97-13481. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan National Priorities List  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 100 (Friday, May 23, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 28407-28410]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-13481]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 300
    
    [FRL-5828-5]
    
    
    National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan 
    National Priorities List
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to delete the Middletown Air Field Site, 
    located in Middletown, Pennsylvania, from the National Priorities List 
    and request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region III announces 
    its intent to delete the Middletown Air Field Site (Site) from the 
    National Priorities List (NPL) and requests public comment on this 
    action. The NPL constitutes Appendix B of the National Oil and 
    Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR part 300, 
    which EPA promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the Comprehensive 
    Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as 
    amended. EPA and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental 
    Protection (PADEP) have determined that all appropriate CERCLA response 
    actions have been implemented and that no further cleanup is 
    appropriate. Moreover, EPA and the State have determined that remedial 
    activities conducted at the Site to date have been protective of public 
    health, welfare, and the environment.
    
    DATES: Comments concerning the proposed deletion of this Site from the 
    NPL may be submitted on or before June 23, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted to Nicholas J. DiNardo, (3HW50), 
    Project Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 841 Chestnut 
    Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, (215) 566-3365.
        Comprehensive information on this Site is available for viewing at 
    the Site information repositories at the following locations:
    
    U.S. EPA, Region III, Hazardous Waste Technical Information Center, 841 
    Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, PA 19107, (215) 566-5363.
    Middletown Public Library, 20 North Catherine Street, Middletown, PA 
    17057, (717) 944-6412.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas J. DiNardo (3HW50), U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, 
    Philadelphia, PA 19107, (215) 566-3365.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Table of Contents
    
    I. Introduction
    II. NPL Deletion Criteria
    III. Deletion Procedures
    IV. Basis for Intended Site Deletion
    
    I. Introduction
    
        The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region III announces its 
    intent to delete the Middletown Air Field Site, Dauphin County, 
    Pennsylvania, from the National Priorities List (NPL), Appendix B of 
    the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan 
    (NCP), and requests comments on this deletion. The EPA identifies sites 
    that appear to present a significant risk to public health, welfare, or 
    the environment and maintains the NPL as the list of those sites. Sites 
    on the NPL may be the subject of remedial actions financed by the 
    Hazardous Substance Superfund Response Trust Fund (Fund). Pursuant to 
    Sec. 300.425(e) of the NCP, any site deleted from the NPL remains 
    eligible for Fund-financed remedial actions if conditions at the site 
    warrant such action.
        EPA will accept comments on the proposal to delete this Site from 
    the NPL for thirty calendar days after publication of this notice in 
    the Federal Register.
        Section II of this notice explains the criteria for deleting sites 
    from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using for 
    this action. Section IV discusses how the site meets the deletion 
    criteria.
    
    II. NPL Deletion Criteria
    
        The NCP establishes the criteria that the Agency uses to delete 
    sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be 
    deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In 
    making this determination, EPA will consider, in consultation with the 
    State, whether any of the following criteria have been met:
        (i) Responsible or other parties have implemented all appropriate 
    response actions required; or
    
    [[Page 28408]]
    
        (ii) All appropriate Fund-financed responses under CERCLA have been 
    implemented and no further cleanup is appropriate; or
        (iii) As set forth in the investigative findings for the Site, the 
    release poses no significant threat to public health or the environment 
    and, therefore, taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
        In addition to the above, for all remedial actions which result in 
    hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site 
    above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, 
    section 121(c) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9621(c), the NCP at 40 CFR 
    300.430(f)(4)(ii) and EPA's policy, OSWER Directive 9320.2-09, dated 
    August 1995, provide that a subsequent review of the site will be 
    conducted at least every five years after the initiation of the first 
    remedial action at the Site to ensure that conditions at the Site 
    remain protective of public health and the environment. In the case of 
    this Site, EPA conducted a ``five year review'' in August of 1996. 
    Based on the inspection, EPA determined that conditions at the Site 
    remain protective of public health and the environment. As explained/
    discussed below, the Site meets the NCP's deletion criteria listed 
    above. Five-year reviews will continue to be conducted at the Site 
    until no hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain above 
    levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure.
        Releases shall not be deleted from the NPL until the state in which 
    the release was located has concurred on the proposed deletion. 40 CFR 
    300.425(e)(2).
        All releases deleted from the NPL are eligible for further Fund-
    financed remedial actions should future conditions warrant such action. 
    Whenever there is a significant release from a site deleted from the 
    NPL, the site can be restored to the NPL without application of the 
    Hazard Ranking System. 40 CFR 300.425(e)(3).
    
