[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 101 (Thursday, May 26, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-12897]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: May 26, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 646
[Docket No. 940246-4137; I.D. 013194B]
RIN 0648-AE51
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to implement Amendment 6 to the
Fishery Management Plan for the Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South
Atlantic (FMP). Amendment 6 establishes management measures necessary
to conserve overfished stocks of snowy grouper, golden tilefish,
speckled hind, and warsaw grouper in the South Atlantic exclusive
economic zone (EEZ). The intended effects of this rule are to rebuild
the snapper-grouper resources and to clarify the regulations
implementing the FMP.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 27, 1994, except for Sec. 646.25, which is
effective June 6, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Copies of Regulatory Impact Review, Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis and Environmental Assessment are available from the South
Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 1 Southpark Circle, suite 306,
Charleston, SC 29407-4699; FAX 803-769-4520.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter J. Eldridge, 813-893-3161.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Snapper-grouper species off the southern
Atlantic states are managed under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the
South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and is implemented
through regulations at 50 CFR part 646 under the authority of the
Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson Act).
Detailed description, background, and rationale for the management
measures in Amendment 6 and the additional measures proposed by NMFS
were included in the proposed rule (59 FR 9721, March 1, 1994) and are
not repeated here.
Comments and Responses
Eighteen comments were received during the public comment period.
Most of the comments concerned the proposed closure of the Oculina Bank
habitat area of particular concern (HAPC) to fishing for species in the
snapper-grouper management unit.
Comment: Five commercial fishermen opposed the closure of the HAPC
to fishing for snapper-grouper species. They stated that the closure
would reduce income to fishermen and reduce the supply of locally
caught fish to wholesale and retail dealers. They also stated that the
closure of the HAPC to bottom fishing could result in a shift of
fishing effort to adjacent areas and result in overfishing of species
in the open areas. They concluded that the action would result in a
negative economic impact for the Fort Pierce area, which is adjacent to
the HAPC.
Response: In general, the Council and NMFS agree that some fishing
income could be lost and a reduction may occur in the flow of locally
caught fish to commercial channels. Also, some fishing effort may shift
to open areas. A minor negative economic impact on local communities
may occur. Fishermen may target other species within the HAPC and fish
in other nearby areas; however, quantitative data do not exist to
estimate these potential impacts. The HAPC is not a major fishing area
for snapper-grouper species and commercial landings from that area have
never been sufficient to supply local demand. The closure will not
create a shortage of seafood in the Fort Pierce area. Some fishing
effort may shift to open areas; however, there are sufficient
management measures in place and under development to regulate any
additional fishing effort.
Presently, 13 species in the snapper-grouper fishery management
unit are overfished and 14 others, with similar life history
characteristics, are thought to be overfished. The Council is concerned
that traditional fishery management measures, such as minimum size
limits and quotas, may not be sufficient to protect fully the snapper-
grouper resource. The Council considered establishing marine reserves
in the EEZ off the southern Atlantic states but deferred action after
considering public opposition and lack of information on benefits
derived from marine reserves. This HAPC closure is a management
experiment to determine the consequences of establishing a marine
reserve. This measure will ``sunset'' after 10 years if not
reauthorized by the Council. NMFS is to report to the Council on the
effectiveness of the closure as soon as data are available, but no
later than the end of 2000. The HAPC area was selected because it is
relatively small compared to the total area that may be fished, will
have a relatively small impact on fishermen, is already familiar to the
industry, and is already subject to certain fishing restrictions under
regulations implementing the Fishery Management Plan for Coral and
Coral Reefs of the Gulf of Mexico and the South Atlantic and the FMP
(see 50 CFR parts 638 and 646). The Council believes, and NMFS agrees,
that the benefits derived from this management experiment will exceed
the temporary costs to some fishermen.
Comment: Five recreational fishermen and two sports fishing clubs
opposed closure of the HAPC because it may result in reduced catches.
They claimed that recreational anglers might not come to the Fort
Pierce area to fish, which would be detrimental to the local economy.
