[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 25, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-12682]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: May 25, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. 94-40; Notice 1]
Receipt of Petition for Determination That Nonconforming 1993
Mercedes-Benz 200E Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for determination that
nonconforming 1993 Mercedes-Benz 200E passenger cars are eligible for
importation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a determination that a
1993 Mercedes-Benz 200E that was not originally manufactured to comply
with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards is eligible
for importation into the United States because (1) it is substantially
similar to a vehicle that was originally manufactured for importation
into and sale in the United States and that was certified by its
manufacturer as complying with the safety standards, and (2) it is
capable of being readily modified to conform to the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is June 24, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice
number, and be submitted to: Docket Section, room 5109, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9:30 am to 4 pm]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ted Bayler, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5306).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under section 108(c)(3)(A)(i) of the National Traffic and Motor
Vehicle Safety Act (the Act), 15 U.S.C. 1397(c)(3)(A)(i), a motor
vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards must be refused
admission into the United States on and after January 31, 1990, unless
NHTSA has determined that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to
a motor vehicle originally manufactured for importation into and sale
in the United States, certified under section 114 of the Act, and of
the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be compared,
and is capable of being readily modified to conform to all applicable
Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
Petitions for eligibility determinations may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA determines, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this determination
in the Federal Register.
Champagne Imports, Inc. of Lansdale, Pennsylvania (Registered
Importer R-90-009) has petitioned NHTSA to determine whether 1993
Mercedes-Benz 200E (Model ID 124.019) passenger cars are eligible for
importation into the United States. The vehicle which Champagne
believes is substantially similar is the 1993 Mercedes-Benz 300E, which
was manufactured for importation into, and sale in the United States,
and certified by its manufacturer, Daimler Benz A.G., as conforming to
all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
The petitioner contends that it carefully compared the 1993 model
200E to the 1993 model 300E, and found the two vehicles to be
substantially similar with respect to compliance with most applicable
Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
Champagne submitted information with its petition intended to
demonstrate that the 1993 model 200E, as originally manufactured,
conforms to many Federal motor vehicle safety standards in the same
manner as the 1993 model 300E, or is capable of being readily modified
to conform to those standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that the 1993 model 200E is
identical to the 1993 model 300E with respect to compliance with
Standard Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence * * *, 103
Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and Washing
Systems, 105 Hydraulic Brake Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 107 Reflecting
Surfaces, 109 New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch Systems, 116 Brake
Fluid, 124 Accelerator Control Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in
Interior Impact, 202 Head Restraints, 203 Impact Protection for the
Driver from the Steering Control System, 204 Steering Control Rearward
Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials, 207 Seating Systems, 209 Seat Belt
Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 211 Wheel Nuts, Wheel
Discs and Hubcaps, 212 Windshield Retention, 216 Roof Crush Resistance,
219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, and 302 Flammability of Interior
Materials.
Additionally, the petitioner states that the 1993 model 200E
complies with the Bumper Standard found in 49 CFR Part 581.
Petitioner also contends that the 1993 model 200E is capable of
being readily modified to meet the following standards, in the manner
indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: (a) Substitution of a lens
marked ``Brake'' for a lens with an ECE symbol on the brake failure
indicator lamp; (b) installation of a seat belt warning lamp that
displays the seat belt symbol; (c) recalibration of the speedometer/
odometer from kilometers to miles per hour.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: (a) Installation of U.S.-model headlamp assemblies which
incorporate sealed beam headlamps and front sidemarkers; (b)
installation of U.S.-model taillamp assemblies which incorporate rear
sidemarkers; (c) installation of a high mounted stop lamp.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: Installation of a tire
information placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Replacement of the passenger's
outside rearview mirror, which is convex but does not bear the required
warning statement.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: Installation of a buzzer
microswitch in the steering block assembly, and a warning buzzer.
Standard No. 115 Vehicle Identification Number: Installation of a
VIN plate that can be read from outside the left windshield pillar, and
a VIN reference label on the edge of the door or latch post nearest the
driver.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated Window Systems: Rewiring of the
power window system so that the window transport is inoperative when
the ignition is switched off.
Standard No. 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components:
Replacement of the rear door locks and locking buttons with U.S.-model
components.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: (a) Installation of
either a U.S.-model seat belt in the driver's position, or a belt
webbing-actuated microswitch inside the driver's seat belt retractor;
(b) installation of an ignition switch-actuated seat belt warning lamp
and buzzer; (c) replacement of the vehicle's European driver's side air
bag with a U.S.-model air bag; (d) installation of a U.S.-model knee
bolster to augment the vehicle's passive restraint system. The
petitioner states that the remaining components of the vehicle's
passive restraint system, consisting of a converter and sensor, have
part numbers identical to those found on the U.S. certified 1993 model
300E.
Standard N. 214 Side Door Strength: Installation of reinforcing
beams.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: Installation of a rollover
valve in the fuel tank vent line between the fuel and the evaporative
emissions collection canister.
Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition
described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be
submitted to: Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, room 5109, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above address both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1397(c)(3)(A)(i)(I) and (C)(ii); 49 CFR
593.8; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: May 11, 1994.
William A. Boehly,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 94-12682 Filed 5-24-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
