97-11742. New USA Mutual Funds, Inc., et al.; Notice of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 87 (Tuesday, May 6, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 24679-24680]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-11742]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Investment Company Act Release No. 22649; 812-10564]
    
    
    New USA Mutual Funds, Inc., et al.; Notice of Application
    
    April 30, 1997.
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'').
    
    ACTION: Notice of application for exemption under the Investment 
    Company Act of 1940 (``Act'').
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    APPLICANTS: New USA Mutual Funds, Inc. (``New USA Co.'') on behalf of 
    its series, New USA Growth Fund; New USA Research & Management Co. 
    (``NURM''); O'Neil Data Systems, Inc. (``ODS''); and MFS Series Trust 
    II (``MFS Series II''). on behalf of its series, MFS Emerging Growth 
    Fund (``MFS Growth Fund'').
    
    RELEVANT ACT SECTIONS: Order requested under section 6(c) for an 
    exemption from section 15(f)(1)(A).
    
    SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants request an exemption from section 
    15(f)(1)(A) to permit ODS to sell its interest in NURM, the investment 
    manager of the New USA Growth Fund, a series offered by New USA Co., to 
    MFS. Without the requested exemption, MFS Series II would have to 
    reconstitute its boards of directors to meet the 75 percent non-
    interested director requirement of section 15(f)(1)(A) in order to 
    comply with the safe harbor provisions of section 15(f).
    
    FILING DATES: The application was filed on March 11, 1997.
    
    HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
    will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
    request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving 
    applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing 
    requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on May 27, 1997 and 
    should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of 
    an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing 
    requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason 
    for the request, and the issues contested. Persons may request 
    notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary.
    
    ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. 
    Applicants: New USA Mutual Funds, Inc., New USA Research & Management 
    Co., and O'Neil Data Systems, Inc., 12655 Beatrice Street, Los Angeles, 
    California 90066; and MFS Series Trust II c/o MFS Emerging Growth Fund, 
    500 Boylston Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Mary T. Geffroy, Staff Attorney, at (202) 942-0553, or Mary Kay Frech, 
    Branch Chief, at (202) 942-0564 (Division of Investment Management, 
    Office of Investment Company Regulation).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
    application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from 
    the SEC's Public Reference Branch.
    
    Applicant's Representations
    
        1. New USA Co. is an open-end management investment company 
    registered under the Act consisting of one series, the New USA Growth 
    Fund. NURM is the investment manager of the New USA Growth Fund 
    pursuant to an investment management agreement between New USA Co. and 
    NURM (the ``Investment Advisory Agreement''). NURM's sole stockholder 
    and parent company is ODS.
        2. MFS Series II is an open-end management investment company 
    registered under the Act consisting of four separate series (the ``MFS 
    Series II Funds''), including the MFS Growth Fund. The MFS Growth Fund 
    is part of the MFS family of funds, which consists of approximately 50 
    funds (collectively, the ``MFS Funds''). Massachusetts Financial 
    Services Company (``MFS'') is the investment adviser to the MFS Growth 
    Fund.
        3. MFS Series II proposes to acquire the assets and liabilities of 
    the New USA Growth Fund in exchange for shares of equal aggregate value 
    of the MFS Growth Fund. In connection therewith, MFS will acquire all 
    of the outstanding shares of the stock of NURM from ODS. The foregoing 
    transactions are referred to as the ``Transaction.''
        4. On March 6, 1997, ODS and MFS entered into a Stock Purchase 
    Agreement (the ``Purchase Agreement'') pursuant to which, and subject 
    to certain conditions, MFS agreed to purchase all of the outstanding 
    capital stock of NURM. The consummation of the Purchase Agreement is 
    subject to, among other things, the approval of the shareholders of the 
    New USA Growth Fund of a plan of reorganization by and between New USA 
    Co., on behalf of the New USA Growth Fund, and MFS Series II, on behalf 
    of the MFS Growth Fund (the ``Reorganization Agreement'').
        5. The MFS Series II board of trustees approved the Reorganization 
    Agreement on December 11, 1996, and the New USA Co. board of directors 
    unanimously approved it on March 4, 1997. The Reorganization Agreement 
    provides for: (a) The acquisition by the MFS Growth Fund of 
    substantially all of the assets and liabilities of the New USA Growth 
    Fund in exchange for shares of the MFS Growth Fund; (b) the 
    distribution of these MFS Growth Fund shares to the shareholders of the 
    New USA Growth Fund in liquidation of the New USA Growth Fund; and (c) 
    New USA Co.'s
    
    [[Page 24680]]
    
    liquidation and termination under state law.
        6. Applicants request an exemption under section 6(c) of the Act 
    from the provisions of section 15(f)(1)(A) to permit ODS to receive 
    consideration in compliance with section 15(f) in connection with the 
    Transaction, notwithstanding the fact that, after the Transaction, the 
    MFS Growth Fund will have a board of trustees consisting of fewer than 
    75% disinterested trustees.
    
