[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24979-24980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-11859]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket 70-7002]
Notice of Amendment to Certificate of Compliance GDP-2 for the
U.S. Enrichment Corporation, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant,
Portsmouth, OH
The Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, has
made a determination that the following amendment request is not
significant in accordance with 10 CFR 76.45. In making that
determination the staff concluded that (1) There is no change in the
types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may
be released offsite; (2) there is no significant increase in individual
or cumulative occupational radiation exposure; (3) there is no
significant construction impact; (4) there is no significant increase
in the potential for, or radiological or chemical consequences from,
previously analyzed accidents; (5) the proposed changes do not result
in the possibility of a new or different kind of accident; (6) there is
no significant reduction in any margin of safety; and (7) the proposed
changes will not result in an overall decrease in the effectiveness of
the plant's safety, safeguards or security programs. The basis for this
determination for the amendment request is shown below.
The NRC staff has reviewed the certificate amendment application
and concluded that it provides reasonable assurance of adequate safety,
safeguards, and security, and compliance with NRC requirements.
Therefore, the Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, is prepared to issue an amendment to the Certificate of
Compliance for the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. The staff has
prepared a Compliance Evaluation Report which provides details of the
staff's evaluation.
The NRC staff has determined that this amendment satisfies the
criteria for a categorical exclusion in accordance with 10 CFR 51.22.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact
statement or environmental assessment need be prepared for this
amendment.
USEC or any person whose interest may be affected may file a
petition, not exceeding 30 pages, requesting review of the Director's
Decision. The petition must be filed with the Commission not later than
15 days after publication of this Federal Register Notice. A petition
for review of the Director's Decision shall set forth with
particularity the interest of the petitioner and how that interest may
be affected by the results of
[[Page 24980]]
the decision. The petition should specifically explain the reasons why
review of the Decision should be permitted with particular reference to
the following factors: (1) The interest of the petitioner; (2) how that
interest may be affected by the Decision, including the reasons why the
petitioner should be permitted a review of the Decision; and (3) the
petitioner's areas of concern about the activity that is the subject
matter of the Decision. Any person described in this paragraph (USEC or
any person who filed a petition) may file a response to any petition
for review, not to exceed 30 pages, within 10 days after filing of the
petition. If no petition is received within the designated 15-day
period, the Director will issue the final amendment to the Certificate
of Compliance without further delay. If a petition for review is
received, the decision on the amendment application will become final
in 60 days, unless the Commission grants the petition for review or
otherwise acts within 60 days after publication of this Federal
Register Notice.
A petition for review must be filed with the Secretary of the
Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001, Attention: Docketing and Services Branch, or may be delivered to
the Commission's Public Document Room, Gelman Building, 2120 L Street,
NW., Washington, DC, by the above date.
For further details with respect to the action see (1) The
application for amendment and (2) the Commission's Compliance
Evaluation Report. These items are available for public inspection at
the Commission's Public Document Room, Gelman Building, 2120 L Street,
NW., Washington, DC, and at the Local Public Document Room.
Date of amendment request: February 28, 1997.
Brief Description of Amendment
The amendment proposes to add a definition for completion times and
to define the maximum interval between repetitive action completion
times in the Technical Safety Requirements and to make the same changes
to the Safety Analysis Report.
Basis for Finding of No Significance
1. The proposed amendment will not result in a change in the types
or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be
released offsite.
The proposed amendment to include a definition for completion time
and to define the maximum time interval for repetitive actions is an
administrative action. As such, these changes have no impact on plant
effluents and will not result in any impact to the environment.
2. The proposed amendment will not result in a significant increase
in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The proposed amendment will not increase radiation exposure.
3. The proposed amendment will not result in a significant
construction impact.
The proposed amendment will not result in any construction,
therefore, there will be no construction impacts.
4. The proposed amendment will not result in a significant increase
in the potential for, or radiological or chemical consequences from,
previously analyzed accidents.
The proposed amendment to include a definition for completion time
and to define the maximum time interval for repetitive actions will
provide more formality for the conduct of plant operations. This
inclusion will ensure consistent interpretation of the requirements.
The proposed changes do not affect the potential for, or radiological
or chemical consequences from, previously evaluated accidents.
5. The proposed amendment will not result in the possibility of a
new or different kind of accident.
The proposed amendment to include a definition for completion time
and to define the maximum time interval for repetitive actions will
ensure consistent interpretation of the requirements. The changes will
not create new operating conditions or a new plant configuration that
could lead to a new or different type of accident.
6. The proposed amendment will not result in a significant
reduction in any margin of safety.
A definition for completion time and the definition for a maximum
time interval for repetitive actions were not formally defined in the
past and were subject to interpretation. The addition of these
definitions for completion time and the maximum time interval for
repetitive actions provides more formality for the conduct of plant
operations. The proposed changes cause no reductions in the margins of
safety.
7. The proposed amendment will not result in an overall decrease in
the effectiveness of the plant's safety, safeguards or security
programs.
The proposed amendment to include a definition for completion time
and to define the maximum time interval for repetitive actions provides
more formality for the conduct of plant operations. The effectiveness
of the safety, safeguards, and security programs is not decreased.
EFFECTIVE DATE: Thirty days after issuance.
Certificate of Compliance No. GDP-2
Amendment will incorporate a new Technical Safety Requirement, a
revised Technical Safety Requirement and Safety Analysis Report
changes.
Local Public Document Room location: Portsmouth Public Library,
1220 Gallia Street, Portsmouth, Ohio 45662.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of April 1997.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Carl J. Paperiello,
Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 97-11859 Filed 5-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
