94-14169. Grant of Individual Exemptions; Fidelity Management Trust Company, et al.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 111 (Friday, June 10, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-14169]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: June 10, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 94-43; Exemption Application No. D-
    9282, et al.]
    
     
    
    Grant of Individual Exemptions; Fidelity Management Trust 
    Company, et al.
    
    AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Labor.
    
    ACTION: Grant of individual exemptions.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document contains exemptions issued by the Department of 
    Labor (the Department) from certain of the prohibited transaction 
    restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
    (the Act) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
        Notices were published in the Federal Register of the pendency 
    before the Department of proposals to grant such exemptions. The 
    notices set forth a summary of facts and representations contained in 
    each application for exemption and referred interested persons to the 
    respective applications for a complete statement of the facts and 
    representations. The aplicaitons have been available for public 
    inspection at the Department in Washington, DC. The notices also 
    invited interested persons to submit comments on the requested 
    exemptions to the Department. In addition the notices stated that any 
    interested person might submit a written request that a public hearing 
    be held (where appropriate). The applicants have represented that they 
    have complied with the requirements of the notification to interested 
    persons. No public comments and no requests for a hearing, unless 
    otherwise stated, were received by the Department.
        The notices of proposed exemption were issued and the exemptions 
    are being granted solely by the Department because, effective December 
    31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (43 FR 
    47713, October 17, 1978) transferred the authority of the Secretary of 
    the Treasury to issue exemptions of the type proposed to the Secretary 
    of Labor.
    
    Statutory Findings
    
        In accordance with section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 
    4975(c)(2) of the Code and the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 
    2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon 
    the entire record, the Department makes the following findings:
        (a) The exemptions are administratively feasible;
        (b) They are in the interests of the plans and their participants 
    and beneficiaries; and
        (c) They are protective of the rights of the participants and 
    beneficiaries of the plans.
    
    Fidelity Management Trust Company Located in Boston, Massachusetts
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 94-43; Exemption Application No. D-
    9282]
    
    Exemption
    
        The restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A) and 406(b)(2) of the Act 
    and the sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975 of the 
    Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) of the Code, shall not apply 
    to the cross-trading of securities by Fidelity Management Trust Company 
    (Fidelity) on behalf of employee benefit plan accounts for which 
    Fidelity acts as fiduciary.
    Part I--General Conditions
        (A) Each Plan participating in Fidelity's cross-trading program has 
    assets of at least $25 million;
        (B) A Plan's participation in the cross-trade program is subject to 
    a written authorization executed in advance by a fiduciary with respect 
    to each such Plan;
        (C) The authorization referred to in section (B) of this Part I is 
    terminable at will without penalty to such Plan, upon receipt by 
    Fidelity of written notice of such termination;
        (D) Before an authorization is made, the authorizing Plan fiduciary 
    must be furnished with any reasonably available information necessary 
    for the authorizing fiduciary to determine whether the authorization 
    should be made, including (but not limited to) a copy of this 
    exemption, an explanation of how the authorization may be terminated, a 
    detailed disclosure of the procedures implemented in Fidelity's cross-
    trade practices, and any other reasonably available information 
    regarding the matter that the authorizing fiduciary requests;
        (E) Each cross-trade transaction involves only securities for which 
    there is a generally recognized market;
        (F) Each cross-trade transaction is effected at the current market 
    value for the security on the date of the transactions, which shall be, 
    for equity securities, the closing price for the security on the date 
    of the transaction, and for debt securities, as determined in 
    accordance with paragraph (b) of Rule 17a-7 issued by the Securities 
    and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940;
        (G) Fidelity will not charge any Plan affected by a cross-trade 
    transaction any fee or commission for such transaction;
        (H) At least every three months, and not later than 45 days 
    following the period to which it relates, Fidelity will furnish the 
    authorizing Plan fiduciary with a report disclosing (1) a list of all 
    cross-trade transactions engaged in on behalf of the Plan, and (2) with 
    respect to each cross-trade transaction, the highest and lowest prices 
    at which the securities involved in the transaction were traded on the 
    date of such transaction;
        (I) The authorizing Plan fiduciary will be furnished with a summary 
    of certain additional information at least once per year. The summary 
    must be furnished within 45 days after the end of the period to which 
    it relates, and must contain the following: (1) A description of the 
    total amount of Plan assets involved in cross-trade transactions during 
    the period, (2) a description of Fidelity's cross-trade practices, (3) 
    A statement that the Plan fiduciary's authorization of cross-trade 
    transactions may be terminated upon receipt by Fidelity of the 
    fiduciary's written notice to that effect, and (4) a statement that the 
    Plan fiduciary's authorization of the cross-trade transaction will 
    continue in effect unless it is terminated; and
        (J) The Accounts involved in cross-trade transactions will not 
    include assets of any Plan established or maintained by Fidelity or its 
    affiliates.
    Part II--Specific Conditions
    (A) Index Accounts
        (1) The index of the Account is based on an index which represents 
    the investment performance of a specific segment of the public market 
    for equity or debt securities in the United States and/or foreign 
    countries. The organization creating and maintaining the index must be 
    (a) engaged in the business of providing financial information, 
    evaluations, advice or securities brokerage services to institutional 
    clients, (b) a publisher of financial news or information, or (c) a 
    public stock exchange or association of securities dealers. The index 
    must be created and maintained by an organization independent of 
    Fidelity and its affiliates. The index must be a generally accepted 
    standardized index of securities which is not specifically tailored for 
    the use of Fidelity or its affiliates.
        (2) The transaction takes place within three business days of the 
    ``triggering event'' giving rise to the cross-trade transaction. A 
    triggering event is defined as:
    
        (a) A change in the composition or weighting of the index 
    underlying an Index Account; or
        (b) A change in the overall level of investment in an Index 
    Account as a result of investments and withdrawals made on the Index 
    Account's opening date (the regularly-scheduled date on which 
    investments in or withdrawals from an Index Account may be made).
    
