97-11855. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Et Al., Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 7, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 24981-24982]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-11855]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-440]
    
    
    The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Et Al., Perry 
    Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1, Environmental Assessment and Finding 
    of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering approval, by issuance of an order under 10 CFR 50.80, of 
    the indirect transfer of Facility Operating License No. NPF-58, issued 
    to The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, et al., the licensees, 
    for operation of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1, located in 
    Lake County, Ohio.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would consent to the indirect transfer of the 
    license with respect to a proposed merger between Centerior Energy 
    Corporation (the parent corporation for The Cleveland Electric 
    Illuminating Company, Toledo Edison Company, and Centerior Service 
    Company; licensees for Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1) and Ohio 
    Edison Company (Perry licensee). Ohio Edison Company is also the parent 
    company for OES Nuclear, Inc., and Pennsylvania Power Company, which 
    are also licensees for Perry. The merger would result in the formation 
    of a new single holding company, First Energy Corp.
        The proposed action is in accordance with The Cleveland Electric 
    Illuminating Company's request for approval dated December 13, 1996. 
    Supplemental information was submitted by letter dated February 14, 
    1997.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is required to obtain the necessary consent to 
    the indirect transfer of the license discussed above. According to the 
    licensee, the underlying transaction is needed to create a stronger, 
    more competitive enterprise that is expected to save over $1 billion 
    over the first 10 years of FirstEnergy operation.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has reviewed the proposed action and concludes that 
    there will be no changes to the facility or its operation as a result 
    of the proposed action. Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that there 
    are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with 
    the proposed action.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does not affect nonradiological plant effluents and has no other 
    environmental impact. Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that there 
    are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts associated 
    with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered 
    denial of the proposed action. Denial of the application would result 
    in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental 
    impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the 
    Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, documented in NUREG-0884.
    
    [[Page 24982]]
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on April 10, 1997, the staff 
    consulted with the Ohio State official, C. O'Clare of the Ohio 
    Emergency Management Agency, regarding the environmental impact of the 
    proposed action. The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has 
    determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see The 
    Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company submittal dated December 13, 
    1996, supplemented by letter dated February 14, 1997, which are 
    available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document 
    Room, The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at 
    the local public document room located at the Perry Public Library, 
    3753 Main Street, Perry, Ohio 44081.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of April 1997.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Jon B. Hopkins, Sr.
    Project Manager, Project Directorate III-3, Division of Reactor 
    Projects III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 97-11855 Filed 5-6-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/07/1997
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-11855
Pages:
24981-24982 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-440
PDF File:
97-11855.pdf