[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29371-29375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14577]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Implementation of Special Refund Procedures
AGENCY: Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Implementation of Special Refund Procedures.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy
announces procedures for the disbursement of $592,001 (plus accrued
interest) collected pursuant to a consent order with Macmillan Oil
Company (Case No. LEF-0046) and $15,822 (plus accrued interest)
collected pursuant to a consent order with Kenny Larson Oil Company
(Case No. VEF-0002). The funds will be distributed in accordance with
the DOE's special refund procedures, 10 CFR part 205, subpart V.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan F. MacPherson, Assistant
Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy,
Washington, DC. 20585, (202) 426-1562.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Sec. 205.282(b) of the
procedural regulations of the Department of Energy (DOE), 10 CFR
Sec. 205.282(b), notice is hereby given of the issuance of the Decision
and Order set out below. The Decision and Order specifies the
procedures that will be used to distribute monies that have been
collected by the DOE pursuant to consent orders with Macmillan Oil
Company (Macmillan) and Kenny Larson Oil Company (Larson). The consent
order with Macmillan settled possible pricing violations with respect
to Macmillan's sales of propane, No. 2 fuel oil and Nos. 5 and 6
residual fuel oil. The DOE has collected $592,001 from Macmillan. The
consent order with Larson settled possible pricing violations with
respect to Larson's sales of motor gasoline. The DOE has
[[Page 29372]]
collected $15,822 from Larson. The Decision and Order finds that the
funds should be distributed to the firms that were overcharged as set
forth in DOE audit records. The amount of each firm's potential refund
is set forth in the Appendices to the Decision and Order.
Applications for Refund must be filed prior to December 31, 1996
and should contain the information specified in the Decision and Order.
Dated: May 29, 1996.
George B. Breznay,
Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.
Department of Energy
Washington, DC 20585
May 29, 1996.
DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Special Refund Procedures
Name of Firms: Macmillan Oil Company, Kenny Larson Oil Company
Dates of Filings: June 5, 1992, October 18, 1994
Case Numbers: LEF-0046, VEF-0002.
In accordance with the procedural regulations of the Department
of Energy (DOE), 10 C.F.R. Part 205, Subpart V, the Economic
Regulatory Administration (ERA) filed Petitions to Implement of
Special Refund Procedures with the Office of Hearings and Appeals
(OHA) on June 5, 1992, and on October 18, 1994. The petitions
request that the OHA formulate and implement procedures to
distribute funds received pursuant to consent orders entered into
between the DOE and Kenny Larson Oil Company (Larson) of Oregon
City, Oregon, and Macmillan Oil Company (Macmillan) of Des Moines,
Iowa. After reviewing the records in the present cases, we have
concluded that a Subpart V proceeding is an appropriate mechanism
for distributing the Larson and Macmillan consent order funds. We
therefore shall grant the ERA's petitions and assume jurisdiction
over distribution of the funds.
I. Background
Larson and Macmillan were ``reseller-retailers'' as defined in 6
C.F.R. Sec. 150.352 and 10 C.F.R. Sec. 212.31. During the relevant
periods these companies were subject to the Mandatory Petroleum
Price Regulations, 10 C.F.R. Part 212, Subpart F. An ERA audit of
Larson's business records revealed possible pricing violations with
respect to the firm's sales of motor gasoline during the period May
through December 1979. An ERA audit of Macmillan's business records
revealed possible pricing violations with respect to the firm's
sales of propane, No. 2 fuel oil, and Nos. 5 and 6 residual fuel oil
during the period November 1, 1973, through April 30, 1974. In order
to settle all claims and disputes between these companies and the
DOE regarding their compliance with the price regulations, the DOE
entered into consent orders with Larson and Macmillan on September
21, 1981, and March 7, 1988, respectively.