        (3) Fidelity maintains or causes to be maintained for a period of 
    six years from the date of the transaction the records necessary to 
    enable the persons described in section (4) of this Part II (A) to 
    determine whether the conditions of this exemption have been met, 
    except that a prohibited transaction will not be considered to have 
    occurred if, due to circumstances beyond the control of Fidelity or its 
    affiliates, the records are lost or destroyed prior to the end of the 
    six-year period.
        (4) (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section (4) 
    and notwithstanding any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b) of 
    section 504 of the Act, the records referred to in section (3) of this 
    Part II are unconditionally available at their customary location for 
    examination during normal business hours by--
    
        (1) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the 
    Department or the Internal Revenue Service,
        (2) Any fiduciary of a Plan participating in an Index Account 
    who has authority to acquire or dispose of the interests of the Plan 
    or any duly authorized employee or representative of such fiduciary,
        (3) Any contributing employer to any Plan participating in an 
    Index Account or any duly authorized employee or representative of 
    such employer, and
        (4) Any participant or beneficiary of any Plan participating in 
    an Index Account, or any duly authorized employee or representative 
    of such participant or beneficiary.
    
        (b) None of the persons described in paragraphs (2) through (4) of 
    subsection (a) of this section (4) shall be authorized to examine trade 
    secrets of Fidelity, any of its affiliates, or commercial or financial 
    information which is privileged or confidential.
    (B) Managed Accounts
        (1) An independent fiduciary of each Plan must specifically 
    authorize each cross-trade transaction in accordance with the following 
    procedure:
        (a) No more than three business days prior to the execution of any 
    cross-trade transaction, Fidelity must inform an independent fiduciary 
    of each Plan involved in the cross-trade transaction that Fidelity 
    proposes to buy or sell specified securities in a cross-trade 
    transaction if an appropriate opportunity is available, the current 
    trading price for such securities, and the total number of shares to be 
    acquired or sold by each such Plan.
        (b) Prior to each cross-trade transaction, the transaction must be 
    authorized either orally or in writing by the independent fiduciary of 
    each Plan involved in the cross-trade transaction;
        (c) If a cross-trade transaction is authorized orally by an 
    independent fiduciary, Fidelity will provide written confirmation of 
    such authorization in a manner reasonably calculated to be received by 
    such independent fiduciary within one business day from the date of 
    such authorization;
        (d) The authorization referred to in this Part II(B) will be 
    effective for a period of three business days; and
        (e) No more than ten days after the completion of a cross-trade 
    transaction, the independent fiduciary authorizing the cross-trade 
    transaction must be provided a written confirmation of the transaction 
    and the price at which the transaction was executed;
        (2) A cross-trade transaction will be effected only where the 
    transaction involves less than five percent of the aggregate average 
    daily trading volume for the securities involved in the transaction for 
    the week immediately preceding the authorization of the transaction. A 
    cross-trade transaction may exceed this limit only by express 
    authorization of independent fiduciaries on behalf of Plans affected by 
    the transaction; and
        (3) The cross-trade transaction is effected at a price which is 
    within ten percent of the closing price of the security on the day 
    before the date on which Fidelity receives authorization by the 
    independent Plan fiduciary to engage in the cross-trade transaction.
    Part III--Definitions
        (A) ``Account'' means an account holding assets of one or more 
    employee benefit plans which are subject to the Act (the Plans), for 
    which Fidelity or an affiliate of Fidelity acts as a fiduciary;
        (B) ``Affiliate'' means any person, directly or indirectly through 
    one or more intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common 
    control with Fidelity;
        (C) ``Cross-trade transaction'' means a purchase and sale of 
    securities between ERISA Accounts or between an ERISA Account and a 
    non-ERISA account for which Fidelity or an affiliate of Fidelity acts 
    as a trustee or investment manager;
        (D) ``Index Account'' means an Account for which Fidelity and the 
    Plan sponsor or other named fiduciary have agreed that the investment 
    of the assets in question will be designed to replicate the 
    capitalization-weighted composition of a stock or bond index; and
        (E) ``Managed Account'' means an Account for which Fidelity and the 
    Plan sponsor or other named fiduciary have agreed that the investment 
    of the assets in question will be managed actively at the discretion of 
    Fidelity, pursuant to written guidelines as to which types of 
    securities to buy or sell for the Account.
        Written Comments: The Department received one written comment and 
    no requests for a hearing. The comment was submitted by the applicant, 
    Fidelity Management Trust Company. The applicant addresses two matters 
    which are summarized as follows:
        (1) The applicant notes a typographical error in Part III of the 
    proposed exemption: Within the definition of ``Cross-trade 
    transaction'', the word ``account'' should not be capitalized. The 
    applicant represents that, as described elsewhere in the Notice of 
    Proposed Exemption, cross-trade transactions covered by the proposed 
    exemption may occur between an account holding assets of one or more 
    employee benefit plans which are subject to the Act (``Account'') and a 
    non-ERISA account managed by the applicant or an affiliate 
    (``account'').
        (2) The applicant wishes to supplement the summary of facts and 
    representations of the notice of proposed exemption (the Summary), by 
    clarifying and revising its explanation of the manner in which 
    opportunities for cross-trading transactions are allocated among 
    accounts under its management, which is found in section 10 of the 
    Summary. The applicant represents that subsequent to the publication of 
    the Summary, it determined that its cross-trading program will be 
    effected pursuant to a non-discretionary pro-rata allocation system. 
    For example, in the event that the number of shares of a particular 
    security which an Account proposes to sell on a given day is less than 
    the number of shares of such security which other Fidelity-advised 
    accounts propose to buy on that date, the direct cross-trade 
    opportunity will be allocated among potential buyers on a pro-rata 
    basis. A similar procedure would apply where the number of shares of a 
    particular security to be sold by Fidelity-advised accounts is less 
    than the number of such shares which an Account and one or more other 
    Fidelity-advised accounts proposes to buy on that date. Thus, the 
    Accounts participating in Fidelity's cross-trade program will have 
    opportunities to participate on a proportional basis in all cross-trade 
    transactions during the operation of the cross-trade program. The 
    applicant represents that this aspect of Fidelity's cross-trading 
    program is among the information which will be disclosed in writing to 
    the fiduciaries of the pension plans which invest in the Accounts.
        After careful consideration of the entire record, the Department 
    has determined to grant the exemption, as supplemented by the 
    applicant's comment.
        For a more complete statement of the facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to 
    the notice of proposed exemption published on December 10, 1993 at 58 
    FR 64978.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Willett of the Department, 
    telephone (202) 219-8881. (This is not a toll-free number.)
    