Also, they stated that fishing effort would shift to open areas and
result in overfishing.
Response: The Council and NMFS agree that some reductions in catch
may occur and some anglers may switch to other fishing grounds within
and outside of the Fort Pierce area. Resulting impacts on the local
economy are uncertain, but are not expected to be significant. Since
anglers can still target pelagic species such as mackerels, billfish,
and sharks in the HAPC and surrounding areas, the impacts on overall
catch rates should not be major. No significant net change in domestic
economic activity will result if anglers switch to other fishing
grounds located in U.S. waters. The majority of recreational anglers do
not possess vessels of sufficient size to fish the HAPC. As stated
earlier, the Council and NMFS agree that there may be some temporary,
relatively minor negative impacts. In this context, if fish become
abundant in the HAPC as expected, some will move into adjacent open
areas where they will be available to fishermen. Also, total
recruitment may be increased, which would result in higher catches in
open areas due to the increased abundance of spawners in the HAPC. The
Council believes, and NMFS agrees, that the benefits derived from this
management experiment will exceed the temporary costs to some
fishermen. If this experiment does not produce desired benefits, the
fishing restrictions will be reconsidered.
Comment: The Deputy Executive Director of the Council commented
that the proposed rule does not prohibit anchoring in the HAPC,
contrary to Amendment 6.
Response: Amendment 6 includes a prohibition on anchoring in the
HAPC as an aid to enforcement of the prohibition on fishing in the HAPC
for snapper-grouper species. Under the Magnuson Act, the scope of these
regulations may not extend to a per se anchoring prohibition in the
HAPC, or to non-fishing vessels. The Council did not intend to prohibit
fishing in the HAPC for fish other than snapper-grouper species.
Accordingly, a prohibition on the combination of fishing and anchoring
in the HAPC more effectively meets the intent of the Council. NMFS is
not aware of any fishing that would be conducted while anchored in the
HAPC other than fishing for snapper-grouper species. Accordingly, the
proposed rule and this final rule establish a rebuttable presumption
that fishing while anchored in the HAPC constitutes fishing for
snapper-grouper species, which is prohibited. Further, snapper-grouper
species taken in the HAPC may not be retained. Thus, a vessel fishing
in the HAPC, whether or not anchored, may not possess snapper-grouper
species.
NMFS believes this final rule meets the intent of the Council
regarding anchoring in the HAPC, to the extent allowable under the
Magnuson Act.
Comment: Two fishermen stated that anchoring in the HAPC should not
be prohibited because of safety reasons.
Response: NMFS agrees; this final rule merely establishes a
rebuttable presumption that a vessel fishing while at anchor in the
HAPC is fishing for snapper-grouper.
Comment: One fisherman stated that the HAPC coordinates were not
published in the public hearing draft of Amendment 6; therefore, no one
knew where the area was proposed to be situated. He concluded that this
resulted in reduced public comment during public hearings.
Response: The coordinates of the HAPC were published on page 25 of
the public hearing draft under Action 9. Figure 3 of the same document
showed the location of the HAPC, including major cities in the
immediate area. Each participant at the public hearings received a copy
of Figure 3. Final Amendment 6 and the proposed rule provide similar
information. Moreover, the coordinates of the HAPC have been
established in Federal regulations since July 23, 1984 (50 CFR
638.22(c)). Appendix E (Summary of Public Comments) in Amendment 6
shows that five comments favored closing the HAPC to fishing, while
seven comments opposed it. The above information indicates that the
public had adequate notice concerning the location of the HAPC during
the public hearing and proposed rule stages.
Comment: One fisherman stated that a plan for scientific study of
fish stocks in the HAPC was lacking and this was a violation of the
Magnuson Act.
Response: Basic research needs are listed and updated periodically
for each fishery management plan in the southeastern United States. In
addition, NMFS and Council staff prepare annual research plans for each
fishery management plan. Research pertaining to the HAPC will be
addressed by the NMFS Science and Research Director and incorporated
into the annual research plans. NMFS must present the results of the
research to the Council no later than the end of the year 2000.
