97-11966. Statement of Policy on Assistance to Operating Insured Depository Institutions; Rescission of Policy Statement  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 89 (Thursday, May 8, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 25191-25192]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-11966]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
    
    
    Statement of Policy on Assistance to Operating Insured Depository 
    Institutions; Rescission of Policy Statement
    
    AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC).
    
    ACTION: Rescission of policy statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: As part of the FDIC's systematic review of its regulations and 
    written policies under section 303(a) of the Riegle Community 
    Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, the FDIC is 
    rescinding its Statement of Policy on Assistance to Operating Insured 
    Depository Institutions (the Policy Statement). The Policy Statement, 
    which reflects various statutory requirements of the Federal Deposit 
    Insurance Act (the FDI Act), provides criteria for the FDIC's 
    consideration of proposals it receives for assistance to operating 
    insured depository institutions under section 13(c) of the FDI Act 
    (assistance proposals). The FDIC is rescinding the Policy Statement, as 
    it is duplicative of statutory requirements in the FDI Act, it is not 
    required by the FDI Act or necessary for purposes of the FDIC's 
    consideration of assistance proposals it receives. The FDIC does not 
    anticipate receiving many viable assistance proposals in the future, as 
    it is unlikely that any assistance proposals will meet the statutory 
    requirements.
    
    DATES: This Policy Statement is rescinded May 8, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Herbert J. Held, Assistant Director, 
    Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, (202) 898-7329; Sean 
    Forbush, Resolutions Specialist, Division of Resolutions and 
    Receiverships, (202) 898-8506; Barbara I. Taft, Assistant General 
    Counsel, Legal Division, (202) 736-0183, Michael B. Phillips, Counsel, 
    Legal Division, (202) 898-3581, FDIC, 550 17th Street, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20429.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FDIC is conducting a systematic review 
    of its regulations and written policies. Section 303(a) of the Riegle 
    Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 (CDRI) 
    1 requires the FDIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the 
    Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the 
    Office of Thrift Supervision each to streamline and modify its 
    regulations and written policies in order to improve efficiency, reduce 
    unnecessary costs, and eliminate unwarranted constraints on credit 
    availability. Section 303(a) of CDRI also requires each of the federal 
    banking agencies to remove inconsistencies and outmoded and duplicative 
    requirements from its regulations and written policies.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 12 U.S.C. 4803(a).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The current Statement of Policy on Assistance to Operating Insured 
    Depository Institutions, which was adopted by the Board of Directors of 
    the FDIC, was published in the Federal Register on December 18, 
    1992.2 The Policy Statement, which reflects various 
    statutory requirements of the FDI Act, provides criteria for the FDIC's
    
    [[Page 25192]]
    
    consideration of proposals it receives for assistance to operating 
    insured depository institutions under section 13(c) of the FDI Act. The 
    FDIC published for comment in the Federal Register on July 3, 1996, a 
    proposed revision to the Policy Statement, which updated and revised 
    the Policy Statement.3 The proposed revision to the Policy 
    Statement resulted from the FDIC's systematic review of its regulations 
    and written policies under section 303(a) of CDRI. The following 
    primary changes to the Policy Statement were reflected in the proposed 
    revision to the Policy Statement: (i) Deletion of references to the 
    Resolution Trust Corporation, which statutorily ``sunset'' on December 
    31, 1995; and (ii) the incorporation of the requirements of section 11 
    of the Resolution Trust Corporation Completion Act of 1993,4 
    which revised section 11(a)(4) of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1821(a)(4), to 
    prohibit the use of the Bank Insurance Fund or the Savings Association 
    Insurance Fund to benefit shareholders of a failed or failing insured 
    depository institution, except in cases of systemic risk determined in 
    accordance with section 13(c)(4)(G) of the FDI Act.5
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ See 57 FR 60203 (December 18, 1992).
        \3\ See 61 FR 34814 (July 3, 1996).
        \4\ Pub. L. 103-204 (1993).
        \5\ In pertinent part, section 13(c)(4)(G) of the FDI Act, 12 
    U.S.C. 1823(c)(4)(G) provides that the FDIC has the authority to 
    provide to an operating insured institution assistance that does not 
    meet the requirements of section 13(c)(4)(A) of the FDI Act only if 
    the Secretary of the Treasury (in consultation with the President 
    and upon the written recommendations of two-thirds of the Board of 
    Directors of the FDIC and two-thirds of the Board of Governors of 
    the Federal Reserve System) determines that the FDIC's compliance 
    with section 13(c)(4)(A) of the FDI Act would have serious adverse 
    effects on economic conditions or financial stability and the 
    assistance to the operating insured institution would avoid or 
    mitigate such adverse effects.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The only comment received on the proposed revision to the Policy 
    Statement was a letter dated November 25, 1996, from Representative 
    James A. Leach (R-Iowa), Chairman, Committee on Banking and Financial 
    Services, U.S. House of Representatives. Chairman Leach indicated his 
    strong opposition to providing any assistance which benefits 
    shareholders of a failed or failing institution, except in cases of 
    systemic risk as provided in section 13(c)(4)(G) of the FDI Act.
        As part of its ongoing review under section 303(a) of CDRI, the 
    FDIC has determined that the FDIC's written policies can be streamlined 
    by rescinding the Policy Statement. The Policy Statement, which is 
    duplicative of statutory provisions of the FDI Act, is not required by 
    the FDI Act. It is not necessary for consideration by the FDIC of 
    assistance proposals it receives. Assistance proposals the FDIC 
    receives will be evaluated against the applicable provisions of the FDI 
    Act.
        The Policy Statement has not been utilized much in recent years. As 
    section 13(c)(4) of the FDI Act requires the FDIC to select the 
    resolution alternative that involves the least cost to the relevant 
    deposit insurance fund, any open assistance proposal must be evaluated 
    on a competitive basis with other available resolution alternatives. 
    Because of the cost savings inherent in FDIC-assisted transactions 
    involving the appointment of a receiver for an institution, it is 
    unlikely that an open assistance proposal will be more cost effective 
    than an available closed institution resolution.6 Further, 
    it will be extremely difficult for assistance proposals to meet the 
    least-cost test, the requirements of section 11(a)(4), and other 
    applicable statutory requirements. The FDIC has not approved any 
    assistance proposals since 1992, when two proposals were approved. 
    During the period 1993-1996, the FDIC received only two assistance 
    proposals which were not approved, as they did not meet the applicable 
    statutory requirements.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ Among the cost advantages favoring a resolution transaction 
    following appointment of a receiver for an institution are the 
    effect of the receivership on the contingent liabilities of the 
    failed institution, the potential for uninsured depositors and other 
    unsecured creditors to share in the loss incurred on the institution 
    and the ability of the FDIC as receiver to repudiate burdensome 
    contracts.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the above reasons, the Policy Statement is rescinded.
    
        By order of the Board of Directors.
    
        Dated at Washington, D.C. this 29th day of April, 1997.
    
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
    Robert E. Feldman,
    Deputy Executive Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-11966 Filed 5-7-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/08/1997
Department:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Rescission of policy statement.
Document Number:
97-11966
Dates:
This Policy Statement is rescinded May 8, 1997.
Pages:
25191-25192 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-11966.pdf