99-13809. Texas Regulatory Program  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 29249-29252]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-13809]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
    
    30 CFR Part 943
    
    [SPATS No. TX-041-FOR]
    
    
    Texas Regulatory Program
    
    AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public 
    hearing.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) 
    is announcing receipt of an amendment to the Texas regulatory program 
    (Texas program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 
    1977 (SMCRA). Texas proposes to add revegetation success and normal 
    husbandry practice guidelines to its program. Texas intends to revise 
    its program to ensure that adequate data collection methods are used 
    for determining revegetation success for purposes of releasing 
    reclamation performance bonds and to ensure that the husbandry 
    practices used by the permittee during the period of responsibility for 
    revegetation success and bond liability are normal husbandry practices 
    within the region for unmined lands.
        This document gives the times and locations that the Texas program 
    and the amendment to that program are available for your inspection, 
    the comment period during which you may submit written comments on the 
    amendment, and the procedures that we follow for the public hearing, if 
    one is requested.
    
    DATES: We will accept written comments until 4 p.m., c.d.t., July 1, 
    1999. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on the amendment on 
    June 28, 1999. We will accept requests to speak at the hearing until 
    4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on July 16, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: You should mail or hand deliver written comments and 
    requests to speak at the hearing to Michael C. Wolfrom, Director, Tulsa 
    Field Office, at the address listed below.
        You may review copies of the Texas program, the amendment, a 
    listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments 
    received in response to this document at the addresses listed below 
    during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding 
    holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting 
    OSM's Tulsa Field Office.
    
    Michael C. Wolfrom, Director, Tulsa Field Office, Office of Surface 
    Mining, 5100 East Skelly Drive, Suite 470, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135-6547, 
    Telephone: (918) 581-6430.
    Surface Mining and Reclamation Division, Railroad Commission of Texas, 
    1701 North Congress Avenue, Capitol Station, P. O. Box 12967, Austin, 
    Texas 78711-2967, Telephone: (512) 463-6900.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael C. Wolfrom, Director, Tulsa 
    Field Office. Telephone: (918) 581-6430. 
    Internet:mwolfrom@tokgw.osmre.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background on the Texas Program
    
        On February 16, 1980, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally 
    approved the Texas program. You can find background information on the 
    Texas program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of 
    comments, and the conditions of approval in the February 27, 1980, 
    Federal Register (45 FR 12998). You can find later actions concerning 
    the Texas program at 30 CFR 943.10, 943.15, and 943.16.
    
    II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
    
        By letter dated May 13, 1999 (Administrative Record No. TX-649), 
    Texas sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA. Texas sent the 
    amendment at its own initiative. The amendment includes a guidance 
    document on the procedures and standards for determining revegetation 
    success on surface-mined lands in Texas and a guidance document on the 
    normal husbandry practices that permittees are to use during the period 
    of responsibility for revegetation success and bond liability (extended 
    responsibility period). Below is a summary of the two documents. The 
    full text of the program amendment is available for your inspection at 
    the locations listed above under ADDRESSES.
    
    1. Revegetation Success Guidelines: Procedures and Standards for 
    Determining Revegetation Success on Surface-Mined Lands in Texas
    
        Texas is proposing a guideline document that describes the 
    procedures and standards for determining revegetation success on 
    reclaimed surface mined lands in Texas.
        a. Section I contains introductory information. Revegetation 
    success must be demonstrated by using the revegetation standards and 
    statistically valid sampling techniques for measuring success contained 
    in the proposed guideline document. The use of the methods contained in 
    this guidance document by mining companies operating in Texas will 
    provide assurance that adequate data collection methods have been used 
    for determining revegetation success for purposes of releasing 
    reclamation performance bond funds. Mining companies may propose 
    alternative procedures for sampling and analysis of vegetation data. 
    However, the use of alternative methods must be approved by Texas, and 
    the alternative methods must be included in the approved regulatory 
    program.
        b. Section II describes the regulatory requirements for meeting 
    revegetation
    
