94-12477. Northern Natural Gas Co.; Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed EF Expansion Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 98 (Monday, May 23, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-12477]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: May 23, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    [Docket No. CP94-224-000]
    
     
    
    Northern Natural Gas Co.; Intent to Prepare an Environmental 
    Assessment for the Proposed EF Expansion Project and Request for 
    Comments on Environmental Issues
    
    May 17, 1994.
        The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the 
    Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will 
    discuss environmental impacts of the construction and operation of 
    natural gas pipeline facilities proposed in the EF Expansion 
    Project.\1\ This EA will be used by the Commission in its decision-
    making process to determine whether an environmental impact statement 
    is necessary and whether or not to approve the project.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\Northern Natural Gas Company's (Northern) application was 
    filed with the Commission under section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Summary of the Proposed Project
    
        The applicant proposes to construct and operate the following 
    facilities:
        A. Three segments of approximately 11.95 miles of pipeline:
         1.28 miles of 30-inch-diameter pipeline in Washington 
    County, Minnesota (C-Line Extension);
         2.82 miles of 30-inch-diameter pipeline in Steele County, 
    Minnesota (D-Line Extension);
         7.85 miles of 8-inch-diameter pipeline in Morrison County, 
    Minnesota (Alexandria Branchline Loop); and
        B. modify nine existing Town Border Stations (TBS) (see appendix 
    1).
        The proposed facilities would be used to transport up to 19,288 
    Mcfd to Minnegasco, a Division of Arkla, Inc. and Great Plains Natural 
    Gas Company.
        The general location of these facilities is shown in appendix 2.\2\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\Appendices 2 and 3 are not being printed in the Federal 
    Register. Copies are available from the Commission's Public 
    Reference Branch, room 3104, 941 North Capitol Street, NE., 
    Washington, DC 20426, or call (202) 208-1371. Copies of the 
    appendices were sent to all those receiving this notice in the mail.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Land Requirements for Construction
    
        The proposed pipeline would be built adjacent and parallel to 
    existing rights-of-way. Northern intends to use a 75-foot-wide 
    construction right-of-way. About 25 to 35 feet of the planned 75-foot 
    width would use existing right-of-way. Consequently, about 35 to 50 
    feet of new clearing would be required in most areas. Following 
    construction, about 25 feet of the construction right-of-way would be 
    allowed to revert to its former land use.
        Additional working space would be required adjacent to the planned 
    construction right-of-way at road and stream crossings.
    
    The EA Process
    
        The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the 
    Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could 
    result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a 
    Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us 
    to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals. 
    We call this ``scoping''. The main goal of the scoping process is to 
    focus the analysis in the EA on the important environmental issues. By 
    this Notice of Intent, the Commission requests public comments on the 
    scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All comments received 
    are taken into account during the preparation of the EA.
        The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the 
    construction and operation of the proposed project under these general 
    headings:
     geology and soils
     water resources, fisheries, and wetlands
     vegetation and wildlife
     endangered and threatened species
     land use
     cultural resources
     hazardous waste
    
        We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project 
    or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen 
    or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
        Our independent analysis of the issues will be in the EA. Depending 
    on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA may be 
    published and mailed to Federal, State, and local agencies, public 
    interest groups, interested individuals, affected landowners, 
    newspapers, libraries, and the Commission's official service list for 
    this proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA 
    is published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we 
    recommend that the Commission approve or not approve the project.
    
    Currently Identified Environmental Issues
    
        We have already identified several issues that we think deserve 
    attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and 
    the environmental information provided by Northern. Keep in mind that 
    this is a preliminary list. The list of issues will be added to, 
    subtracted from, or changed based on your comments and our analysis. 
    Issues are:
         The Alexandria Branchline Loop crosses residential land 
    within the Platte River Estate.
         The pipeline would cross 4 perennial streams and 19 
    wetlands.
         The project may potentially impact federally listed 
    threatened or endangered species.
         The project may cross or be near cultural resources/
    archeological sites.
    
