98-14435. Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; Wyoming; Control of Landfill Gas Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 29644-29646]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-14435]
    
    
    
    [[Page 29644]]
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 62
    
    [WY-001-0001a; FRL-6104-7]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated 
    Facilities and Pollutants; Wyoming; Control of Landfill Gas Emissions 
    From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The EPA is approving the Wyoming plan and associated 
    regulations for implementing the Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfill 
    Emission Guidelines at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc, which were required 
    pursuant to section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (Act). The State's plan 
    was submitted to EPA on February 13, 1998, in accordance with the 
    requirements for adoption and submittal of State plans for designated 
    facilities in 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. The State's plan establishes 
    performance standards for existing MSW landfills and provides for the 
    implementation and enforcement of those standards. EPA finds that 
    Wyoming's plan for existing MSW landfills adequately addresses all of 
    the Federal requirements applicable to such plans.
    
    DATES: This direct final rule is effective on July 31, 1998, unless EPA 
    receives adverse comment by July 1, 1998. If adverse comment is 
    received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule 
    in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not 
    take effect.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments may be mailed to Vicki Stamper, 8P2-A, at 
    the EPA Region VIII Office listed. Copies of the documents relative to 
    this action are available for inspection during normal business hours 
    at the Air Program, Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 
    18th Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466. Copies of the 
    State documents relevant to this action are available for public 
    inspection at the Air Quality Division, Wyoming Department of 
    Environmental Quality, 122 West 25th Street, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicki Stamper, EPA Region VIII, (303) 
    312-6445.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        Under section 111(d) of the Act, EPA has established procedures 
    whereby States submit plans to control certain existing sources of 
    ``designated pollutants.'' Designated pollutants are defined as 
    pollutants for which a standard of performance for new sources applies 
    under section 111, but which are not ``criteria pollutants'' (i.e., 
    pollutants for which National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) are 
    set pursuant to sections 108 and 109 of the Act) or hazardous air 
    pollutants (HAPs) regulated under section 112 of the Act. As required 
    by section 111(d) of the Act, EPA established a process at 40 CFR part 
    60, subpart B, which States must follow in adopting and submitting a 
    section 111(d) plan. Whenever EPA promulgates a new source performance 
    standard (NSPS) that controls a designated pollutant, EPA establishes 
    emissions guidelines in accordance with 40 CFR 60.22 which contain 
    information pertinent to the control of the designated pollutant from 
    that NSPS source category (i.e., the ``designated facility'' as defined 
    at 40 CFR 60.21(b)). Thus, a State's section 111(d) plan for a 
    designated facility must comply with the emission guideline for that 
    source category as well as 40 CFR part 60, subpart B.
        On March 12, 1996, EPA published Emission Guidelines (EG) for 
    existing MSW landfills at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc (40 CFR 60.30c-
    60.36c) and NSPS for new MSW Landfills at 40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW 
    (40 CFR 60.750-60.759). (See 61 FR 9905-29.) The pollutant regulated by 
    the NSPS and EG is MSW landfill emissions, which contain a mixture of 
    volatile organic compounds (VOCs), other organic compounds, methane, 
    and HAPs. VOC emissions can contribute to ozone formation which can 
    result in adverse effects to human health and vegetation. The health 
    effects of HAPs include cancer, respiratory irritation, and damage to 
    the nervous system. Methane emissions contribute to global climate 
    change and can result in fires or explosions when they accumulate in 
    structures on or off the landfill site. To determine whether control is 
    required, nonmethane organic compounds (NMOCs) are measured as a 
    surrogate for MSW landfill emissions. Thus, NMOC is considered the 
    designated pollutant. The designated facility which is subject to the 
    EG is each existing MSW landfill (as defined in 40 CFR 60.31c) for 
    which construction, reconstruction or modification was commenced before 
    May 30, 1991.
        Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.23(a), States were required to either (1) 
    submit a plan for the control of the designated pollutant to which the 
    EG applies or (2) submit a negative declaration if there were no 
    designated facilities in the State within nine months after publication 
    of the EG, or by December 12, 1996.
        EPA has been involved in litigation over the requirements of the 
    MSW landfill EG and NSPS since the summer of 1996. On November 13, 
    1997, EPA issued a notice of proposed settlement in National Solid 
    Wastes Management Association v. Browner, et. al., No. 96-1152 (D.C. 
    Cir), in accordance with section 113(g) of the Act. (See 62 FR 60898.) 
    It is important to note that the proposed settlement does not vacate or 
    void the existing MSW landfill EG or NSPS. Accordingly, the currently-
    promulgated MSW landfill EG was used as a basis for EPA's review of 
    Wyoming's submittal.
    
