99-11363. Bankers Trust Company, et al.; Notice of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 87 (Thursday, May 6, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 24427-24430]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-11363]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Investment Company Act Release No. 23817; 812-11530]
    
    
    Bankers Trust Company, et al.; Notice of Application
    
    April 29, 1999.
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
    
    
    [[Page 24428]]
    
    
    ACTION: Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment 
    Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') for an exemption from section 15(a) of 
    the Act.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION: The requested order would permit the 
    implementation, without prior shareholder approval, of new investment 
    advisory and subadvisory agreements (``New Advisory Agreements'') in 
    connection with the merger of Bankers Trust Corporation (``BT Corp'') 
    and Deutsche Bank AG (``Deutsche Bank''). The order would cover a 
    period of up to 150 days following the later of the date the merger is 
    consummated or the date the requested order is issued (but in no event 
    later than November 30, 1999) (``Interim Period'').
    
    APPLICANTS: Bankers Trust Company ``BT''), Investment Company Capital 
    Corp. (``ICCC''), and Alex. Brown Investment Management (``ABIM'') 
    (collectively, ``BT Advisers''); Brown Investment Advisory & Trust 
    Company (``Brown Trust''); LaSalle Investment Management (Securities), 
    L.P. (``LaSalle''); and The Glenmede Trust Company (``Glenmede'') 
    (collectively with the BT Advisers, Brown Trust and LaSalle, 
    ``Advisers'').
    
    FILING DATES: The application was filed on March 5, 1999 and amended on 
    April 28, 1999.
    
    HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
    will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested 
    persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's Secretary 
    and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by 
    mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 
    p.m. on May 24, 1999 and should be accompanied by proof of service on 
    applicants in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate 
    of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's 
    interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons 
    may request notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.
    
    ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
    20549-0609. Applicants, c/o Willkie Farr & Gallagher, Attn: Burton M. 
    Leibert, Esq. or Jon S. Rand, Esq., 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 
    10019-6099.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel H. Graham, Senior Counsel, at 
    (202) 942-0583, or Nadya B. Roytblat, Assistant Director, at (202) 942-
    0564 (Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company 
    Regulation).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
    application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from 
    the Commission's Public Reference Branch, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20549-0102 (telephone (202) 942-8090).
    