In the Larson consent order, the firm agreed to remit a total of
$7,415, approximately 38 percent of the amount of the overcharges
alleged by the DOE, plus installment interest. Of the principal
amount, $5,842 was to be remitted to the DOE, and $1,573 was to be
paid directly to six of Larson's customers. Larson failed to comply
with the Consent Order and remitted no funds to either the DOE or
the six customers. On August 29, 1994, we granted Larson a refund of
$15,822 in the Texaco special refund proceeding. Texaco Inc./Kenny
Larson Oil Company, 24 DOE para. 85,081 (1994) (Texaco/Larson). At
that time, Larson was in default in the amount of $26,168 ($7,415
principal plus $18,753 interest) in its obligations pursuant to the
Consent Order. Accordingly, in Texaco/Larson, we determined that the
Texaco refund should be used to fund Larson's consent order escrow
account, in satisfaction of the firm's principal settlement amount
and partial satisfaction of its debt for interest accrued.
Accordingly, the $15,822 Texaco refund was deposited into the Kenny
Larson Oil Company escrow account maintained at the Department of
the Treasury, Consent Order No. 000H00439. This is the amount which
is available for distribution to Larson's customers in this
proceeding.
On February 1, 1983, a Proposed Remedial Order was issued to
Macmillan which alleged that the firm violated the price regulations
with respect to its sales of propane, No. 2 fuel oil, and Nos. 5 and
6 residual fuel oil. Macmillan contested the PRO before OHA (Case
No. HRO-0122). During the course of that proceeding, the ERA reduced
the amount of the alleged overcharges from $383,268 to $333,853. See
Letter from Ann C. Grover, Associate Solicitor, ERA, to Richard T.
Tedrow, OHA Deputy Director (October 5, 1987). On March 7, 1988,
Macmillan and DOE entered into a consent order that settled the
PRO's allegations. Pursuant to the consent order obligation,
Macmillan remitted a total amount of $592,001 (including pre-
settlement interest) to the DOE in full satisfaction of the amount
owed. The audit workpapers identify the customers that Macmillan
allegedly overcharged.
II. Refund Procedures
On August 2, 1995, a Proposed Decision and Order was issued that
tentatively concluded that the procedures set forth below should
govern the distribution of funds received pursuant to the Macmillan
and Larson consent orders. That Proposed Decision was published in
the Federal Register, and interested parties were given 30 days in
which to comment. 60 Fed. Reg. 40580 (August 9, 1995). No comments
were received. Accordingly, we find that the procedures described in
the Proposed Decision, and which are set forth below, should govern
the distribution of the Macmillan and Larson consent order funds.
A. Refund Claimants
In the first stage, refund monies will be distributed to those
parties which were directly injured in transactions with Larson and
Macmillan during the audit periods. We believe that the Larson and
Macmillan customers who were adversely affected by the alleged
overcharges are primarily those purchasers specifically identified
in the consent orders and in the audit papers. In addition,
customers who purchased motor gasoline from the three retail outlets
operated by Larson were referred to as a class in the ERA audit
files but could not be individually identified. These parties may
also file for refunds in this proceeding.
Based on the information we have about Larson's business, we
expect that all applicants in the Larson proceeding and most
applicants in the Macmillan proceeding will be ultimate consumers.
As in many other refund proceedings, we are making a finding that
end-users or ultimate consumers whose businesses are unrelated to
the petroleum industry were injured by the overcharges covered by
the Consent Order. Unlike regulated firms in the petroleum industry,
members of this group were generally not subject to price controls
during the audit period and were not required to keep records which
justified selling-price increases by reference to cost increases.
See, e.g., Marion Corp., 12 DOE para. 85,014 (1984); Thornton Oil
Corp., 12 DOE para. 85,112 (1984). For these reasons, an analysis of
the impact of the increased cost of petroleum products on the final
prices of non-petroleum goods and services would be beyond the scope
of this special refund proceeding. See Office of Enforcement, 10 DOE
para. 85,072 (1983); see also Texas Oil & Gas Corp., 12 DOE para.
85,069 at 88,209 (1984). Therefore the end-users of Larson and
Macmillan petroleum products named in the consent orders or
workpapers shall be presumed injured by the alleged overcharges.
