94-10911. Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Proposed Anacostia River and Tributaries, District of Columbia and Maryland Feasibility Study  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 87 (Friday, May 6, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-10911]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: May 6, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    Corps of Engineers
    
     
    
    Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for 
    the Proposed Anacostia River and Tributaries, District of Columbia and 
    Maryland Feasibility Study
    
    AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District, DOD.
    
    ACTION: Notice of availability.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Baltimore District of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
    investigated the feasibility of construction of fish and wildlife 
    restoration measures in the Anacostia River basin. The District 
    Engineer recommends the restoration of 80 acres of wetlands, t miles of 
    streams and 33 acres of bottomland habitat. The feasibility study of 
    the potential restoration actions was conducted under authority of a 
    U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Public Works and 
    Transportation resolution adopted September 8, 1988. The non-Federal 
    sponsors for the feasibility phase of the project are: Montgomery 
    County, Prince Georges County, the District of Columbia, the State of 
    Maryland, the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, and the 
    Metropolitan Washington Counsel of Governments.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be submitted by June 5, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send comments to: Colonel J. Richard Capa, District 
    Engineer, P.O. Box 1715, Attn: CENAB-PL-PR, Baltimore, Maryland 21203-
    1715.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Mr. Marak McKevitt, Study Manager, (410) 962-2650.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
        1. The U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Public Works and 
    Transportation, authorized the Anacostia River and Tributaries study in 
    a resolution adopted on September 8, 1988. The resolution requested the 
    Corps of Engineers to determine if further improvements for flood 
    control, navigation, erosion, sedimentation, water quality and other 
    related water resources needs are advisable on the Anacostia River and 
    Tributaries.
        2. The Anacostia River basin is a 170-square-mile sub-basin of the 
    Potomac River. Headwaters of the Anacostia River are in the Piedmont 
    and coastal plain areas of Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties, 
    Maryland and it joins with the Potomac River in the District of 
    Columbia. The entire river system is freshwater; although, the total 
    tidal influence extends for approximately 9 miles above the confluence 
    with the Potomac River.
        3. The Corps of Engineers involvement in the basin dates back more 
    than 115 years and includes projects and programs for navigation, flood 
    control, debris removal and aquatic vegatation control. These Federal 
    actions have served their intended purposes well and have benefited the 
    area in terms of improved navigation and reduced flood damage. However, 
    from 1902 through the 1960s, project construction eliminated 
    approximately 2,600 acres of wetlands, 99,000 linear feet of aquatic 
    habitat and 700 acres of bottomland hardwoods. These ecosystems 
    performed numerous beneficial ecological functions for the Anacostia 
    basin and the associated Potomac River and Chesapeake Bay. One of the 
    primary functions of these ecosystems is fish and wildlife habitat. 
    Historically, the Anacostia River basin contained a diverse assemblage 
    of fish and wildlife species. However, populations of many species have 
    sharply declined due to the habitat loss and degradation in the 
    Anacostia basin.
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Site                     Action               Target stream                     Location          
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Wetland Restoration                                                                                      
                                                                                                                    
    Kingman Lake....................  WR                Anacostia River..............  Washington, DC.              
    River Fringe Wetlands...........  WR                Anacostia River..............  Washington, DC.              
    Fordham Street Wetland..........  WR                Northwest Branch.............  Prince George's Co.          
                                                                                                                    
           Aquatic Restoration                                                                                      
                                                                                                                    
    NW Branch-PG Co.................  SR                Northwest Branch.............  Prince George's Co.          
    Tanglewood Retrofit.............  WR/SM/SR          Little Paint Branch..........  Montgomery Co.               
    Snowden's Mill I................  WR/SM/SR          Paint Branch.................  Montgomery Co.               
    Snowden's Mill II...............  WR/SM/SR          Paint Branch.................  Montgomery Co.               
    Stewart/April Lane..............  WR/SM/SR          Paint Branch.................  Montgomery Co.               
    Lockridge Drive.................  WR/SM/SR          Northwest Branch.............  Montgomery Co.               
    Gum Springs.....................  SR                Gum Springs..................  Montgomery Co.               
    Sligo Creek.....................  SR                Sligo Creek..................  Montgomery Co.               
    NW Branch-Mont. Co..............                                                                                
    Paint Branch....................  SR                Paint Branch.................  Montgomery Co.               
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *WR--Wetland Restoration.                                                                                       
    SM--Stormwater Management.                                                                                      
    SR--Stream Restoration.                                                                                         
    
        5. The Baltimore District has prepared a DEIS which describes the 
    impacts of the proposed projects on environmental and cultural 
    resources in the study area and the overall public interest. The DEIS 
    also apply guidelines issued by the Environmental Protection Agency, 
    under authority of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (Pub. L. 
    95-217). An evaluation of the proposed actions on the waters of the 
    United States was performed pursuant to the guidelines of the 
    Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under authority of 
    Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The Section 404(b)(1) evaluations 
    show that the proposed actions meet all guidelines under the Clean 
    Water Act, and an exemption under Section 404(r) of Public Law 92-500, 
    as amended is therefore requested.
        6. The public involvement included meetings and close coordination 
    with interested private individuals and organizations, as well as 
    concerned Federal, state and local agencies. A public notice requesting 
    comments on the proposed project and DE is being provided to 
    appropriate agencies and the public through printed media and mailings. 
    The Baltimore District invites potentially affected Federal, state and 
    local agencies, and other interested organizations and parties to 
    comment on the study recommendations. Agencies that are currently 
    involved in the feasibility study and EIS process include, but are not 
    limited to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and 
    Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Geological 
    Service, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, National Park Service, 
    National Capital Planning Commission, Montgomery County Department of 
    Environmental Protection, Prince George's County Department of 
    Environmental Resources, District of Columbia Department of Consumer 
    and Regulatory Affairs and Department of Public Works, Maryland 
    Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Department of the 
    Environment, Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission, 
    Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, and the Metropolitan 
    Washington Council of Governments.
        7. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
    and the Clean Water Act, the Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments 
    from the public, Federal, state and local agencies and officials, and 
    other interested parties. Any comments received will be considered by 
    the Corps of Engineers in the decision to implement the projects. To 
    make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered 
    species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental 
    effects, and other interest factors listed above. Comments are also 
    used to determine the overall public interest and the need for a public 
    hearing on the proposed activities. This public notice is being sent to 
    organizations and individuals known to have an interest in the 
    restoration of the Anacostia River basin. Please bring this notice to 
    the attention of any other individuals with an interest in this matter.
        8. Any person who has an interest in the proposed projects may make 
    comments and/or request a public hearing. Comments must clearly set 
    forth the interest which may be adversely affected by these activities 
    and the manner in which the interest may be adversely affected. Copies 
    of the DEIS are available upon request. Written comments must be 
    submitted within 30 calendar days of the date of the notice in the 
    Federal Register.
    Kenneth L. Denton,
    Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
    [FR Doc. 94-10911 Filed 5-5-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/06/1994
Department:
Engineers Corps
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of availability.
Document Number:
94-10911
Dates:
Written comments must be submitted by June 5, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: May 6, 1994