96-13384. Reasserting NRC's Authority for Approving Onsite Low-Level Waste Disposal in Agreement States; Withdrawal  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 26852-26853]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-13384]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    10 CFR Part 150
    
    RIN 3150-AC57
    
    
    Reasserting NRC's Authority for Approving Onsite Low-Level Waste 
    Disposal in Agreement States; Withdrawal
    
    AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule: Withdrawal.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is withdrawing a 
    notice of proposed rulemaking that would have reasserted the NRC's 
    jurisdiction in Agreement States over the disposal of licensed material 
    generated and disposed of at nuclear reactor sites. The proposed rule 
    would also have clarified the jurisdiction over disposal of noncritical 
    waste quantities of special nuclear material at reactors and fuel cycle 
    facilities.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph J. Mate, Office of Nuclear 
    Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
    20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-6202.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On August 22, 1988 (53 FR 31880), the Commission published a notice 
    of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register entitled ``Reasserting 
    NRC's Authority for Approving Onsite Low-Level Waste Disposal in 
    Agreement States.'' This rule would have reasserted the NRC's 
    jurisdiction in the Agreement States over the disposal of low-level 
    radioactive waste generated and disposed of at reactor sites. The 
    proposed rule would also have clarified the jurisdiction over the 
    disposal of noncritical waste quantities of special nuclear material at 
    fuel cycle facilities. The NRC would have authorized this disposal 
    under 10 CFR 20.302, but 10 CFR part 20, ``Standards for Protection 
    Against Radiation,'' was revised in May 1991 (56 FR 23360). The 
    applicable regulation is now 10 CFR 20.2002.
        The purpose of the proposed rule was to provide for a more 
    centralized and consistent regulatory review of all onsite waste 
    management activities and to avoid duplication of regulatory effort by 
    the NRC and the Agreement States. The uniform review process that would 
    result from the proposed rule was intended to provide greater assurance 
    that onsite disposal of radioactive material will not present a health 
    hazard and that the disposal of this waste in this manner will not 
    unnecessarily complicate or delay decommissioning.
        As a result of publishing the proposed rule in the Federal 
    Register, the NRC received 49 comment letters. Twelve commenters (24 
    percent) favored the proposal, 37 commenters (76 percent) opposed the 
    proposal. Comments were submitted by private citizens, Agreement and 
    Non-Agreement States, nuclear utilities, nuclear utilities' 
    representatives, and various conservation and public interest groups. 
    The vast majority of the comments favoring the proposal were from 
    nuclear utilities and their representatives. Comments opposed to the 
    proposal came from private citizens, Agreement and Non-Agreement 
    States, and conservation and public interest groups. Nineteen of the 
    commenters questioned the need for the proposed rule, six commenters 
    wanted the States' participation in the approval process to be 
    specified, and a few States questioned the NRC's authority to 
    promulgate the rule. The remaining commenters were concerned with 
    better definitions of the protected and exclusion areas, the type of 
    waste to be covered by the rule, existing onsite disposal, and the 
    impact on regional low-level waste disposal facilities. Some States 
    commented that the Agreement States were more familiar with local 
    conditions and that their requirements were more strict than the NRC's. 
    Of the 10 Agreement States that commented, 9 States were opposed to the 
    amendments. The remaining Agreement State that commented supported the 
    rule but reserved the right to participate in the approval process with 
    full review privileges and expected their concerns to be addressed.
        As a result of the public comments received and the relatively low 
    hazards
    
    [[Page 26853]]
    
    associated with onsite disposal of low-level waste radioactive 
    material, the NRC reevaluated the merits of the proposed rule. In the 7 
    years since this rulemaking was originally proposed, there have been a 
    number of approvals granted by Agreement States for onsite disposal of 
    low-level waste material under the equivalent of 10 CFR 20.2002 
    (successor to 20.302). The NRC staff is not aware of any problems with 
    the Agreement States' approvals of any onsite burials of low-level 
    waste material.
        Based on the comments received, the relatively low hazards 
    associated with onsite disposal of this type of radioactive material, 
    and current experience with disposals, the NRC has reevaluated the 
    issues and concluded that it is not necessary to reassert its 
    regulatory jurisdiction over onsite disposal at reactor sites in the 
    Agreement States.
        Therefore, the proposed rule is not required and is being 
    withdrawn. Withdrawal of the proposed rule does not affect the current 
    NRC jurisdiction over disposal of special nuclear material by reactor 
    or fuel cycle licensees. With the withdrawal of the proposed rule, the 
    Agreement States will maintain jurisdiction over the disposal of low-
    level radioactive waste on nuclear reactor sites.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Md, this 22nd day of May, 1996.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    John C. Hoyle,
    Secretary of the Commission.
    [FR Doc. 96-13384 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/29/1996
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule: Withdrawal.
Document Number:
96-13384
Pages:
26852-26853 (2 pages)
RINs:
3150-AC57
PDF File:
96-13384.pdf
CFR: (1)
10 CFR 150