    [[Page 29250]]
    
    success under the Texas Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Act at 
    sections 134.041, .092(a)(19) and (20), and .104 and the implementing 
    performance standards for revegetation success in the Texas Coal Mining 
    Regulations at Title 16, Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 12.390 through 
    12.395, and 12.399.
        c. Section III identifies specific concepts and requirements to be 
    followed in developing revegetation evaluation plans.
        d. Section IV provides the approved methods for implementing the 
    various evaluation methods for ground cover, productivity, and woody-
    plant stocking, including the proper selection of observation points. 
    Measurement methods are presented for all vegetation parameters. 
    Measurement results must be compared to either approved reference areas 
    or technical success standards. Subsection A provides information on 
    the selection of observation points for collecting vegetation data. 
    Subsection B provides guidance on adjusting for field conditions when 
    conducting vegetation surveys. Subsection C provides guidelines for 
    ground cover measurements. Subsection D contains guidance for 
    measurement of productivity. Subsection E provides guidelines for woody 
    plant stocking. Subsection F contains guidance on selecting and 
    management of reference areas.
        e. Section V lists the revegetation success standards for each land 
    use type and provides information on determining productivity of the 
    reclaimed areas. Nine general types of land use are included: 
    grazingland, pastureland, cropland, forestry, fish and wildlife 
    habitat, undeveloped land, industrial/commercial, residential, and 
    recreation. Subsection A provides guidelines relating to ground cover 
    and productivity standards for grazingland and pastureland. Subsection 
    B contains guidance on the ground cover and productivity standards for 
    cropland. Subsection C provides guidelines on the ground cover 
    standards and woody-plant stocking rates for the forestry land use 
    category. Subsection D contains guidance on ground cover standards and 
    woody-plant rates for fish and wildlife habitat. Subsection E provides 
    guidelines on ground cover standards and woody-plant stocking rates for 
    undeveloped land. Subsection F includes guidelines relating to ground 
    cover standards and woody-plant stocking rates for industrial/
    commercial land uses. Subsection G provides guidance on ground cover 
    standards and woody-plant stocking rates for residential land uses. 
    Subsection H contains guidelines on ground cover standards and woody-
    plant stocking rates for recreation land uses. Subsections A through H 
    include the steps to be followed for measurement and statistical 
    comparison when either reference areas or technical standards are used 
    as a measure for revegetation success. These subsections also contain 
    information on evaluating ground cover measurements in conjunction with 
    the species composition, when applicable.
        f. Section VI provides a listing of the literature used in 
    developing the proposed guideline document. Appendix A contains the 
    statistical information, including equations and tables, to be used in 
    the determination of revegetation success for ground cover, 
    productivity, and woody-plant stocking. Appendix B provides a table 
    summarizing the revegetation success standards for all land uses. The 
    table in Appendix B includes the revegetation parameters, performance 
    standards, and conditions for bond release relating to each land use. 
    Appendix C contains examples of revegetation success determinations for 
    ground cover, productivity involving herbaceous biomass, and woody 
    plant stem counts. Attachment 1 is a document entitled ``The 
    Development of the Forage Production Standards for Post Mine Soils'' by 
    the United States Department of Agriculture--Natural Resources 
    Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). Attachment 2 is a document entitled 
    ``Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Recommendations for the 
    Development of Success Standards for Woody-Plant Stocking Rates.'' 
    Attachment 3 is a document entitled ``Texas Forest Service 
    Recommendations for Reforestation of Pine and Hardwoods in Texas.''
    
    2. Guidelines for Normal Husbandry Practices for Surface-Mined Lands in 
    Texas
    
        Texas is proposing a guideline document that describes the 
    husbandry practices to be used by the permittee during the period of 
    responsibility for revegetation success and bond liability. These 
    practices are normal husbandry practices within the region for unmined 
    lands.
        a. Section I contains introductory information. The guideline 
    document includes the normal husbandry practices that permittees must 
    use for disease and pest control, application of fertilizers, 
    application and incorporation of other soil amendments, and any other 
    necessary soil vegetation management activities on surface-mined lands 
    in Texas during the extended responsibility period. Husbandry practices 
    not included in this document may be considered augmentative in nature 
    and, if performed on land that is currently in the extended 
    responsibility period, may restart that period. The decision whether a 
    particular activity can be classified as a normal husbandry practice 
    will depend both on the regulatory requirements of the Texas Coal 
    Mining Regulations and the postmining land use. Texas discusses its 
    regulatory requirements in section II of the document.
        b. Section III describes the conventions for normal husbandry 
    practices. Texas lists the following three conventions regarding normal 
    husbandry practices for surface-mined lands in Texas:
    
