95-12704. Unlicensed Personal Communications Services; Radio Frequency Devices  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 27423-27425]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-12704]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Part 15
    
    [GEN Docket No. 90-314, FCC 95-167]
    
    
    Unlicensed Personal Communications Services; Radio Frequency 
    Devices
    
    Agency: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    action: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    summary: By this action, the Commission affirms its designation of 
    UTAM, Inc., to manage the transition of the 1910-1930 MHz band from the 
    Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service to unlicensed Personal 
    Communication Service (PCS) operations. Further, the Commission accepts 
    UTAM's plan for the relocation of fixed microwave operations from this 
    spectrum and the deployment of unlicensed PCS devices. The Commission 
    is requiring UTAM to submit reports at six-month intervals on the 
    progress of the plan's implementation. UTAM's management of the 
    transition of the 1910-1930 MHz band will help to ensure that new and 
    innovative unlicensed PCS devices, such as wireless PBX equipment, 
    wireless messaging systems, wireless local area networks, and a broad 
    range of data communication products, are made available as rapidly as 
    possible without disrupting fixed microwave service.
    
    effective date: June 23, 1995.
    
    for further information contact: David L. Means, Office of Engineering 
    and Technology, New Technology Development Division, (301) 725-1585, 
    extension 206.
    
    supplementary information: This is a summary of the Commission's Fourth 
    Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 95-167, adopted April 19, 1995, and 
    released May 12, 1995. The full text of this decision is available for 
    inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Dockets 
    Branch (Room 230), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. Copies may also 
    be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, 
    International Transcription Services, at (202) 857-3800 or 2100 M 
    Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.
    
