98-12293. Proposed Change #3 to FAA-P-8110-2, Airship Design Criteria (ADC)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 25540-25541]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-12293]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    
    Proposed Change #3 to FAA-P-8110-2, Airship Design Criteria (ADC)
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Change 3 is based on a National Transportation Safety Board 
    (NTSB) recommendation calling for envelope tear warning systems on new 
    airship certification projects. The recommendation stems from an 
    airship accident that resulted from an envelope failure. Change 3 
    requires that some means of indication or warning system will alert the 
    pilot of envelope tears. This could be an elaborate warning system 
    based on sensors or simple gauges located and marked such that an 
    unusual indication would be obvious to the pilot.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 8, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send all comments to: Federal Aviation Administration, Small 
    Airplane Directorate, Standards Office, ACE-110, 601 East 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lowell Foster, Regulations and Policy 
    Branch, ACE-111, at the address above, telephone number (816) 426-6941.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any person may obtain a copy of this 
    information by contacting the person named above under FOR FURTHER 
    INFORMATION CONTACT.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        We invite interested parties to submit comments on the proposed 
    change to the ADC. Commenters must identify the report number (FAA-P-
    8110-2) and submit comments to the address specified above. The FAA 
    will consider all communications received on or before the closing date 
    for comments before issuing the final Change 3 to the ADC. The proposed 
    changes to the ADC and comments received may be inspected at the 
    Standards Office (ACE-110), 1201 Walnut, Suite 900, Kansas City, 
    Missouri, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays, except 
    Federal holidays.
    
    Background
    
        In 1993, an airship came to rest on top and draped over a seven-
    story building in New York, New York, after the airship deflated in 
    flight and became uncontrollable. The airship suffered a large tear in 
    the envelope, the material
    
    [[Page 25541]]
    
    that makes up the shape of the balloon portion of the airship. The NTSB 
    subsequently investigated and recommended several changes to the FAA's 
    airship design standards. One of the recommendations called for an 
    envelope tear warning system.
        The primary reason for the NTSB's recommendation for the envelope 
    tear warning system came from the crew's report. The pilot and 
    passenger both stated that they were not aware of the loss of envelope 
    pressure until the airship began to collapse, even though there was a 
    pressure gauge and a low pressure indicator light to alert them of 
    envelope damage. Although crew procedures for both major and minor 
    envelope tears had been established, those actions were not 
    accomplished because the crew did not initially recognize that the 
    envelope was damaged.
        The emergency procedures for this airship, relating to a tear in 
    the envelope, are to operate the airship with a very low pressure. Very 
    low pressure causes the airship to lose rigidity, but minimizes the 
    loss of helium while maintaining controllability. If the emergency 
    procedure is not followed, ballonets will automatically attempt to keep 
    the envelope pressure constant, forcing helium out through the tear. 
    Ballonets are airbags contained within the envelope that are inflated 
    with air to control the rigidity and sometimes the center of gravity 
    (trim) of the airship. A warning light and alarm activate when the 
    envelope pressure drops below a nominal level; however, if the 
    ballonets continue to automatically inflate to maintain envelope 
    pressure, the alarm system does not activate until substantial helium 
    is lost.
        The NTSB noted that the airship was not equipped nor required to be 
    equipped with a ballonet inflation rate transducer or other device, 
    which might have alerted the crew to the loss of significant quantities 
    of helium. The NTSB believes that had the airship been equipped with a 
    better warning system, the pilot would have been alerted to the loss of 
    pressure earlier and could have taken prudent emergency actions to 
    improve the possibility of a controlled emergency landing.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 30, 1998.
    Michael Gallagher,
    Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    
    Proposed Change #3 To FAA-P-8110-2 Airship Design Criteria (ADC)
    
    New Item: Add to 6.2 ``(i)''
    
        Change 3 is based on a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) 
    recommendation calling for envelope tear warning systems on new airship 
    certification projects. The recommendation stems from an airship 
    accident that resulted from an envelope failure. Change 3 requires that 
    some means of indication or warning system will alert the pilot of 
    envelope tears.
        The new paragraph will be added to item 6.2 as follows:
        (i) Means to warn the pilot of envelope tears.
        Acceptable compliance means include systems as simple as locating 
    and marking both envelope and ballonet pressure gauges so that unusual 
    indications (rapid loss of helium) are immediately noticeable to the 
    pilot. If an airship valving system is complex or automatic, a system 
    such as a ballonet airflow rate change sensor connected to a warning 
    system may be more appropriate.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-12293 Filed 5-7-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/08/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of availability and request for comments.
Document Number:
98-12293
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before June 8, 1998.
Pages:
25540-25541 (2 pages)
PDF File:
98-12293.pdf