request should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on June 7, 1994, and 
    should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of 
    an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing 
    requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason 
    for the request, and the issues contested. Persons may request 
    notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary.
    
    addresses: Secretary, SEC, 450 5th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
    20549. Applicants, Two World Trade Center, 104th Floor, New York, NY 
    10048.
    
    for further information contact: Elaine M. Boggs, Staff Attorney, at 
    (202) 942-0572, or Robert A. Robertson, Branch Chief, at (202) 942-0564 
    (Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company 
    Regulation).
    
    supplementary information: The following is a summary of the 
    application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee at the 
    SEC's Public Reference Branch.
    
    Applicants' Representations
    
        1. SBSUT is registered under the Act as a unit investment trust and 
    consists of a series of separate trusts. Each of the Funds (defined 
    below) is, or is a series of, an open-end management investment company 
    registered under the Act. The Sponsor is a registered broker-dealer and 
    investment adviser. Applicants request that relief be extended to each 
    future series of SBSUT (together with SBSUT, a ``Trust'') and to any 
    fixed income or equity mutual funds other than money market and no-load 
    funds (the ``Funds'') which are part of the group of mutual funds that 
    have a common investment adviser, principal underwriter or depositor, 
    or whose investment advisers, principal underwriters or depositors are 
    under common control (as ``control'' is defined in section 2(a)(9)) and 
    that hold themselves out to investors as related funds for purposes of 
    investment and investor services.
        2. On March 12, 1993, Shearson entered into an asset purchase 
    agreement with Primerica and its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Smith 
    Barney. The agreement provided for the sale to Smith Barney and its 
    designated affiliates of substantially all the assets of Shearson (the 
    ``Transaction''). Upon the closing of the Transaction on July 31, 1993, 
    Smith Barney changed its name to Smith Barney Shearson Inc. and became 
    the sponsor and principal underwriter of the Trusts, which were 
    formerly sponsored and underwritten by Shearson. In addition, upon the 
    closing of the Transaction, the investment advisory services which had 
    formerly been provided to the Funds by Shearson Lehman Advisors, an 
    affiliate of Shearson, were assumed by Greenwich Street Advisors 
    Division of Mutual Management Corp., an affiliate of Smith Barney 
    Shearson. Other advisory services are performed by Smith Barney 
    Advisers, Inc., its SBS asset management division or its subsidiary, 
    Smith Barney Shearson Strategy Advisers, Inc. Subsequently, Primerica 
    was acquired by The Travelers, Inc.
        3. The Prior Order let the Trusts and the Sponsor (a) invest in 
    portfolios consisting of zero-coupon obligations and shares of certain 
    investment companies, (b) publicly offer units of the Trusts without 
    previously placing at least $100,000 of units, (c) waive a deferred 
    sales load under certain circumstances, and (d) engage in certain 
    affiliated transactions.\1\ At the request of Shearson and Smith 
    Barney, the SEC's Division of Investment Management informed Shearson 
    and Smith Barney that the Division would not recommend that the SEC 
    take any enforcement action against them if registered investment 
    companies sponsored by Shearson, which would include the Trusts and the 
    Funds, operate under the terms of any prior order until the earlier of 
    (a) the date any prior order is renewed by the SEC pursuant to a 
    renewal order specifying Smith Barney and its subsidiaries or 
    affiliates as applicants or (b) June 8, 1994.\2\ Applicants request an 
    order that would continue and renew the exemption granted to Shearson 
    and its subsidiaries and grant the same exemptions to Smith Barney 
    Shearson and its subsidiaries and affiliates.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\Investment Company Act Release Nos. 16904 (Apr. 6, 1989) 
    (notice) and 16940 (Apr. 27, 1989) (order).
        \2\Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. (pub. avail. June 8, 1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        4. Each Trust will be a unit investment trust and will hold a 
