96-11074. Exceptions to Worker Protection Standard Early Entry Restrictions; Limited Contact Activities; Correction  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Page 19889]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-11074]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 170
    
    [OPP-250101B; FRL-5366-2]
    
    
    Exceptions to Worker Protection Standard Early Entry 
    Restrictions; Limited Contact Activities; Correction
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Correction.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA issued a document in the Federal Register that proposed a 
    rule change allowing early entry into pesticide-treated areas. In that 
    proposal, EPA indicated that methyl parathion requires both oral and 
    written notification (``double notification'') of agricultural workers 
    when it is applied. Methyl parathion was mentioned incorrectly, as the 
    Agency had previously determined that its acute dermal toxicity is 
    Toxicity Category II, which does not require double notification. 
    Moreover, a study of methyl parathion's potential for acute dermal 
    irritation demonstrated that it is Toxicity Category IV and that it is 
    not a skin sensitizer.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua First, Office of Pesticide 
    Programs (7506C), Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. Office location, telephone number, and e-mail 
    address: 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Mall #2, Rm. 1121, 
    Arlington, VA, 703-305-7437, e-mail: [email protected]
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of January 11, 1995 
    (60 FR 2842) (FRL-4930-4), EPA issued a proposed rule to change 
    allowing early entry into pesticide-treated areas under certain 
    conditions (the proposal was subsequently finalized on May 3, 1995 (60 
    FR 21955) (FRL-4950-4). In the January 11th proposal, EPA described 
    some pesticides whose labeling requires ``double notification'' when 
    those pesticides are applied. The ``double notification'' requirement 
    is set by the Worker Protection Standard (40 CFR part 170). EPA is 
    hereby stating that its previous indication that methyl parathion 
    requires ``double notification'' was incorrect. Methyl parathion does 
    not require ``double notification.''
    
    Lists of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Labeling, Occupational safety and health, Pesticides and pests.
    
        Dated: April 26, 1996.
    Daniel M. Barolo,
    Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    [FR Doc. 96-11074 Filed 5-2-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/03/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Correction.
Document Number:
96-11074
Pages:
19889-19889 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
OPP-250101B, FRL-5366-2
PDF File:
96-11074.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 170