97-14108. Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; PATANOLSUPTM/SUP  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 103 (Thursday, May 29, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 29143-29144]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-14108]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    [Docket No. 97E-0108]
    
    
    Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
    Extension; PATANOLTM
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
    regulatory review period for PATANOLTM and is publishing 
    this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the 
    determination because of the submission of an application to the 
    Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the 
    extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the 
    Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 
    12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health 
    Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
    Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1382.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
    Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
    and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide 
    that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
    the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
    device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
    review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
    product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
    amount of extension an applicant may receive.
        A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
    testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the 
    testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical 
    investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the 
    approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial 
    submission of an application to market the human drug product and 
    continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. 
    Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward 
    the actual amount of extension that the Commissioner of Patents and 
    Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be 
    subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent 
    was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review 
    period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase 
    and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
        FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product 
    PATANOLTM (olopatadine hydrochloride). PATANOLTM 
    is indicated for the temporary prevention of itching of the eye due to 
    allergic conjunctivitis. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and 
    Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for 
    PATANOLTM (U.S. Patent No. 5,116,863) from Alcon 
    Laboratories, Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's 
    assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for patent term 
    restoration. In a letter dated April 1, 1997, FDA advised the Patent 
    and Trademark Office that this human drug product had undergone a 
    regulatory review period and that the approval of PATANOLTM 
    represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the 
    product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested 
    that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
        FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
    PATANOLTM is 1,064 days. Of this time, 739 days occurred 
    during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 325 
    days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were 
    derived from the following dates:
        1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, 
    Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: January 21, 
    1994. The applicant claims January 20, 1994, as the date the 
    investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However, 
    FDA records indicate that the IND effective date was January 21, 1994, 
    which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
        2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to 
    the human drug product under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act: January 29, 1996. FDA has verified the applicant's 
    claim that the new drug application (NDA) for PATANOLTM (NDA 
    20-688) was initially submitted on January 29, 1996.
        3. The date the application was approved: December 18, 1996. FDA 
    has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 20-688 was approved on 
    December 18, 1996.
        This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
    maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. 
    Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in 
    its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
    application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 571 days of 
    patent term extension.
        Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is 
    incorrect may, on or before July 28, 1997, submit to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a 
    redetermination. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA, 
    on or before November 25, 1997, for a determination regarding whether 
    the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the 
    regulatory review period. To meet its burden, the petition must contain 
    sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 
    1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the 
    format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
        Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets 
    Management
    
    [[Page 29144]]
    
    Branch (address above) in three copies (except that individuals may 
    submit single copies) and identified with the docket number found in 
    brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and petitions may be 
    seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday.
    
        Dated: May 20, 1997.
    Stuart L. Nightingale,
    Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 97-14108 Filed 5-28-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/29/1997
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
97-14108
Pages:
29143-29144 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97E-0108
PDF File:
97-14108.pdf