95-10750. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 21786-21789]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-10750]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 300
    
    [FRL-5197-1]
    
    
    National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; 
    National Priorities List
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to delete Alpha Chemical Corporation Site from 
    the National Priorities List: request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV announces 
    its intent to delete the Alpha Chemical Corporation Site from the 
    National Priorities List (NPL) and requests public comment on this 
    proposed action. The NPL is codified as Appendix B of the National Oil 
    and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR part 
    300, which EPA promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive 
    Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 
    1980, as amended. EPA and the State of Florida Department of 
    Environmental Protection (FDEP) have determined that the Site poses no 
    significant threat to public health or the environment and therefore, 
    no further response pursuant to CERCLA is appropriate.
    
    DATES: Comments concerning this Site may be submitted on or before: 
    June 2, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Joe Franzmathes, Director, Waste 
    Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 345 
    Courtland Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30365.
        Comprehensive information on this Site is available through the 
    Region IV [[Page 21787]] public docket, which is available for viewing 
    at the Alpha Chemical Corporation information repositories at two 
    locations. Locations, contacts, phone numbers and viewing hours are:
    
    U.S. EPA Record Center, attn: Shannon Neal, 345 Courtland Street, N.E., 
    Atlanta, Georgia 30365, Phone: (404) 347-0506. Hours: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 
    p.m., Monday through Friday, by appointment only;
    Lakeland Public Library, 100 Lake Morton Drive, Lakeland, Florida 
    33801, Phone: (813) 499-8242, Hours: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday 
    through Thursday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Friday and Saturday, 1:30 
    p.m. to 5:00 p.m., Sunday.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Dick, U.S. EPA Region IV, Mail 
    Code: WD-SSRB, 345 Courtland Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30365, 
    (404) 347-2643 x6273.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Table of Contents
    
    I. Introduction
    II. NPL Deletion Criteria
    III. Deletion Procedures
    IV. Basis for Intended Site Deletion
    
    I. Introduction
    
        The EPA Region IV announces its intent to delete the Alpha Chemical 
    Corporation Site, Lakeland, Florida, from the NPL, which constitutes 
    Appendix B of the NCP, 40 CFR Part 300, and requests comments on this 
    deletion. EPA identifies sites on the NPL that appear to present a 
    significant risk to public health, welfare, or the environment. 
    Pursuant to Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, any site deleted from the 
    NPL remains eligible for Fund-financed remedial actions if conditions 
    at the site warrant such action.
        EPA proposes to delete the Alpha Chemical Corporation Site at 4620 
    N. Galloway Road, Lakeland, Florida 33809 from the NPL.
        EPA will accept comments concerning this Site for thirty days after 
    publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
        Section II of this notice explains the criteria for deleting sites 
    from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using for 
    this action. Section IV discusses how this Site meets the deletion 
    criteria.
    
    II. NPL Deletion Criteria
    
        The NCP establishes the criteria that the Agency uses to delete 
    sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR Section 300.425(e), sites 
    may be deleted from or recategorized on the NPL where no further 
    response is appropriate. In making this determination, EPA shall 
    consider, in consultation with the State, whether any of the following 
    criteria have been met:
        (i) Responsible or other parties have implemented all appropriate 
    response actions required;
        (ii) All appropriate Fund-financed responses under CERCLA have been 
    implemented and no further action by responsible parties is 
    appropriate; or
        (iii) The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses 
    no significant threat to public health or the environment and, 
    therefore, taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
        Whenever there is a significant release from a site deleted from 
    the NPL, the site may be restored to the NPL without the application of 
    the Hazardous Ranking System.
    
    III. Deletion Procedures
    
        The following procedures were used for the intended deletion of the 
    Site:
        1. FDEP has concurred with the deletion decision;
        2. A notice has been published in local newspapers and has been 
    distributed to appropriate Federal, State and local officials, and 
    other interested parties announcing a 30-day public comment period on 
    the proposed deletion from the NPL; and
        3. The Region has made all relevant documents available at the 
    information repositories.
        The Region will respond to significant comments, if any, submitted 
    during the comment period.
        Deletion of the Site from the NPL does not itself create, alter, or 
    revoke any individual rights or obligations. The NPL is designed 
    primarily for informational purposes to assist Agency management.
        A deletion occurs when the Regional Administrator places a final 
    notice in the Federal Register. Generally, the NPL will reflect any 
    deletions in the final update following the Notice. Public notices and 
    copies of the Responsiveness Summary, if any, will be made available to 
    local residents by the Regional office.
    