Finally, sections III. B. and III. C. of FMP Amendment 4 also
specifically provide for fishery data collection and periodic
scientific assessment of the condition of managed snapper and grouper
stocks; these particular FMP provisions fulfill sections 303(a) (3) and
(5) of the Magnuson Act requiring the evaluation of the condition of
fish stocks. In summary, the Council and NMFS are meeting research
needs indicated in this instance and are in compliance with the
Magnuson Act.
Comment: Two commercial fishermen opposed the quotas for snowy
grouper and golden tilefish because they believed that the quotas would
discriminate against fishermen with smaller vessels, especially those
that fished in the Florida Keys. A representative of a commercial
fishing organization opposed the quotas because he felt they were not
needed.
Response: Both snowy grouper and golden tilefish are overfished.
Therefore, regulatory guidelines require stock rebuilding programs. The
Council and NMFS believe that fishing pressure must be reduced to
rebuild these species. The use of commercial quotas is an acceptable
and traditional method to reduce fishing pressure. The Council has
chosen to implement quota reductions over a 3-year period to minimize
the economic impact upon commercial fishermen. Also, the Council
recognizes that some snowy grouper and golden tilefish would likely be
taken as bycatch by fishermen targeting other species. Consequently,
the Council is reserving a portion of the annual snowy grouper and
golden tilefish quotas as a bycatch allowance. Fishermen will be
allowed a trip limit (allowance) of 300 pounds (lb) (136 kilograms
(kg)) after initial quotas are reached. Since fishermen in the Florida
Keys with smaller vessels rarely catch 300 lb (136 kg) of either
species in a trip, their catches should not be affected by either
quota.
Comment: Two fishermen in the Florida Keys, who represented
fishermen with smaller vessels, supported trip limits for snowy grouper
and golden tilefish. A representative of a commercial fishing
organization located in the Florida Keys did not think trip limits
would adversely affect the members of that organization.
Response: NMFS agrees that the commercial trip limits for snowy
grouper and golden tilefish, together with the bycatch allowance (300
lb (136 kg)) that applies after the fishing year quotas are filled,
should not adversely affect fishermen with smaller vessels.
Comment: Three commercial fishermen and a representative of a
commercial fishing organization were opposed to the prohibition on sale
of warsaw grouper and speckled hind. They stated that harvest of warsaw
grouper and speckled hind is rare, and these species would not survive
release because of the depth of capture. One of the fishermen stated
that it would not be practical to donate these fish to a charitable
organization. The representative of the commercial fishing organization
stated that the prohibition on sale would create confusion in the
market and result in law enforcement difficulties.
Response: Warsaw grouper and speckled hind are rare and overfished.
The Council recognizes that most harvest of warsaw and speckled hind is
bycatch and that survival of released individuals is low. However, the
Council is following stock rebuilding guidelines with regard to these
species. The Council received public testimony that some fishermen may
target these species at certain times during the year. The Council
proposed the prohibition on sale to reduce directed fishing mortality,
but allowed retention of one warsaw and one speckled hind per vessel
per trip to minimize waste. Fishermen are encouraged to donate these
fish to ``good causes,'' such as charitable organizations. Many marine
species in the United States are subject to restrictions on sale,
either seasonally or geographically. Both the market and law
enforcement agencies have adjusted accounting procedures and other
practices to implement such restrictions.
Partial Disapproval of Amendment 6
On May 5, 1994, the Regional Director, Southeast Region, NMFS
(Regional Director), partially disapproved Amendment 6. Specifically,
the Regional Director disapproved Action 12 of the amendment, which
would have required all permitted vessels to maintain and submit vessel
logbooks. The Regional Director believes that the methods of obtaining
necessary management data and the appropriate sampling system for such
data are determinations properly made by NMFS.
The regulations at 50 CFR 646.5(a) require vessel logbooks to be
maintained and submitted by all vessels fishing for wreckfish and for
other permitted vessels selected by the Science and Research Director,
Southeast Fisheries Science Center, NMFS. Currently all permitted
vessels are selected to maintain and submit logbooks.