    Applicants' Representations
    
        1. BT, a New York banking corporation, serves as investment adviser 
    or subadviser to various open-end management investment companies 
    registered under the Act (``BT Advised Funds'') pursuant to separate 
    investment advisory or subadvisory agreements (``Existing BT 
    Agreements'').\1\ ICCC, a Maryland corporation and wholly-owned 
    subsidiary of BT Alex. Brown Incorporated, serves as investment adviser 
    to various open-end management investment companies registered under 
    the Act (``ICCC Funds'' and, together with the BT Advised Funds, 
    ``Funds'') pursuant to separate investment advisory agreements 
    (``Existing ICCC Agreements'').\2\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ BT serves as investment adviser for the following BT Advised 
    Funds: BT Insurance Funds Trust, Cash Management Portfolio, Treasury 
    Money Portfolio, Tax Free Money Portfolio, New York Tax Free Money 
    Portfolio, International Equity Portfolio, Equity 500 Index 
    Portfolio, Asset Management Portfolio, Capital Appreciation 
    Portfolio, Intermediate Tax Free Portfolio, BT Investment 
    Portfolios, Quantitative Equity Fund (a series of BT Investment 
    Funds), Institutional Daily Assets Funds and Institutional Treasury 
    Assets Fund (each a series of BT Institutional Funds), and BT 
    Investment Equity Appreciation Fund (a series of BT Pyramid Mutual 
    Funds). BT serves as investment subadviser for the following BT 
    Advised Funds: AARP U.S. Stock Index Fund, a series of AARP Growth 
    Trust; three series of American General Series Portfolio Company 
    (Mid Cap Index Fund, Stock Index Fund, and Small Cap Index Fund); 
    four series of American General Series Portfolio Company 2 (Small 
    Cap ``Value'' Index Fund, Stock Index Fund, Midcap Index Fund, and 
    Small Cap Index Fund); Small Cap Value Index Fund, a series of 
    American General Series Portfolio Company 3; AST Bankers Trust 
    Enhanced 500 Portfolio, a series of American Skandia Trust; three 
    series of EQ Advisors Trust (BT Equity 500 Index Portfolio, BT Small 
    Company Index Portfolio, and BT International Equity Index 
    Portfolio); Spartan Market Index Fund, a series of Fidelity 
    Commonwealth Trust; four series of Fidelity Concord Street Trust 
    (Spartan Extended Market Index Fund, Spartan Total Market Index 
    Fund, Spartan International Market Index Fund, and Spartan U.S. 
    Equity Index Fund); Index 500 Portfolio, a series of Fidelity 
    Variable Insurance Products Fund II; two series of Pacific Select 
    Fund (Equity Index Portfolio and Small-Cap Index Portfolio); two 
    series of SBL Fund (Series H and Series I); two series of Security 
    Index Fund (International Series and Enhanced Index Series); 
    International Equity Portfolio, a series of Style Select Series 
    Inc.; and eight series of Seasons Series Trust (Large-Cap Growth 
    Portfolio, Large-Cap Composite Portfolio, Large-Cap Value Portfolio, 
    Mid-Cap Growth Portfolio, Mid-Cap Value Portfolio, Small Cap 
    Portfolio, International Equity Portfolio, and Diversified Fixed 
    Income Portfolio).
        \2\ The ICCC Funds are: Tax-Free Series, Prime Series, and 
    Treasury Series (each a series of BT Alex. Brown Cash Reserve Fund, 
    Inc.); Flag Investors Communications Fund, Inc.; Flag Investors 
    Emerging Growth Fund, Inc.; Flag Investors Short-Intermediate Income 
    Fund, Inc.; Flag Investors Value Builder Fund, Inc.; Flag Investors 
    Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc.; Flag Investors Equity Partners 
    Fund, Inc.; and Flag Investors International Fund, Inc.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        2. ABIM, a Maryland limited partnership, serves as investment 
    subadviser to three ICCC Funds. Brown Trust, a Maryland trust company, 
    serves as investment subadviser to two ICCC Funds. LaSalle, a Maryland 
    limited partnership, and Glenmede, a Pennsylvania limited purpose trust 
    company, each serve as investment subadviser to one ICCC Fund. Each of 
    ABIM, Brown Trust, LaSalle, and Glenmede serves in this capacity 
    pursuant to separate investment subadvisory agreements with ICCC 
    (collectively, ``Existing Subadvisory Agreements,'' and together with 
    the Existing BT Agreements and the Existing ICCC Agreements, ``Existing 
    Advisory Agreements'').
        3. BT and ICCC are wholly-owned subsidiaries of BT Corp, a 
    registered bank holding company that also indirectly controls ABIM. BT 
    Corp is not affiliated with Brown Trust, LaSalle, or Glenmede (each a 
    ``Non-BT Subadviser'').
        4. BT, Brown Trust, and Glenmede are exempt from registration as 
    investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 
    (``Advisers Act'') pursuant to section 202(a)(11)(A) of the Advisers 
    Act. ICCC, ABIM, and LaSalle are registered as investment advisers 
    under the Advisers Act.
        5. On November 30, 1998, BT Corp and Deutsche Bank entered into an 
    agreement pursuant to which Circle Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-
    owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank, will merge with and into BT Corp, 
    with BT Corp continuing as the surviving entity (the ``Merger''). 
    Applicants expect consummation of the Merger on or about May 31, 1999.
        6. Applicants state that the Merger may result in the assignment, 
    and thus termination, of the Existing Advisory Agreements under the 
    terms of those agreements and the Act. Applicants request an exemption 
    to permit (i) the implementation of the New Advisory Agreements without 
    prior shareholder approval, and (ii) the Advisers to receive all 
    advisory fees earned under the New Advisory Agreements during the 
    Interim Period, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by 
    the Funds' shareholders. The requested exemption would cover the 
    Interim Period of not more than 150 days beginning on the later of the 
    date the
    
