95-11054. Determination Not To Revoke Countervailing Duty Order; Certain Textile Mill Products From Sri Lanka

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22049-22050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11054]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[C-542-401]


Determination Not To Revoke Countervailing Duty Order; Certain 
Textile Mill Products From Sri Lanka

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Import Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of determination not to revoke countervailing duty 
order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is notifying the 
public of its determination not to revoke the countervailing duty order 
on certain textile mill products from Sri Lanka.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Albright, Office of 
Countervailing Compliance, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2786.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 1, 1994, the Department published in the Federal Register 
(59 FR 9727) its intent to revoke the countervailing duty order on 
certain textile mill products from Sri Lanka (50 FR 9826; March 12, 
1985). Under 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii), the Secretary of 
[[Page 22050]] Commerce will conclude that an order is no longer of 
interest to interested parties and will revoke the order if no domestic 
interested party objects to revocation, and no interested party 
requests an administrative review by the last day of the fifth 
anniversary month.
    Within the specified time frame, we received an objection from 
domestic interested parties to our intent to revoke this countervailing 
duty order. The Department determined that these domestic interested 
parties had standing as an interested party under 19 CFR 355.2(i) with 
respect to all like products covered by this countervailing duty order. 
See Memorandum to the File from Martina Tkadlec, Case Analyst, April 
12, 1995, which is on file in the Central Records Unit (Room B-099 of 
the Main Commerce Building).
    Therefore, because the requirements of 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii) 
have not been met, we will not revoke the order.
    This determination is in accordance with 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4).

    Dated: April 8, 1995.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-11054 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P