96-13098. Northern States Power Co.; Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Prairie Island Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102 (Friday, May 24, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 26225-26226]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-13098]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 50-263, 50-282, 50-306 and 72-10]
    
    
    Northern States Power Co.; Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, 
    Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Prairie 
    Island Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation; Environmental 
    Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering approval of the transfer of, and issuance of amendments to 
    Facility Operating Licenses Nos. DPR-22, DPR-42, DPR-60, and SNM-2506 
    issued to Northern States Power Company, (the licensee), for operation 
    of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, located in Wright County, 
    Minnesota, and the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 
    2, and the Prairie Island Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation 
    (ISFSI) located in Goodhue County, Minnesota.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Actions
    
        The proposed actions would consent to the transfer of control of 
    the operating licenses, and amend them to reflect the transfer of 
    control of the licenses for the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, 
    the Prairie Island Units 1 and 2 Nuclear Generating Plants, and the 
    Prairie Island Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation facility, 
    held by Northern States Power Company (NSP). Following a series of 
    transactions, NSP
    
    [[Page 26226]]
    
    will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Wisconsin Energy Corporation 
    (WEC), the parent company of Wisconsin Electric Power Company (WEPCO). 
    WEC will be renamed Primergy Corporation (Primergy) and will own two 
    operating utility subsidiaries: (1) Northern States Power Company, 
    which will be reincorporated in Wisconsin and merged with a newly 
    formed WEC/Primergy subsidiary, and (2) WEPCO, which will be named 
    Wisconsin Energy Company. The merged NSP will continue to operate the 
    same facilities above in the same locations. The proposed action is in 
    accordance with NSP's applications dated October 20, 1995, and December 
    6, 1995.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Actions
    
        The proposed actions are required to approve and reflect the 
    transfer of control of the licenses discussed above. The transfer and 
    amendments reflecting the transfer of control will have minimal impact 
    on the operation of the facilities by NSP. The transfer and amendment 
    will not affect the facilities' Technical Specifications or license 
    conditions.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Actions
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed 
    transfer of control of the licenses and related license amendments and 
    concludes that there will be no changes to the Monticello, Prairie 
    Island Units 1 and 2, and Prairie Island ISFSI facilities, or to the 
    environment as a result of these actions. The transfer of control of 
    the licenses and the associated license amendments will not affect the 
    qualifications or organizational affiliation of the personnel who 
    operate the facilities, as NSP will continue to be responsible for the 
    operation of the Monticello and Prairie Island facilities.
        The Commission has evaluated the environmental impact of the 
    proposed actions and has determined that the probability or 
    consequences of accidents would not be increased by the transfer of 
    control and issuance of related amendments, and that post-accident 
    radiological releases would not be greater than previously determined. 
    Further, the Commission has determined that the transfer of control and 
    issuance of related amendments would not affect routine radiological 
    plant effluents and would not increase occupational radiological 
    exposure. Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no 
    significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the 
    proposed actions.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the transfer of 
    control and related amendments would not affect nonradiological plant 
    effluents and would have no other environmental impact. Therefore, the 
    Commission concludes that there are no significant nonradiological 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed actions.
    
    Alternative to the Proposed Actions
    
        Since the Commission has concluded that the environmental effects 
    of the proposed actions are not significant, any alternatives with 
    equal or greater environmental impact need not be evaluated. The 
    principal alternative would be to deny the requested approvals. Denial 
    of the applications would result in no change in current environmental 
    impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed actions and the 
    alternative action are identical.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        These actions do not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statements for the 
    Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant dated November 22, 1972, the 
    Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant dated May 1973, and the Prairie 
    Island ISFSI dated April 1991.
    
    Agencies and Persons Contacted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, the NRC staff consulted with 
    the Minnesota State official, Mr. Michael McCarthy of the Department of 
    Public Services, on May 6, 1996, regarding the environmental impact of 
    the proposed actions. Mr. McCarthy had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed actions will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has 
    determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed actions.
        For further details with respect to the proposed actions, see the 
    licensee's submittals dated October 20 and December 6, 1995, which are 
    available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document 
    Room, The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC, and at 
    the local public document room located at the Minneapolis Public 
    Library, Technology and Science Department, 300 Nicollet Mall, 
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Md., this 17 day of May 1996.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
    Mark Reinhart,
    Acting Director, Project Directorate III-1, Division of Reactor 
    Projects--III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 96-13098 Filed 5-23-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/24/1996
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-13098
Pages:
26225-26226 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-263, 50-282, 50-306 and 72-10
PDF File:
96-13098.pdf