    [[Page 24429]]
    
    merger is consummated (``Closing Date'') or the date the requested 
    order is issued and continuing until the New Advisory Agreements are 
    approved or disapproved by the Funds' shareholders, but in no event 
    later than November 30, 1999.\3\ Applicants state that the New Advisory 
    Agreements will contain substantially the same terms and conditions as 
    the Existing Advisory Agreements, except for the dates of commencement 
    and termination.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ Applicants state that if the Closing Date precedes the 
    issuance of the requested order, they will serve after the Closing 
    Date and prior to the issuance of the order in a manner consistent 
    with their fiduciary duty to provide investment advisory and 
    subadvisory services to the Funds even though approval of the New 
    Advisory Agreements has not yet been secured from the Funds' 
    shareholders. Applicants submit that, in such an event, they will be 
    entitled to receive, from the Closing Date until the issuance of the 
    order, no more than their actual out-of-pocket costs for providing 
    investment advisory and subadvisory services to the Funds.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        7. Applicants state that, on March 11, 1999, six days after 
    applicants filed this application with the Commission, the U.S. 
    Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a three-count 
    felony information (``Information'') in the United States District 
    Court for the Southern District of New York. The Information charges BT 
    with making false entries on its books and records as a result of the 
    conduct of certain employees in BT's processing services businesses in 
    1994-1996.\4\ On March 11, 1999, BT pleaded guilty to the charges in 
    the Information pursuant to a written cooperation and plea agreement 
    (``Cooperation and Plea Agreement'').\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ The conduct involved the transfer to reserve accounts and to 
    income of aged credit items that should have been paid to customers, 
    other third parties, or state abandoned property authorities.
        \5\ As part of the Cooperation and Plea Agreement, BT agreed to 
    pay a $60 million fine and to place that amount in escrow pending 
    sentencing. As a result of the matters underlying the Cooperation 
    and Plea Agreement, BT also has agreed to pay a $3.5 million fine to 
    the State of New York.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        8. On March 12, 1999, BT filed an application pursuant to section 
    9(c) of the Act for a temporary order exempting it and entities of 
    which it is or becomes an affiliated person (``Covered Entities'') from 
    the provisions of section 9(a) of the Act. \6\ On March 12, 1999, BT 
    and the Covered Entities received a temporary conditional order from 
    the Commission exempting them from section 9(a) of the Act with respect 
    to the Cooperation and Plea Agreement (``Temporary Order'') (Investment 
    Company Act Release No. 23737). The Temporary Order stated that it 
    would expire when the Commission took final action on an application 
    for a permanent order or, if earlier, May 11, 1999. On march 25, 1999, 
    the BT Advisers filed an application under section 9(c) for (i) a 
    permanent order exempting the Covered Entities from section 9(a) with 
    respect to the Cooperation and Plea Agreement and (ii) an extension of 
    the Temporary Order if the requested permanent order is not granted 
    before the Temporary Order expires.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ Section 9(a), in relevant part, prohibits a person and any 
    company of which the person is an affiliated person from serving or 
    acting as an investment adviser, principal underwriter, or depositor 
    for any registered investment company if the person has been 
    convicted of any felony arising out of the person's conduct as, 
    among other things, an underwriter, broker, dealer, investment 
    adviser, or transfer agent. Section 9(c) of the Act provides that 
    the Commission shall grant an application for an exemption from the 
    disqualification provisions of section 9(a) if it is established 
    that these provisions, as applied to the applicant, are unduly or 
    disproportionately severe or that the applicant's conduct has been 
    such as not to make it against the public interest or the protection 
    of investors to grant the application.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        9. Applicants currently intend that the board of directors 
    (``Board'') of each Fund will meet prior to the Closing Date to 
    consider approval of the New Advisory Agreements and submission of the 
    New Advisory Agreements to the shareholders for their approval, in 
    accordance with section 15(c) of the Act.\7\ Applicants state that each 
    Board will evaluate whether the terms of the relevant New Advisory 
    Agreement(s) are in the best interests of the Fund and its 
    shareholders. Applicants state that a majority of the Boards already 
    have convened and approved the New Advisory Agreements applicable to 
    their Funds. Applicants represent that any Board that met prior to 
    March 11, 1999 subsequently was apprised of the Cooperation and Plea 
    Agreement and BT's requests for relief under section 9(c). Applicants 
    also represent that all other Boards have been or will be apprised of 
    the Cooperation and Plea Agreement and BT's requests for relief under 
    section 9(c) before voting on the New Advisory Agreements applicable to 
    their Funds. Applicants further represent that each Board has been or 
    will be provided with all information reasonably necessary to evaluate 
    whether retaining the relevant BT Adviser is in the best interests of 
    the Fund and its shareholders.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ Applicants acknowledge that, to the extent that a Fund's 
    Board cannot meet prior to the Closing Date, the applicable 
    Adviser(s) may not rely upon the exemptive relief requested in this 
    application.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        10. Advisory fees earned by the Advisers under the New Advisory 
    Agreements during the Interim Period will be maintained in interest-
    bearing escrow accounts with one or more financial institutions 
    unaffiliated with the Advisers (each an ``Escrow Agent'').\8\ The 
    applicable Escrow Agent will release the amounts held in the escrow 
    accounts (including any interest earned): (i) to the applicable Adviser 
    upon approval of each New Advisory Agreement by the relevant Fund's 
    shareholders; or (ii) to the Fund, if the Interim Period has ended and 
    the Fund's shareholders have not approved the New Advisory 
    Agreement.\9\ Before any such release is made, the Board of the 
    applicable Fund will be notified.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ In certain cases, the fees payable to BT under the New 
    Advisory Agreements include a portion of revenues earned from 
    securities lending activities performed on behalf of certain BT 
    Advised Funds. The portion of such revenues owned to the applicable 
    BT Advised Funds, as opposed to BT, will not be placed into escrow.
        \9\ As described in representation 11 in this notice, if the 
    Commission declines to extend the Temporary Order or denies the BT 
    Advisers' request for a permanent section 9(c) order, the BT 
    Advisers may only receive the fees payable to them that were 
    escrowed up to the date on which the Temporary Order or an extension 
    of the Temporary Order expires if the permanent order has not been 
    granted.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        11. Proxy materials for the shareholders meeting of each Fund are 
    expected to be mailed beginning in or about May, 1999. The proxy 
    materials will include disclosure regarding the Corporation and Plea 
    Agreement, the Temporary Order, and the BT Advisers' request for a 
    permanent order of exemption from section 9(a). Applicants represent 
    that if the Commission decides not to extend the Temporary Order or 
    denies the BT Advisers' request for a permanent section 9(c) order 
    prior to the time that the proxy materials are mailed, solicitation of 
    shareholder votes with respect to the New Advisory Agreements will be 
    limited only to approval of the release of amounts payable to the BT 
    Advisers that were escrowed up to the date on which the Temporary Order 
    or an extension of the Temporary Order expires if the permanent order 
    has not been granted. Applicants further represent that if the 
    Commission decides not to extend the Temporary Order or denies the BT 
    Advisers' request for a permanent section 9(c) order while the proxies 
    are outstanding, the BT Advisers will mail supplemental proxy materials 
    with respect to the BT Advisers' New Advisory Agreements soliciting 
    shareholder approval only for the release of amounts payable to the BT 
    Advisers that were escrowed up to the date on which the Temporary Order 
    or an extension of the Temporary Order expires if the permanent order 
    has not been granted. In either instance, the ICCC Funds subadvised by 
    the Non-BT Subadvisers will be permitted to solicit shareholder 
    approval of the release of all escrowed fees payable to the Non-BT 
    Subadvisers under the New Advisory Agreements.
    