        1. Normal husbandry practices are region-specific and include 
    activities performed by landowners managing lands not disturbed by 
    mining activities.
        2. Normal husbandry practices are those activities that can 
    expected to continue as part of the postmining land use.
        3. Discontinuance of the husbandry practices will not reduce the 
    probability of revegetation success.
    
    Texas also provides examples of the applicability of the conventions 
    listed in items 1 and 3.
        c. In section IV, Texas proposes normal husbandry practices for six 
    vegetative community postmining land uses defined in the Texas program: 
    grazingland, pastureland; cropland; forestry; fish and wildlife 
    habitat; and undeveloped land. The normal husbandry practices listed 
    for grazingland, pastureland, cropland, forestry, and fish and wildlife 
    habitat are divided into three general categories: general management 
    of soil and vegetation; addition of plant nutrients and other soil 
    amendments; and pest management. Reference documents defining the 
    normal husbandry practices for each category are listed. Texas 
    submitted copies of these reference documents to support its proposed 
    practices for disease and pest control, application of fertilizers, 
    application and incorporation of other soil amendments, and other 
    necessary soil vegetation management activities on surface-mined lands. 
    Because the definition of undeveloped land excludes any type of 
    management inputs during the extended responsibility period, Texas is 
    only allowing limited erosion repair for this land use.
        d. In section V, Texas provides guidelines for erosion repair, 
    other damage repair, reseeding areas, overseeding, and restocking of 
    woody species. Texas also included a provision for regrading and 
    revegetation of areas
    
    [[Page 29251]]
    
    where temporary structures have been removed.
        Texas may consider repair of erosion or other types of damage as a 
    normal husbandry practice, provided that the damage is not caused by a 
    lack of planning, design, or implementation of the mining and 
    reclamation plan. The total acreage of repaired areas cannot exceed 
    three contiguous acres or ten percent of the total land of the extended 
    responsibility area. In cases of erosion, repairs may be considered 
    non-augmentative if rill and gully damage was caused by precipitation 
    exceeding a 10-year/24-hour event or damage occurred before the first 
    two years of a 5-year extended responsibility period (areas with annual 
    precipitation >26 inches) or four years of a 10-year extended 
    responsibility period (areas with annual precipitation 26 
    inches). After the first two or four years, whichever is applicable, 
    total acreage for erosion repair cannot exceed one contiguous acre or 
    two percent of the total land of that extended responsibility area.
        Texas will determine whether or not regrading and revegetation of 
    areas where temporary structures such as sediment ponds, roads, and 
    small diversions have been removed are non-augmentative on a case-by-
    case basis. Areas that may pose significant potential for reclamation 
    problems will require a separate extended responsibility period.
        Overseeding of winter cover crops and/or summer annuals, into 
    existing vegetation, is considered a normal husbandry practice. 
    Restocking of woody species is allowed, as long as the time and 
    quantity of restocking is in compliance with Texas' regulations at 16 
    TAC 12.395(b)(3)(B).
        Reference documents defining the normal husbandry practices 
    relating to general management, addition of plant nutrients and other 
    soil amendments, and pest management for erosion repair and reseeded 
    areas are listed in this section. Texas submitted copies of these 
    reference documents to support these practices.
        e. In section VI, Texas lists those activities that are considered 
    unacceptable husbandry practices. The activities include: reseeding of 
    areas devoid of vegetation due to acid mine soils; irrigation; 
    supplemental watering of herbaceous vegetation and supplemental 
    watering of large woody stock later than two years after planting; all 
    application and incorporation of alkaline amendments, except for non-
    excessive application; and excessive application of plant nutrients.
        If any of the listed practices are performed, the extended 
    responsibility period for the affected areas will restart. Texas does 
    not consider practices required to address problems that arise from 
    mining-related activities as normal husbandry practices. Texas will use 
    information from field inspection reports and mine-soil chemical 
    analysis data to evaluate unacceptable husbandry practices or 
    augmentation.
    