    Lone Star Industries, Inc. Master Retirement Trust (the Master Trust) 
    Located in Chicago, Illinois
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption No. 94-44; Application No. D-9295]
    
    Exemption
    
    Section I--Transactions
        Effective September 10, 1990, the restrictions of sections 406(a), 
    406(b)(1), 406(b)(2), and 407(a) of the Act and the sanctions resulting 
    from the application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section 
    4975(c)(1) (A) through (E) of the Code, shall not apply to:
        (a) The lease (the Lease) by the Master Trust of a certain parcel 
    of real property (the Property) located in Rancho Cordova, California, 
    to RMC Lonestar (RMC), a party in interest with respect to plans 
    participating in the Master Trust (the Plans);
        (b) The obligations and guarantees to the Master Trust by Lone Star 
    Industries, Inc. (LSI), a party in interest with respect to the Plans, 
    arising under the terms of the Lease on the Property, subsequent to the 
    assignment by LSI of its leasehold interest in the Property to RMC; and
        (c) The payment in the amount of $6,000,000 by LSI to the Master 
    Trust in exchange for a release of LSI's obligation to perform under 
    the terms of a certain yield guarantee agreement signed December 18, 
    1992, by LSI and the Master Trust; provided that the conditions set 
    forth in section II below are met.\1\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\For purposes of this exemption, references to specific 
    provisions of Title I of the Act, unless otherwise specified, refer 
    also to the corresponding provisions of the Code.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Section II--Conditions
        This exemption is conditioned upon the adherence to the material 
    facts and representations described herein and in the application for 
    exemption and upon the satisfaction of the following requirements:
        (a) The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the 
    Bankruptcy Court) enters and order confirming the modified amended 
    consolidated plan of reorganization filed by LSI and its affiliates, 
    pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code;
        (b) The obligations and guarantees of LSI to the Master Trust under 
    the Lease are assumed by LSI and continue after the plan of 
    reorganization is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court;
        (c) LSI pays the $6,000,000 in a single lump-sum payment in cash to 
    the Master Trust, not later than sixty (60) days following the later of 
    (1) the date of the order of the Bankruptcy Court approving the 
    payment, or (2) the date the grant of this exemption is published in 
    the Federal Register;
        (d) Morrison, Karsten, Ramzy & Arthur, Inc. (MKRA), acting as 
    independent qualified fiduciary on behalf of the Master Trust (the I/
    F), has negotiated, reviewed, and approved the transactions, and has 
    determined that the transactions were feasible, in the interest of, and 
    protective of the participants and beneficiaries of the Plans invested 
    in the Master Trust, as of the effective date of this exemption;
        (e) MKRA at the time of its appointment was unrelated to LSI, RMC, 
    and any other parties involved in the Lease and will at all times 
    remain independent of such parties;
        (f) The provisions of the amendment to the Lease, executed in 
    December 1992 (the First Amendment) become effective on the date that 
    the grant of this exemption is published in the Federal Register;
        (g) The terms of the Lease, as modified by the First Amendment, are 
    at least as favorable to the Master Trust, the Plans, and their 
    participants and beneficiaries, as those which could have been obtained 
    by the Master Trust in an arm's length negotiation with an unrelated 
    third party under similar circumstances;
        (h) From September 10, 1990, to June 1, 1993, the Northern Trust 
    Company (the Trustee), an independent party with respect to LSI, RMC, 
    and their affiliates, managed the Property on behalf of the Master 
    Trust and monitored and enforced the terms of the Lease;
        (i) From June 1, 1993, MKRA managed the Property on behalf of the 
    Master Trust and monitored and enforced the terms of the Lease, and 
    MKRA or its successors, will act as I/F with respect to the Property 
    and will monitor and enforce the provisions of the Lease as long as 
    such Property is leased to a party in interest;
        (j) MKRA or its successors will monitor the fair market value of 
    the Master Trust in order to insure that the fair market value of the 
    Property will at no time exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total fair 
    market value of the assets of the Master Trust;
        (k) LSI has either paid directly or reimbursed the Master Trust for 
    any fees, other than trustee and investment management fees, incurred 
    in connection with the transactions with respect to the ownership of 
    the Property by the Master Trust, and in the future, the Master Trust 
    will incur no fees in connection with the transactions, other than fees 
    paid to the trustee and to the investment manager; and
        (l) LSI has filed Forms 5330 and paid the excise taxes with respect 
    to the Lease of the Property for years 1987-1989 and, LSI, not later 
    than sixty (60) days after the date the grant of this exemption is 
    published in the Federal Register, will file Forms 5330 and will pay 
    the excise taxes for the period after December 31, 1989, and before the 
    effective date of this exemption.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This exemption will be effective as of September 10, 
    1990.
    
