95-12520. Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company; Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change Modifying the Same-Day Funds Settlement System to Accommodate the Overall Conversion to Same-Day Funds Settlement ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 27360-27362]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-12520]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-35720; File No. SR-DTC-95-06]
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company; 
    Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change Modifying 
    the Same-Day Funds Settlement System to Accommodate the Overall 
    Conversion to Same-Day Funds Settlement for Securities Transactions
    
    May 16, 1995.
    
        On March 22, 1995, The Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') filed 
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed 
    rule change (File No. SR-DTC-95-06) pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'').\1\ Notice of the proposal 
    was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 1995.\2\ No comment 
    letters were received. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission 
    is granting accelerated approval of the proposed rule change.
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35613 (April 17, 1995), 
    60 FR 19971.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Description of the Proposal
    
        DTC currently processes the money settlements related to different 
    types of securities transactions in either the next-day funds \3\ 
    settlement (``NDFS'') system or the same-day funds \4\ settlement 
    (``SDFS'') system. The NDFS system is used primarily for the money 
    settlement of equity, corporate debt, and municipal debt issue 
    transactions. The SDFS system began operation in 1987 and is used 
    primarily for the money settlement of transactions in commercial paper 
    and other money market instruments (``MMIs'').\5\
    
        \3\ The term ``next-day funds'' refers to payment by means of 
    certified checks that are for value on the following day.
        \4\ The term ``same-day funds'' refers to payment in funds that 
    are immediately available and generally are transferred by 
    electronic means.
        \5\ For a description of the SDFS system, refer to Securities 
    Exchange Act Release Nos. 24689 (July 9, 1987), 52 FR 26613 [File 
    No. SR-DTC-87-04] (order granting temporary approval to DTC's SDFS 
    settlement service); 26051 (August 31, 1988), 53 FR 34853 [File No. 
    SR-DTC-88-06] (order granting permanent approval to DTC's SDFS 
    settlement service); 33958 (April 22, 1994), 59 FR 22878 [SR-DTC-93-
    12] (order temporarily approving DTC's MMI settlement program 
    through April 1, 1994); and 35655 (April 30, 1995), 60 FR 22423 
    [File No. SR-DTC-95-05] (order temporarily approving DTC's MMI 
    settlement program through April 30, 1996).
    
        DTC and the National Securities Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'') 
    jointly have issued three memoranda which describe DTC's and NSCC's 
    respective plans for converting their payment systems to SDFS.\6\ DTC's 
    sections of the memoranda describe its plan to combine its NDFS and 
    SDFS systems into a single system which will be based on the design of 
    the current SDFS system with some modifications. DTC's and NSCC's plans 
    are in accord with the 1989 recommendation of the international Group 
    of Thirty \7\ that all securities transactions should settle in same-
    day funds.\8\
    
        \6\ The Depository Trust Company and National Securities 
    Clearing Corporation, Memorandum (July 1, 1992) (``1992 
    Memorandum''); The Depository Trust Company and National Securities 
    Clearing Corporation, Memorandum (July 26, 1993) (``1993 
    Memorandum''); The Depository Trust Company and National Securities 
    Clearing Corporation, Memorandum (July 29, 1994) (``1994 
    Memorandum'').
        \7\ The Group of Thirty was established in 1978 as an 
    independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization composed of 
    international financial leaders whose focus is on international 
    economic and financial issues.
        \8\ Group of Thirty, Clearance and Settlement Systems in the 
    World's Securities Markets (March 1989) (``Group of Thirty 
    Report'').
        Under the conversion plan, all issues currently settling in DTC's 
    NDFS system will be transferred to the SDFS system on a single day, 
    which DTC anticipates will occur in the fourth quarter of 1995 or the 
    first quarter of 1996.\9\ In order to assure an efficient conversion, 
    certain modifications to the current SDFS system will be implemented at 
    various times during 1995 prior to the overall conversion date. The 
    purpose of the current rule change is to convert DTC's current SDFS 
    system Participants Fund to an all cash fund and to modify certain risk 
    management controls and other features of the SDFS system. The 
    Participants Fund for the NDFS system will not be affected by this rule 
    change. The rule change implements a number of the modifications 
    described in the 1994 Memorandum.\10\
    
        \9\ Only one DTC Participants Fund will be needed when the NDFS 
    system and the SDFS system are combined into a new SDFS system.
        \10\ Supra note 6 and accompanying text.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Currently, the SDFS system Participants Fund consists of cash and 
    securities and has separate components for money market instruments and 
    for other SDFS system securities.\11\ The rule change converts DTC's 
    SDFS system Participants Fund to an all-cash fund with no separate 
    component for the MMI Program.\12\ The rule change also 
    [[Page 27361]] decreases the minimum deposit to the SDFS system 
    Participants Fund from $200,000 to $10,000 and changes the method of 
    calculating a participant's required deposit.
    