Vessel logbooks provide catch and effort data, which the Council
believes are needed for quota monitoring, stock assessments, catch
histories, and indications of shifts in fishing effort. NMFS agrees
that catch and effort data via logbooks are needed for all of these
purposes except for quota monitoring. In the snapper-grouper fishery,
NMFS has chosen to use dealer reports for quota monitoring rather than
vessel logbooks. These collections of information have been approved
previously under Office of Management and Budget control numbers 0648-
0016 (logbooks) and 0648-0013 (dealer reports). NMFS agrees with the
Council that good and sufficient reasons continue to exist for the
current requirement that all permitted vessels maintain and submit
vessel logbooks. Accordingly, NMFS intends to continue to select all
permitted vessels to maintain and submit logbooks. When NMFS believes
that the 100-percent level of submission is no longer required, it will
reduce the percentage of vessels required to maintain and submit
logbooks, without the necessity of amending the FMP.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
As a consequence of the partial disapproval of Amendment 6,
discussed above, the proposed change to Sec. 646.5(a)(1) is not
included in this final rule and the proposed change to Sec. 646.5(d)
introductory text is modified.
Classification
The Regional Director determined that Amendment 6 is necessary for
the conservation and management of the snapper-grouper fishery and that
it is consistent with the national standards, other provisions of the
Magnuson Act, and other applicable law, with the exception of the
measure that would have required all permitted vessels to maintain and
submit vessel logbooks.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of E.O. 12866.
The Council prepared an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(initial RFA) for this action. The initial RFA has been adopted as
final without change. The final RFA concludes that this final rule may
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, as summarized in the proposed rule.
The commercial vessel trip limits established in Sec. 646.25 of
this final rule are intended to prolong the commercial seasons for
snowy grouper and golden tilefish under the newly established
commercial quotas. Prolonging the seasons will have considerable
economic benefits for the fisheries. Delay in implementing these trip
limits will reduce significantly the potential benefits. However,
immediate implementation might adversely affect commercial fishermen
when this final rule is published because they may be at sea.
Accordingly, to maximize the potential economic benefits of the trip
limits without undue adverse effect on fishermen now on fishing trips,
the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, finds for good cause
under section 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act that the
effective date of Sec. 646.25 should not be delayed beyond 10 days from
the date of publication of this final rule.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 646
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 20, 1994.
Charles Karnella,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 646 is amended
as follows:
PART 646--SNAPPER-GROUPER FISHERY OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 646 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 646.1, paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 646.1 Purpose and scope.
* * * * *
(b) This part governs conservation and management of fish in the
snapper-grouper fishery in or from the South Atlantic EEZ, except that
Secs. 646.5 and 646.24 also apply to such fish in or from adjoining
state waters.
Sec. 646.2 [Amended]
3. In Sec. 646.2, in the definition for ``Fish in the snapper-
grouper fishery'', under the family designation ``Tilefishes--
Malacanthidae'', the listing for ``Tilefish (Golden)'' is revised to
read ``Golden tilefish''; and the family designation ``Triggerfishes--
Balistidae'' is revised to read ``Leatherjackets--Balistidae''; and in
the definition for ``Sea bass pot'', in paragraph (3) introductory
text, the parenthetical phrase ``(see Figure 3)'' is revised to read
``(see Figure 2)''.
Sec. 646.4 [Amended]
4. In Sec. 646.4, in paragraph (b)(2)(vi)(A), the word ``and'' is
added after the concluding semi-colon; in paragraph (b)(2)(vi)(B), the
concluding word ``and'' is removed; and paragraph (b)(2)(vi)(C) is
removed.
5. In Sec. 646.5, paragraphs (d) introductory text and (d)(4) are
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 646.5 Recordkeeping and reporting.
