-
Start Preamble
AGENCY:
Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Department of the Navy deleted the exempt system of records N05527-4, entitled “Naval Security Group Personnel Security/Access Files” on April 24, 2002, at 67 FR 20100. This rule will delete the exemption rule for the now non-existent Privacy Act system of records.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
April 24, 2002.
Start Further InfoFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mrs. Doris Lama at (202) 685-6545 or DSN 325-6545.
End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental InformationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review”
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96-354, “Regulatory Flexibility Act” (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they are concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department of Defense. Start Printed Page 30554
Public Law 96-511, “Paperwork Reduction Act” (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of Defense and that the information collected within the Department of Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, “Unfunded Mandates Reform Act”
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rulemaking for the Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments.
Executive Order 13132, “Federalism”
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Start List of SubjectsList of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 701
- Privacy
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 701, Subpart G continues to read as follows:
End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part2. In Section 701.118, paragraph (p) is removed and reserved as follows:
End Amendment Part Start SignatureDated: April 29, 2002.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 02-10993 Filed 5-6-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-U
Document Information
- Effective Date:
- 4/24/2002
- Published:
- 05/07/2002
- Department:
- Navy Department
- Entry Type:
- Rule
- Action:
- Final rule.
- Document Number:
- 02-10993
- Dates:
- April 24, 2002.
- Pages:
- 30553-30554 (2 pages)
- Docket Numbers:
- Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5211.5
- Topics:
- Privacy
- PDF File:
- 02-10993.pdf
- CFR: (1)
- 32 CFR 701.118