    separate portfolio of securities and file a separate registration 
    statement under the Securities Act of 1933 (the ``1993 Act''). Each 
    Trust will be created under its own trust indenture which will 
    incorporate by reference a master trust agreement to be entered into 
    among the Sponsor (as depositor), a bank meeting the requirements of 
    section 26(a) (as trustee (``Trustee'')), and an independent evaluator 
    (collectively, the master trust agreement and the indenture are the 
    ``Trust Agreement'').
        5. Pursuant to the Trust Agreement, the Sponsor will deposit with 
    the Trustee securities consisting of: stripped Government securities, 
    as defined in section 2(a)(16), or certificates of interest of receipts 
    for or other evidences of an ownership interest therein (the ``zero-
    coupon obligations'') and shares of one Fund per Trust. The Sponsor 
    will purchase the zero-coupon obligations to be deposited in the Trust 
    at the prevailing market price from unaffiliated third parties. 
    Simultaneously with such deposit, the Trustee will deliver to the 
    Sponsor registered certificates for units representing the entire 
    beneficial ownership of each Trust. These units then will be offered 
    for sale to the public by the Sponsor.
        6. The Sponsor may deposit additional securities, which may result 
    in a potential corresponding increase in the number of units 
    outstanding. The Sponsor anticipates that any additional securities 
    deposited in a Trust subsequent to the date of the initial deposit in 
    connection with the sale of additional units will maintain as far as 
    practicable the original percentage relationship between the principal 
    amounts of zero-coupon obligations and Fund shares in the portfolio.
        7. The purpose of the Trusts is to provide preservation of capital 
    and the opportunity for capital appreciation. Each Trust will contain a 
    sufficient amount of zero-coupon obligations to ensure that, at the 
    specified maturity date for such Trust, investors purchasing units on 
    the date of the initial deposit will receive back the approximate total 
    amount of their original investment in such Trust, including the sales 
    charge.
        8. The shares of the Funds will be sold at net asset value for 
    deposit in any one Trust. The Funds will waive any otherwise applicable 
    front-end sales loads or contingent deferred sales loads (``CDSCs'') 
    with respect to all shares deposited in any trust to avoid pyramiding 
    of expenses. Furthermore, because Fund shares have their net asset 
    values calculated daily and this value is readily available to the 
    Sponsor, no evaluation fee will be charged with respect to determining 
    the value of Fund shares that constitute part of a Trust's portfolio. 
    An evaluation fee will be charged, however, with respect to that 
    portion of the Trust's portfolio that consists of zero-coupon 
    obligations. Moreover, the Sponsor will rebate to the Trustee any rule 
    12b-1 fees it receives on shares of the Funds attributable to the 
    shares held by a Trust.
        9. Investors may be provided a reinvestment vehicle for 
    distributions made during the life of a Trust whereby a unitholder may 
    elect to invest such distributions directly in Fund shares underlying a 
    Trust. Such reinvestment also will be permitted upon maturity of a 
    Trust. In either case, the Fund shares will be registered in the 
    unitholder's name and will not become part of the Trust's assets.
        10. The Sponsor intends to maintain a secondary market for units of 
    each Trust, although it is not legally obligated to do so. The 
    existence of such a secondary market will reduce or eliminate the 
    number of units tendered for redemption and, thus, alleviate the 
    necessity to sell securities to meet redemption obligations. In the 
    event that the Sponsor does not maintain a secondary market, the 
    underlying Fund shares will be sold first to meet unit redemption 
    obligations. To ensure that the benefit of the zero-coupon obligations 
    is not impaired, the master trust agreement provides that the Sponsor 
    will not instruct the Trustee to sell zero-coupon obligations from any 
    Trust's portfolio until the Fund shares held therein have been 
    liquidated, unless the Sponsor is able to sell zero-coupon obligations 
    and still maintain at least the original proportional relationship to 
    unit value. The trust indenture also provides that zero-coupon 
    obligations may not be sold to meet Trust expenses.
    