    III. Deletion Procedures
    
        Section 300.425(e)(4) of the NCP sets forth requirements for site 
    deletions to assure public involvement in the decision. During the 
    proposal to delete a site from the NPL, EPA is required to conduct the 
    following activities:
        (i) Publish a notice of intent to delete in the Federal Register 
    and solicit comment through a public comment period of a minimum of 30 
    calendar days;
        (ii) Publish a notice of availability of the notice of intent to 
    delete in a major local newspaper of general circulation at or near the 
    site that is proposed for deletion;
        (iii) Place copies of information supporting the proposed deletion 
    in the information repository at or near the site proposed for 
    deletion; and,
        (iv) Respond to each significant comment and any significant new 
    data submitted during the comment period in a Responsiveness Summary.
        If appropriate, after consideration of comments received during the 
    public comment period, EPA then publishes a notice of deletion in the 
    Federal Register and places the final deletion package, including the 
    Responsiveness Summary, in the Site repositories.
        Deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, alter, or 
    revoke any individual's rights or obligations. As stated in Section II 
    of this Notice, Sec. 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP provides that the 
    deletion of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility for 
    future response actions.
    
    IV. Basis for Intended Site Deletion
    
        The following site summary provide's EPA's rationale for the 
    proposal to delete the Middletown Air Field Site from the NPL.
        The Site is located in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, about 8 miles 
    southeast of Harrisburg. It is situated between the boroughs of 
    Highspire and Middletown along Pennsylvania Route 230, and bordered by 
    the Susquehanna River to the south. The site property was initially 
    established as Camp George Gordon Meade by the Army in July 1898 and 
    then was operated as a pickle farm by the H.J. Heinz company until May 
    15, 1917, when ground was broken for an Army Signal Corps storage depot 
    (the Aviation General Depot, later known as the Middletown Air 
    Intermediate Depot). Flight activities began on the site in 1918 and 
    the airfield was named Olmstead Field in 1923. In 1947 it became known 
    as Olmstead Air Force base. In 1967 Olmstead Air Force Base was 
    transferred to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the facility was 
    renamed Olmstead State Airport. It was renamed Harrisburg International 
    Airport in 1971.
        The former Air Force field and most of the former Air Force 
    industrial buildings (approximately 625 acres) are currently owned by 
    the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Department of 
    Transportation (PennDOT) maintains and manages the Harrisburg 
    International Airport (HIA) portion. The 193rd Special Operations group 
    of the Pennsylvania Air National Guard operates a small portion of the 
    Site, just east of the airport complex. Approximately 218 acres of 
    former administrative and housing facilities north of Route 230 are 
    owned by the Harrisburg campus of Pennsylvania State University. An 
    additional 93 acres of former Air Force warehouse facilities north of 
    the Pennsylvania Turnpike (I-76) were originally leased to Fruehauf 
    Industries (Fruehauf) in May 1966 by a local industrial development 
    authority. Fruehauf manufactured truck trailers and its Site activities 
    including welding, punching, fastening, foaming and painting. By May 
    23, 1986, Fruehauf had acquired ownership of the 93 acres. In June 
    1995, the property, excluding the North Base Landfill, was sold to 
    First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. by Fruehauf. Fruehauf still retains 
    ownership the North Base Landfill property.
        Activities throughout the history of the Site included:
         Warehousing and supply of parts, equipment, general 
    supplies, petroleum, oil and lubricants (POL) for the Department of the 
    Army's Northeast Procurement District;
         Complete aircraft overhaul including stripping, 
    repainting, engine overhaul, reassembly, and equipment replacement;
         Engine and aircraft testing; and
         General base support maintenance and operation.
        HIA currently conducts general airport operations and maintenance, 
    and leases buildings to fixed base operators and industrial tenants. 
    Tenants have performed a number of activities at this Site, including:
         Aircraft maintenance operations, aircraft paint stripping 
    and repainting, and parts cleaning;
         Aircraft instrument overhaul and repair;
         Fabric dying;
         Machine shop operations; and
         Typewriter ribbon inking and cartridge assembly.
        Various studies have been conducted by both EPA and the 
    Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP, formerly 
    the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources), at the 
    facility since 1983 to investigate and monitor areas that were affected 
    by operations at the Site. In March 1983, PADEP discovered the volatile 
    organic compound (VOC) trichloroethylene (TCE) in six of ten HIA 
    production wells. This discovery triggered subsequent environmental 
    investigations and studies, and the installation of a water treatment 
    system that is currently still in use at the facility.
        In 1984, EPA conducted ground penetrating radar and magnetometer 
    surveys at the Runway, Industrial, and
    
    [[Page 28409]]
    