Other end-user applicants in the Larson proceeding (those purchasing
from retail outlets), if any, need only demonstrate that they
purchased from Larson and document their purchase volumes to make a
sufficient showing that they were injured by the alleged
overcharges.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ One Larson customer (Portland General Electric) and three
Macmillan customers (Iowa Power & Light, Atlantic Municipal
Utilities, and Iowa South Utilities) are public utilities. As in
other Subpart V proceedings, we will treat the utilities as end-
users. Since each of their potential refunds is less than $5,000, we
will not require them to submit the type of certification of pass-
through required of public utilities that receive refunds in excess
of the $5,000 small claims threshold. See, e.g., Placid Oil Co., 18
DOE para. 85,176 at 88,290 (1988).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We expect some of the applicants in the Macmillan proceeding to
be resellers or retailers. With respect to such applicants, we shall
adopt a small-claims threshold of $5,000. Reseller or retailer
applicants seeking refunds of $5,000 or less will not be required to
demonstrate that they were injured by Macmillan's alleged
overcharges. In addition, one former customer of Macmillan, E.L.
Bride, appears to be a reseller whose potential refund amount is
$141,986. Consistent with prior cases, it will be able to obtain a
refund of $50,000 without making a demonstration that it was injured
by Macmillan's overcharges. In order to obtain a refund of its full
overcharge amount, it would have to show that it was injured by the
overcharges. See Gulf Oil Corp., 16 DOE
[[Page 29373]]
para. 85,381 at 88,738 (1987); Marathon Petroleum Co., 14 DOE para.
85,269 at 88,510 (1986).
B. Calculation of Refund Amount
As stated above, the audits which gave rise to the Macmillan
Consent Order identified all of the customers allegedly overcharged
during the audit period. In total, there are 66 identified customers
who were allegedly overcharged by Macmillan during its refund
period. The Larson audit identified six customers which account for
21.2 percent of the alleged overcharges, while the remaining 78.8
percent of the alleged overcharges were attributed to Larson's sales
to customers at its retail stations. With respect to the identified
customers of Larson and Macmillan, we have determined that the use
of the audit results to establish potential refunds on a firm-
specific basis is more accurate than any other method to relate
probable injury to refund amount.
We shall therefore base the identified customers' potential
refunds on the amount that each of these firms was allegedly
overcharged, as determined by the ERA audit. Thus, the principal
amount of each firm's maximum refund is 100 percent of the amount
designated for that firm in the Consent Order plus a pro rata share
of the interest that the DOE has collected on that amount. (For
Larson, the latter is approximately 45 percent of the interest that
Larson actually owed at the time the money was placed in the escrow
account.) The firms and their potential refund amounts are listed in
the Appendices to this Decision. In addition, to the amounts
indicated in the Appendices, each successful claimant will receive a
pro rata share of the interest accrued on the consent order funds
between the date the funds were placed in the Larson and Macmillan
escrow accounts and the date the claimant's refund is disbursed.
We shall use a volumetric methodology to distribute that portion
of the consent order fund attributable to purchases from Larson's
retail outlets. Under the volumetric methodology, customers at
Larson's retail outlets will be eligible to receive a refund equal
to the number of gallons of motor gasoline purchased from Larson
from May through December 1979 multiplied by the volumetric factor.
The volumetric factor for Larson is equal to $0.0123.2 We also
establish a minimum amount of $15 for refund claims, as the cost of
processing claims in which refunds are sought for amounts less than
$15 outweighs the benefits of restitution in those situations. See,
e.g., Uban Oil Co., 9 DOE para. 82,541 at 82,225 (1982); see also 10
C.F.R. Sec. 205.286(b). Therefore, retail outlet customers must have
purchased at least 1,220 gallons of Larson motor gasoline during the
Larson audit period in order to be eligible for a refund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The volumetric factor was computed by dividing $12,467 (78.8
percent of the $15,822 collected for the Larson escrow account) by
1,016,250 (the approximate volume of motor gasoline sold to retail
customers during the audit period).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Distribution of Remaining Funds
Any funds that remain after all first-stage claims have been
decided will be distributed in accordance with the provisions of the
Petroleum Overcharge Distribution and Restitution Act of 1986
(PODRA), 15 U.S.C. Secs. 4501-07. PODRA requires that the Secretary
of Energy determine annually the amount of oil overcharge funds that
will not be required to refund monies to injured parties in Subpart
V proceedings and make those funds available to state governments
for use in four energy conservation programs. The Secretary has
delegated these responsibilities to OHA. Any funds in the Larson and
Macmillan escrow account that OHA determines will not be needed to
effect direct restitution to injured Larson and Macmillan customers
will be distributed in accordance with the provisions of PODRA.