    Written Comments
    
        In the Notice of Proposed Exemption (the Notice), the Department 
    invited all interested persons to submit written comments and any 
    requests for a hearing on the proposed exemption within forty-five (45) 
    days from the date of the publication of the Notice in the Federal 
    Register. All written comments and requests for a hearing were to have 
    been received by the Department by April 22, 1994.
        As of the close of the comment period, the Department had received 
    eight (8) letters from interested persons commenting on the proposed 
    exemption in addition to comment letters from the applicant. In this 
    regard, the Department forwarded copies of the commentators' letters to 
    the applicant and requested that the applicant address in writing the 
    concerns raised.
        In a letter dated May 4 1994, the applicant responded to the 
    commentators, as requested by the Department. In this regard, the 
    applicant stated that in general the concerns of the commentators did 
    not identify any factual issues or express any direct objection to the 
    exemption. The comments from the commentators on the proposed exemption 
    were summarized by the applicant as follows: (1) Some of the comment 
    letters were generally opposed to anything that would adversely affect 
    their pension; (2) others of the comment letters expressed general 
    concerns regarding the effect of the exemption on pension benefits; and 
    (3) one comment letter supported the exemption.
        In the opinion of the applicant the one favorable comment letter 
    would appear to need no response. In response to the adverse comment 
    letters, the applicant notes that the granting of the exemption in and 
    of itself does not affect the security of pensions payable from the 
    Plans participating in the Master Trust. In this regard, the applicant 
    maintains: (1) That the granting of the exemption does not reduce the 
    obligation to pay benefits of any of the Plans participating in the 
    Master Trust; (2) that the exemption does not affect the duty of the 
    sponsoring employer to comply with the funding requirements of 
    applicable law; (3) that the I/F has determined that the terms of the 
    agreement reached with LSI result in an overall transaction that is 
    equal to or superior to transactions that could be negotiated with 
    unrelated third parties; (4) that the terms of the agreement provide 
    for LSI to pay $6 million to the Master Trust; (5) that based on the 
    terms agreed to and the receipt of the $6 million dollar payment, the 
    I/F has determined that the Master Trust is assured an internal rate of 
    return in excess of 11% on the Property; and (6) that the terms of the 
    agreement provide the Master Trust with significant opportunity to 
    obtain an advantageous investment return with very little downside 
    risk. Based on these considerations, the applicant maintains that no 
    adverse effect on pension benefits payable by the Plans participating 
    in the Master Trust should occur if the exemption is granted.
        Two of the commentators requested that the Department schedule a 
    hearing on the matter, in accordance section 29 CFR 2570.46 of the 
    Department's regulations which provides that the Department in its 
    discretion may convene a hearing if requested by any interested persons 
    who may be adversely affected by the exemption and where such exemption 
    proposes to grant relief from section 406(b) of the Act. In response to 
    this request for a hearing, the applicant points out that the 
    commentators do not object to any specific issue in connection with the 
    grant of the exemption, but expresses only general concern for how the 
    exemption might affect health insurance, life insurance, and monthly 
    pension benefits.
        The Department's regulations regarding the right to a hearing state 
    that a request for hearing must include ``a statement of the issues to 
    be addressed and a general description of the evidence to be presented 
    at the hearing. Further, the regulations state that the Department will 
    grant a request for hearing ``where a hearing is necessary to fully 
    explore material factual issues identified by the person requesting the 
    hearing'' or may decline to hold a hearing ``where the factual issues 
    identified can be fully explored through the submission of evidence in 
    written form.'' The Department has concluded that the issues identified 
    by the commentators, who requested a hearing, have been full explored 
    in the case record including the material submitted by the applicant in 
    response to the comments. Accordingly, the Department has determined 
    not to hold a public hearing.
        In addition to the above comments and request for a hearing 
    received from interested persons, the applicant informed the Department 
    in submissions dated April 8, 1994, and April 22, 1994, of certain 
    factual changes to the information contained in the application and 
    technical clarifications to the language of the Notice. The following 
    items represents a summary of the comments submitted to the Department 
    by the applicant subsequent to the publication of the Notice:
        (1) LSI informed the Department that the Bankruptcy Court had 
    entered an order on March 31, 1994, that approved the $6 million dollar 
    payment by LSI to the Master Trust. Subsequently, the Department was 
    informed that on April 14, 1994, LSI emerged from bankruptcy protection 
    and that in connection with such emergence, LSI made the $6 million 
    payment to the Master Trust that is a condition, as set forth in 
    Section II(c), of this exemption. In this regard, such condition 
    provides that LSI pay ``* * * the $6,000,000 in a single lump-sum 
    payment in cash to the Master Trust, not later than sixty (60) days 
    following the later of (1) the date of the order of the Bankruptcy 
    Court approving the payment, or (2) the date the grant of this 
    exemption is published in the Federal Register.'' In the opinion of 
    LSI, since the condition of the exemption states that the payment be 
    made no later than a specified date, that LSI's payment of the $6 
    million dollars before the publication of the final exemption complies 
    with the condition for grant of the exemption. The Department agrees 
    with the position as expressed by LSI;
        (2) LSI commented on the language concerning the condition of the 
    exemption, as set forth in Section II(g), which states that ``the terms 
    of the Lease, as modified by the First Amendment, are at least as 
    favorable to the Master Trust, the Plans, and their participants and 
    beneficiaries, as those which could have been obtained by the Master 
    Trust in an arm's length negotiations with an unrelated third party 
    under similar circumstances.'' With respect to the language in this 
    sentence from Section II(g), the Department wishes to correct a 
    typographical error in that the word, ``negotiations,'' written in the 
    plural should read ``negotiation,'' in the singular. Accordingly, the 
    Department has made this change in the language of Section II(g) in the 
    granted exemption.
        Further in the language quoted in the paragraph above from Section 
    II(g), LSI points out that the I/F's opinion regarding the transaction, 
    including the Lease of the Property, is that the overall transaction, 
    taking into account all of its provisions including the $6 million 
    dollar payment, is equal to or superior to transactions that could be 
    negotiated with unrelated third parties. To the extent the inclusion of 
    the language in Section II(g) referring to ``under similar 
    circumstances'' is intended to include the other term of the overall 
    transaction, LSI states that the condition is accurate as it relates to 
    opinions provided by the I/F. The Department concurs with LSI's 
    position;
        (3) LSI requested modification of the language in Section II(k) 
    which provides, in part that, ``LSI has either paid directly or 
    reimbursed the Master Trust for any fees, other than trustee and 
    investment management fees, incurred with respect to the ownership of 
    the Property by the Master Trust.'' In the opinion of LSI the quoted 
    language in the sentence above implies that the Master Trust has paid 
    no fees in connection with ownership of the Property other than trustee 
    or investment manager fees. LSI believes that this language is over 
    broad, because it is not limited to those fees incurred in connection 
    with the transactions. For this reason, LSI suggests adding after the 
    word, ``incurred,'' the phrase, ``in connection with the 
    transactions.'' The Department has no objection to LSI's proposed 
    modification, and accordingly, has amended the language of Section 
    II(k);
        (4) LSI proposes clarification of the language of Section II(l) 
    which states that ``LSI has filed Forms 5330 and paid the excise taxes 
    with respect to the Lease of the Property for the years 1987-1989 and 
    will file Forms 5330 and pay the excise taxes for the period after 
    December 31, 1989, and before the effective date of this exemption.'' 
    Because the effective date of this exemption is September 10, 1990, LSI 
    believes that this provision should be revised to clarify that the 
    excise taxes for the period after December 31, 1989, must be paid 
    within sixty (60) days of the date the grant of this exemption is 
    published in the Federal Register. For this reason, LSI suggests adding 
    before the words, ``will file,'' the phrase, ``LSI not later than sixty 
    (60) days after the date the grant of this exemption is published in 
    the Federal Register.'' The Department has no objection to LSI's 
    proposed modification, and accordingly, has amended the language of 
    Section II(l);
        (5) LSI requests modification of the language in the third sentence 
    of paragraph number one in the Summary of Facts and Representations in 
    the Notice which states that, ``In addition, LSI is a major source of 
    ready-mixed concrete and precast concrete products and is a leading 
    importer of cement and clinker.'' In this regard, LSI has brought to 
    the Department's attention a more current description of LSI's 
    business. Accordingly, LSI requests that the sentence be amended to 
    read ``In addition, LSI is a leading producer of cement, ready-mixed 
    concrete, sand and gravel, crushed stone, and construction materials.'' 
    The Department has made the requested change to the description of LSI; 
    and
        (6) LSI requests modification of the representation in the fourth 
    sentence in the fourth full paragraph of paragraph number six of the 
    Summary of Facts and Representations which states that, ``It is 
    represented that the royalty payments actually made by RMC have 
    exceeded the minimum guaranteed royalty amounts for the years 1989 
    through 1992.'' In this regard, LSI has informed the Department that 
    the date 1992 should be corrected to read 1991. The Department has made 
    this change as requested by LSI.
        As the Department concurs with the requested the modifications and 
    clarifications to the language of the proposed exemption, such changes 
    are hereby incorporated into the exemption, as granted. Accordingly, 
    after giving full consideration to the record, including the comments 
    by interested persons and the responses of the applicant, the 
    Department has determined to grant the exemption, as described herein. 
    In this regard, the comments submitted to the Department have been 
    included as part of the public record of the exemption application. The 
    complete application file, including all supplemental submissions 
    received by the Department, is made available for public inspection in 
    the Public Documents Room of the Pension Welfare Benefits 
    Administration, room N-5507, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 
    Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
        For a more complete statement of the facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption refer to 
    the Notice published on March 8, 1994, 59 FR 10832.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelena C. Le Blanc, of the 
    Department, telephone (202) 219-8883. (This is not a toll-free number.)
    