    North Base Landfill areas at the Site. EPA removed nine partially 
    exposed 55-gallon drums from a fill area located along a stream bank 
    northeast of the Meade Heights housing complex. The drums were empty 
    except for water and coatings of a hard, black tarry substance. EPA 
    sampled the drum contents and found that they did not exhibit the 
    characteristic of EP toxicity (as described in 40 CFR 261.24) at the 
    time of the sampling.
        EPA evaluated the Site under the Hazard Ranking System and was 
    proposed for inclusion on the National Priorities List (NPL) on October 
    1, 1984. EPA added the Site to the NPL on June 1, 1986. 51 FR 21054 
    (June 6, 1996). EPA's initial response after the NPL listing focused on 
    the presence of VOCs found in the groundwater beneath the Site. EPA 
    selected an interim remedy in the December 30, 1987, Record of Decision 
    (1987 ROD) that addressed HIA's contaminated drinking water supply. The 
    selected response consisted of the installation of an air stripping 
    system for the removal of VOCs to meet the drinking water standards. 
    The existing treatment system consists of two air strippers, an ion 
    exchange unit for the removal of hardness, and disinfection prior to 
    distribution.
        A train spill occurred northwest of the runway area on June 4, 
    1988, approximately 500 feet west of Production Well HIA-12. Diethylene 
    glycol and mineral oil were released to the soil as a result of the 
    spill. PADEP remediated the site of the spill through pumping ground 
    water into settling tanks, skimming the mineral oil, biotreatment of 
    the diethylene glycol, and reinjection of the treated water. PADEP 
    completed the remediation in 1989.
        In order to fully characterize the remainder of the Site and 
    identify potential public health and environmental concerns, EPA issued 
    a contract for an extensive study of the Site in 1988. The study was 
    performed in two phases--the Remedial Investigation (RI) and the 
    Feasibility Study (FS). See 40 CFR 300.430 (d) and (e).
        Based upon the 1988 RI/FS for the Site, the Operable Unit 2 Record 
    of Decision (1990 ROD), signed on December 17, 1990, directed continued 
    operation of existing drinking water supply treatment and the current 
    distribution system, the institution of groundwater use restrictions, 
    and additional monitoring of the water supply wells. The remedy 
    contained in the 1990 ROD also directed the use of institutional 
    controls to address direct contact and other threats from potentially 
    contaminated soils that may be exposed at the Site during construction, 
    demolition, excavation or other activities that disturb Site soils and 
    involve the potential for worker and public exposure to presently 
    contaminated soils. The 1990 ROD also selected final remedial actions 
    at study areas (SAs) 1, 2, 3, and 4 and an interim action at SA-5, 
    since the field investigation results at SA-5 were inconclusive in 
    determining contaminant sources and their potential environmental 
    impact.
        Under the 1990 ROD, the remedy selection for SA-1 involved the 
    continued operation of the ground water treatment system currently in 
    place at the Site, the institution of restrictions for all ground water 
    use throughout the Site (which extends from the North Base Landfill to 
    the Susquehanna River), and the addition of monitoring for the water 
    supply wells.
        The remedy for SA-2 and SA-3 included land use and access 
    restrictions, and the development of public and worker health and 
    safety requirements for activities involving construction, demolition, 
    and excavation or other activities that would disturb the Site soil.
        The remedy for SA-4, which provided for the installation of 
    ``sentinel wells'' designed to assure protection of well MID-04 from 
    contaminants found on the Site, was coupled with the remedy for SA-1 to 
    efficiently and effectively address ground water contamination at the 
    Site.
        The interim action required for SA-5 included a study evaluating 
    the water quality of, and organisms living in, the stream near Meade 
    Heights.
        After reviewing the 1990 ROD, PADEP asserted that the ROD did not 
    fully investigate the relationship between soil and ground water 
    contamination, nor did it consider active soil cleanup technologies. In 
    1992, an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) was issued to 
    address PADEP's concerns by expanding the scope of the Supplemental 
    Studies Investigation (SSI) required by the 1990 ROD. The ESD explained 
    that the ground water remedy selected in the 1990 ROD was an interim 
    action and that the final decision would follow in the third ROD. The 
    ESD also rescinded the requirement in the 1990 ROD, that the existing 
    water supply system must continue to operate even if airport operations 
    cease would be eliminated and reevaluated at a later date.
        The SSI concluded that no contaminants of concern were identified 
    in the surface water or sediment at the Site above the Biological 
    Technical Assistance Group (BTAG) screening levels. Furthermore, based 
    on the Baseline Risk Assessment (BRA) that was performed as part of the 
    SSI, EPA concluded in the third ROD, issued on September 17 1996, that:
         No additional action, other than that already required by 
    earlier RODs, is necessary to address soils at the Site. Therefore all 
    remedial designs and remedial actions are complete, and no cleanup 
    standards are set for any operable unit.
         Institutional restrictions on ground water use will be 
    continued at the Site.
         Monitoring of surface water and sediment in the 
    Susquehanna River as required by the 1990 ROD should continue. In 
    addition, two locations involving the J-5 storm drain, situated next to 
    building 208, should also be sampled quarterly and evaluated as part of 
    the five year review for the Site. These locations are the J-5 storm 
    drain and the outfall of the J-5 storm line at Post Run. The sampling 
    frequency may be modified by PADEP after one year. No other sampling 
    for surface water and sediment is deemed necessary at this time.
         Monitoring of the sentinel wells in the North Base 
    Landfill Area, as required by the 1990 ROD for the protection of the 
    MID-04 well, should continue. No other actions for this area are deemed 
    necessary at this time.
         No action is required for surface water or sediment in 
    Meade Heights.
         In the event that the HIA should cease or reduce the 
    pumping of the production wells, PADEP will assess the potential for 
    currently contained hazardous substances to migrate towards the 
    Susquehanna River and PADEP, as provided for in the April 16, 1997, 
    Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between PADEP and PennDOT, may impose 
    a sampling and review period (not to initially exceed 5 years) to 
    assess whether any impact is occurring regarding the Susquehanna River. 
    After the initial review, PADEP will again review the Site's status and 
    determine if additional action is warranted.
         As required by the 1990 ROD, ground water use will be 
    restricted in the event any new wells are to be installed or 
    modification of usage to existing wells is to be implemented at the 
    Site. The extracted ground water must be tested and the results 
    reported to PADEP. Ground water use at the Site will require a permit 
    or approval by PADEP prior to use.
        The 1996 ROD concluded that no additional action, other than that 
    already required by the 1987 ROD and the 1990 ROD, as modified by the 
    1992
    