    IV. Basis for Intended Site Deletion
    
        The following site summary provides the Agency's rationale for the 
    intention to delete this Site from the NPL.
        The Alpha Chemical Corporation Site in western Polk County, Florida 
    encompasses 32 acres of land. Since 1967 Alpha Resins Corporation (ARC) 
    has manufactured polyester resins at the Site and until 1976 discharged 
    wastewater from the resin manufacturing into two onsite surface 
    impoundments. The ponds operated as percolation basins under a permit 
    with the FDEP. In 1976 a thermal oxidizer was installed and water was 
    no longer placed into the percolation ponds.
        By 1977 the smaller of the two permitted ponds had dried. This 
    unlined pond was used as a solid waste landfill for ARC and its 
    employees for approximately one year. A dam was constructed in the 
    center of the other wastewater pond and half was lined in concrete 
    after pumping the sediments and water into the other half. The 
    concrete-lined pond received caustic wash waste and did not discharge 
    any of the waste stream to the environment. This concrete-lined pond 
    was later filled with soil. The unlined pond remained; however, its use 
    was discontinued.
        In October 1981 Alpha Chemical Corporation was one of the original 
    sites proposed for placement on the NPL. In the early 1980's EPA 
    collected samples from the Site and offsite wells, and in 1983 FDEP 
    issued an Environmental Groundwater Assessment report. The report 
    determined that groundwater contamination was confined to the surficial 
    aquifer and had not migrated offsite. Contaminants detected onsite 
    included ethylbenzene, xylene, naphthalene, and benzene. Alpha Chemical 
    Corporation became a final site on the first NPL list in September 
    1983.
        ARC installed ground water monitoring wells and sampled the soil 
    and groundwater and found phthalates, halogenated and non-halogenated 
    volatile organic compounds (VOCs), phenols, polynuclear aromatic 
    hydrocarbons (PAHs), and non-priority pollutants such as benzyl alcohol 
    and benzoic acid in groundwater from the shallow onsite monitoring 
    wells. ARC signed a consent order with FDEP in March 1985 to perform a 
    Remedial Investigation (RI), Endangerment Assessment (EA), and if 
    necessary, a Feasibility Study (FS).
        The EA concluded that the contaminated samples are confined to a 
    few sampling locations. Groundwater sampling results in 1987 from all 
    groundwater monitoring wells and sand point wells showed an overall 
    trend of decreasing levels of constituents in the groundwater. No 
    positively identified constituents were detected in the shallow 
    monitoring wells located immediately south of the wetland, indicating 
    offsite migration was unlikely.
        FDEP and EPA met the community in a public meeting in November 
    1986, to discuss the EA and RI and again in a 1988 public meeting to 
    discuss the results of the FS. EPA and FDEP [[Page 21788]] addressed 
    questions from the audience concerning health effects, aquifer 
    characteristics, onsite landfill impacts, sampling efforts, remedial 
    alternatives, and monitoring.
        In May 1988 EPA signed a Record of Decision (ROD) selecting a 
    remedy for the Alpha Chemical Corporation Site. The ROD called for 
    placing a low permeability cap over the small unlined pond and long-
    term monitoring of the surface and groundwater to ensure that the 
    remedy is effective and that the landfill continues to meet the 
    applicable and relevant or appropriate requirements (ARARs). (Section 
    121(d)(2)(A) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9621(d)(2)(A), requires with 
    respect to any contaminant that will remain on site after the remedy is 
    complete, that the degree of cleanup must meet all ARARs.)
        A consent decree between EPA and ARC was entered into court in May 
    1989, requiring ARC to perform the remedial design/remedial action (RD/
    RA) and to record appropriate deed restrictions. The remedial design 
    consisted of capping the unlined pond with a synthetic low permeability 
    cap. The cap design ensured that surface runoff would be diverted and 
    vertical infiltration would be prevented.
        The remedial action involved removing water from the unlined pond 
    and filling with clean clay soil. A synthetic low permeability liner 
    and layers of drainage material, filter fabric, and topsoil were placed 
    over the compacted fill material. Drainage swales were installed around 
    the cap to prevent vertical infiltration. The cap surface was seeded 
    and drainage ditches sodded to preclude erosional damage to the cap. 
    Construction of the cap over the unlined pond required two weeks and 
    was completed on September 15, 1989. EPA sent out fact sheets to inform 
    the public that remedial construction had been completed. During the 
    following year, ARC decided to sod the cap as an extra measure of 
    precaution against the threat of erosion.
        The ROD identified groundwater and surface water cleanup standards 
    for five indicator chemicals at the site. One of these chemicals, 1,2-
    dichloropropane, was not detected in groundwater at the time the ROD 
    was written and another chemical, benzoic acid, did not have a 
    groundwater cleanup value; therefore, the ROD required periodic 
    monitoring for only three contaminants, ethylbenzene, styrene, and 
    total xylenes. Quarterly groundwater samples taken from two monitoring 
    wells have been analyzed for these three compounds since the remedial 
    action construction was complete in September 1989. Six other wells 
    selected for monitoring in the Remedial Design/Remedial Action Project 
    Operations Plan (POP) were eliminated from the monitoring requirements 
    since the three contaminants being monitored in these wells were 
    consistently below contingency levels, often at non-detect levels. 
    Prior to site close out, it was confirmed that 1,2-dichloropropane was 
    still not present in the groundwater.
        When the ROD was issued in 1988, the Agency had established 
    Recommended Maximum Contaminant Levels (RMCLs) for four of the five 
    groundwater contaminants at the Alpha Chemical Corporation Site. These 
    RMCLs were also used as the contingency levels, or cleanup goals, in 
    the POP and are shown in the table below. Since then EPA has 
    established MCL Goals (MCLGs) and MCLs for these four contaminants at 
    the site. The fifth contaminant, benzoic acid, did not have a RMCL nor 
    does it have a MCLG or MCL. The protective groundwater values for the 
    four contaminants have changed as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              MCL           
                   Contaminant                 Recommended    goal   MCL (ug/
                                                MCL (ug/l)   (ug/l)     l)  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1,2-Dichloropropane......................          6          0        5
    Xylene...................................        440     10,000   10,000
    Styrene..................................        140        100      100
    Ethylbenzene.............................        680        700      700
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition, the ROD required groundwater monitoring to ensure that 
    source control (the cap and landfill) achieved the clean-up standards 
    identified in the ROD as ARARs. The Agency is now confident that the 
    remedy, as carried out pursuant to the ROD, is, and will continue to 
    be, protective of human health and the environment, because the post-
    ROD, more protective MCL levels have been attained at this Site for 
    1,2-dichloropropane and styrene.1 In addition, the other two 
    contaminants of concern, xylene and ethylbenzene, have attained RMCLs, 
    which are the clean-up standards established in the ROD.
    
