94-13192. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 104 (Wednesday, June 1, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-13192]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: June 1, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
     
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [OPP-300341; FRL-4864-1]
    RIN No. 2070-AC18
    
    1,1-Dichloro-2,2-Bis(p-Ethylphenyl) Ethane; Proposed Revocation of 
    Tolerances
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to revoke the tolerances listed at 40 CFR 
    180.139 for residues of the pesticide 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-bis(p-
    ethylphenyl) ethane (also known as Perthane, Ethylan, or diethyl 
    diphenyl dichloroethane, and hereafter referred to as Perthane) in or 
    on raw agricultural commodities. This revocation is proposed because 
    all registrations of Perthane have been canceled. The revocation would 
    take effect 30 days after the date of publication of the final rule in 
    the Federal Register.
    
    DATES: Written comments, identified by the OPP document control number 
    [OPP-300341], must be received on or before July 1, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail, submit comments to: Public Response and Program 
    Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, 401 M St., Washington, DC 20460. In person, deliver 
    comments to: Rm. 1132, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., 
    Arlington, VA 22202.
        Information submitted as a comment concerning this document may be 
    claimed as confidential by marking any or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). Information so marked will 
    not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 
    CFR part 2. A copy of the comment that does not contain CBI must be 
    submitted for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked 
    confidential may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. All 
    written comments will be available for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at 
    the Virginia address given above, from 8 a.m. until 4:30 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday, except legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Sibold, Special Review and 
    Reregistration Division (7508W), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location and telephone number: Special Review Branch, Crystal 
    Station #1, 3rd Floor, 2800 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, 
    Telephone: (703)-308-8033.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Introduction
    
        Currently, a tolerance of 15 ppm exists at 40 CFR 180.139 for 
    residues of Perthane in or on the raw agricultural commodities apples, 
    broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage, cauliflower, cherries, kohlrabi, 
    lettuce, pears, and spinach; and a tolerance of 0 ppm for residues in 
    milk and meat.
    
    II. Background
    
        Perthane is a chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticide chemically 
    related to DDT. It was used for insect control on agricultural crops, 
    on agricultural premises such as barns and corrals, in pet areas for 
    tick control, in homes for mosquito and fly control, and in fabric for 
    moth control. Rohm and Haas was the sole producer of technical 
    Perthane, although many companies formulated end-use products.
        On May 11, 1978, Rohm and Haas informed EPA that it was 
    discontinuing production and sale of their Perthane insecticide because 
    of its inability to produce the product at a reasonable cost and its 
    loss of market share. Rohm and Haas also stated that it had already 
    discontinued production of its last remaining Perthane product, which 
    was technical Perthane. Rohm and Haas further stated that the expected 
    sale of the remaining inventory was to be completed in the fourth 
    quarter of 1978. The company also submitted a copy of a letter it was 
    sending to its Perthane customers telling them of its business decision 
    to stop producing this product and further stating that it would 
    allocate existing stocks against open orders received by May 31, 1978.
        On March 28, 1980, EPA issued a Data Call-In (DCI) for toxicology 
    data to all technical and end-use registrants of Perthane. EPA had 
    determined that it lacked adequate data to determine whether pesticide 
    products containing Perthane cause unreasonable adverse effects on 
    humans and the environment. Further, after reviewing all of the 
    available acute, subchronic, and chronic toxicity studies supporting 
    the registration of Perthane, the Agency determined that the available 
    data were not sufficient to support the continued registration of these 
    products.
        On May 14, 1980, Rohm and Haas notified EPA by letter that it was 
    choosing to voluntarily withdraw all the registrations it held for 
    Perthane (Perthane 75% Solution -- Registration 707-60, Perthane EC -- 
    Registration 707-65, and Perthane Technical -Registration 707-96). 
    Subsequently, on June 20, 1980 (45 FR 41694), EPA announced that Rohm 
    and Haas Co. had requested voluntary cancellation of the registrations 
    of its three Perthane products. The effective date of the cancellation 
    was July 21, 1980. Rohm and Haas was permitted to sell existing stocks 
    of Perthane for 1 year.
        On December 31, 1984, EPA issued a Data Call-In to the remaining 
    registrants of Perthane to give them the opportunity to generate 
    chronic toxicology data to support registrations of Perthane for food 
    and certain non-food uses. In the ensuing years, registrations of end-
    use products of Perthane were canceled as a result of regulatory action 
    and follow-up to the 1980 and 1984 DCIs. In 1990, the last Perthane 
    registration, for a non-food use, was found to be unsupported for Phase 
    II of reregistration and was subsequently canceled by Agency action (55 
    FR 31164).
    