    Summary of the Memorandum Option and Order
    
        1. This Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order affirms its designation 
    of UTAM, Inc., to manage the transition of the 1910-1930 MHz band from 
    the Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service to unlicensed Personal 
    Communication Service (PCS) operations. Further, the Commission accepts 
    UTAM's plan for the relocation of fixed microwave operations from this 
    spectrum and the deployment of unlicensed PCS devices. The Commission 
    is requiring UTAM to submit reports at six-month intervals on the 
    progress of the plan's implementation.
        2. The 1910-1930 MHz band is currently occupied by 383 fixed point-
    to-point microwave links. In the Second Report and Order, 58 FR 59174, 
    November 8, 1993, the Commission designated UTAM as the coordinator for 
    the transition of the unlicensed PCS band from the fixed microwave 
    service to unlicensed PCS, conditioned on UTAM's submission and the 
    Commissions acceptance of: (1) A funding plan that is equitable to all 
    prospective manufacturers of unlicensed devices, and (2) a plan for 
    ``band clearing'' that will permit the implementation of nomadic 
    devices and, in particular, nomadic data PCS devices, as promptly as 
    possible.
        3. On August 1, 1994, UTAM, Inc., submitted its plan for managing 
    the transition of the 1910-1930 MHz band to use by unlicensed PCS 
    operations. The UTAM plan describes UTAM's organization and governance, 
    financing plan, bank clearing plan, coordination procedures, protection 
    of proprietary information, dispute resolution procedures and UTAM's 
    plans for ending its coordination role and dissolving itself.
        4. We find that UTAM's cost and revenue projections are reasonable. 
    These projections appear to be based on conservative estimates and to 
    allow for situations where a revenue source may develop somewhat 
    slowly. While we recognize that there is always some uncertainty in 
    making such projections, we are convinced that there will eventually be 
    sufficient revenues to totally fund relocation of the microwave 
    incumbents. It seems fair to assume the PCS licensees will bear 
    approximately half the cost of relocating the incumbent microwave links 
    in the 1910-1930 MHz band, since these links are paired with links in 
    the licensed PCS spectrum. We agree with UTAM that its estimate of the 
    cost for relocating each link is conservative, which should provide 
    some margin if UTAM is faced with relocating more links than it 
    anticipates. We do not agree with arguments that the relocation of 
    links would be disrupted if there are funding shortfalls. We note, in 
    particular, that UTAM will not initiate relocation negotiations until 
    adequate funding is available. Further, [[Page 27424]] we believe that 
    UTAM is taking adequate steps to control interference so as to avoid 
    the need to relocate microwave links prematurely. We also see no need 
    to require UTAM to establish a contingency fund for such situations. We 
    are satisfied that the BIS study provides a reasonable estimate of 
    unlicensed PCS device deployment and takes due account of demand that 
    may be satisfied through other equipment or services. Even if demand 
    for unlicensed PCS devices does not fall within the range predicted by 
    the BIS study, or if licensed PCS penetration lags or negotiations with 
    incumbents take longer than anticipated, the safeguards included in the 
    plan ensure that the only consequence will be that band clearing will 
    simply take longer. With regard to concerns about equity in the band 
    clearing process, we agree with UTAM that the plan clearly indicates 
    that donated funds may be designated for clearing any part of the 
    spectrum that the donor chooses and will be credited as an advance 
    against the donor's clearing fees. Thus, no company interested in 
    clearing the asynchronous band segment for deployment of nomadic 
    products will be forced to subsidize coordination activities.
        5. We believe that UTAM's band clearing plan is workable and 
    appropriate. While we understand concerns for the need to make spectrum 
    available for nomadic operations promptly, we also recognize the 
    practical difficulties UTAM faces in clearing the 1910-1930 MHz band. 
    We believe that UTAM has devised a workable strategy for expediting 
    nomadic device deployment given the existing constraints, such as the 
    need to fund and negotiate the relocation of the incumbent microwave 
    links, and the fact that incumbent public safety licensees are not 
    required to relocate for five years. While we are sympathetic to 
    desires for a more rapid deployment scheme for nomadic data devices in 
    this spectrum, none is apparent. We believe that the only way to make 
    the band fully available to nomadic devices is to completely clear it. 
    The most effective way to do so is to enable non-nomadic devices to be 
    deployed so that fees from such deployment can be used to complete the 
    band clearing process as rapidly as possible. While we share doubts 
    regarding the potential of the ``wedge'' clearing approach to make 
    significant amounts of spectrum available to nomadic devices prior to 
    complete band clearing, this approach appears to be the soundest plan 
    given the constraints. As an alternative for those developers of 
    nomadic devices whose needs could be accommodated by the UTAM plan, we 
    note that we recently allocated additional spectrum at 2390-2400 MHz 
    for unlicensed data PCS devices, and this spectrum will not require 
    clearing. We believe that the immediate needs of unlicensed nomadic 
    data PCS devices can be accommodated in this spectrum. Operation in the 
    2390-2400 MHz band will not require participation in UTAM and will not 
    be governed by the UTAM plan.
        6. With regard to concerns about deployment of nomadic devices 
    prior to complete band clearing, we addressed this matter in the 
    Memorandum Opinion and Order in this proceeding, 59 FR 32830, June 24, 
    1994. We stated therein that when we have determined that spectrum is 
    available, or will soon be available, for deployment of nomadic 
    devices, we will issue a Public Notice announcing the date upon which 
    we will begin accepting and processing applications for certification 
    of such devices. We believe that this plan will adequately ensure that 
    nomadic operations do not cause interference to fixed microwave 
    operations. We believe UTAM's commitment to voluntarily address the 
    concerns of the incumbent microwave community regarding coordination 
    with PCS licensees to negotiate microwave relocations on a system-wide 
    basis where possible and appropriately will further the relocation 
    process. Such system-wide coordination and negotiation activities will 
    promote more rapid availability of spectrum and minimize the relocation 
    burden for incumbent microwave licensees. We believe that is neither 
    necessary nor practical for the Commission to require such system-wide 
    negotiations. Similarly, we believe that UTAM has adequately responded 
    to concerns about clearing priorities and updating of the zone status.
        7. We believe that UTAM has adequately responded to the concerns 
    that have been raised about its coordination procedures. Its 
    explanation that appropriate adjustments have already been incorporated 
    into the TIA Bulletin 10F criteria and stated intention to coordinate 
    system deployed in Zone 1 areas at maximum system capacity appear to 
    adequately address the concerns of the microwave community. We also 
    note that UTAM is taking steps to respond to the concerns of HP and 
    other manufacturers regarding the necessity for advance warning for 
    ``stop deployment'' orders. We are similarly convinced that UTAM will 
    be gathering sufficient information to monitor manufacturer compliance 
    with its LVP and to expeditiously locate any source of interference, 
    should it occur. We disagree that we intended that UTAM develop and 
    specify a standard procedure or specific technology to prevent 
    unauthorized deployment of unlicensed PCS devices. In fact, we 
    previously stated that we would allow UTAM broad flexibility in 
    establishing the means it uses to fulfill its responsibility for 
    ensuring that unlicensed devices do not interfere with existing 
    microwave operations. We continue to believe that this is the 
    appropriate approach. We believe that the standards for disablement 
    mechanisms outlined in the plan, with the clarifications provided by 
    UTAM in its response to the comments, will adequately protect incumbent 
    microwave operations from potential interference caused by unauthorized 
    relocation of unlicensed devices. We also agree with UTAM that further 
    requirements would not prevent those who wish to intentionally violate 
    the rules from doing so.
        8. Regarding enforcement, we believe that the requirements of 
    Section 15.307(b) of the Commission's rules are adequate to ensure 
    manufacturers' compliance with the procedures established by UTAM, and 
    that no additional rules are necessary or desirable. We fully intend to 
    take appropriate enforcement action against parties that violate the 
    rules and procedures we have established with regard to operation in 
    the unlicensed spectrum at 1910-1930 MHz. We further believe that the 
    clarifications UTAM provides regarding its dispute resolution 
    procedures remove any confusion over UTAM's intent to work in good 
    faith to resolve any disputes that may arise.
        9. We find that UTAM has provided adequate and sufficient 
    information to satisfy the conditions laid out in the Second Report and 
    Order. As explained above, we believe that UTAM has adequately 
    addressed all of the relevant issues. We find no merit in arguments 
    that UTAM's authorization should be revoked or limited. While Apple 
    challenges UTAM's governance, it offers no specifics as to how the 
    governance procedures should be changed or otherwise improved. Further, 
    we disagree that it is necessary or desirable to identify an 
    alternative entity at this time to manage the band transition should 
    UTAM cease operation. We note that no alternative to UTAM has been 
    suggested or come forward. Therefore, we are reaffirming UTAM has the 
    coordinator for the transition of the 1910-1930 MHz band from fixed 
    microwave services to use by unlicensed PCS.
        10. We do not believe it is necessary to require UTAM to submit a 
    revised [[Page 27425]] plan that includes the additional information 
    presented in its reply comments. We recognize that, to some extent, the 
    plan and details of its implementation are a work in progress. 
    Accordingly, we believe the appropriate course of action is to monitor 
    UTAM's implementation of the plan. We are requiring UTAM to furnish 
    biannual reports on its progress in implementing the plan. The first 
    report will be due July 1, 1995, and every six months thereafter. The 
    reports should provide an update on the status of the financial and 
    band clearing plans, the extent of incumbent microwave relocation, and 
    the extent of unlicensed PCS device deployment. Additionally, the 
    reports should provide updated projections of future band clearing and 
    unlicensed PCS implementation based on the best and most current data 
    available at the time the report is prepared. We also are requiring 
    that the report provide information on any problems or difficulties 
    encountered in implementing the plan and how they are being resolved.
    