    Applicants' Legal Analysis
    
        1. Section 12(d)(1) limits the amount of securities a registered 
    investment company may hold of other investment companies. The section 
    is intended to prevent the duplication of fees and costs, undue 
    concentration of control, and other adverse consequences to investors 
    incident to the pyramiding of investment companies. Applicants believe 
    that their proposal is structured to eliminate such pyramiding of 
    expenses and control problems and that the unit investment trust format 
    is uniquely adaptable to avoiding such concerns.
        2. Applicants believe that there will be no duplicative sales 
    charges, distribution fees, or investment advisory fees. The evaluation 
    fee for Fund shares held by a Trust will be waived. In addition, 
    applicants believe that the administration and operation of the Trusts 
    and the Funds will be reduced by the proposed arrangement. Applicants 
    further believe that their proposal and the conditions below address 
    potentially abusive control problems resulting from concentration of 
    voting power in a fund holding company or from the threat a large-scale 
    redemptions.
        3. Section 14(a) provides, in pertinent part, that no registered 
    investment company shall make a public offering of its securities 
    unless such company has a net worth of at least $100,000 or certain 
    undertakings are included in the investment company's registration of 
    its securities under the 1933 Act to ensure, among other things, that 
    the company has a net worth of $100,000 within 90 days after the 
    registration statement becomes effective. Applicants recognize that 
    under the Trust's proposed operation, the Sponsor could be deemed to be 
    reducing the net worth of each Trust below he requirement imposed by 
    section 14(a) and, thus, request an exemption from section 14(a).
        4. Each of the Funds which imposes a rule 12b-1 fee also currently 
    imposes a CDSC. Section 22(d) generally prohibits a registered 
    investment company from selling its redeemable securities other than a 
    current public offering price described in the company's prospectus. 
    Applicants request relief to continue the waiver of any otherwise 
    applicable CDSC for redemptions under all circumstances where the 
    Sponsor has purchased Fund shares in connection with the sale of Trust 
    units (as well as where the proceeds of the zero-coupon obligations at 
    the maturity of the Trust, and distributions from the Trust made during 
    the life of the Trust, have been reinvested by the unitholder in 
    additional Fund shares). Applicants believe that waiver of the CDSC in 
    the above circumstances will not harm the Funds or their remaining 
    shareholders or unfairly discriminate among shareholders or purchasers.
        5. Applicants further believe that the granting of the requested 
    order is necessary and appropriate in the public interest and 
    consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly 
    intended by the policy and provisions of the Act within the meaning of 
    section 6(c).
        6. Section 17(d) and rule 17d-1 prohibit an affiliated person of an 
    investment company, acting as principal, from participating in or 
    effecting any transaction in connection with any joint enterprise or 
    joint arrangement in which the investment company participates. 
    Applicants state that their proposal addresses potential section 17(d) 
    and rule 17d-1 concerns. Applicants believe that neither the Funds nor 
    any Trust will be disadvantaged by the arrangement and each stands to 
    gain significant benefits from the proposed transaction.
    
    Applicants' Conditions
    
        Applicants agree to the following as conditions to the requested 
    order:
        1. The Trustee will not redeem Fund shares except to the extent 
    necessary to meet redemptions of units by untiholders, or to pay Trust 
    expenses should distributions received on Fund shares insufficient to 
    cover such expenses.
        2. The rule 12-1 fees received by the Sponsor in connection with 
    the distribution of Fund shares to the Trust will be rebated to the 
    Trustee.
        3. Applicants will comply with rule 12b-1 as currently adopted and 
    may be modified.
        4. Applicants will comply with rule 22d-1 as adopted and may be 
    modified.
        5. Applicants agree to comply with rule 6c-10 as proposed, adopted, 
    and may be modified.
        6. No one series of the Trust will, at the time of any deposit of 
    any Fund shares, hold as a result of the deposit, more than 10% of the 
    then-outstanding shares of a Fund.
        7. All Trust series will be structured so that their maturity dates 
    will be at least thirty days apart from one another.
        8. Creation and operation of each Trust series will comply in all 
    respects with the requirements of rule 14a-3, except that the Trust 
    will not restrict its portfolio investments to ``eligible trust 
    securities.''
        9. Shares of a Fund which are held by a series of the Trust will be 
    voted by the Trustee of the Trust, and the Trustee will vote all shares 
    of a Fund held in a Trust series in the same proportion as all other 
    shares of that Fund not held by the Trust are voted.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
    Pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-12392 Filed 5-19-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/20/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of Application for Exemption under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').
Document Number:
94-12392
Dates:
The application was filed on April 11, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: May 20, 1994, Rel. No. IC-20297, 812-8934