* * * * *
(d) Commercial vessel, charter vessel and headboat inventory. A
person described under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section who is not
selected to report must provide the following information when
interviewed by the Science and Research Director:
* * * * *
(4) Fishing areas;
* * * * *
6. In Sec. 646.7, paragraph (kk) is revised; paragraph (mm) is
redesignated as paragraph (ss); and new paragraphs (mm) through (rr)
are added to read as follows:
Sec. 646.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(kk) Transfer at sea--
(1) Warsaw grouper or speckled hind, as specified in
Sec. 646.21(j)(6);
(2) Fish in the snapper-grouper fishery subject to a bag limit, as
specified in Sec. 646.23(f); or
(3) Snowy grouper or golden tilefish, as specified in
Sec. 646.25(e).
* * * * *
(mm) Fish for fish in the snapper-grouper fishery in the Oculina
Bank habitat area of particular concern (HAPC), retain such fish in or
from the Oculina Bank HAPC, or fail to release immediately such fish
taken in the Oculina Bank HAPC by hook-and-line gear, as specified in
Sec. 646.26(d)(2).
(nn) Possess a warsaw grouper or speckled hind in excess of the
vessel trip limit, as specified in Sec. 646.21 (j)(1) or (j)(2).
(oo) Sell, purchase, trade, or barter, or attempt to sell,
purchase, trade, or barter, a warsaw grouper or speckled hind, as
specified in Sec. 646.21(j)(3).
(pp) Exceed a commercial trip limit for snowy grouper or golden
tilefish, as specified in Sec. 646.25 (a) or (b).
(qq) Sell, purchase, trade, or barter, or attempt to sell,
purchase, trade, or barter, snowy grouper or golden tilefish in excess
of an applicable trip limit, as specified in Sec. 646.25(f).
(rr) Make any false statement, oral or written, to an authorized
officer concerning the taking, catching, harvesting, landing, purchase,
sale, possession, or transfer of a fish in the snapper-grouper fishery.
* * * * *
7. Section 646.20 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 646.20 Fishing years.
(a) The fishing year for wreckfish begins on April 16 and ends on
April 15.
(b) The fishing year for fish in the snapper-grouper fishery other
than wreckfish begins on January 1 and ends on December 31.
8. In Sec. 646.21, a new paragraph (j) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 646.21 Harvest limitations.
* * * * *
(j) Warsaw grouper and speckled hind. (1) The possession of warsaw
grouper in or from the EEZ is limited to one per vessel per trip.
(2) The possession of speckled hind in or from the EEZ is limited
to one per vessel per trip.
(3) A warsaw grouper or a speckled hind in or from the EEZ may not
be sold, purchased, traded, or bartered, or attempted to be sold,
purchased, traded, or bartered.
(4) A person who fishes in the EEZ may not combine a possession
limit specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this section with a
bag or possession limit applicable to state waters.
(5) The operator of a vessel that fishes in the EEZ is responsible
for the possession limit applicable to that vessel.
(6) A warsaw grouper or speckled hind taken in the EEZ may not be
transferred at sea, regardless of where such transfer takes place; a
warsaw grouper or speckled hind may not be transferred at sea in the
EEZ, regardless of where such warsaw grouper or speckled hind was
taken.
9. In Sec. 646.23, a new paragraph (a)(4) is added and paragraph
(b)(3) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 646.23 Bag and possession limits.
(a) * * *
(4) Special limitations on possession of warsaw grouper and
speckled hind apply. (See Sec. 646.21(j).)
(b) * * *
(3) Groupers, excluding jewfish and Nassau grouper, and tilefishes,
combined--5.
* * * * *
10. Section 646.24 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 646.24 Commercial quotas.
Persons who are not subject to the bag limits are subject to the
following quotas. (See Sec. 646.23(a)(1) for applicability of the bag
limits.)
(a) Wreckfish (whole weight)--2 million pounds (907,185 kg) each
fishing year.
(b) Snowy grouper (gutted weight, that is, eviscerated but
otherwise whole)--
(1) 540,314 pounds (245,082 kg) in the fishing year that commences
January 1, 1994.
(2) 442,448 pounds (200,691 kg) in the fishing year that commences
January 1, 1995.