        \11\ Currently, the SDFS system Participants Fund consists of 
    approximately $253 million in cash and $567 million in pledged 
    securities.
        \12\ Under the conversion plan, the SDFS system Participants 
    Fund will consist of $400 million in cash. Based on current activity 
    levels, DTC believes that a $400 million cash-only Participants Fund 
    will provide sufficient protection against present liquidity and 
    credit risks. Pursuant to its rules, DTC may change the formulas 
    used to determine a participant's required deposit or require a 
    participant to make additional deposits to the Participants Fund.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The new SDFS Participants Fund formula bases each participant's 
    required deposit on the amount of liquidity that the participant uses 
    in the system. A participant's liquidity use will be determined using a 
    sixty day rolling average of the participant's intraday net debit 
    peaks.\13\ The rule change requires a participant to deposit in the 
    SDFS Participants Fund an amount equal to that participant's 
    proportional liquidity needs.\14\
    
        \13\ The new SDFS system will monitor the levels of a 
    participant's net settlement debits during each day and will record 
    the highest net debit experienced by that participant. This measure 
    of liquidity is referred to as the participant's ``intraday debit 
    peak.''
        \14\ For example, assume DTC had three participants, A, B, and 
    C, and had established $400,000,000 as the size of the SDFS system 
    Participants Fund. Each participant's minimum deposit would be 
    $10,000 for a total of $30,000 which leaves $399,970,000 as the 
    incremental fund deposit amount needed for the Participants Fund. In 
    order to allocate the $399,970,000 among the three participants, 
    their respective average intraday net debit peaks would be used. 
    Assume Participant A's average net debit peak is $300,000,000, 
    Participant B's is $500,000,000, and Participant C's is 
    $500,000,000. Since all incurred net debit peaks of at least 
    $300,000,000, each created liquidity needs of $300,000,000 and would 
    contribute equally to provide DTC's first $300,000,000. Each would 
    be responsible for a $10,000 minimum deposit plus a $99,990,000 
    incremental deposit bringing the total to $100,000,000 for each 
    participant and $300,000,000 in total. Participants B and C would be 
    assigned an additional $100,000,000 increment since they were 
    responsible for creating liquidity needs up to $500,000,000. 
    Together, A, B, and C would be assigned incremental amounts totaling 
    $499,970,000. Since the goal is to create a $400,000,000 
    Participants Fund, the $499,970,000 must be prorated downward to 
    399,970,000, the amount needed in addition to their minimum 
    contributions to achieve $400,000,000. Each participant's increments 
    would be reduced by applying a factor of .799988 (i.e., 399,970,000/
    499,970,000). Their required deposits would then be as follows:
        A: $10,000 + ($99,990,000  x  .799988)=$80,000,800
        B: $10,000 + ($199,990,000  x  .799988)=$159,999,600
        C: $10,000 + ($199,990,000  x  .799988)=$159,999,600
        Total: $400,000,000
        In addition, the rule change modifies certain risk management 
    controls in the SDFS system. The method used to calculate the net debit 
    cap for each participant is being changed \15\ and the maximum net 
    debit cap for each participant is being increased to $900,000,000 from 
    approximately $580,000,000 today. The rule change also adds the Largest 
    Provisional Net Credit (``LPNC'') calculation control which is designed 
    to protect DTC against the combined failure of an issuer of MMIs and a 
    participant. The LPNC control creates a provisional net balance by 
    withholding a participant's largest net settlement credit due to 
    transactions in any single issuer's MMIs. DTC's risk management 
    controls will be applied to the provisional net balance that is created 
    by the LPNC procedure, and transactions that cause the provisional net 
    balance to violate those risk management controls will not be 
    completed.\16\
    
