94-11030. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.; Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc.; and Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Changes Relating to Pilot Programs Providing Price ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 88 (Monday, May 9, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-11030]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: May 9, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-33991; File Nos. SR-CHX-93-23; SR-BSE-93-24; SR-PSE-94-
    2; SR-Phlx-94-8]
    
     
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
    Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.; Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc.; and 
    Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule 
    Changes Relating to Pilot Programs Providing Price Protection of Limit 
    Orders Executable After the Close of Regular Trading Hours
    
    I. Introduction
    
        The Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX''), Boston Stock Exchange, 
    Inc. (``BSE''), Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc. (``PSE''), and 
    Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'') (collectively, the 
    ``Regional Exchanges'') have filed with the Securities and Exchange 
    Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC''), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of 
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``ACT'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 
    thereunder,\2\ proposed rule changes to request permanent approval of 
    their respective pilot programs relating to price protection of limit 
    orders.\3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\17 CFR 240.19b-4 (1993).
        \3\The CHX originally submitted File No. SR-CHX-93-23 to request 
    permanent approval of its pilot program relating to price protection 
    of limit orders. On December 22, 1993, the CHX filed Amendment No. 1 
    to the proposal requesting that, in addition, the Commission approve 
    a three month extension of its pilot program until April 30, 1994. 
    See letter from David T. Rusoff, Attorney, Foley & Lardner, to Louis 
    A. Randazzo, Attorney, Office of Derivative and Exchange Oversight, 
    SEC, dated December 21, 1993.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The proposed rule changes were published for comment in Securities 
    Exchange Act Release Nos. 33798 (March 22, 1994), 59 FR14693 (March 29, 
    1994); 33800 (March 22, 1994), 59 FR 14691 (March 29, 1994); 33799 
    (March 22, 1994), 59 FR 14697 (March 29, 1994); and 33801 (March 22, 
    1994), 59 FR 14700 (March 29, 1994). No comments were received on the 
    proposals. This order grants permanent approval to the pilot programs.
    
    II. Description of the Proposal
    
        The Regional Exchanges request permanent approval of their 
    respective pilot programs relating to price protection of limit orders 
    based on after-hours prints in a primary market.\4\ The pilot programs 
    require Exchange specialists to provide primary market protection for 
    those limit orders entered during an Exchange's primary trading session 
    which are designated as executable after the close of the regular 
    Exchange auction market trading session, known as ``GTX'' orders 
    (``good until canceled, executable in the afternoon session'').\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\For a complete description of each Regional Exchange's pilot 
    program, See their respective approval orders, infra note 5.
        The Commission notes that the PSE, in an earlier proposed rule 
    change (File No. SR-PSE-91-21) proposed to permit the creation and 
    trading of a new type of order, one-sided (``OS'') closing price 
    orders for after hours trading. The proposed OS order is a ``day 
    limit order'' entered for execution after 1 p.m. PT and eligible for 
    execution as determined by the Exchange. The PSE has withdrawn the 
    request for OS orders for after hours trading. See letter to Sharon 
    Lawson, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, 
    Commission, from David P. Semak, Vice President, PSE, dated April 
    20, 1994.
        \5\On June 13, 1991, the Commission approved, on a pilot basis, 
    File Nos. SR-MSE-91-11 (in 1991, the CHX was named the Midwest Stock 
    Exchange or MSE), SR-BSE-91-04, SR-PSE-91-21, and SR-Phlx-91-26, 
    which amended the Exchanges' respective Rules relating to price 
    protection of limit orders. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
    29297, 56 FR 28191 (June 19, 1991) (``MSE Approval Order''); 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29301, 56 FR 28182 (June 19, 
    1991) (``BSE Approval Order''); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
    29305, 56 FR 28208 (June 19, 1991) (``PSE Approval Order''); and 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29300, 56 FR 28212 (June 19, 
    1991 (``Phlx Approval Order''). Additional approvals were granted in 
    Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 29543 (August 16, 1991), 56 FR 
    40929 (``Order approving File No. SR-PSE-91-28'') and 29749 (October 
    4, 1991), 56 FR 50405 (``Order approving File No. SR-Phlx-91-32''). 
    These pilot programs were established in response to the new after 
    hours trading sessions established by the New York Stock Exchange, 
    Inc. (``NYSE'') and American Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex''). The 
    NYSE Off-Hours trading (``OHT'') sessions extend the NYSE's trading 
    hours beyond the 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. trading session. See 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29237 (May 24, 1991), 56 FR 
    24853 (May 31, 1991) (approving File Nos. SR-NYSE-90-52 and NYSE-90-
    53), and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29515 (August 2, 1991), 
    56 FR 37736 (August 8, 1991) (approving File No. SR-Amex-91-15). The 
    Regional Exchanges' procedures provide primary market protection for 
    customer GTX orders (good until cancelled, executable in the 
    afternoon session) in securities listed both on the NYSE and on the 
    Amex. The Commission several times approved extensions of all the 
    pilot programs, most recently until April 30, 1994. See Securities 
    Exchange Act Release No. 32365 (May 25, 1993), 58 FR 31560 (June 3, 
    1993) (order extending approval of File No. SR-BSE-93-10); 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32363 (May 25, 1993), 58 FR 
    31558 (June 3, 1993) (order extending approval of File No. SR-Amex-
    93-19); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32368 (May 25, 1993), 58 
    FR 31563 (June 3, 1993) (order extending approval of File No. SR-
    MSE-93-6); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32367 (May 25, 1993), 
    58 FR 31570 (June 3, 1993) (order extending approval of File No. SR-
    PSE-93-6); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32364 (May 25, 1993), 
    58 FR 31574 (June 3, 1993) (order extending approval of File No. SR-
    Phlx-93-16); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32362 (May 25, 
    1993), 58 FR 31565 (June 3, 1993) (order extending approval of File 
    No. SR-NYSE-93-23); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33561 
    (February 1, 1994), 59 FR 5789 (February 8, 1994) (order extending 
    approval of File No. SR-Amex-93-15); Securities Exchange Act Release 
    No. 33562 (February 1, 1994), 59 FR 5792 (February 8, 1994) (order 
    approving File Nos. SR-CHX-93-23; SR-BSE-93-18; SR-PSE-94-1; and SR-
    Phlx-94-7); and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33563 (February 
    1, 1994), 59 FR 5795 (February 8, 1994) (order approving File No. 
    SR-NYSE-93-51).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Discussion
    
