97-14010. Availability of Draft Branch Technical Position on a Performance Assessment Methodology for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 103 (Thursday, May 29, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 29164-29165]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-14010]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    
    Availability of Draft Branch Technical Position on a Performance 
    Assessment Methodology for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal 
    Facilities
    
    AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    
    ACTION: Availability of Draft Branch Technical Position.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is announcing the 
    availability of the ``Draft Branch Technical Position on a Performance 
    Assessment Methodology for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal 
    Facilities.''
    
    DATES: The comment period expires August 27, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send comments to Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch, 
    Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services, U.S. 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11545 Rockville Pike, Mail Stop T-6-D59, 
    Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738. Comments may be delivered to the same 
    address between 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., on Federal workdays.
        A copy of the draft Branch Technical Position (BTP) is available 
    for public inspection and/or copying at the NRC Public Document Room, 
    2120 L Street (Lower Level), NW, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Copies of 
    the draft BTP may also be obtained by contacting Karen S. Vandervort, 
    Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and 
    Safeguards. Telephone: (301) 415-7252.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne E. Garcia, Division of Waste 
    Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. 
    Telephone: (301) 415-6631.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's 
    (NRC's) regulation regarding the licensing requirements for the land 
    disposal of low-level radioactive waste (LLW) can be found at 10 CFR 
    part 61. Part 61 requires that technical analyses be performed to 
    demonstrate protection of the general population from releases of 
    radioactivity to the general environment in certain environmental 
    pathways such as ground water, surface water, air, soil, and biota 
    (plants). A LLW performance assessment is a technical analysis that can 
    be used to demonstrate compliance with NRC's performance objective for 
    radiological protection of the general public--10 CFR 61.41. NRC's 
    Performance Assessment Working Group has prepared a draft BTP, 
    designated NUREG-1573, as a step toward providing detailed LLW 
    performance assessment guidance to potential applicants for a NRC 
    license. When finalized, the BTP may contain information that may be 
    useful to Agreement States and disposal site developers on LLW 
    performance assessment. In this regard, the draft BTP includes the 
    staff's technical positions on: (a) An acceptable approach for 
    systematically integrating site characterization, facility design, and 
    performance modeling into a single performance assessment process; (b) 
    five principal regulatory issues regarding interpreting and 
    implementing Part 61 performance objectives and technical requirements 
    governing LLW site post-closure performance; and (c) implementation of 
    NRC's LLW performance assessment methodology. In arriving at the 
    proposed positions taken on these issues in the draft BTP, the staff 
    has considered a number of alternatives. Nevertheless, the staff is 
    interested in the public's views on both the suitability of approaches 
    presented in the draft BTP for measuring the performance of LLW 
    disposal facilities, as well as the staff's proposed positions on 
    certain LLW regulatory issues: (a) Consideration of future site 
    conditions, processes, and events; (b) performance of engineered 
    barriers; (c) timeframe for an LLW performance assessment; (d) 
    treatment of sensitivity and uncertainty; and (e) the role of 
    performance assessment during the operational and closure periods.
        To obtain early feedback on the guidance for LLW performance 
    assessment under development by the staff, a preliminary draft of the 
    BTP was distributed for comment to LLW-sited and host Agreement State 
    regulatory entities; the Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW); 
    the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE); the U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency; and the U.S. Geological Survey in January 1994. The staff 
    briefed the ACNW and the Commission on the scope and content of the BTP 
    in March and April 1994, respectively. The staff subsequently held two 
    workshops on the BTP and LLW performance assessment. The first was a 2-
    day workshop held at NRC Headquarters on November 16-17, 1994. The 
    second was a half-day workshop, limited to certain technical issues in 
    LLW performance assessment, held at the 16th Annual DOE/LLW Management 
    Conference on December 13-15, 1994. Finally, the staff briefed the ACNW 
    on key regulatory issues and its evaluation of the workshop comments on 
    March 16, 1995. This draft BTP reflects the staff's consideration of 
    feedback received during those interactions. However, the staff did not 
    formally respond to these comments in preparing this version.
        In a related matter, the staff would be interested in the views of 
    the public concerning whether it would be appropriate to discount 
    potential doses, from a hypothetical LLW disposal site, to future 
    generations. In the context of LLW disposal, it does not appear that 
    the use of the ``time-value of money'' approach to discounting is 
    implementable considering the long time frames of performance 
    considered. In the context of LLW disposal, application of discounting, 
    either qualitative or quantitative, might more appropriately weigh 
    present-day economic cost of design and performance features associated 
    with LLW disposal against expectations about future health risks. This 
    approach would not allow the standard to be exceeded, but would address 
    the level of assurance necessary to demonstrate that the LLW 
    performance objectives will be met. Although the draft BTP does not 
    address this issue, the staff has been asked by the Commission to 
    request comment on this concept as part of the public comment process.
        Finally, the staff is aware that several entities have commented on 
    aspects of the BTP, as presented in the January 1994, preliminary 
    draft, through the Commission's November 1995 Strategic Assessment and 
    Rebaselining Initiative. The staff was directed by the Commission to 
    inform it on how it plans to resolve those comments prior to a decision 
    to finalize the BTP. As part of the public comment process, the staff 
    will provide the Commission with a summary of all public comments, 
    including those made during the Strategic Assessment and Rebaselining 
    Initiative, and proposed resolutions to those comments prior to 
    finalizing the BTP.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd day of May 1997.
    
    
    [[Page 29165]]
    
    
        For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Michael J. Bell,
    Acting Chief, Performance Assessment and High-Level Waste Integration 
    Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety 
    and Safeguards.
    [FR Doc. 97-14010 Filed 5-28-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/29/1997
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Availability of Draft Branch Technical Position.
Document Number:
97-14010
Dates:
The comment period expires August 27, 1997.
Pages:
29164-29165 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-14010.pdf