    Public Participation
    
        You can make a difference by sending a letter addressing your 
    specific comments or concerns about the project. You should focus on 
    the potential environmental effects of the proposal, alternatives to 
    the proposal (including alternative routes), and measures to avoid or 
    lessen environmental impact. The more specific your comments, the more 
    useful they will be. Please follow the instructions below to ensure 
    that your comments are received and properly recorded:
         Address your letter to: Lois Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
    Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol St., NE, Washington, DC 
    20426;
         Reference Docket No. CP94-224-000;
         Send a copy of your letter to: Ms. Medha Kochhar, EA 
    Project Manager, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
    Capitol St., NE., room 7312, Washington, DC 20426; and
         Mail your comments so that they will be received in 
    Washington, DC on or before June 10, 1994.
        If you wish to receive a copy of the EA, you should request one 
    from Ms. Medha Kochhar at the above address.
    
    Becoming an Intervenor
    
        In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want 
    to become an official party to the proceeding or become an 
    ``intervenor''. Among other things, intervenors have the right to 
    receive copies of case-related Commission documents and filings by 
    other intervenors. Likewise, each intervenor must provide copies of its 
    filings to all other parties. If you want to become an intervenor you 
    must file a Motion to Intervene according to Rule 214 of the 
    Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) attached 
    as appendix 3.
        The date for filing timely motions to intervene in this proceeding 
    has passed. Therefore, parties now seeking to file late interventions 
    must show good cause, as required by Sec. 385.214(b)(3), why this time 
    limitation should be waived. Environmental issues have been viewed as 
    good cause for late intervention. You do not need intervenor status to 
    have your scoping comments considered.
        Additional information about the proposed project is available from 
    Ms. Medha Kochhar, EA Project Manager, at (202) 208-2270.
    Lois D. Cashell,
    Secretary.
    
                                 Appendix 1--Proposed Town Border Station Modifications                             
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               No. and TBS                          County/state                             Facilities             
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1. Clarkfield No. 1..............  Yellow Medicine, MN, NW\1/4\SW\1/4\,    3-inch rotary meter run, modify meter
                                        Sec. 4 T115N R41W.                      piping.                             
    2. St. Michael No. 1.............  Wright, MN, NE\1/4\SE\1/4\, Sec. 8      3-inch rotary meter run, modify meter
                                        T120N R23W.                             piping, remove 1-inch regulators and
                                                                                install 2-inch regulators.          
    3. Glenwood No. 1................  Pope, MN, NW\1/4\NW\1/4\, Sec. 6 T125N  Remove existing meters, install 3-   
                                        R37W.                                   inch rotary meter run, and one 6-   
                                                                                inch turbine.                       
    4. St. Bonifacius No. 1..........  Hennepin, MN, SE\1/4\NE\1/4\, Sec. 32   Remove existing meter, install two 3-
                                        T117N R24W.                             inch rotary meters, and modify meter
                                                                                piping.                             
    5. Waconia No. 1.................  Carver, MN, NW\1/4\SW\1/4\, Sec. 24     Remove existing meter regulator and  
                                        T116N R25W.                             install two 2-inch regulators.      
    6. Waconia No. 1B................  Carver, MN, SW\1/4\NE\1/4\, Sec. 24     Remove existing meter and install    
                                        T116N R25W.                             diaphragm meter.                    
    7. Prior Lake No. 1..............  Scott, MN, SE\1/4\NW\1/4\, Sec. 11      Replace existing regulators with two 
                                        T114N R22W.                             1-inch regulators and modify piping 
                                                                                under relief valve.                 
    8. Prior Lake No. 1A.............  Scott, MN, NW\1/4\NW\1/4\, Sec. 16      Remove existing meters and install   
                                        T114N R22W.                             one 3-inch and one 4-inch regulator.
    9. Mound No. 1...................  Hennepin, MN, NW\1/4\SW\1/4\, Sec. 22   Replace existing regulator valve     
                                        T117N R24W.                             trim.                               
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 94-12477 Filed 5-20-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/23/1994
Department:
Defense Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-12477
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: May 23, 1994, Docket No. CP94-224-000