    II. Analysis of State's Submittal
    
        On February 13, 1998, the State of Wyoming submitted its plan and 
    regulations (hereafter referred to as the ``State Plan'') for 
    implementing EPA's MSW landfill EG. The Wyoming State Plan includes the 
    State's implementing regulations in Section 35 of the Wyoming Air 
    Quality Standards and Regulations (WAQSR) and supporting documentation 
    for the other requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart B.
        Wyoming has adopted provisions in Section 35 of the WAQSR which 
    incorporate all of the requirements of the EG. Wyoming has also adopted 
    compliance timelines in Section 35(b)(iv) and (e) of the WAQSR to 
    address the compliance timelines of the EG and the increments of 
    progress requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. Thus, the State's 
    regulations adequately address the requirements of the EG, including 
    the required applicability provisions, emission limitations, test 
    methods and procedures, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, and 
    compliance times. Specifically, Wyoming's regulation requires that 
    existing MSW landfills that: (1) accepted waste since November 8, 1987; 
    (2) have a design capacity equal to or greater than 2.5 million 
    megagrams (Mg) or 2.5 million m3; and (3) have a NMOC 
    emission rate, calculated in accordance with the procedures of 40 CFR 
    60.754, equal to or greater than 50 Mg/year to install a gas collection 
    and control system meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 60.33c(b) and (c) 
    within thirty months from the effective date of the State regulation 
    (or, for those existing MSW landfills whose initial NMOC emission rate 
    is less than 50 Mg/yr on the effective date of the State regulation, 
    within thirty months after the landfill's
    
    [[Page 29645]]
    
    NMOC emission rate equals or exceeds 50 Mg/yr).
        The State Plan also includes documentation showing that all 
    requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart B have been met. Specifically, 
    the State Plan includes a demonstration of legal authority to adopt and 
    implement the plan, an emissions inventory, increments of progress 
    compliance deadlines, a commitment to submit to EPA annual State 
    progress reports on plan implementation and enforcement, and 
    documentation that the State addressed the public participation 
    requirements of 40 CFR 60.23. In addition, as stated above, the State 
    has adopted emission standards and compliance schedules as an 
    enforceable State regulation that is no less stringent than the EG.
        Consequently, EPA finds that the State Plan and implementing 
    regulations meet all of the requirements applicable to such plans in 40 
    CFR part 60, subparts B and Cc. The State did not, however, submit 
    evidence of authority to regulate existing MSW landfills in Indian 
    Country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Therefore, EPA is not approving 
    this State Plan as it relates to those sources.
        More detailed information on the requirements for an approvable 
    plan and Wyoming's submittal can be found in the Technical Support 
    Document (TSD) accompanying this notice, which is available upon 
    request.
    
    III. Final Action
    
        Based on the rationale discussed above and in further detail in the 
    TSD associated with this action, EPA is approving Wyoming's plan and 
    associated regulations, as submitted on February 13, 1998, for the 
    control of landfill gas from existing MSW landfills, except for those 
    existing MSW landfills located in Indian Country. As provided by 40 CFR 
    60.28(c), any revisions to Wyoming's State Plan or associated 
    regulations will not be considered part of the applicable plan until 
    submitted by the State in accordance with 40 CFR 60.28(a) or (b), as 
    applicable, and approved by EPA in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, 
    subpart B.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
    revision to any State Plan. Each request for revision to a State Plan 
    shall be considered separately in light of specific technical, 
    economic, and environmental factors and in relation to relevant 
    statutory and regulatory requirements.
        EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because the 
    Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
    adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this 
    Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document 
    that will serve as the proposal to approve the State Plan should 
    adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective July 31, 1998 
    without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by 
    July 1, 1998.
        If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice 
    withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule did 
    not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in 
    a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not 
    institute a second comment period on the proposed rule. Any parties 
    interested in commenting on the proposed rule should do so at this 
    time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this 
    rule will be effective on July 31, 1998 and no further action will be 
    taken on the proposed rule.
    
