[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 86 (Monday, May 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24422-24423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-11617]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Technology Administration
Notice of Public Meeting on the Proposed Experimental Program To
Stimulate Competitive Technology (EPSCoT)
AGENCY: Technology Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting on the proposed experimental program
to stimulate competitive technology (EPSCoT).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Technology Administration will hold an open meeting on May
29, 1997 to solicit input on the proposed Experimental Program to
Stimulate Competitive Technology (EPSCoT) from representatives of state
and local government, universities, and the private- and non-profit
sectors, who are involved with technology development, diffusion,
commercialization, and using technology to promote economic growth. The
purpose of the meeting is to determine what activities are currently
being conducted in the states to foster technology-based economic
growth and how a new competitive, cost-shared federal grant program
with the mission of fostering the development of indigenous technology
assets in states that are traditionally under represented in Federal
R&D funding could be structured. The following states would currently
be eligible to participate in the EPSCoT:
[[Page 24423]]
Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine,
Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming, as well as
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
DATES: The meeting will be held on May 29, 1997 from 9 am until 12 pm.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the National Research Center for
Coal and Energy at the West Virginia University in Morgantown, West
Virginia. Individuals wishing to attend the meeting should contact
Maureen Wood, Office of the Deputy Under Secretary for Technology, at
(202) 482-1091 by close of business May 27, 1997.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marc Cummings, Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce
at (202) 482-8323.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Technology Administration (TA) is
proposing a new, competitive, matching grant program called the
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Technology (EPSCoT) to
foster the development of indigenous technology assets in states that
traditionally have been under represented in the distribution of
Federal R&D expenditures.
Technology is the engine of economic growth and, as such, its
development, deployment, and diffusion are critical to U.S.
competitiveness. Although it is often said that nations do not compete,
companies do, it is apparent that sub-national units--regions within
states and clusters of states--do compete, not simply with one another,
but also internationally. This is because in a global economy, capital,
labor, and technology are increasingly mobile and they are attracted to
regions with the most promising opportunities. To this end, regional
policies and infrastructures play a large role in determining both
where companies locate and their ability to be competitive in a global
marketplace.
Commerce Department research shows that firms that adopt advanced
technologies create more jobs at higher wages than those that do not.
Furthermore, regions that boast concentrations of high-tech industries
enjoy high growth rates and standards of living. Regions thus compete
to attract federal research facilities, private investment, and skilled
labor. Recent research suggests that a region's technological
infrastructure is among the most important factors that businesses
consider when making location decisions. Accordingly, regions are
searching for strategies to attract and retain high-tech firms and the
jobs that they bring. These strategies may involve building on existing
strengths at research universities, providing extension services to
local businesses, or integrating existing business assistance
resources, but ultimately their success is contingent upon an
institutional capacity to support technology-based economic
development.
In the Federal government's efforts to foster competitiveness, it
must ensure that all regions of the nation develop the necessary
infrastructure to support indigenous technology development. Most less
populated states, whose manufacturers tend to be small- and medium-
sized, are at a competitive disadvantage because there is generally no
research base on which local businesses can build. The EPSCoT seeks to
remedy this disadvantage.
The EPSCoT seeks to build on the NSF's successful Experimental
Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) which was
established in 1979 to stimulate sustainable improvements in the
quality of the academic science and technology infrastructure of states
that traditionally have been under represented in receiving federal R&D
funds. Within these states, the EPSCoR's primary emphasis is on
improving the competitive performance of major research universities.
By focusing on building the science base of these regions, primarily in
universities, the EPSCoR has successfully strengthened the research
capacity of universities in these states; yet, there remains a
technology ``gap.''
Improving the competitive performance of universities, which is an
essential component of a successful technology-based economy, is often
not sufficient to establish new companies, develop new job
opportunities or raise the standard of living.
That is why the Department of Commerce proposes to create an
EPSCoT--the technology counterpart to the EPSCoR. EPSCoT would help to
bridge the gap between university research and the local economy. It
would develop essential economic development tools to foster regional
technology-based economic growth. The program would stimulate the
development of indigenous technological infrastructure and
institutional capabilities of states through a variety of means,
including outreach activities, technology development and deployment,
technology transfer, education and training, and better linking
universities, firms, and state and local governments.
Dated: April 28, 1997.
Mary Good,
Under Secretary for Technology.
[FR Doc. 97-11617 Filed 5-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-18-M
