95-13033. Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; NeuroliteRegister  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 27982]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-13033]
    
    
    
    [[Page 27982]]
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    [Docket No. 95E-0046]
    
    
    Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
    Extension; Neurolite
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
    regulatory review period for Neurolite and is publishing this 
    notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the 
    determination because of the submission of an application to the 
    Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the 
    extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the 
    Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm. 
    1-23, 12420 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health 
    Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
    Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1382.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
    Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
    and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide 
    that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
    the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
    device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
    review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
    product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
    amount of extension an applicant may receive.
        A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
    testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the 
    testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical 
    investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the 
    approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial 
    submission of an application to market the human drug product and 
    continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. 
    Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward 
    the actual amount of extension that the Commissioner of Patents and 
    Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be 
    subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent 
    was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review 
    period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase 
    and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
        FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product 
    Neurolite. Neurolite (Technetium TC-99M Bicisate) 
    single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) is indicated as 
    an adjunct to conventional computed tomography (CT) or magnetic 
    resonance imaging (MRI) in the localization of stroke in patients in 
    whom stroke has already been diagnosed. Subsequent to this approval, 
    the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration 
    application for Neurolite (U.S. Patent No. 5,279,811) from 
    Dupont Merck Pharmaceutical Co., and the Patent and Trademark Office 
    requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for 
    patent term restoration. In a letter dated march 28, 1995, FDA advised 
    the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product had 
    undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of 
    Neurolite represented the first permitted commercial 
    marketing or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and 
    Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory 
    review period.
        FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
    Neurolite is 2,595 days. Of this time, 1,602 days occurred 
    during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 993 
    days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were 
    derived from the following dates:
        1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, 
    Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: October 18, 
    1987. The applicant claims September 18, 1987, as the date the 
    investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However, 
    FDA records indicate that the IND effective date was October 18, 1987, 
    which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
        2. The date the human drug was initially submitted with respect to 
    the human drug product under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act: March 6, 1992. The applicant claims March 5, 1992, as 
    the date the new drug application (NDA) for Neurolite (NDA 
    20-256) was initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate that NDA 
    20-256 was submitted on March 6, 1992.
        3. The date the application was approved: November 23, 1994. FDA 
    has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 20-256 was approved on 
    November 23, 1994.
        This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
    maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. 
    Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in 
    its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
    application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 156 days of 
    patent term extension.
        Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is 
    incorrect may, on or before July 25, 1995, submit to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a 
    redetermination. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA, 
    on or before November 22, 1995, for a determination regarding whether 
    the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the 
    regulatory review period. To meet its burden, the petition must contain 
    sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 
    1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the 
    format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
        Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) in three copies (except that 
    individuals may submit single copies) and identified with the docket 
    number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and 
    petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m. 
    and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
        Dated: May 15, 1995.
    Stuart L. Nightingale,
    Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 95-13033 Filed 5-25-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/26/1995
Department:
Health and Human Services Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
95-13033
Pages:
27982-27982 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95E-0046
PDF File:
95-13033.pdf