94-12697. Pesticide Tolerances for Clofentezine  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 25, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-12697]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: May 25, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 9F3699, 9F3793 and 9F3799/R2057; FRL-4771-1]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
     
    
    Pesticide Tolerances for Clofentezine
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes tolerances for residues of the 
    insecticide clofentezine in or on the following raw agricultural 
    commodities: peaches, nectarines, almonds, walnuts, apricots and 
    cherries and for clofentezine and its metabolite 3-(2-cloro-4-
    hydroxphenyl)-6-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine in or on meat, fat, 
    and meat byproducts of cattle, goats, hogs, horses, and sheep and milk. 
    Nor-Am Chemical Co. requested this regulation to establish maximum 
    permissible levels for residues of the insecticide.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation became effective May 13, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
    document control number, [PP 9F3699, 9F3793, and 9F3799/R2057], may be 
    submitted to: Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Rm. 3708, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. A copy of any 
    objections and hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be 
    identified by the document control number and submitted to: Public 
    Response and Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division 
    (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
    401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring copy of 
    objections and hearing requests to Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson 
    Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202. Fees accompanying objections shall be 
    labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters 
    Accounting Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, 
    Pittsburgh, PA 15251.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Dennis H. Edwards, Jr., 
    Product Manager (PM) 19, Registration Division (7505C), Environmental 
    Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office 
    location and telephone number: Rm. 207, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis 
    Highway, Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-305-6386.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued rules, published in the Federal 
    Registers of June 28, 1990 (55 FR 26438), May 15, 1991 (56 FR 22333), 
    and June 12, 1991 (56 FR 26911), which announced that Nor-Am Chemical 
    Co. had submitted pesticide petitions (PP 9F3699, 9F3793, and 9F3799) 
    to EPA requesting that the Administrator, pursuant to section 408(d) of 
    the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), 
    establish tolerances for clofentezine in or on peaches at 1.0 part per 
    million (ppm) and nectarines at 1.0 ppm (PP 9F3699); almond hulls at 
    5.00 ppm, almond nutmeat at 0.5 ppm, walnuts at 0.02 ppm (PP 9F3793); 
    apricots at 1.0 ppm and cherries at 1.0 ppm (PP 9F3799). The Agency 
    established these tolerances with an expiration date of September 30, 
    1994, to cover residues expected to be present from use during the 
    period of conditional registration for these uses. The conditional 
    registrations were to expire September 30, 1993. The Agency recently 
    extended the conditional registration expiration date to December 31, 
    1994.
        The conditional registration required the following information to 
    be submitted. These studies were required because the chronic risk of 
    clofentezine to avian and aquatic species could not be fully evaluated.
        1. Avian reproduction studies (bobwhite quail and mallard duck) 
    were required to be repeated.
        2. Two aquatic studies, an aquatic invertebrate life-cycle study 
    and a fish life-cycle study, were required.
        Studies have been submitted and are currently in review, but a 
    final review is not expected to be completed for some time. However, 
    the Agency has conducted a preliminary review of these studies and 
    determined that they are scientifically sound. Therefore, on the basis 
    of Nor-Am's compliance with the requirements of the conditional 
    registration, the Agency is removing the expiration date for the 
    tolerances of the commodities listed above. In the interim, until the 
    Agency is able to complete its final review and risk assessment a 
    conditional registration will remain in effect for the commodities 
    listed above.
        In the Federal Register of February 9, 1994 (58 FR 42728), the 
    Agency announced receipt of a petition from Nor-Am Chemical Co. 
    requesting to make the tolerances permanent for residues on peaches, 
    nectarines, almonds, walnuts, apricots, and cherries and in or on meat, 
    fat, and meat byproducts of cattle, goats, hogs, horses, and sheep. No 
    comments were received in response to this notice of filing. As 
    described above, the Agency has decided to remove the expiration date 
    for these tolerances based on Nor-Am's submittal of the studies 
    requested in the conditional registration.
        Based on the 1-year dog-feeding study with a NOEL of 1.25 mg/kg/day 
    and using a safety factory of 100, the acceptable daily intake (ADI) 
    for humans is 0.013 mg/kg of body weight/day. The current action will 
    contribute .0000519 mg/kg/day of residue to the human diet utilizing an 
    additional 4.0 percent the ADI. This results in a total utilization of 
    4.5 percent of the ADI.
        The scientific data submitted in the petitions and other relevant 
    material have been reviewed. The toxicological data considered in 
    support of these tolerances are discussed in detail in previous final 
    rules establishing tolerances for clofentezine referenced earlier in 
    this document, i.e., the Federal Registers of June 28, 1990 (55 FR 
    26438), May 15, 1991 (56 FR 22333), and June 12, 1991 (56 FR 26911).
        The nature of residue is understood. An adequate analytical method, 
    high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), is available for 
    enforcement. There are presently no actions pending against the 
    continued registration of this chemical. This pesticide is considered 
    useful for the purposes for which the tolerances are sought. Based on 
    the information and data considered, the Agency has determined that the 
    tolerances established by amending 40 CFR part 180 will protect the 
    public health. Therefore, the tolerances are established as set forth 
    below.
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
    written objection and/or request a hearing with the Hearing Clerk, at 
    the address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy of the objections and/
    or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be submitted to 
    the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The objections submitted must 
    specify the provisions of the regulation deemed objectionable and the 
    grounds for the objections (40 CFR 178.25). Each objection must be 
    accompanied by the feed prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is 
    requested, the objections must include a statement of the factual 
    issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions 
    on such issues, and a summary of any evidence relied upon by objector 
    (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing will be granted if the 
    Administrator determines that the material submitted shows the 
    following: There is genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is 
    reasonable possibility that available evidence identified by the 
    requestor would, if established, resolve one or more of such issues in 
    favor or the requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts 
    to the contrary: and resolution of the factual issue(s) in the manner 
    sought by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action 
    requested (40 CFR 17.32).
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order (i.e., 
    Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB). Under section 3(f), the order defines ``significant'' as 
    those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an annual effect on 
    the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially 
    affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
    environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal 
    governments or communities (also known as ``economically 
    significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise 
    interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) 
    materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user 
    fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues 
    arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the 
    principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of the Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that the rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review. Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the 
    Administrator has determined that regulations establishing new 
    tolerances or raising tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from 
    tolerance requirements do not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities. A certification statement to this 
    effect was published in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 
    24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
    Dated: May 13, 1994.
    
    Douglas D. Campt,
    Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In Sec. 180.446, by revising the introductory texts of 
    paragraphs (b) and (c), to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.446   Clofentezine; tolerances for residues.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) Tolerances are established for residues of the insecticide 
    clofentezine (3,6-bis(2-chlorophenyl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine) in or on the 
    following raw agricultural commodities:
    * * * * *
        (c) Tolerances are established for the combined residues of 
    clofentezine and the 3-(2-chloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)-6-(2-chlorophenyl)-
    1,2,4,5-tetrazine metabolite in or on the following commodities:
    * * * * *
    
    [FR Doc. 94-12697 Filed 5-24-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/13/1994
Published:
05/25/1994
Department:
Housing and Urban Development Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-12697
Dates:
This regulation became effective May 13, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: May 25, 1994, PP 9F3699, 9F3793 and 9F3799/R2057, FRL-4771-1
RINs:
2070-AB78
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.446