    [[Page 28410]]
    
    ESD, is required at the Site. Further, EPA has concluded that the 1996 
    ROD's ``No Further Action'' alternative's use of engineering and 
    institutional controls at the Site will not interfere with the 
    redevelopment and expansion objectives set forth in the October 1990 
    Master Plan Harrisburg International Airport commissioned by PennDOT's 
    Bureau of Aviation's State-owned Airports Division.
        On August 21, 1996, EPA and PADEP conducted a final inspection of 
    the sentinel well construction. No deficiencies were noted nor were 
    additional activities deemed necessary as a result of the inspection.
        All remedial actions for this Site are complete. Collection of 
    monitoring well data from the HIA production wells and the North Base 
    Landfill sentinel wells, initially on a quarterly basis (unless and 
    until modified by PADEP), is the only O&M requirement necessary.
        PADEP has assumed the responsibility for assuring compliance with 
    the institutional controls identified in the RODs for this Site, and 
    the review of data generated as part of the 5-year review process. On 
    April 16, 1997, PADEP and PennDOT entered into a Memorandum of 
    Understanding (MOU). The MOU expresses the intent of PADEP and PennDOT 
    that PennDOT will, inter alia, perform the sampling of the wells, water 
    and sediment and implement institutional controls, as required by 
    remedy selected in the 1996 ROD.
        The statutorily required five-year review of the ground water 
    treatment remedy selected in the 1987 ROD was completed on September 
    1996. Further five year reviews will be conducted pursuant to OSWER 
    Directive 9355.7-02. ``Structure and Components of Five-Year Reviews,'' 
    and/or other applicable guidance. The next scheduled five year review 
    is set for September, 1998. Subsequent five year reviews will be 
    conducted pursuant to the directive.
        The remedies selected for this Site have been implemented in 
    accordance with the three Records of Decision as modified and expanded 
    in the EPA-approved Remedial Designs for the Operable Units and the 
    1992 ESD. Human health threats and potential environmental impacts have 
    been reduced to acceptable levels. EPA and the PADEP find that the 
    remedies implemented continue to provide adequate protection of human 
    health and the environment.
        EPA, with the concurrence of PADEP, believes that the criteria for 
    deletion of this Site have been met. Therefore, EPA is proposing 
    deletion of this Site from the NPL.
    
        Dated: May 15, 1997.
    W. Michael McCabe,
    Regional Administrator, USEPA Region III.
    [FR Doc. 97-13481 Filed 5-22-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/23/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of intent to delete the Middletown Air Field Site, located in Middletown, Pennsylvania, from the National Priorities List and request for comments.
Document Number:
97-13481
Dates:
Comments concerning the proposed deletion of this Site from the NPL may be submitted on or before June 23, 1997.
Pages:
28407-28410 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-5828-5
PDF File:
97-13481.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 300.425(e)