III. Requirements for Refund Applications
To apply for a refund from any of the settlement funds, a
claimant should submit an Application for Refund containing all of
the following information:
(1) Identifying information including the claimant's name,
current business address, taxpayer identification number, the name,
title, and telephone number of a person to contact for additional
information, and the name and address of the person who should
receive any refund check.3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Under the Privacy Act of 1974, the submission of a social
security number by an individual applicant is voluntary. An
applicant that does not wish to submit a social security number must
submit an employer identification number if one exists. This
information will be used in processing refund applications, and is
requested pursuant to our authority under the Petroleum Overcharge
Distribution and Restitution Act of 1986 and the regulations
codified at 10 C.F.R. Part 205, Subpart V. The information may be
shared with other Federal agencies for statistical, auditing or
archiving purposes, and with law enforcement agencies when they are
investigation a potential violation of civil or criminal law. Unless
an applicant claims confidentiality, this information will be
available to the public in the Public Reference Room of the Office
of Hearings and Appeals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Describe any change in ownership of the applicant firm since
the refund period. If the applicant claims a refund as an heir or
assignee of the person or firm that purchased products from Larson
or Macmillan it should explain why it should receive the refund.
(3) A statement whether the applicant or a related firm has
filed, or has authorized any individual to file on its behalf, any
other application in this refund proceeding. If so, an explanation
of the circumstances of the other filing or authorization should be
submitted.
(4) If the applicant is or was in any way affiliated with the
consenting firms, it should explain this affiliation.
(5) The statement listed below signed by the individual
applicant or a responsible official of the firm filing the refund
application:
I swear (or affirm) that the information contained in this
application and its attachments is true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I understand that anyone who is convicted
of providing false information to the federal government may be
subject to a fine, a jail sentence, or both, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1001. I understand that the information contained in this
application is subject to public disclosure.
Each applicant for which an address appears in the Appendices
will be mailed a sample application form that may be used, but which
is not required. Copies will be sent to any other party upon
request. Each applicant must submit an original and one copy of the
application. All refund applications should be postmarked no later
than December 31, 1996, and be sent to: Macmillan Oil Company [or]
Kenny Larson Oil Company, Special Refund Proceeding, Office of
Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585-
0107.
It Is Therefore Ordered That:
(1) Applications for Refund from the funds remitted to the
Department of Energy by Kenny Larson Oil Company pursuant to the
September 21, 1981 Consent Order may now be filed. The funds will be
distributed in accordance with the foregoing Decision.
(2) Applications for Refund from the funds remitted to the
Department of Energy by Macmillan Oil Company pursuant to the March
7, 1988 Consent Order may now be filed. The funds will be
distributed in accordance with the foregoing Decision.
(3) To be considered, all Applications for Refund must be
postmarked no later than December 31, 1996.
Dated: May 29, 1996.
George B. Breznay.
Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.