    IV. Administrative Requirements
    
    A. Executive Order 12866
    
        The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this 
    regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.
    
    B. Executive Order 13045
    
        The [proposed/final] rule is not subject to E.O. 13045, entitled 
    ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
    Risks,'' because it is not an ``economically significant'' action under 
    E.O. 12866.
    
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600, et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
    and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        State Plan approvals under section 111 of the Act do not create any 
    new requirements, but simply approve requirements that the State is 
    already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal State Plan approval 
    does not impose any new requirements, the Administrator certifies that 
    it does not have a significant impact on small entities affected. 
    Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the 
    Act, preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute 
    Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State action. The 
    Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning State Plans on such 
    grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 
    (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
    
    D. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
    must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
    final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to 
    the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA 
    must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
    that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with 
    statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan 
    for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
    significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
        EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not 
    include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 
    million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the 
    aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre-
    existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new 
    requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or 
    tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
    
    E. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
    
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as 
    added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 
    1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency 
    promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy 
    of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller 
    General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this 
    rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House 
    of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States 
    prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is 
    not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
    
    [[Page 29646]]
    
    F. Petitions for Judicial Review
    
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
    judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
    of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 31, 1998. Filing a 
    petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
    does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
    review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
    review must be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
    rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
    to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
    
    G. Executive Order 13045
    
        Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
    Risks. Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to 
    any rule that is (1) likely to be ``economically significant'' as 
    defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) the Agency has reason to 
    believe that the environmental health or safety risk addressed by the 
    rule may have a disproportionate effect on children. If a regulatory 
    action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental 
    health or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain 
    why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective 
    and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
        This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045, ``Protection of Children 
    from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' because this is not 
    an ``economically significant'' regulatory action as defined by E.O. 
    12866, and because it does not involve decisions on environmental 
    health or safety risks that may disproportionately affect children.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Methane, Municipal 
    solid waste landfills, Nonmethane organic compounds, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: May 21, 1998.
    Carol Rushin,
    Acting Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
    
        40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 62--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7642.
    
        2. Subpart ZZ is added to read as follows:
    
    Subpart ZZ--Wyoming
    
    Sec.
    62.12600  Identification of plan.
    62.12601  Identification of sources.
    62.12602  Effective date.
    
    Subpart ZZ--Wyoming
    
    Landfill Gas Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid Waste 
    Landfills
    
    
    Sec. 62.12600  Identification of plan.
    
        Section 35, ``Municipal Solid Waste Landfills,'' of the Wyoming Air 
    Quality Standards and Regulations and associated documentation 
    submitted by the State on February 13, 1998.
    
    
    Sec. 62.12601  Identification of sources.
    
        The plan applies to all existing municipal solid waste landfills 
    for which construction, reconstruction, or modification was commenced 
    before May 30, 1991 that accepted waste at any time since November 8, 
    1987 or that have additional capacity available for future waste 
    deposition, as described in 40 CFR part 60, subpart CC.
    
    
    Sec. 62.12602  Effective date.
    
        The effective date of the plan for municipal solid waste landfills 
    is July 31, 1998.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-14435 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/31/1998
Published:
06/01/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
98-14435
Dates:
This direct final rule is effective on July 31, 1998, unless EPA receives adverse comment by July 1, 1998. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect.
Pages:
29644-29646 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
WY-001-0001a, FRL-6104-7
PDF File:
98-14435.pdf
CFR: (3)
40 CFR 62.12600
40 CFR 62.12601
40 CFR 62.12602