97-13607. Rules and Regulations Under the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 100 (Friday, May 23, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 28342-28344]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-13607]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
    16 CFR Part 303
    
    
    Rules and Regulations Under the Textile Fiber Products 
    Identification Act
    
    AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission announces amendments to Rule 7 of 
    the Rules and Regulations Under the Textile Fiber Products 
    Identification Act (``Textile Rules''), which lists generic names and 
    definitions for manufactured fibers. 16 CFR 303.7 (1996). The 
    amendments create a new subsection that designates a new fiber name, 
    ``elastoester,'' and establishes a definition for the fiber. The 
    Commission initiated this proceeding in response to a petition for a 
    new generic fiber name under the Textile Rules filed by Teijin Limited, 
    a fiber manufacturing company based in Osaka, Japan. Teijin 
    manufactures the fiber under the trade name ``REXE.'' The Commission is 
    making the amendments effective today, as permitted by 5 U.S.C. 553(d), 
    because the amendments do not create new obligations under the Rule; 
    rather, they merely create a fiber name and definition that the public 
    may use to comply with the Rule.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: May 23, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    James G. Mills, Attorney, Division of Enforcement, Room 4616, Federal 
    Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 20580; (202) 326-3035, FAX: (202) 
    326-3259.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    I. Background
    
    A. Statutory and Regulatory Framework
    
        Section 4(b)(1) of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act 
    (``the Act'') declares that a textile product will be misbranded unless 
    it is labeled to show, among other elements, the percentages, by 
    weight, of the constituent fibers (or fiber combinations) in the 
    product, designated by their generic name and in order of predominance 
    by weight. 15 U.S.C. 70b(b)(1). Section 4(c) of the Act provides that 
    the same information
    
    [[Page 28343]]
    
    required by section 4(b)(1) (except the percentages) must appear in 
    written advertisements for covered textile products. 15 U.S.C. 70b(c). 
    Section 7(c) empowers the Commission to promulgate such rules, 
    including the establishment of generic names of manufactured fibers, as 
    are necessary to enforce the Act's directives. 15 U.S.C. 70e(c).
        Rule 8 of the Textiles rules contains the Commission's procedures 
    for establishing new generic names. 16 CFR 303.8 (1996). Rule 6 
    requires manufacturers to use the generic names of the fibers contained 
    in their textile fiber products when they disclose fiber content as 
    required by the Act and the Textile Rules. 16 CFR 303.6 (1996). Rule 7 
    lists the generic names and definitions that the Commission has 
    established for manufactured fibers. 16 CFR 303.7 (1996).
    
    B. Procedural History
    
        Teijin submitted its petition to the Commission in this matter on 
    October 30, 1992, and subsequently submitted additional information. 
    Teijin requested that its new fiber, REXE, be given one of the 
    following generic names, in descending order of its preference: (1) 
    ``Polyetherester,'' (2) ``Elastoester,'' or (3) ``Estelast.'' Teijin 
    also suggested a definition for the new fiber. The application and 
    related materials were placed on the rulemaking record. After an 
    initial analysis, the Commission issued the designation ``TL 0001'' on 
    December 29, 1992, for Teijin's temporary use in identifying REXE until 
    a final determination could be made as to the merits of the 
    application.
        The Commission subsequently requested and received additional 
    information from Teijin pertaining to its fiber's chemical and physical 
    properties, as well as information concerning Teijin's plans for 
    marketing the fiber. After analyzing this supplemental information, on 
    July 9, 1996, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    (``NPR'') detailing the technical aspects of Teijin's fiber and 
    requesting public comment on whether to add a new generic fiber name 
    and definition to Rule 7 of the Textile Rules.\1\ On September 10, 
    1996, the comment period created by the NPR closed. No comments were 
    received.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 61 FR 35992 (July 9, 1996).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Description of Teijin's Fiber and Solicitation of Comments in 
    the NPR
    
        The NPR provided a detailed description, taken from Teijin's 
    application, of REXE's chemical composition and physical and chemical 
    properties.\2\ Teijin maintained that its new fiber, which is 
    manufactured from poly tetramethylene ether/poly butylene glycol 
    terephthalate copolymer, has a unique chemical composition and 
    distinctive physical characteristics so it cannot be identified by any 
    of the generic names already established by the Commission in Rule 7 of 
    the Textile Rules. 16 CFR 303.7 (1996). Teijin also stated that it 
    intends to market the fiber commercially, and said in subsequent 
    information that REXE is now being sold and used in the United States.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ Id., at 35993 (July 9, 1996). For brevity's sake, the 
    Commission is providing a simplified description of the fiber today, 
    and refers those members of the public who wish to see detailed 
    technical information about the fiber to the earlier description in 
    the NPR.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In the NPR, the Commission solicited comment on Teijin's 
    application generally, but asked especially whether the application met 
    the following criteria, which the Commission has identified in the past 
    as grounds for granting applications for new generic names:
    