    [[Page 24430]]
    
    Applicants' Legal Analysis
    
        1. Section 15(a) of the Act provides, in relevant part, that it is 
    unlawful for any person to serve as an investment adviser to a 
    registered investment company, except pursuant to a written contract 
    that has been approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding 
    voting securities of the investment company. Section 15(a) further 
    requires the written contract to provide for its automatic termination 
    in the event of its assignment. Section 2(a)(4) of the Act defines 
    ``assignment'' to include any direct or indirect transfer of a 
    controlling block of the assignor's outstanding voting securities by a 
    security holder of the assignor. Applicants state that the Merger may 
    result in an assignment of the Existing Advisory Agreements and that 
    such agreements will terminate according to their terms.
        2. Rule 15a-4 under the Act provides, in relevant part, that if an 
    investment advisory contract with a registered investment company is 
    terminated due to its assignment, an investment adviser may act as such 
    for the company for 120 days under a written contract that has not been 
    approved by the company's shareholders, provided that: (i) The new 
    contract is approved by that company's board of directors, including a 
    majority of the non-interested directors; (ii) the compensation to be 
    paid under the new contract does not exceed the compensation that would 
    have been paid under the contract most recently approved by the 
    company's shareholders; and (iii) neither the adviser nor any 
    controlling person of the adviser ``directly or indirectly receive[s] 
    money or other benefit'' in connection with the assignment. Applicants 
    state that they may not rely on rule 15a-4 because BT Corp will receive 
    benefits in connection with the Merger.
        3. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt 
    any person, security, or transaction from any provision of the Act or 
    any rule thereunder if and to the extent that such exemption is 
    necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with 
    both the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by 
    the policy and provisions of the Act. Applicants state that the 
    requested relief meets this standard.
        4. Applicants state that the terms and timing of the Merger were 
    determined in response to a number of factors beyond the scope of the 
    Act and substantially unrelated to the Funds. Applicants assert that 
    there is insufficient time to obtain shareholder approval of the New 
    Advisory Agreements before the Merger is consummated. Applicants 
    further assert that the requested relief would prevent any disruption 
    in the delivery of investment advisory services to the Funds during the 
    period after the Merger.
        5. Applicants represent that, under the New Advisory Agreements 
    during the Interim Period, the Funds will receive the same scope and 
    quality of investment advisory services, provided in the same manner, 
    as they receive under the Existing Advisory Agreements. Applicants 
    state that, in the event of any material change in investment 
    management personnel providing services to the Funds, the applicable 
    Adviser will apprise and consult with the relevant Fund's Board to 
    ensure that the Broad, including a majority of the non-interested 
    directors, is satisfied that the services provided by the Adviser will 
    not be diminished in scope and quality. Applicants note that the fees 
    payable to the Advisers under the New Advisory Agreements during the 
    Interim Period will be at the same rate as the fees paid under the 
    Existing Advisory Agreements.
    