    General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan; General Motors 
    Retirement Program for Salaried Employees; Saturn Individual Retirement 
    Plan for Represented Team Members; and Saturn Personal Choices 
    Retirement Plan for Non-Represented Team Members (Collectively, the 
    Plans) Located in New York, New York
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 94-45; Application Nos. D-8402 and D-
    8405]
    
    Exemption
    
    Section I--Transactions
        The restrictions of section 406(a) of the Act and the sanctions 
    resulting from the application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason 
    of section 4975(c)(1) (A) through (D) of the Code, shall not apply to 
    the following transactions if the conditions set forth in Section II 
    below are met:
        (a) The acquisition or sale of a net profits interest (NPI), a 
    royalty interest (Royalty), or a production payment contract 
    (Production Payment), in oil and gas properties (the Properties) 
    between the Plans and oil and gas companies or their affiliates that 
    are parties in interest with respect to the Plans (collectively, the 
    Companies);
        (b) Any loan by the Plans to the Companies where such loans are 
    secured by interests in the Properties, including loans with conversion 
    rights to acquire a NPI, Royalty, or Production Payment in the 
    Properties;
        (c) The acquisition or sale between the Plans and the Companies of 
    any stock or debt securities which are convertible into such stock, 
    issued by the Companies (Company Securities); and
        (d) The acquisition or sale between the Plans and the Companies of 
    any interests in certain limited partnerships which invest in such 
    Properties where the Company is a general partner and/or operating 
    owner for the Properties (Company Partnership Interest), or interests 
    in certain joint ventures which invest in such Properties where the 
    Company is a joint venturer and/or operating owner for the Properties 
    (Company Venture Interest).
    Section II--Conditions
        (a) A ``qualified oil and gas investment manager'' (as defined 
    below) fully reviews each transaction before recommending the 
    transaction to the Pension Investment Committee of General Motors 
    Corporation (the PIC) or, as of December 1, 1992, to the General Motors 
    Investment Management Corporation (GMIMCo), fiduciaries of the Plans. 
    The decision to enter into the transaction is made by the PIC or 
    GMIMCo, which retains final approval authority over the transaction. 
    The ``qualified oil and gas investment manager'' negotiates the 
    transaction and manages the oil and gas investments for the Plans, in 
    its capacity as a fiduciary for the Plans, and monitors all 
    transactions on behalf of the Plans in order to take any appropriate 
    action necessary to safeguard the interests of the Plans.
        (b) The Companies and their affiliates are independent of and 
    unrelated to:
        (i) The General Motors Corporation (GMC);
        (ii) Any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, 
    or under common control with GMC;
        (iii) Any officer or director of GMC or any of its subsidiaries or 
    affiliated companies;
        (iv) Any partnership in which GMC is a 10 percent or more (directly 
    or indirectly in capital or profits) partner; and
        (v) Any ``qualified oil and gas investment manager'' which acts for 
    the Plans with respect to an oil and gas transaction covered by the 
    exemption, or any other person who exercises discretionary authority, 
    responsibility or control or who provides investment advice for the 
    investment of the Plans' assets involved in oil and gas transactions.
        (c) In any transaction where the Plans acquire a NPI, Royalty, 
    Production Payment, Company Security, Company Partnership Interest, or 
    Company Venture Interest from the Companies, the Plans pay a purchase 
    price which is no greater than the fair market value of such interests 
    or securities based on an appraisal developed by the Plans' fiduciaries 
    or an independent, qualified appraiser selected by the Plans' 
    fiduciaries.
        (d) In any transaction where the Plans sell a NPI, Royalty, 
    Production Payment, Company Security, Company Partnership Interest, or 
    Company Venture Interest to the Companies, the Plans receive a price 
    which is no less than the fair market value of such interests or 
    securities based on an appraisal developed by the Plans' fiduciaries or 
    an independent, qualified appraiser selected by the Plans' fiduciaries.
        (e) In instances involving the acquisition of the Properties by a 
    Company from a third party with a simultaneous sale of a NPI, Royalty, 
    or Production Payment by the Company to the Plans, the Plans pay a 
    purchase price which reflects the fair market value of the interest as 
    agreed to by the Plans' fiduciaries in arms-length negotiations 
    directly involving the Plans, the Company, and the third party seller.
        (f) In instances involving the sale of a NPI, Royalty, or 
    Production Payment by the Plans to a Company in connection with the 
    Company's simultaneous sale of a WI in the Properties to a third party, 
    the Plans receive a sales price which reflects the fair market value of 
    the interest as agreed to by the Plans' fiduciaries in arm's-length 
    negotiations directly involving the Plans, the Company, and the third 
    party buyer.
        (g) In any loan by the Plans to a Company in connection with an oil 
    and gas investment, the Plans obtain terms which include: (1) An 
    interest rate that is commensurate with the prevailing market rate for 
    such loans at the time of the transaction, as determined by the Plans' 
    fiduciaries in accordance with rates quoted by established commercial 
    lenders offering similar loans; and (ii) a security interest in 
    designated oil and gas investment interests in the Properties, which 
    have a fair market value that equals at least 150% of the amount loaned 
    by the Plans throughout the duration of such loan, based on an 
    appraisal of such interests developed by the Plans' fiduciaries or by 
    an independent, qualified appraiser selected by the Plans' fiduciaries.
        (h) All other terms of each such transaction are not less favorable 
    to the Plans than the terms generally available in an arm's-length 
    transaction between unrelated parties.
        (i) The amount of each Plan's total assets involved in all 
    transactions with the Companies represents no more than three percent 
    (3%) of such Plan's total assets as of the date of approval of each 
    transaction by the PIC or GMIMCo.
        (j) No investment management fee, advisory fee, underwriting fee, 
    brokerage or sales commission, or similar compensation is paid to the 
    Companies by the Plans with regard to the transactions.
        (k) GMC maintains for the duration of each transaction and for six 
    years thereafter records necessary to enable persons described below in 
    subsection (1) to determine whether the conditions of this exemption 
    have been met, except that (1) a prohibited transaction will not be 
    considered to have occurred if, due to circumstances beyond the control 
    of GMC or an affiliate, the records are lost or destroyed prior to the 
    end of the six-year period, and (2) no party in interest, other than 
    GMC and its affiliates, shall be subject to the civil penalty that may 
    be assessed under section 502(i) of the Act or to taxes imposed by 
    section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code if the records are not maintained 
    or are not available for examination as required by subsection (1) 
    below; and
        (l)(1) Except as provided in subsection (1)(2) and notwithstanding 
    any provisions of section 504(a)(2) and (b) of the Act, the records 
    referred to in subsection (k) are unconditionally available at their 
    customary location for examination during normal business hours by--
        (i) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the 
    Department or the Internal Revenue Service, and
        (ii) Any participant or beneficiary of the Plans or duly authorized 
    representative of such participant or beneficiary.
        (2) None of the persons described in subsection (l)(1)(ii) shall be 
    authorized to examine trade secrets of the Companies or any commercial 
    or financial information which is privileged or confidential.
    Section III--Definitions
        For purposes of this exemption,
        (a) The term ``Company'' means a publicly or privately owned oil 
    and gas exploration, development and operating company or partnership 
    which is independent of an unrelated to GMC, its affiliates, and 
    various Plan fiduciaries described in Section II(a) above.
        (b) The term ``affiliate'' of a Company means any entity directly 
    or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controlling, 
    controlled by, or under common control with the Company.
        (c) The term ``control,'' for purposes of the above definition, 
    means the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management 
    or policies of an entity.
        (d) The term ``qualified oil and gas investment manager'' means a 
    fiduciary as defined in section 3(21) of the Act which: (i) Is 
    independent of and unrelated to any of the Companies and their 
    affiliates (as defined above); (ii) is a financial institution or 
    business organization that in the normal course of business advises 
    institutional investors regarding oil and gas investments; (iii) 
    acknowledges in writing to the Plans that is will manage specific oil 
    and gas investments on behalf of the Plans, in its capacity as a 
    fiduciary of the Plans, as designated by the PIC or GMIMCo; and (iv) 
    satisfies the definition of ``qualified professional asset manager'' 
    (QPAM) under Section V(a) of Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-14 
    (PTE 84-14, 49 FR 9494, March 13, 1984), except for the fact that 
    either the PIC or GMIMCo retains final approval authority for all oil 
    and gas investments recommended by such fiduciary.
        (e) The term ``Property'' or ``Properties'' means any oil and gas 
    properties such as long-term leasehold interests in oil and gas 
    producing fields and the oil and gas in place on the properties. Such 
    ``Property'' may include an interest in the oil and gas wells, 
    platforms, wellheads, piping, as well as the gas gathering system or 
    processing facility through which gas produced from the wells is either 
    transported to the gas pipeline for shipment to various end users or 
    treated before delivery to the end users.
        For a more complete statement of the facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to 
    the notice of proposed exemption published on December 29, 1993 at 58 
    FR 68958.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of this exemption is May 8, 1990.
    