        1. The fiber for which a generic name is requested must have a 
    chemical composition radically different from other fibers, and that 
    distinctive chemical composition must result in distinctive physical 
    properties of significance to the general public.
        2. The fiber must be in active commercial use or such use must 
    be immediately foreseen.
        3. The grant of the generic name must be of importance to the 
    consuming public at large, rather than to a small group of 
    knowledgeable professionals such as purchasing officers for large 
    Government agencies.\3\
    
        \3\ The Commission added:
        [W]here appropriate, in considering applications for new generic 
    names for fibers that are of the same general chemical composition 
    as those for which a generic name already has been established, 
    rather than of a chemical composition that is radically different, 
    but that have distinctive properties of importance to the general 
    public as a result of a new method of manufacture or their 
    substantially differentiated physical characteristics, such as their 
    fiber structure, [the Commission] may allow such fiber to be 
    designated in required information disclosures by either its generic 
    name, or alternatively, by its ``subclass'' name. The Commission 
    will consider this disposition when the distinctive feature or 
    features of the subclass fiber make it suitable for uses for which 
    other fibers under the established generic name would not be suited 
    or would be significantly less well suited. See 60 FR 62352, 62353 
    (Dec. 6, 1995) (reaffirming and clarifying criteria first announced 
    at 38 FR 34114 (Nov. 12, 1973)).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission also asked for comment on the names suggested by 
    Teijin for the fiber and proposed the following definition for Teijin's 
    new fiber:
    
        A manufactured fiber in which the fiber-forming substance is a 
    long-chain synthetic polymer composed of at least 50% by weight of 
    aliphatic polyether and at least 35% by weight of polyester, as 
    defined in 16 CFR Sec. 303.7(c).
    
    III. Discussion
    
    A. Distinctive Chemical Composition and Physical Properties of 
    Importance to the Public
    
        The only fiber to which REXE is somewhat similar chemically is 
    polyester, and the Commission considered, therefore, whether to include 
    the fiber under the definition in Rule 7 for polyester, either in its 
    present form or modified to accommodate the characteristics of REXE. 
    After analyzing the evidence, however, the Commission agrees with 
    Teijin that REXE is not ``composed of at least 85% by weight of an 
    ester of a substituted aromatic carboxylic acid,'' as is specified in 
    the definition of polyester in the Textile Rules.\4\ Moreover, there is 
    evidence that REXE's physical properties are quite different from those 
    of polyester, as the Commission reported in the NPR. The Commission 
    concludes, therefore, that it would be inappropriate to include REXE 
    under the definition of polyester.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ 61 FR 35993 (July 9, 1996); see 16 CFR 303.7(c) for the 
    definition of polyester.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Because one of REXE's physical characteristics is that it has 
    elastic properties, the Commission considered whether it could 
    encompass REXE within any of the current generic fibers with elastic 
    properties that are defined in the Textile Rules, such as rubber, 
    lastrile, spandex (to which Teijin compared, and with which it 
    contrasted, REXE in its application), or anidex. Because REXE is 
    considered an elastomeric polyester, however, and therefore consists of 
    polyester and polyether segments, it has a different chemical 
    composition from the fibers that fall under those four definitions. 
    Thus, the Commission concludes that it would be inappropriate to 
    include REXE under any of the existing definitions for fibers with 
    elastic properties.
        Teijin's fiber has several physical properties that are important 
    to the public. As stated above, it has elastic properties; in addition, 
    it is readily washable, and can withstand high temperatures when wet, 
    which is particularly important with respect to dyeing. This tolerance 
    of high temperature also could allow the development of elastic fabrics 
    (for example, a combination of REXE and polyester) that would have many 
    of the properties of polyester, such as excellent washability. Finally, 
    fabrics made of REXE and polyester are less discolored or adversely 
    affected by chlorine than fabrics made of nylon and
    
    [[Page 28344]]
    
    spandex, which is important in the case of such products as swimming 
    suits.
    