(3) 344,508 pounds (156,266 kg) in the fishing year that commences
January 1, 1996.
(c) Golden tilefish (gutted weight, that is, eviscerated but
otherwise whole)--
(1) 1,475,795 pounds (669,409 kg) in the fishing year that
commences January 1, 1994.
(2) 1,238,818 pounds (561,918 kg) in the fishing year that
commences January 1, 1995.
(3) 1,001,663 pounds (454,347 kg) in the fishing year that
commences January 1, 1996.
Secs. 646.27 and 646.25 [Redesignated as Secs. 646.28 and 646.27]
11. Section 646.27 is redesignated as Sec. 646.28; Sec. 646.25 is
redesignated as Sec. 646.27; and a new Sec. 646.25 is added to read as
follows:
Sec. 646.25 Commercial trip limits.
Persons who are not subject to the bag limits and who fish in the
EEZ on a trip are subject to the following vessel trip limits. (See
Sec. 646.23(a)(1) for applicability of the bag limits.)
(a) Snowy grouper (whole weight or gutted weight, that is,
eviscerated but otherwise whole).
(1) Until the fishing year quota specified in Sec. 646.24(b) is
reached, 2,500 pounds (1,134 kg).
(2) After the fishing year quota specified in Sec. 646.24(b) is
reached, 300 pounds (136 kg).
(b) Golden tilefish (whole weight or gutted weight, that is,
eviscerated but otherwise whole).
(1) Until the fishing year quota specified in Sec. 646.24(c) is
reached, 5,000 pounds (2,268 kg).
(2) After the fishing year quota specified in Sec. 646.24(c) is
reached, 300 pounds (136 kg).
(c) Reduction of trip limits. When a commercial quota specified in
Sec. 646.24(b) or (c) is reached, or is projected to be reached, the
Assistant Administrator will file a notice to that effect with the
Office of the Federal Register. On and after the effective date of such
notice, for the remainder of the fishing year, the appropriate trip
limit applies.
(d) A person who fishes in the EEZ may not combine a trip limit
under this section with any trip or possession limit applicable to
state waters.
(e) A snowy grouper or golden tilefish taken in the EEZ may not be
transferred at sea, regardless of where such transfer takes place; a
snowy grouper or golden tilefish may not be transferred at sea in the
EEZ, regardless of where such snowy grouper or golden tilefish was
taken.
(f) Snowy grouper or golden tilefish in excess of an applicable
trip limit specified in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may not be
sold, purchased, traded, or bartered, or attempted to be sold,
purchased, traded, or bartered.
12. In Sec. 646.26, a new paragraph (d) is added to read as
follows:
Sec. 646.26 Area limitations.
* * * * *
(d) Habitat area of particular concern (HAPC). (1) The Oculina
Bank, which is a coral HAPC under Sec. 638.23(c) of this chapter, is
bounded on the north by 27 deg.53'N. latitude, on the south by
27 deg.30'N. latitude, on the east by 79 deg.56'W. longitude, and on
the west by 80 deg.00'W. longitude.
(2) No fishing for fish in the snapper-grouper fishery may be
conducted in the Oculina Bank HAPC; such fish may not be retained in or
from the Oculina Bank HAPC. Fish in the snapper-grouper fishery taken
incidentally in the Oculina Bank HAPC by hook-and-line gear must be
released immediately by cutting the line without removing the fish from
the water. It is a rebuttable presumption that fishing aboard a vessel
that is anchored in the HAPC constitutes fishing for fish in the
snapper-grouper fishery.
(3) See Sec. 638.23(c) of this chapter for prohibitions on fishing
with bottom longlines, traps, pots, dredges, and bottom trawls in the
Oculina Bank HAPC.
Figure 3 to Part 646 [Redesignated as Figure 2 to Part 646]
13. Figure 2 to part 646 is removed and Figure 3 to part 646 is
redesignated as Figure 2 to part 646.
[FR Doc. 94-12897 Filed 5-25-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