        \1\Zero level MCLGs are not used as ARARs, instead the MCL is 
    used if applicable and appropriate. 40 CFR 300.430(e)(2)(i)(C).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Agency has groundwater monitoring data showing that groundwater 
    downgradient of the landfill has attained all ARARs, as identified in 
    the ROD. Monitoring results have shown that groundwater concentrations 
    of xylene have consistently been below the RMCL and MCLG for 10 years 
    in all monitoring wells being monitored. Since one detection at 100 ug/
    l in 1990, styrene has been below both the RMCL and the MCLG in all 
    groundwater samples. Concentrations of ethylbenzene in the groundwater 
    have been below the RMCL and MCLG since 1991, with the exception of a 
    detection of 690 ug/l in December 1992 and 1200 ug/l in June 1994. 
    Overall monitoring results clearly show these minor exceedances are 
    isolated cases. This data demonstrates the effectiveness of the source 
    control remedy selected in the ROD as the preferred alternative for 
    protecting human health and the environment at the Site.
        The ROD also required surface water monitoring to be conducted to 
    confirm surface water ARARs were being attained and specified surface 
    water values for ambient criteria for protection of fresh water life 
    for the five contaminants. Prior to site close out, all five 
    contaminants were confirmed to be below the surface water values cited 
    in the ROD. Current ARARs for surface water are the Florida Surface 
    Water Quality Criteria and the Federal Ambient Quality Criteria; 
    however, no state or federal criteria values have been designated for 
    any of the five contaminants. Freshwater quality screening values for 
    1,2-dichloropropane and ethylbenzene have been established by Region IV 
    Waste Management Division and these two contaminants have not been 
    found in surface water above the screening values. In addition, the 
    three VOCs constantly being monitored over the long-term have either 
    not been detected or were detected at low levels in surface water 
    samples.
        As required by the consent decree, ARC has recorded approriate deed 
    restrictions for the property.
        In summary, sampling results from all monitoring wells and surface 
    water collections confirm that the contaminants have decreased to 
    levels below ARARs and that all appropriate actions have been taken to 
    ensure that the Site remains protective of human health and the 
    environment. ARC's inspections of the cap have indicated that the 
    remedy is performing as designed.
        EPA completed a Five-Year Review at the Site to determine whether 
    the cap remains effective in 1994. Review activities included a Site 
    visit, a reassessment of the ARARs, and sampling. The Five-Year Review 
    and monitoring results have demonstrated that the remedy at Alpha 
    Chemical Corporation Site has been effective at [[Page 21789]] meeting 
    the ARARs. EPA has met the requirement for performing a five-year 
    review at the Site, as specified in Section 121(c) of SARA. The next 
    five-year review will check future problems and be performed no later 
    than February 1999.
        Confirmational monitoring of groundwater demonstrates that no 
    significant risk to public health or the environment is posed by the 
    Site. The results of the monitoring confirmed that the remedy is 
    effective and that the landfill continues to meet ARARs.
        EPA, with concurrence of FDEP, has determined that all appropriate 
    actions at the Alpha Chemical Corporation Site have been completed, and 
    that no further response is necessary. Therefore, EPA is proposing 
    deletion of the Site from the NPL.
    
        Dated: April 11, 1995.
    Patrick M. Tobin,
    Acting Regional Administrator, USEPA Region IV.
    [FR Doc. 95-10750 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/03/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of intent to delete Alpha Chemical Corporation Site from the National Priorities List: request for comments.
Document Number:
95-10750
Dates:
Comments concerning this Site may be submitted on or before: June 2, 1995.
Pages:
21786-21789 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-5197-1
PDF File:
95-10750.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 300