    B. Active Commercial Use
    
        Although the information available when the NPR was published did 
    not establish exactly when REXE was first marketed in the U.S., it is 
    clear that by March 1995 REXE was in use, although not in large 
    quantities, in products covered by the Textile Act.\5\ The garments 
    were mostly sportswear, including swim suits, cycling pants and ski 
    pants. Thus, the Commission concludes that the Teijin fiber is in 
    ``active commercial use.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ Teijin represented to the Commission that 6,100 yards of 
    REXE were used in the U.S. in 1994, that total production of REXE in 
    1994 was 67 metric tons, and that estimated 1995 production was 65 
    metric tons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    C. Importance to the Consuming Public
    
        Based on REXE's ability to be used in sportswear for swimming and 
    cycling, the Commission concludes that the fiber may be used by the 
    consuming public in general, and that the granting of this new generic 
    fiber name and definition will not be of interest only to ``a small 
    group of knowledgeable professionals, such as purchasing officers for 
    large Government agencies.''
    
    D. New Generic Fiber Definition
    
        The Commission finds that REXE possesses a distinctive chemical 
    composition not encompassed by any of the Textile Rules' existing 
    generic definitions for manufactured fibers, that its physical 
    properties are important to the public, that the fiber is in active 
    commercial use, and that the granting of a new generic name and 
    definition is important to the consuming public at large. Accordingly, 
    and given that the Commission has received no additional information 
    bearing on this issue beyond that available to it when it published the 
    NPR, the Commission today amends Rule 7 of the Textile Rules by adding 
    the following new definition for Teijin's fiber, which it proposed in 
    the NPR:
    
        A manufactured fiber in which the fiber-forming substance is a 
    long-chain synthetic polymer composed of at least 50% by weight of 
    aliphatic polyether and at least 35% by weight of polyester, as 
    defined in 16 CFR 303.7(c).
    
    E. New Generic Name
    
        Although each of the three generic names for REXE that Teijin 
    suggested has merit, the Commission believes that the name 
    ``elastoester'' is most likely to communicate to consumers that REXE 
    (and other fibers that would fall within the definition's purview) has 
    the qualities of an elastomer and a polyester, which would tend to make 
    purchasing decisions easier. Therefore, the Commission adopts the 
    generic name ``elastoester'' for Teijin's fiber.
    
    IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        In the NPR, the Commission tentatively concluded that the 
    provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act relating to an initial 
    regulatory analysis, 5 U.S.C. 603-604, did not apply to this proposal 
    because the amendment, if promulgated, would not have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The 
    Commission believed that the proposed amendment would impose no 
    additional obligations, penalties, or costs. The amendment simply would 
    allow covered companies to use a new generic name for a new fiber that 
    may not appropriately fit within current generic names and definitions, 
    and would impose no additional labeling requirements. To ensure, 
    however, that no substantial economic impact was overlooked, the 
    Commission solicited public comment in the NPR on the effect of the 
    proposed amendment on costs, profits, competitiveness of, and 
    employment in small entities.
        No comments were received on this (or any other) issue in response 
    to the NPR. Accordingly, the Commission hereby certifies, pursuant to 
    the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that the amendment 
    promulgated today will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
    
    V. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This proposed amendment does not constitute a ``collection of 
    information'' under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 
    Chapter 35 (as amended), and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR 1320 
    et seq. (1996). The collection of information imposed by the procedures 
    for establishing generic names, 16 CFR 303.8 (1996), has been submitted 
    to OMB and has been assigned Control Number 3084-0101.
    
    List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 303
    
        Labeling, Textile, Trade practices.
    
    Text of Amendments
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 16 CFR Part 303 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 303--RULES AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE TEXTILE FIBER PRODUCTS 
    IDENTIFICATION ACT
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 303 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 15 U.S.C. 70 et seq.
    
        2. In Sec. 303.7, paragraph (v) is added, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 303.7  Generic names and definitions for manufactured fibers.
    
    * * * * *
        (v) Elastoester. A manufactured fiber in which the fiber-forming 
    substance is a long-chain synthetic polymer composed of at least 50% by 
    weight of aliphatic polyether and at least 35% by weight of polyester, 
    as defined in 16 CFR 303.7(c).
    
        By direction of the Commission.
    Donald S. Clark,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-13607 Filed 5-22-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/23/1997
Published:
05/23/1997
Department:
Federal Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-13607
Dates:
May 23, 1997.
Pages:
28342-28344 (3 pages)
PDF File:
97-13607.pdf
CFR: (1)
16 CFR 303.7