    III. Public Comment Procedures
    
        Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are requesting 
    comments on whether the proposed amendment satisfies the applicable 
    program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the 
    amendment, it will become part of the Texas program.
    
    Written Comments
    
        Your written comments should be specific and pertain only to the 
    issues proposed in this rulemaking. You should explain the reason for 
    any recommended change. In the final rulemaking, we will not 
    necessarily consider or include in the Administrative Record any 
    comments received after the time indicated under DATES or at locations 
    other than the Tulsa Field Office.
    
    Public Hearing
    
        If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person 
    listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., c.d.t. on July 
    16, 1999. We will arrange the location and time of the hearing with 
    those persons requesting the hearing. If you are disabled and need 
    special accommodations to attend a public hearing, contact the 
    individual listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We will not 
    hold the hearing if no one requests an opportunity to speak at the 
    public hearing.
        You should file a written statement at the time you request the 
    hearing. This will allow us to prepare adequate responses and 
    appropriate questions. The public hearing will continue on the 
    specified date until all persons scheduled to speak have been heard. If 
    you are in the audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish 
    to do so, you will be allowed to speak after those who have been 
    scheduled. We will end the hearing after all persons scheduled to speak 
    and persons present in the audience who wish to speak have been heard.
    
    Public Meeting
    
        If only one person requests an opportunity to speak at a hearing, 
    we may hold a public meeting, rather than a public hearing. If you wish 
    to meet with us to discuss the amendment, request a meeting by 
    contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All 
    such meetings are open to the public and, if possible, we will post 
    notices of meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will 
    also make a written summary of each meeting part of the Administrative 
    Record.
    
    IV. Procedural Determinations
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempts this rule from 
    review under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review).
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required 
    by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has 
    determined that, to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the 
    applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section. 
    However, these standards are not applicable to the actual language of 
    State regulatory programs and program amendments since each program is 
    drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 
    503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30 CFR 730.11, 
    732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on State regulatory programs and 
    program amendments must be based solely on a determination of whether 
    the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal 
    regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 
    731, and 732 have been met.
    
    National Environmental Policy Act
    
        This rule does not require an environmental impact statement since 
    section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency 
    decisions on State regulatory program provisions do not constitute 
    major Federal actions within the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the 
    National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rule does not contain information collection requirements that 
    require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
    3507 et seq.).
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
    The State submittal
    
    [[Page 29252]]
    
    which is the subject of this rule is based upon corresponding Federal 
    regulations for which an economic analysis was prepared and 
    certification made that such regulations would not have a significant 
    economic effect upon a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, 
    this rule will ensure that existing requirements previously published 
    by OSM will be implemented by the State. In making the determination as 
    to whether this rule would have a significant economic impact, the 
    Department relied upon the data and assumptions for the corresponding 
    Federal regulations.
    
    Unfunded Mandates
    
        OSM has determined and certifies under the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
    Act (2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq.) that this rule will not impose a cost of 
    $100 million or more in any given year on local, state, or tribal 
    governments or private entities.
    
    List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943
    
        Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
    
        Dated: May 24, 1999.
    Brent Wahlquist,
    Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.
    [FR Doc. 99-13809 Filed 5-28-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-05-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/01/1999
Department:
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public hearing.
Document Number:
99-13809
Dates:
We will accept written comments until 4 p.m., c.d.t., July 1, 1999. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on the amendment on June 28, 1999. We will accept requests to speak at the hearing until 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on July 16, 1999.
Pages:
29249-29252 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
SPATS No. TX-041-FOR
PDF File:
99-13809.pdf
CFR: (1)
30 CFR 943