[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 98 (Monday, May 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25269-25270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12636]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. 96-048; Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
1984 Mitsubishi Pajero Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming
1984 Mitsubishi Pajero passenger cars are eligible for importation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that a 1984
Mitsubishi Pajero that was not originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards is eligible for
importation into the United States because (1) it is substantially
similar to a vehicle that was originally manufactured for importation
into and sale in the United States and that was certified by its
manufacturer as complying with the safety standards, and (2) it is
capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is June 19, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice
number, and be submitted to: Docket Section, Room 5109, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh St., SW, Washington,
DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9:30 am to 4 pm].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5306).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) (formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(I)
of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (the Act)), a
motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall be refused
admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the
motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally
manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States,
certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115 (formerly section 114 of the Act), and
of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
Champagne Imports, Inc. of Lansdale, Pennsylvania (Registered
Importer No. R-90-009) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 1984
Mitsubishi Pajero passenger cars are eligible for importation into the
United States. The vehicle which Champagne believes is substantially
similar is the 1984 Mitsubishi Montero. Champagne has submitted
information indicating that the manufacturer of the 1984 Mitsubishi
Montero certified that vehicle as conforming to all applicable Federal
motor vehicle safety standards and offered it for sale in the United
States.
The petitioner contends that it carefully compared the 1984
Mitsubishi Pajero to the 1984 Mitsubishi Montero, and found the two
models to be substantially similar with respect to compliance with most
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
Champagne submitted information with its petition intended to
demonstrate that the 1984 Mitsubishi Pajero, as originally
manufactured, conforms to many Federal motor vehicle safety standards
in the same manner as the 1984 Mitsubishi Montero that was offered for
sale in the United States, or is capable of being readily altered to
conform to those standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that the 1984 Mitsubishi Pajero
is identical to the certified 1984 Mitsubishi Montero with respect to
compliance with Standards Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence *
* *, 103 Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and
Washing Systems, 105 Hydraulic Brake Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 107
Reflecting Surfaces, 113 Hood Latch Systems, 116 Brake Fluid, 119
New Pneumatic Tires for Vehicles other than Passenger Cars, 124
Accelerator Control Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in Interior
Impact, 203 Impact Protection for the Driver From the Steering Control
System, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing
Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating
Systems, 209 Seat Belt Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages,
211 Wheel Nuts, Wheel Discs and Hubcaps, 212 Windshield Retention,
219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, and 302 Flammability of Interior
Materials.
Petitioner also contends that the vehicle is capable of being
readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner
indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: (a) Substitution of a lens
marked ``Brake'' for a lens with a noncomplying symbol on the brake
failure indicator lamp; (b) installation of a seat belt warning lamp
that displays the appropriate symbol; (c) recalibration of the
speedometer/odometer from kilometers to miles per hour.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: (a) Installation of U.S.-model headlamp assemblies which
incorporate headlamps with DOT markings; (b) installation of front and
rear sidemarker/reflector assemblies; (c) installation of U.S.-model
taillamp assemblies.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Replacement of the convex
passenger side rear view mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: Installation of a buzzer
microswitch in the steering lock assembly, and a warning buzzer.
Standard No. 115 Vehicle Identification Number: Installation of a
VIN plate that can be read from outside the left windshield pillar, and
a VIN
[[Page 25270]]
reference label on the edge of the door or latch post nearest the
driver.
Standard No. 118 Power Window Systems: Rewiring of the power
window system so that the window transport is inoperative when the
ignition is switched off.
Standard No. 120 Tire Selection and Rims for Motor Vehicles other
than Passenger Cars: Installation of a tire information placard.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: (a) Installation of a
U.S.-model seat belt in the driver's position, or a belt webbing-
actuated microswitch inside the driver's seat belt retractor; (b)
installation of an ignition switch-actuated seat belt warning lamp and
buzzer. The petitioner states that the vehicle is equipped at each
front designated seating position with a combination lap and shoulder
restraint that adjusts by means of an automatic retractor and releases
by means of a single push button. The petitioner further states that
the vehicle is equipped with a combination lap and shoulder restraint
that releases by means of a single push button at each rear outboard
seating position, and with a lap belt at the rear center seating
position.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: Installation of a rollover
valve in the fuel tank vent line.
Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition
described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be
submitted to: Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, Room 5109, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, DC
20590. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above address both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action of the petition
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141 (a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on : May 14, 1996.
Marilynne Jacobs,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 96-12636 Filed 5-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