        \15\ A participant's net debit cap will be based on an average 
    of the participant's three highest intraday net debit peaks over a 
    rolling three-month period multiplied by factors ranging from 1 to 2 
    based on a sliding scale relative to the size of the participant's 
    net debit peaks. Net debit caps will be determined by and will be 
    applied to a participant's simulated net debit balances caused by 
    the Largest Provisional Net Credit (``LPNC'') procedure describe 
    below.
        \16\ DTC will subtract the amount of a participant's largest 
    provisional net credit due to transactions in any single issuer's 
    MMIs from the participant's collateral monitor (``simulated 
    collateral monitor'') and net debit or credit balance (``simulated 
    balance''). If a transaction will cause the simulated collateral 
    monitor to turn negative (i.e., the participant's collateral would 
    be insufficient to cover its simulated net debit after the 
    transaction) or the resulting net debit balance to exceed the 
    participant's net debit cap, the transaction will be blocked. 
    Blocked transactions will be recycled until credits from other 
    transactions in MMIs of issuers other than those of the largest 
    provisional net credit cause the simulated collateral monitor to be 
    positive or the resulting net debit to be within the net debit cap 
    limits.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The rule change also modifies certain aspects of DTC's Participant 
    Operating Procedures on reclamations \17\ for both the NDFS and the 
    SDFS system, the Receiver Authorized Delivery (``RAD'') service \18\ 
    and the recycle algorithm for deliver orders.\19\ The modified 
    procedures provide for the validation of all reclaims by DTC's system. 
    When a participant submits a reclaim for processing in DTC's NDFS or 
    SDFS systems, DTC's system will verify that a corresponding original 
    delivery that was completed on the same day exists for every reclaim 
    presented for processing.
    
        \17\ A reclamation is the return of a delivery order or a 
    payment order by a participant.
        \18\ RAD allows participants to review and either approve or 
    cancel incoming deliveries before they are processed in DTC's 
    system.
        \19\ DTC's Account Transfer Processor system provides for the 
    recycling or pending of transactions that cannot be completed due to 
    a participant's insufficient positions or violations of risk 
    management controls (i.e., Net Debit Cap and Collateral Monitor).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The modified procedures also establish a minimum threshold of 
    $15,000,000 for bilateral RAD limits. Participants currently are 
    permitted to set individual dollar limits against other possible 
    contra-participants so that deliveries with a settlement value 
    exceeding the specified limit will not be processed until the receiver-
    participant has reviewed and approved the delivery. To limit the number 
    of transactions subject to RAD, participants will not be able to set 
    RAD limits at an amount less than $15 million.
        The new recycle algorithm for deliver orders will offer SDFS system 
    users a second recycle options for deliver orders. Transactions that 
    are recycled because of insufficient positions or violations of risk 
    management controls are currently prioritized based on transaction type 
    and then on transaction size (``Option 1''). The new option (``Option 
    2'') provides participants with the ability to choose whether pending 
    transactions caused by an insufficient position will be recycled in the 
    order in which they were entered (i.e., first in, first out) or in the 
    Option 1 prioritization schedule.\20\
    
        \20\ Under Options 1 and 2, CNS deliveries are always given the 
    highest priority on the recycle queue.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Most of the modifications to be implemented by the rule change will 
    be effective on dates to be specified by DTC in the second quarter of 
    1995. The control involving the LPNC calculation and the $15,000,000 
    threshold for bilateral RAD limits will be made effective on dates to 
    be specified by DTC in the third quarter of 1995.
    
    II. Discussion
    
        Section 17A(b)(3)(F) requires that the rules of a clearing agency 
    be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement 
    of securities transactions and to assure the safeguarding of securities 
    and funds in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which 
    it is responsible.\21\ As discussed below, the Commission believes that 
    DTC's proposed rule change is consistent with DTC's obligations under 
    the Act.
    
        \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission believes that DTC's SDFS system rules and procedures 
    provides certain protections for DTC and its participants from 
    financial loss associated with member defaults and insolvencies. The 
    rule change contains a number of protections designed to decrease the 
    chance of member default and to limit loss in the event of a default. 
    Those protections include an all-cash SDFS Participants Fund, a new 
    Participants Fund formula based on liquidity use, a new net debit cap 
    formula, a new fixed net debit cap of $900 million, and the application 
    of the LPNC control.
        The new SDFS Participants Fund will be comprised of approximately 
    $400 [[Page 27362]] million in cash deposit and $700 million in 
    committed line(s) of credit.\22\ In the event that a participant fails 
    to settle for any reason, the all-cash fund in most cases should 
    provide enough immediate liquidity to complete settlement without 
    causing DTC to use its lines of credit. The size of the fund, $400 
    million in cash, was designed to provide sufficient liquidity to cover 
    all but a few of DTC's largest participants' individual net settlement 
    debits. The $700 million in committed lines of credit should provide 
    additional liquidity sufficient to cover the large end-of-day net 
    debits expected to be produced by these few largest participants with 
    the application of a new net debit cap of $900 million.
    