[[Page 29374]]
Appendix A.--Macmillan Customers and their Potential Refund Amounts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre- Potential
Customer name Overcharge settlement refund
amount interest amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACE LINES, INC., c/o T.C. MILLER,
P.O. BOX 8088, DES MOINES IA
50301........................... $223 $172 $395
ARMSTRONG RUBBER, 2345 E MARKET
ST, DES MOINES IA 50317-7598.... $17,982 $13,904 $31,886
ASSOCIATED MILK PRODUCERS, 305
19TH ST SW, MORGAN CITY IA 50401 $635 $491 $1,126
ATLANTIC MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, 15
W 3RD ST, ATLANTIC IA 50022-1055 $694 $537 $1,231
BANKERS LIFE CO., 7524 HICKMAN
RD, DES MOINES IA 50322......... $2,068 $1,599 $3,667
BEAVER VALLEY CANNING............ $4,922 $3,806 $8,728
BELL WATCHER..................... $1,834 $1,418 $3,252
BITUCOTE PRODUCTS CO............. $14 $11 $25
BOESEN THE FLORIST, 3422 BEAVER
AVE, DES MOINES IA 50310-3241... $285 $220 $505
BOOKEY PACKING, & MORTON BOOKEY,
3002 SW 30TH ST, DES MOINES IA
50321........................... $843 $652 $1,495
C&K ENTERPRISES.................. $360 $278 $638
CITY OF PLEASANT HILL............ $7 $5 $12
COLLEGE OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE,
3200 GRAND AVE, DES MOINES IA
50312-4104...................... $222 $172 $394
CREES ENTERPRISES................ $1,015 $785 $1,800
CROUSE CARTAGE, 5185 NE 22ND ST,
DES MOINES IA 50313-2521........ $414 $320 $734
DAKOTA OIL CO.................... $650 $503 $1,153
DES MOINES COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
1100 7TH ST, DES MOINES IA 50314 $411 $318 $729
DES MOINES INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS,
1800 GRAND AVE, DES MOINES IA
50309........................... $10,035 $7,759 $17,794
E.L. BRIDE COMPANY, P.O. BOX
7470, SHAWNEE MISSION KS 66207.. $80,066 $61,920 $141,986
ELVIEW CONSTRUCTION, 806 S
ANKENY, ANKENY IA............... $1,345 $1,040 $2,385
EMCO INDUSTRIES, 220 NEW YORK
AVE, DES MOINES IA 50313........ $520 $402 $922
EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO.,
13300 HICKMAN RD, DES MOINES IA
50325-8617...................... $4,736 $3,662 $8,398
EVERDS BROS...................... $213 $165 $378
FIDELITY WAREHOUSE, c/o JACOBSON
WAREHOUSE CO, 1500 DELAWARE AVE,
DES MOINES IA................... $3,146 $2,432 $5,578
FIRESTONE, 2 AVE & HOFFMAN RD,
DES MOINES IA 50309............. $196 $152 $348
FORT DODGE TRANSPORT, c/o GORDON
OLSON, 707 7TH AVE N, FT. DODGE
IA 50501........................ $517 $400 $917
GEORGE A. HORMEL & CO., NORTH
LINN, ATLANTIC IA 50022......... $11,756 $9,090 $20,846
GREENFIELD OIL CO................ $1,019 $788 $1,807
H. WEST CONSTRUCTION............. $25 $19 $44
HOTEL DES MOINES................. $325 $251 $576
HOTEL FT. DES MOINES, 10 &
WALNUT, DES MOINES IA 50309..... $3,494 $2,702 $6,196
HOWE LAUNDRY, c/o GENE E. HOWE,
1311 WEST AVENUE, DES MOINES IA. $1,093 $845 $1,938
INLAND MILLS, c/o ADM MILLING CO,
1925 E GRAND, DES MOINES IA..... $2,565 $1,983 $4,548
IOWA POWER AND LIGHT, 311 ALIX
ST, RED OAK IA 51566-1001....... $4,352 $3,365 $7,717
IOWA ROAD BUILDERS, c/o CARL H.
EDMAN, 700 58TH ST, WEST DES
MOINES IA 50266................. $4,379 $3,386 $7,765
IOWA SOUTH UTILITIES, 18 S, MAIN
ST., ALBA IA 52531.............. $409 $316 $725
KECK, INC., 301 SW 9TH ST, DES
MOINES IA 50309................. $1,071 $828 $1,899
KRIZAN, CHARLES.................. $556 $430 $986
LITTLE GIANT CRANE, 1601 NE 66TH
AVE, DES MOINES IA 50313-1237... $652 $504 $1,156
LOCAL 334, MUSICIANS UNION, 82
MULBERRY ST, WATERLOO IA 50703.. $99 $77 $176
MAYTAG, 1 DEPENDABILITY SQ,
NEWTON IA 50208-9238............ $88,470 $68,405 $156,875
MEREDITH PUBLISHING CO., 1716
LOCUST, DES MOINES IA 50309..... $2,721 $2,104 $4,825
MOTT CONSTRUCTION, 3675 E T C
JESTER BLVD, HOUSTON TX 77018... $523 $404 $927
NATIONAL GYPSUM, 2001 REXFORD RD,
CHARLOTTE NC 28211.............. $508 $393 $901
NEW MONROE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, 407
PLAINSMEN RD, MONROE IA 50170... $2,111 $1,632 $3,743
PARKER OIL CO., 7TH & RACCOON SE,
DES MOINES IA 50309............. $746 $577 $1,323
PEPSI COLA BOTTLERS, 3825 106TH
ST, DES MOINES IA 50322-2098.... $957 $740 $1,697
RALSTON PURINA, 433 S PINE ST,
DAVENPORT IA 52802-2800......... $1,281 $990 $2,271
SAVORY HOTEL, 4TH & LOCUST, DES
MOINES IA....................... $3,617 $2,797 $6,414
SENDLER STONE PRODUCTS........... $193 $149 $342
SHAVER OIL CO., c/o BERWIN P.