    Applicants' Conditions
    
        Applicants agree as conditions to the issuance of the exemptive 
    order requested by the application that:
        1. The New Advisory Agreements will contain substantially the same 
    terms and conditions as the Existing Advisory Agreements, except for 
    the date of commencement and termination.
        2. The portion of the advisory fees earned by the Advisers during 
    the Interim Period will be maintained in interest-bearing escrow 
    accounts, and amounts in the accounts chargeable to the Funds 
    (including interest earned on such amounts) will be paid to the 
    applicable Adviser only upon approval of each New Advisory Agreement by 
    the relevant Fund's shareholders or, in the absence of such approval, 
    to the Fund.\10\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ As described in representation 11 in this notice, if the 
    Commission declines to extend the Temporary Order or denies the BT 
    Advisers' request for a permanent section 9(c) order, the BT 
    Advisers may only receive the fees payable to them that were 
    escrowed up to the date on which the Temporary Order or an extension 
    of the Temporary Order expires if the permanent order has not been 
    granted.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        3. Each fund will schedule a meeting of its shareholders to vote on 
    approval of the New Advisory Agreements, which will be held within 150 
    days following the commencement of the Interim Period (but in no event 
    later that November 30, 1999).
        4. The BT Advisers, or entities controlling them, will pay the 
    costs of preparing and filing the application and the costs relating to 
    the solicitation and approval of Fund Shareholders of the New Advisory 
    Agreements necessitated by the Merger.
        5. BT Corp, Deutsche Bank, and applicants will take all appropriate 
    actions to ensure that the scope and quality of investment advisory and 
    other services to be provided to the Funds by the advisers during the 
    Interim Period will be least equivalent, in the judgment of the Boards, 
    including a majority of the non-interested directors, to the scope and 
    quality of services currently provided under the Existing Advisory 
    Agreements. In the event of any material change in investment 
    management personnel providing advisory services pursuant to the New 
    Advisory Agreements, the applicable Adviser will apprise and consult 
    with the relevant Fund's Board to ensure that the Board, including a 
    majority of the non-interested directors, is satisfied that the 
    services provided by the Adviser during the Interim Period will not be 
    diminished in scope or quality.
        6. The application and any exemption issued will be without 
    prejudice to, and will not limit the Commission's rights in any manner 
    with respect to, any Commission investigations or enforcement actions 
    pursuant to the federal securities laws, or the consideration by the 
    Commission of any application for exemption from statutory 
    requirements, including without limitation, the consideration of a 
    request for a permanent exemption pursuant to sections 9(c) of the Act, 
    or the revocation, removal, or extension of the Temporary Order.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
    under delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-11363 Filed 5-5-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/06/1999
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') for an exemption from section 15(a) of the Act.
Document Number:
99-11363
Dates:
The application was filed on March 5, 1999 and amended on April 28, 1999.
Pages:
24427-24430 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Investment Company Act Release No. 23817, 812-11530
PDF File:
99-11363.pdf