    III. Current Proposal
    
        EPA is proposing to revoke all tolerances for Perthane under 
    section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 
    U.S.C. 301 et seq. The Agency is taking this action because all 
    registrations for uses of Perthane have been canceled.
        Once the tolerances for Perthane on these raw agricultural 
    commodities are revoked, it will be unlawful to import into the United 
    States any commodities or products containing any Perthane. EPA has no 
    evidence of recent foreign usage of Perthane on commodities which may 
    be imported into the United States.
        EPA believes for the following reasons that it is unlikely that 
    residues of perthane will be found in food commodities for which 
    tolerances have been established. EPA has no evidence of domestic 
    distribution of Perthane since at least 1985. In addition, the 
    persistence of Perthane in crops (the half life) is about 30 to 40 
    days. Perthane may be moderately persistent in the environment. 
    However, EPA believes that since so much time has lapsed since Perthane 
    was produced and distributed for use, it is unlikely that Perthane will 
    be found in either the commodities for which there are tolerances or in 
    commodities for which there are not tolerances. For these reasons, EPA 
    does not recommend an action level.
    
    IV. Public Comment Procedures
    
        Any person who has registered or submitted an application for the 
    registration of a pesticide under FIFRA, as amended, which contains 
    Perthane, may request within 30 days after publication in the Federal 
    Register that this proposal to revoke the Perthane tolerance listed in 
    40 CFR 180.139 be referred to an advisory committee in accordance with 
    section 408(e) of FFDCA. Such requests should be addressed to the 
    contact person listed at the beginning of this proposal.
        Interested persons are invited to submit written comments, 
    information, or data in response to this proposed rule. Comments must 
    be submitted by July 1, 1994. Comments must bear a notation indicating 
    the document control number [OPP-300341]. Three copies of the comments 
    should be submitted to either location listed under ``ADDRESSES'' above 
    in this document. Documents considered and relied upon by EPA in 
    reaching its decision and all written comments filed pursuant to this 
    document will be available for public inspection at the Virginia 
    address listed at the beginning of this document.
    
    V. Other Regulatory Requirements
    
        To satisfy requirements for analysis specified by Executive Order 
    12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Paperwork Reduction Act, 
    EPA has analyzed the impacts of this proposal. The complete analysis, 
    summarized below, is available for public inspection at the address 
    listed at the beginning of this proposal.
    
    A. Executive Order 12866
    
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order (i.e., 
    Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB)). Under section 3 (f), the order defines ``significant'' 
    as those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an annual effect 
    on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially 
    affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
    environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal 
    governments or communities ( also known as ``economically 
    significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise 
    interfering with an action taken or planned by another Agency; (3) 
    materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user 
    fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues 
    arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the 
    principles set forth in the Executive Order.
        The last registration of Perthane was canceled voluntarily in 1990 
    as part of reregistration. However, the registrant requested 
    cancellation of Perthane technical in 1980, and EPA understands that 
    production of technical Perthane ceased in 1978. EPA has no evidence of 
    recent domestic or foreign usage of Perthane. There has been no 
    domestic distribution of Perthane since at least 1985. For these 
    reasons, EPA believes that existing stocks of those products should 
    have been depleted and that sufficient time has elapsed for residues to 
    dissipate and for legally treated commodities to have gone through 
    channels of trade. Thus, revocation of Perthane tolerances is expected 
    to have no impact which meets the conditions set forth in E.O. 12866.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The proposed tolerance revocation has been reviewed under the 
    provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the Agency has 
    determined that it will have no economic impact on small businesses, 
    small governments, or small organizations. As indicated in Unit V.A. 
    above, the revocation of the tolerance for perthane is expected to have 
    no impact on any entity of any size, since there appears to have been 
    no distribution of the pesticide for several years. The proposed 
    regulatory action is intended to prevent the sale of food commodities 
    containing pesticide residues where the subject pesticide might be used 
    in an unregistered or illegal manner.
        Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 
    U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have 
    a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
    
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This proposed regulatory action does not contain any information 
    collection requirements subject to review by the Office of Management 
    and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
    seq.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recorkeeping requirements.
    
    Dated: May 17, 1994.
    
    Lynn R. Goldman,
    Assistant Administrator for Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic 
    Substances.
    
        Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 180 be amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
    Sec. 180.139   [Removed]
    
        2. By removing Sec. 180.139 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-bis(p-ethylphenyl) 
    ethane; tolerances for residues.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-13192 Filed 5-31-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/01/1994
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
94-13192
Dates:
Written comments, identified by the OPP document control number [OPP-300341], must be received on or before July 1, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: June 1, 1994
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.139