95-12442. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Series Airplanes Equipped With BFGoodrich Off-Wing Ramp/Slide Evacuation Systems  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 27054-27056]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-12442]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-NM-13-AD]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Series Airplanes 
    Equipped With BFGoodrich Off-Wing Ramp/Slide Evacuation Systems
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 767 series 
    airplanes. This proposal would require modification of the off-wing 
    ramp/slide evacuation systems. This proposal is prompted by reports of 
    punctured tubes on certain BFGoodrich off-wing ramp/slide evacuation 
    systems installed on these airplanes. The actions specified by the 
    proposed AD are intended to prevent such tube punctures, which could 
    delay or impede the evacuation of passengers during an emergency.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by July 17, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No 95-NM-13-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
    holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
    Washington 98124-2207; and BFGoodrich Company, Aircraft Evacuation 
    Systems, Sustaining Engineering, Dept. 7916, Phoenix, Arizona 85040. 
    This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Gfrerer, Aerospace Engineer, 
    ANM-130L, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft 
    Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 
    90712; telephone (310) 627-5338; fax (310) 627-5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 95-NM-13-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 95-NM-13-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has received reports of punctured tubes on BFGoodrich off-
    wing ramp/slide evacuation systems, having part numbers (P/N) 101630, 
    101655, and 101656, installed on certain Boeing Model 767 series 
    airplanes. There have been several incidents in [[Page 27055]] which 
    the ramp/slides have been damaged or punctured during inflation of the 
    ramp/slide. Investigation revealed that the tubes were punctured when 
    the ramp/slides became trapped in the spoiler gap or were caught on the 
    inboard edge of the flap during inflation. Puncture of the tubes on an 
    off-wing ramp/slide evacuation system, if not corrected, could cause 
    portions of the slide to deflate and, thus, delay or impede the 
    evacuation of passengers during an emergency.
        The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Service Bulletin 767-25-
    0218, dated December 15, 1994, which describes procedures for 
    modication of the off-wing ramp/slide evacuation systems. This 
    modification involves replacement of nuts on the bearings on the 
    packboards with new nuts.
        The FAA has also reviewed and approved BFGoodrich Service Bulletin 
    101630/655/656-25-269, dated October 28, 1994, which describes 
    procedures for modication of the off-wing ramp/slide evacuation 
    systems. This modification involves replacement of velcro retainers 
    with improved retainers, installation of a cover panel on the bottom of 
    the inflatable, and installation of a chafe panel between the upper and 
    lower tubes near the transfer tube.
        Accomplishment of the modifications described in these two service 
    bulletins will improve the resistance to a tube puncture when the ramp/
    slide impinges on the spoiler gap and inboard flap edge during 
    inflation.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require modication of the off-wing ramp/slide 
    evacuation systems. The actions would be required to be accomplished in 
    accordance with the service bulletins described previously.
        Operators should note that the applicability of this proposed rule 
    affects Boeing Model 767 series airplanes that are equipped with 
    certain BFGoodrich evacuation systems. The FAA's general policy is 
    that, when an unsafe condition results from the installation of an 
    appliance or other item that is installed in only one particular make 
    and model of aircraft, the AD is issued so that it is applicable to the 
    aircraft, rather than the item. The reason for this is simple: Making 
    the AD applicable to the airplane model on which the item is installed 
    ensures that operators of those airplanes will be notified directly of 
    the unsafe condition and the action required to correct it. While it is 
    assumed that an operator will know the models of airplanes that it 
    operates, there is a potential that the operator will not know or be 
    aware of specific items that are installed on its airplanes. It is for 
    this reason that this proposed AD would be applicable to Model 767's 
    rather than to the BFGoodrich evacuation system. Additionally, calling 
    out the airplane model as the subject of the AD prevents ``unknowing 
    non-compliance'' on the part of the operator.
        The FAA recognizes that there are situations when an unsafe 
    condition exists in an item that is installed in many different 
    aircraft. In those cases, the FAA considers it impractical to issue 
    AD's against each aircraft; in fact, many times, the exact models and 
    numbers of aircraft on which the item is installed may not be known. 
    Therefore, in those situations, the AD is issued so that it is 
    applicable to the item; furthermore, those AD's usually indicate that 
    the item is known to be installed on, but not limited to, various 
    aircraft models.
        As a result of recent communications with the Air Transport 
    Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, 
    some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes 
    that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that 
    have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. The FAA 
    points out that all airplanes identified in the applicability provision 
    of an AD are legally subject to the AD. If an airplane has been altered 
    or repaired in the affected area in such a way as to affect compliance 
    with the AD, the owner or operator is required to obtain FAA approval 
    for an alternative method of compliance with the AD, in accordance with 
    the paragraph of each AD that provides for such approvals. A note has 
    been included in this notice to clarify this long-standing requirement.
        There are approximately 992 BFGoodrich off-wing ramp/slide 
    evacuation systems installed on 496 Model 767 series airplanes (2 
    evacuation systems per airplane) of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 376 BFGoodrich off-wing ramp/
    slide evacuation systems installed on 188 Model 767 series airplanes of 
    U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take 
    approximately 9 work hours per evacuation system to accomplish the 
    proposed actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. 
    Required parts would cost approximately $200 per evacuation system. 
    Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on 
    U.S. operators is estimated to be $278,240, or $740 per evacuation 
    system.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Boeing: Docket 95-NM-13-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 767 series airplanes, equipped with 
    BFGoodrich off-wing ramp/slide evacuation systems having part number 
    (P/N) 101630, 101655, or 101656; certificated in any category.
    
    
    [[Page 27056]]
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (b) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
    should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent tube puncture of the ramp/slide evacuation system, 
    which could delay or impede the evacuation of passengers during an 
    emergency, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, modify 
    the off-wing ramp/slide evacuation systems in accordance with Boeing 
    Service Bulletin 767-25-0218, dated December 15, 1994, and 
    BFGoodrich Service Bulletin 101630/655/656-25-269, dated October 28, 
    1994.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 16, 1995.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-12442 Filed 5-19-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/22/1995
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
95-12442
Dates:
Comments must be received by July 17, 1995.
Pages:
27054-27056 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-NM-13-AD
PDF File:
95-12442.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13