    TEMPORARY NATURE OF EXEMPTION: This exemption will be effective for all 
    transactions described herein which have been entered into by the Plans 
    and the Companies since May 8, 1990. However, this exemption will not 
    apply to any transactions which are entered into with the Companies 
    after five years from the date on which this exemption is published in 
    the Federal Register.
    
    NOTICE TO INTERESTED PERSONS: The applicant represents that it was 
    unable to notify interested persons within the time period specified in 
    the Federal Register notice published on December 29, 1993. The 
    applicant states that all interested persons were notified, in the 
    manner agreed upon between the applicant and the Department, by January 
    28, 1994. Interested persons were advised that they had until February 
    28, 1994 to comment on the proposed exemption.
    
    WRITTEN COMMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS: The applicant submitted a comment 
    letter which requests that certain modifications be made to the notice 
    of proposed exemption (the Proposal).
        The applicant states that the Plans covered by the exemption should 
    include the Saturn Individual Retirement Plan for Represented Team 
    Members and the Saturn Personal Choices Retirement Plan for Non-
    Represented Team Members (the Saturn Plans), whose assets are now 
    included in the trusts which hold the assets of the other Plans 
    sponsored by GMC and its subsidiaries or affiliated companies. The 
    applicant has confirmed that the participants of the Saturn Plans 
    received notice of the proposed exemption in the same manner and during 
    the same time period as the other participants of the Plans. Therefore, 
    the Department has modified the Proposal to include such Plans.
        With respect to the Summary of Facts and Representations in the 
    Proposal (the Summary), the applicant wishes to add the following 
    additional information for purposes of clarification:
        First, Paragraph 1of the Summary should state that Mellon Bank, 
    N.A. (Mellon), in addition to Bankers Trust Company, is a trustee of 
    the Plans. However, Mellon does not have any discretionary authority 
    over the investment management of the assets held in the Plans relating 
    to the subject transactions.
        Second, Paragraph 6 of the Summary should be clarified to reflect 
    the following:
        (a) The Company may receive additional compensation, in the form of 
    operating fees, if the Company operates some or all of the Properties 
    pursuant to agreements with the Plans which allow the Company to 
    operate the Properties (Operating Agreements). In addition, a 
    conveyance of a NPI (the Conveyance) may allow the Company to recoup 
    certain general or administrative expenses incurred by the Company as 
    WI owner of the Properties. Such operating fees or expenses are 
    disclosed in detail in the Operating Agreement and the Conveyance, 
    respectively, and are not subject to arbitrary changes by the Company. 
    The applicant states that increases in any operating fees generally 
    involve expenses related to the operation of a Property and are not 
    related to any element of operation within the Company's control, such 
    as the ability to increase the level of production on a Property. The 
    nature and extent of any operating fees under an Operating Agreement, 
    and any general or administrative expenses under a Conveyance, will be 
    reviewed, approved and monitored by the ``qualified oil and gas 
    investment manager'' acting for the Plans.\2\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\The applicant states that any fees or expenses received by a 
    Company for operation of a Property in connection with a NPI owned 
    by the Plans will meet section 408(b)(2) of the Act. However, the 
    Department is providing no opinion as to whether payment of any fees 
    or expenses to a Company under the circumstances described herein 
    would meet section 408(b)(2) of the Act and the regulations 
    thereunder (see 29 CFR 2550.408b-2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (b) The Company's annual report provided to the Plans containing 
    detailed information on the Company's activities with respect to the 
    Properties during the preceding year is not ``audited'' by the 
    ``qualified oil and gas investment manager'' each year, but is 
    ``audited'' at intervals recommended by the investment manager and 
    authorized by GMIMCo. However, the ``qualified oil and gas investment 
    manager'' will review the information throughout the year for problems 
    or mistakes which will be corrected by the Company.
        Paragraph 10 of the Summary should be clarified to reflect the fact 
    that, as previously noted, the Company may receive additional 
    compensation for operating the Properties in the form of operating fees 
    pursuant to an Operating Agreement and may recoup certain general or 
    administrative expenses as permitted by the Conveyance.
        Paragraph 12 of the Summary should be clarified to reflect the fact 
    that GMIMCo has appointed other ``qualified oil and gas investment 
    managers'' for the Plans, in addition to RPI Institutional Services, 
    Inc., and such managers have met all the requirements of Section III(d) 
    of the Proposal.
        Paragraph 14 of the Summary should be clarified to reflect the 
    correct NPI sharing percentages of the May 8, 1990 NPI transaction with 
    Callon Offshore Production Inc. (Callon). The applicant states that 
    although the Plans did in fact pay 98% of the $28 million purchase 
    price, the Plans received a 98% NPI in the Properties which will 
    continue until the Plans recoup their entire share of the purchase 
    price. After the Plans receive their entire investment in the NPI 
    acquisition, there will be a reversion to an 88% NPI for the Plans at 
    that point in time. The applicant believes that this clarification is 
    important because the Plans will receive all of their investment in the 
    Properties before Callon is able to collect from its additional NPI 
    percentage.
        The Department also received eleven comment letters from 
    participants in the Plans regarding the Proposal. Two of the commenters 
    were opposed to the granting of the exemption. One of these commenters 