        The Commission finds that permanent approval of the Regional 
    Exchanges' respective pilot programs to provide price protection to 
    limit orders executable after the close of regular trading hours is 
    consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and 
    regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. 
    Specifically, the Commission believes that the proposals are reasonably 
    designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, perfect the 
    mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
    in general, further investor protection and the public interest in fair 
    and orderly markets on national securities exchanges.\6\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\As requested by the Regional Exchanges, the Commission has 
    granted an exemption from Rule 10a-1 under the Act to permit short 
    sales of GTX orders on the Exchanges without complying with the 
    ``tick'' provisions of the rule, subject to certain conditions. See 
    letters from Larry E. Bergmann, Associate Director, Division of 
    Market Regulation, Commission, to William W. Uchimoto, General 
    Counsel, Phlx, dated June 13, 1991; Daniel J. Liberti, Associate 
    Counsel, MSE, dated June 13, 1991; Karen A. Aluise, BSE, dated June 
    13, 1991; and David P. Semak, Vice President, PSE, dated June 13, 
    1991.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In the Commission's release approving the NYSE's OHT facility, the 
    Commission noted the benefits that would accrue to investors through 
    the development of an after-hours trading session.\7\ Although the 
    Regional Exchanges' programs do not establish after-hours sessions 
    identical to that of the NYSE, the Commission believes that they 
    provide a reasonable competitive response. By allowing GTX orders that 
    would be executed on the NYSE and Amex to receive a similar fill on the 
    Regional Exchanges, the programs provide a mechanism for maintaining 
    each Regional Exchange's individual marketplace on a competitive level 
    with the primary market.\8\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29237, supra note 5.
        \8\The Commission's rationale for approving the proposals on a 
    pilot basis is contained in the discussion section of the original 
    approval orders. The discussions in those orders are incorporated by 
    reference into this order.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission believes that the Regional Exchanges' programs 
    demonstrate the competitiveness of the U.S. securities markets. As a 
    result, investors have new opportunities for trading. Moreover, the 
    Commission believes that the increased competition that results from 
    permitting Regional specialists to attract GTX order should enhance the 
    quality of customer order execution. In addition, the Commission 
    believes that the Regional programs are consistent with the maintenance 
    of fair and orderly markets and contribute to the practicability of 
    brokers achieving a best execution for customer orders. The programs 
    achieve this by imposing additional obligations on Exchange specialists 
    to provide their customers with primary market price protection. 
    Additionally, since the parameters of the rule are expressed clearly in 
    the text of the rule and do not disturb the priority rules currently in 
    force at the Exchanges, the programs provide fair and reasonable 
    procedures for the protection of limit orders.
        Furthermore, the Commission believes that, although specialists 
    will know which limit orders are designed ``GTX'' and will manually 
    execute GTX orders, they should not be able to use this information to 
    their own advantage. The programs consist of execution guarantee 
    systems. Specialist participation would be limited to filling the 
    contra side of a customer limit order that is eligible, pursuant to the 
    new rule, for a fill. The specialist would have no discretion in 
    choosing which orders to fill and which priority to give orders. In 
    addition, orders would be eligible to be filled according to the 
    priority that already exists on the specialists' books. Thus, the 
    Commission is satisfied that, although specialists will have knowledge 
    of which limit orders have been designated GTX, they would not be able 
    to use this knowledge to the detriment of investors because their 
    participation in the execution of GTX orders will be limited. The 
    Commission expects, however, that the Exchanges will monitor carefully 
    the execution of GTX orders to ensure that specialists are not taking 
    unfair advantage of this information.
        The Commission continues to expect the Regional Exchanges, through 
    use of their surveillance procedures, to monitor for, and report to the 
    Commission, any patterns of manipulation or trading abuses or unusual 
    trading activity resulting from these programs. In addition, the 
    Commission continues to request that the Exchanges keep the Commission 
    apprised of any technical problems which may arise regarding the 
    operation of the programs.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act\9\ 
    that the proposed rule changes (SR-CHX-93-23, SR-BSE-93-24, SR-PSE-94-
    2, and SR-Phlx-94-8) are hereby approved on a permanent basis.
    
        \9\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-11030 Filed 5-6-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
05/09/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-11030
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: May 9, 1994, Release No. 34-33991, File Nos. SR-CHX-93-23, SR-BSE-93-24, SR-PSE-94- 2, SR-Phlx-94-8