    Ordering Clauses
    
        11. Accordingly, It Is Ordered, pursuant to sections 4(i), 7(a), 
    302, 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 
    1934, as amended, U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 157(a), 302, 303(c), 303(f), 
    303(g), and 303(r), that UTAM, Inc. is designated to coordinate and 
    manage the transition of the 1910-1930 MHz band from the Private 
    Operational Fixed Microwave Service to unlicensed PCS operations. It Is 
    Further Ordered, that UTAM, Inc., shall submit to the Commission 
    reports on its progress in implementing its plan beginning on July 1, 
    1995, and every six months thereafter. It Is Further Ordered, that Part 
    15 is amended as shown to remove the conditions attached to UTAM's 
    designation as the coordinator for unlicensed PCS operations in the 
    1910-1930 MHz band.
    
    List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 15
    
        Radio.
    
    Federal Communications Commission.
    William F. Caton,
    Acting Secretary.
    
        Part 15 of Chapter I of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
    is amended as follows:
    
    PART 15--RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 15 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 4, 302, 303, 304, and 307 of the Communications 
    Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154, 302, 303, 304, and 
    307.
    
        2. Section 15.307(a) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 15.307  Coordination with fixed microwave service.
    
        (a) UTAM, Inc., is designated to coordinate and manage the 
    transition of the 1910-1930 MHz band from Private Operational-Fixed 
    Microwave Service (OFS) operating under part 94 of this chapter to 
    unlicensed PCS operations.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 95-12704 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/23/1995
Published:
05/24/1995
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-12704
Dates:
June 23, 1995.
Pages:
27423-27425 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
GEN Docket No. 90-314, FCC 95-167
PDF File:
95-12704.pdf
CFR: (1)
47 CFR 15.307