    was concerned that the oil and gas transactions are risky investments 
    for the Plans and that any appraisal of such assets by the Plans may be 
    overvalued. The other commenter stated that he was opposed to the 
    exemption because GMC may either knowingly or unknowingly exercise a 
    controlling influence over various oil and gas suppliers when it buys 
    oil and gas to meet its own energy needs and that such influence may be 
    to the detriment of the Plans' oil and gas investments. This commenter 
    also stated that GMC's oil and gas purchasing power could be used to 
    affect certain local markets. Many of the Commenters stated that they 
    supported the granting of the exemption, but only if GMC offers an 
    ``early retirement package'' to all salaried employees, regardless of 
    job classification, that meet certain age and service criteria. Some of 
    these commenters noted that notices regarding the Proposal were posted 
    late and that interested persons were not given enough time to reply.
        By letter dated March 18, 1994, the applicant responded to these 
    comments.
        First, with respect to the comment that oil and gas transactions 
    are risky investments for the Plans and that appraisals of such assets 
    may be overvalued, the applicant states that the subject transactions 
    under the terms and conditions described in the Proposal are in the 
    best interests of the Plans and their participants and beneficiaries. 
    The applicant represents that oil and gas investments can be reasonable 
    and appropriate for a large pension plan, such as the Plans, and that 
    the subject transactions have been and will continue to be carefully 
    monitored by GMIMCo. The oil and gas transactions by the Plans under 
    the requested exemption will represent only a small percentage of each 
    Plan's total assets (see Section II(i) above) and the existing 
    investments have yielded the Plans a high rate of return (see Paragraph 
    11 of the Summary). The applicant states that any activity by GMIMCo or 
    the ``qualified oil and gas investment manager'' acting for the Plans 
    that is outside the scope of activity described to the Department in 
    the Proposal, including any methods for overvaluing the fair market 
    value of proposed or existing oil and gas assets of the Plans, would be 
    a breach of fiduciary duty in violation of the Act. In addition, such 
    activity would be outside the scope of the conditions of the Proposal 
    and would not be subject to the prohibited transaction relief which 
    would be afforded by the exemption.
        Second, regarding the comment that GMC may exercise a controlling 
    influence over various oil and gas suppliers when GMC buys oil and gas 
    to meet its own energy needs and that such influence may be to the 
    detriment of the Plans' oil and gas investments, the applicant states 
    that the comment is without merit and is inconsistent with the facts 
    and representations contained in the Proposal. The applicant maintains 
    that GMC has a de minimus involvement with any oil and gas suppliers 
    when acquiring oil and gas to run its own operations. With respect to 
    GMC's relationship to any such suppliers in the subject oil and gas 
    transactions by the Plans, the applicant states that the definition of 
    ``Company'' in Section III(a) of the Proposal excludes any operating 
    company or partnership which is related to GMC or its affiliates. In 
    addition, the oil and gas investments covered by the Proposal involve 
    the Plans' in a passive investment role, with very limited control over 
    the actual sale or distribution of oil and gas obtained from the 
    Properties.
        Third, with respect to whether notification of interested persons 
    was adequate and timely, the applicant states that all notices, 
    together with copies of the Proposal as published in the Federal 
    Register on December 29, 1993, were posted and distributed by GMC in 
    all primary business locations on or prior to January 28, 1994. In 
    addition, each of the appropriate unions received copies of the notices 
    and the Proposal. These notices, a copy of which has been submitted to 
    the Department by the applicant, informed interested persons of their 
    right to comment on the Proposal in writing to the Department on or 
    before February 28, 1994. An authorized representative of GMC has 
    provided the Department with a declaration under penalty of perjury 
    attesting to the truth of the information regarding GMC's notice to 
    interested persons as required by the Department's regulations (see 29 
    CFR 2570.43). Thus, the applicant represents that GMC has complied with 
    the Department's exemption procedures regarding notification of 
    interested persons in the manner agreed to between the applicant and 
    the Department.
        Fourth, with respect to comments which linked the Proposal to GMC 
    providing an early retirement benefits package to its employees, the 
    applicant states that matters concerning the eligibility of Plan 
    participants to certain benefits are totally unrelated to the Proposal. 
    Since the Proposal only involves investing assets of the Plans in 
    specific oil and gas investments and has nothing to do with any early 
    retirement benefits for GMC employees, the applicant requests that the 
    Department not link the granting of an exemption to any requirement 
    that GMC provide early retirement benefits for its employees.
        The Department agrees with the applicant that the merits of 
    granting an exemption for the subject oil and gas investments by the 
    Plans should be judged independent of any decisions by GMC regarding 
    the eligibility of participants to certain benefits under the terms of 
    the Plans. In addition, the Department believes that the applicant has 
    adequately addressed all of the issues raised by the commenters and 
    that the subject oil and gas transactions, under the terms and 
    conditions described herein, are in the interests and protective of the 
    Plans and their participants and beneficiaries.
        Accordingly, after consideration of the entire record, the 
    Department has determined to grant the exemption as modified.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Mr. E.F. Williams of the Department at (202) 219-8194. (This is not a 
    toll-free number.)
    