    Applicants' Legal Analysis
    
        1. Section 15(f) of the Act is a safe harbor that permits an 
    investment adviser to a registered investment company (or an affiliated 
    person of the investment adviser) to realize a profit upon the sale of 
    its business (which results in an assignment of an advisory contract 
    with such company) if certain conditions are met. Section 15(f)(1)(A) 
    requires that, for a period of three years after such a sale, at least 
    75 percent of the board of the investment company (or its successor, by 
    reorganization or otherwise) may not be ``interested persons'' with 
    respect to either the predecessor or successor adviser of the 
    investment company.
        2. Section 6(c) of the Act permits the SEC to exempt any person or 
    transaction from any provision of the Act, or any rule or regulation 
    thereunder, if the exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public 
    interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the 
    purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. 
    Section 15(f)(3)(B) provides that if the assignment of an investment 
    advisory contract results from the merger of, or sale of substantially 
    all the assets by, a registered investment company with or to another 
    registered investment company with assets substantially greater in 
    amount, such discrepancy in size shall be considered by the SEC in 
    determining whether, or to what extent, to grant exemptive relief 
    pursuant to section 6(c) from section 15(f)(1)(A).
        3. Applicants state that at February 24, 1997, the New USA Co. had 
    assets of approximately $203 million, as compared to MFS Series II's 
    assets of approximately $2.649 billion; therefore, the assets of New 
    USA Co. are approximately 7.7% of the assets of MFS Series II. Thus, 
    the transaction involves an acquisition by an investment company with 
    assets ``substantially greater'' than the assets of the acquired fund.
        4. Applicants assert that it is appropriate for the assets of each 
    investment company, as opposed to each series, to be taken into account 
    when considering the ``substantially greater'' test set forth in 
    section 15(f)(3)(B). Applicants contend that any other conclusion would 
    be inconsistent with the literal language of the section, which refers 
    to the sale of assets of one investment company to another ``investment 
    company with assets substantially greater in amount.'' Applicants state 
    that MFS Series II and the New USA Co. are the registered investment 
    companies involved in the transaction and, in fact, the board of 
    trustees of MFS Series II and the board of director of New USA Co. 
    authorized the transaction on behalf of their respective series.
        5. The board of directors of New USA Co. and the board of trustees 
    of MFS Series II consist of the following (``Interested Directors'' and 
    ``Interested Trustees'' are directors and trustees who are ``interested 
    persons,'' within the meaning of section 2(a)(19) of the Act, of NURM 
    and MFS, respectively):
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Number of    Number of            
                                         interested  disinterested          
             Investment company          directors/    directors/     Total 
                                          trustees      trustees            
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    New USA Co.........................          1             4           5
    MFS Series.........................          4             7          11
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In order to comply with section 15(f)(1)(A) following consummation 
    of the transactions, MFS Series II would have to add five Disinterested 
    Trustees or reduce the number of Interested Trustees from four to two. 
    If MFS Series II were to add five Disinterested Trustees, a vote of it 
    shareholders would be required pursuant to section 16(a) of the Act, 
    which requires that at least two-thirds of a fund's trustees be elected 
    by shareholders. MFS Series II otherwise would not be required to hold 
    a shareholders meeting under Massachusetts law or the Act to consummate 
    the transaction.
        6. For the reasons stated above, applicants assert that the 
    requested relief is necessary and appropriate in the public interest, 
    and is consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes 
    fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act, as required by 
    section 6(c).
    
        For the SEC, by the Division of Investment Management, under 
    delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-11742 Filed 5-5-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/06/1997
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of application for exemption under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'').
Document Number:
97-11742
Dates:
The application was filed on March 11, 1997.
Pages:
24679-24680 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Investment Company Act Release No. 22649, 812-10564
PDF File:
97-11742.pdf