        \22\ The current SDFS Participants Fund consists of 
    approximately $253 million in cash contributions, $50 million in 
    internal sources, $500 million in external lines of credit and $500 
    million in additional external lines of credit exclusively dedicated 
    to the MMI program.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Although the minimum deposit to the Participants Fund has been 
    decreased from $200,000 to $10,000, participants will be required to 
    deposit additional amounts based on the size of their intraday net 
    debits weighted against other participants' net debits. As a result, 
    the cash deposits in the SDFS system fund will be increased from $210 
    to $400 million. The allocation under the new Participants Fund formula 
    will apportion fund deposits among participants in proportion to the 
    liquidity requirements they generate in the system. The new 
    Participants Fund formula also will more accurately reflect each 
    participant's liquidity requirements because it is based on a 
    participant's net debit peaks for the prior sixty days. The current 
    fund formula is based on a participant's average gross debits and 
    credits only for the prior month. While the use of gross debits and 
    credits reflects a participant's activity levels, the use of net debit 
    peaks reflects a participants actual liquidity needs.
        The changes to DTC's risk management controls also are intended to 
    protect DTC and its participants against the inability of one or more 
    participants to fulfill its or their settlement obligations. DTC's risk 
    management controls are based on the Board of Governors of the Federal 
    Reserve System's guidelines for book-entry securities systems that 
    settle over Fedwire.\23\ The new net debit cap formula establishes a 
    single net debit cap as opposed to the several adjustable and fixed net 
    debit caps currently used in the SDFS system.\24\ The new net debit cap 
    will better reflect the participants most recent liquidity needs and 
    not just its liquidity needs for the prior month\25\ because it will be 
    calculated daily using a 90-day rolling average.\26\ By requiring 
    participants to have sufficient collateral to support their net debits 
    and by ensuring that their net debits do not exceed their net debit 
    caps, the new LPNC procedure should help to ensure that the occurrence 
    of a combined MMI issuer's default and a participant's failure to 
    settle does not expose DTC to loss and liquidity risks. The application 
    of the LPNC procedure to both the net debit cap and the 
    collateralization procedures should result in a failing participant's 
    net debit remaining collateralized and within its net debit cap if the 
    MMI issuer in which it has the largest net credit also defaulted.
    
        \23\ ``Federal Reserve Policy Statement on Private Delivery-
    Against-Payment Systems,'' Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
    System (June 15, 1989).
        \24\ A participant's net debit cap currently is the least of the 
    following: (1) An amount which is a multiple of the participant's 
    mandatory and voluntary deposits in the fund; (2) an amount equal to 
    75% of DTC's lines of credit; (3) an amount, if any, determined by 
    the participant's settling bank; or (4) an amount, if any, 
    determined by DTC.
        \25\ Because a participant's current adjustable net debit cap is 
    based on the participant's mandatory fund deposit, it will only 
    change on a monthly basis as the required deposit changes. However, 
    a participant may choose to increase its adjustable net debit cap at 
    any time by making voluntary deposits.
        \26\ Supra note 15.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The rule change implements certain modifications to DTC's current 
    SDFS system to provide for an efficient conversion to SDFS environment 
    for all securities transactions. The Commission believes that the 
    overall conversion to a SDFS system will help reduce systemic risk by 
    eliminating overnight credit risk. The SDFS system also will reduce 
    risk by achieving closer conformity with the payment methods used in 
    the derivatives markets, government securities markets and other 
    markets.
        For the reasons described above, the Commission believes that DTC's 
    proposed rule change fulfills the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) 
    of the Act because the proposal assures the safeguarding of securities 
    and funds in the custody and control of DTC. Furthermore, the proposed 
    rule change facilitates the overall conversion of DTC's payment system 
    to an SDFS system which should facilitate the prompt and accurate 
    clearance and settlement of securities transactions.
        DTC has requested that the Commission find good cause for approving 
    the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of 
    publication of notice of the filing. The Commission finds good cause 
    for so approving the proposed rule change because the modifications 
    implemented by the rule change are part of the planned conversion of 
    DTC's entire money settlement system to an SDFS system. The Commission 
    believes that participants should have the opportunity to become 
    familiar with the SDFS system capability and the new risk management 
    controls prior to the complete conversion to an SDFS system for 
    securities transactions.
    
    III. Conclusion
    
        On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
    proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act, particularly 
    with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act and the rules and regulations 
    thereunder.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
    that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-DTC-95-06) be, and hereby 
    is, approved.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
    
        \27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1994).
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-12520 Filed 5-22-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/23/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-12520
Pages:
27360-27362 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-35720, File No. SR-DTC-95-06
PDF File:
95-12520.pdf