SHAVER, 2203 W. LINCOLN WAY,
MARSHALLTOWN IA 50158........... $582 $450 $1,032
STARK HEATING, c/o RALPH STANLEY,
1229 SANFORD AVE, MARSHALLTOWN
IA 50158........................ $761 $588 $1,349
STATE OF IOWA, c/o ATTORNEY
GENERAL'S OFFICE, HOOVER
BUILDING, DES MOINES IA 50319... $1,222 $945 $2,167
DEP'T OF GENERAL SERVICES, c/o
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE,
HOOVER BUILDING, DES MOINES IA
50319........................... $3,092 $2,391 $5,483
STATE OF IOWA BLDG., c/o ATTORNEY
GENERAL'S OFFICE, HOOVER
BUILDING, DES MOINES IA 50319... $183 $141 $324
SWIFT & CO., 406 E 8TH ST,
VILLISCA IA 50846............... $1,766 $1,365 $3,131
SWIFT EDIBLE OIL CO.............. $8,054 $6,227 $14,281
TARGET READY MIX, c/o BILLY H
BRYANT, 405 52ND ST, WEST DES
MOINES IA 50265................. $18,175 $14,053 $32,228
UNIV OF IOWA, 1111 9TH ST, DES
MOINES IA 50314-2527............ $21,616 $16,713 $38,329
UNIV OF N. IOWA, 802 W 29TH ST,
CEDAR FALLS IA 50613............ $4,519 $3,494 $8,013
VA HOSPITAL...................... $12 $9 $21
VETERANS MEMORIAL AUDITORIUM, 833
5TH AVE, DES MOINES IA 50309-
1316............................ $1,009 $780 $1,789
WEST TOWERS BUILDING, MANAGER,
1200 VALLEY WEST DR, WEST DES
MOINES IA 50265................. $3,406 $2,634 $6,040
WESTERN ELECTRIC, c/o ABIGALE
KERPNER, AT&T, 1 OAK WAY, RM
4WD175, BERKELEY HEIGHTS NJ
07922........................... $952 $736 $1,688
WILSON & CO., c/o WILLIAM
AMALONG, 3133 PRARIE ROSE RD,
OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73120.......... $1,822 $1,409 $3,231
[[Page 29375]]
YOUNKERS, 7 & WALNUT, DES MOINES
IA 50314........................ $407 $315 $722
--------------------------------------
TOTAL...................... $333,853 $258,148 $592,001
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix B.--Kenny Larson Customers and Their Potential Refund Amounts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential
Customer name Overcharge Interest principal
amount collected refund
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHULTZ SANITARY SERVICE, 10643
NE SIMPSON, PORTLAND OR 97220-
1223............................ $416 $471 $887
B & C TOWING..................... $96 $109 $205
D & A SUPPLY, 1169 MOLALLA AVE,
OREGON CITY OR 97045............ $91 $101 $192
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC, LEGAL
DEPARTMENT, 121 SW SALMON ST,
PORTLAND OR 97204............... $685 $773 $1,458
LARRY HEPLER..................... $93 $109 $202
SKIG NAGAL FARMS................. $192 $219 $411
RETAIL CUSTOMERS................. $5,842 $6,625 $12,467
--------------------------------------
TOTAL...................... $7,415 $8,407 $15,822
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 96-14577 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
