96-14619. Pure Magnesium From Canada; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 29343-29344]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-14619]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    [A-122-814]
    
    
    Pure Magnesium From Canada; Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
    Duty Administrative Review
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
    Administrative Review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In response to a request from one respondent, the Department 
    of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of 
    the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from Canada. The review 
    covers one manufacturer/exporter of the subject merchandise to the 
    United States for the period August 1, 1994 through July 31, 1995.
        We have preliminarily determined that U.S. sales have not been made 
    below the normal value (NV). Interested parties are invited to comment 
    on these preliminary results. Parties who submit arguments in this 
    proceeding are requested to submit with each argument (1) a statement 
    of the issue, and (2) a brief summary of the argument.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: June 10, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Rausher or Richard Rimlinger, 
    Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International 
    Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
    Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230, telephone: (202) 
    482-4733.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    The Applicable Statute
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 
    1930, as amended (the Act), are references to the provisions effective 
    January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act 
    by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless 
    otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are 
    to the current regulations, as amended by the interim regulations 
    published in the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).
    
    Background
    
        On August 31, 1992, the Department published in the Federal 
    Register (57 FR 39399) the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium 
    from Canada. On August 1, 1995, the Department published a notice of 
    ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' of this antidumping 
    duty order for the period of August 1, 1994 through July 31, 1995 (60 
    FR 39151). We received a timely request for review from the respondent, 
    Norsk Hydro Canada Inc. (NHCI). On September 15, 1995, the Department 
    initiated a review of NHCI (60 FR 47930).
    
    Scope of the Review
    
        The product covered by this review is pure magnesium. Pure 
    unwrought magnesium contains at least 99.8 percent magnesium by weight 
    and is sold in various slab and ingot forms and sizes. Granular and 
    secondary magnesium are excluded from the scope currently classified 
    under subheading 8104.11.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). 
    The HTS item numbers are provided for convenience and for Customs 
    purposes. The written description remains dispositive.
        The review covers one Canadian manufacturer/exporter, NHCI, and the 
    period August 1, 1994 through July 31, 1995.
    
    United States Price (USP)
    
        In calculating USP for NHCI, the Department treated respondent's 
    sale as an export price (EP) sale, as defined in section 772(a) of the 
    Act, because the subject merchandise was sold to an unaffiliated U.S. 
    purchaser prior to the date of importation.
        We calculated EP based on the packed, delivered, duty-paid price to 
    the unaffiliated customer in the United States. We made deductions from 
    the gross unit price, where appropriate, for freight and U.S. customs 
    duty, in accordance with section 772(c)(2)(A) of the Act.
        No other adjustments to USP were claimed or allowed.
    
    Normal Value (NV)
    
        Based on a comparison of the aggregate quantity of home market and 
    U.S. sales, we determined that the quantity of foreign like product 
    sold in the exporting country was sufficient to permit a proper 
    comparison with the sales of the subject merchandise to the United 
    States, pursuant to section 773(a) of the Act. Therefore, in accordance 
    with section 773(a)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we based NV on the prices at 
    which the foreign like products were first sold for consumption in the 
    exporting country.
        Pursuant to section 777A(d)(2) of the Act, we compared the EP of 
    the individual transaction to the monthly weighted-average price of 
    sales of the foreign like product. We compared the EP sale to sales in 
    the home market of identical merchandise.
        We based NV on the price at which the foreign like product is first 
    sold for consumption in the exporting country, in the usual commercial 
    quantities and in the ordinary course of trade and at the same level of 
    trade as the EP, in accordance with section 773(a)(1)(B)(i) of the Act. 
    We made adjustments, where applicable, for freight charges and home 
    market credit expenses, in accordance with section 773(a)(6)(B)(ii) of 
    the Act. We increased home market price by U.S. packing costs in 
    accordance with section 773(a)(6)(A) of the Act and reduced it by home 
    market packing costs in accordance with section 773(a)(6)(B) of the 
    Act. In accordance with section 773(a)(6)(C) of the Act, we increased 
    NV by adding U.S. credit expense. No other adjustments were claimed or 
    allowed.
    
    Preliminary Results of the Review
    
        As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the 
    following weighted-average dumping margin exists:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    Margin  
            Manufacturer/Exporter                 Period          (percent) 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc..............        8/1/94-7/31/95         0.00
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Parties to the proceeding may request disclosure within five days 
    of the date of publication of this notice. Any interested party may 
    request a hearing within 10 days of publication. Any hearing, if 
    requested, will be held 44
    
    [[Page 29344]]
    
    days after the date of publication, or the first workday thereafter. 
    Case briefs and/or written comments from interested parties may be 
    submitted not later than 30 days after the date of publication. 
    Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals to written comments, limited to issues 
    raised in the case briefs and comments, may be filed not later than 37 
    days after the date of publication. Parties who submit arguments in 
    this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument (1) a 
    statement of the issue and (2) a brief summary of the argument. The 
    Department will issue the final results of the administrative review, 
    including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any such 
    written comments or at a hearing, within 120 days of issuance of these 
    preliminary results.
        The Department shall determine, and Customs shall assess, 
    antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Individual differences 
    between USP and NV may vary from the percentage stated above. The 
    Department will issue appraisement instructions directly to Customs. 
    The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment 
    of antidumping dumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the 
    determination and for future deposits of estimated duties.
        Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective 
    upon completion of the final results of this administrative review for 
    all shipments of pure magnesium from Canada entered, or withdrawn from 
    warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
    final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
    751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for NHCI will be the 
    rate established in the final results of administrative review; (2) for 
    merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this 
    review but covered in the original less than fair value (LTFV) 
    investigation or a previous review, the cash deposit will continue to 
    be the most recent rate published in the final determination or final 
    results for which the manufacturer or exporter received a company-
    specific rate; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
    review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the 
    cash deposit rate will be that established for the manufacturer of the 
    merchandise in the final results of this review or the LTFV 
    investigation; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is 
    a firm covered in this or any previous review, the cash deposit rate 
    will be 21 percent, the ``all others'' rate established in Pure 
    Magnesium From Canada: Amendment of Final Determination of Sales At 
    Less Than Fair Value and Order in Accordance With Decision on Remand, 
    58 FR 62643, November 29, 1993.
        This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
    their responsibility to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement 
    of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries 
    during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement 
    could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of 
    antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double 
    antidumping duties.
        This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
    section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 353.22.
    
        Dated: May 29, 1996.
    Paul L. Joffe,
    Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 96-14619 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/10/1996
Published:
06/10/1996
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.
Document Number:
96-14619
Dates:
June 10, 1996.
Pages:
29343-29344 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-122-814
PDF File:
96-14619.pdf