    Alberici Companies Retirement Plan (the Plan) Located in St. Louis, 
    Missouri
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 94-46; Application No. D-9633]
    
    Exemption
    
        The restrictions of sections 406(a), 406 (b)(1) and (b)(2) of the 
    Act and the sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975 of 
    the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1) (A) through (E) of the Code 
    shall not apply to the cash sale (the Sale) by the Plan of Group 
    Annuity Policy No. GA-3363 (the GAP) issued by the New England Life 
    Insurance Company (New England Life) to Alberici Corporation, the Plan 
    sponsor and a party in interest with respect to the Plan; provided that 
    the following conditions are satisfied: (1) The Sale is a one-time 
    transaction for cash; (2) the Plan receives no less than the fair 
    market value of the GAP at the time of the Sale or, the cost of the GAP 
    to the Plan, whichever is greater; (3) the Plan does not suffer any 
    loss nor incur any expenses in connection with the transaction; and (4) 
    the Trustees of the Plan have determined that the proposed transaction 
    is appropriate for and in the best interests of the Plan and its 
    participants and beneficiaries.
        For a more complete statement of the facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to 
    the notice of proposed exemption published on April 22, 1994 at 59 FR 
    19254.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PMs. Virginia J. Miller of the 
    Department, telephone (202) 219-8971. (This is not a toll-free number.)
    
    Laney & Duke Terminal Warehouse Co., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust 
    (the Plan) Located in Jacksonville, Florida
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 94-48; Exemption Application No. D-
    9552]
    
    Exemption
    
        The restrictions of sections 406(a), 406 (b)(1) and (b)(2) of the 
    Act and the sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975 of 
    the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1) (A) through (E) of the Code, 
    shall not apply to the sale of two adjacent commercial buildings 
    (collectively; the Buildings) by the Plan to Laney & Duke Terminal 
    Warehouse Co. Inc. (the Employer), the Plan sponsor and a party in 
    interest with respect to the Plan; provided that the following 
    conditions are satisfied:
        (1) The Plan will receive the greater of: (1) $1,958,000, 
    representing the Plan's total investment in the Buildings; or (2) the 
    aggregate fair market value of the Buildings as determined at the time 
    of the sale by an independent, qualified appraiser;
        (2) The sale will be a one-time transaction; and
        (3) The Plan will pay no costs or commissions as a result of this 
    transaction.
        For a more complete statement of facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption refer to 
    the notice of proposed exemption published on April 22, 1994 at 59 FR 
    19252/19253.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ekaterina A. Uzlyan of the Department, 
    telephone (202) 219-8883. (This is not a toll-free number.)
    
    Atlanta Consulting Group, Inc. Retirement Plan (the Plan) Located in 
    Atlanta, Georgia
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 94-49; Exemption Application No. D-
    9638]
    
    Exemption
    
        The restrictions of section 406(a), 406 (b)(1) and (b)(2) of the 
    Act and the sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975 of 
    the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1) (A) through (E) of the Code, 
    shall not apply to the cash sale (the Sale) of certain shares of stock 
    (the Stock) from the Plan to Atlanta Consulting Group, Inc., a party in 
    interest with respect to the Plan.
        This exemption is conditioned upon the following requirements: (1) 
    All terms and conditions of the Sale are at least as favorable to the 
    Plan as those obtainable in an arm's-length transaction; (2) the Sale 
    is a one-time cash transaction; (3) the Plan is not required to pay any 
    commissions, costs or other expenses in connection with the Sale; and 
    (4) the Plan receives a sales price equal to the greater of: (a) The 
    fair market value of the Stock on the date of the Sale; or (b) the 
    Stock's original acquisition price of $25,000.
        For a more complete statement of the facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption refer to 
    the Notice published on April 22, 1994 at 59 FR 19260.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Parr of the Department, 
    telephone (202) 219-8971. (This is not a toll-free number.)
    
    General Information
    
        The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
        (1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption 
    under section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code 
    does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified 
    person from certain other provisions to which the exemption does not 
    apply and the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of section 
    404 of the Act, which among other things require a fiduciary to 
    discharge his duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of the 
    participants and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion in 
    accordance with section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does it affect the 
    requirement of section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must operate 
    for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer maintaining 
    the plan and their beneficiaries;
        (2) These exemptions are supplemental to and not in derogation of, 
    any other provisions of the Act and/or the Code, including statutory or 
    administrative exemptions and transactional rules. Furthermore, the 
    fact that a transaction is subject to an administrative or statutory 
    exemption is not dispositive of whether the transaction is in fact a 
    prohibited transaction; and
        (3) The availability of these exemptions is subject to the express 
    condition that the material facts and representations contained in each 
    application are true and complete and accurately described all material 
    terms of the transaction which is the subject of the exemption. In the 
    case of continuing exemption transactions, if any of the material facts 
    or representations described in the application change after the 
    exemption is granted, the exemption will cease to apply as of the date 
    of such change. In the event of any such change, application for a new 
    exemption may be made to the Department.
    
        Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of June 1994.
    Ivan Strasfeld,
    Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits 
    Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
    [FR Doc. 94-14169 Filed 6-9-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/10/1990
Published:
06/10/1994
Department:
Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Grant of individual exemptions.
Document Number:
94-14169
Dates:
This exemption will be effective as of September 10, 1990.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: June 10, 1994, Prohibited Transaction Exemption 94-43, Exemption Application No. D- 9282, et al.