98-15407. Federal Reserve Bank Services  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 31777-31779]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-15407]
    
    
    
    [[Page 31777]]
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
    
    [Docket R-1014]
    
    
    Federal Reserve Bank Services
    
    AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
    
    ACTION: Request for comment.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Board is requesting comment on whether the last fifteen 
    minutes of the Fedwire funds transfer operating day, from 6:15 p.m. to 
    6:30 p.m. Eastern Time, should be restricted to funds transfers sent 
    and received by banks for their own account in order to facilitate 
    banks' end-of-day management of their Federal Reserve accounts.
    
    DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 12, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments, which should refer to Docket No. R-1014, may be 
    mailed to Ms. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary, Board of Governors of the 
    Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20551. Comments addressed to Ms. Johnson may also be 
    delivered to the Board's mail room between 8:45 a.m. and 5:15 p.m., and 
    to the security control room outside of those hours. Both the mail room 
    and the security control room are accessible from the courtyard 
    entrance on 20th Street between Constitution Avenue and C Street, N.W. 
    Comments may be inspected in room MP-500 between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 
    p.m., except as provided in Section 261.8 of the Board's Rules 
    Regarding the Availability of Information, 12 CFR 261.8.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louise Roseman, Associate Director 
    (202/425-2789), Jeff Stehm, Manager (202/452-2217), or Gina Sellitto, 
    Financial Services Analyst (202/728-5848), Division of Reserve Bank 
    Operations and Payment Systems. For the hearing impaired only: 
    Telecommunications Device for the Deaf, Diane Jenkins (202/452-3544).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Fedwire funds transfer system operates 
    from 12:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time (all times stated are Eastern 
    Time), with the last half hour of the operating day reserved for 
    settlement transfers.1 Settlement transfers are typically 
    used by banks to adjust their Federal Reserve account positions, as 
    well as their account positions at correspondent banks. Settlement 
    transfers may be two-party transfers sent and received by banks for 
    their own account, or they may contain third-party respondent bank 
    information when a respondent bank is the originator and/or beneficiary 
    of the payment order.2 To the extent that Fedwire settlement 
    transfers are received or requested unexpectedly just before the final 
    close of Fedwire, a bank's ability to manage its reserve position and 
    end-of-day Federal Reserve account position may be complicated. In 
    particular, last minute transfers received during the settlement period 
    for credit to a respondent bank customer may not be anticipated and 
    cannot be controlled by the receiving correspondent bank.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ A settlement transfer is a payment order in which the 
    originator and the beneficiary are each either: (i) a bank subject 
    to Federal Reserve reserve requirements (whether or not it actually 
    maintains reserve balances), or (ii) a participant in a net 
    settlement arrangement approved by a Reserve Bank as an eligible 
    originator or beneficiary of a settlement payment order sent during 
    the settlement period. A settlement transfer sent during the 
    settlement period must be designated by type code 16. For purposes 
    of this notice, the term ``bank'' is used to refer to any depository 
    institution.
        \2\ For purposes of this notice, respondent transfers are 
    defined as Fedwire transfers in which there is an intermediary bank 
    between the originating bank and the Federal Reserve or between the 
    beneficiary's bank and the Federal Reserve.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In response to the Board's request for comment on a return to a 
    system of lagged reserve requirements (62 FR 60671, November 12, 1997), 
    the New York Clearing House Association (NYCHA) requested that the 
    Board reconsider a two-part settlement period at the end of the Fedwire 
    operating day, in which the last fifteen minutes of the Fedwire funds 
    transfer operating day are reserved exclusively for transfers sent by 
    and received for a bank's own account. Under this proposed restriction, 
    funds transfers sent by banks on behalf of a respondent bank or funds 
    transfers received by banks for credit to a respondent bank would be 
    prohibited during the last fifteen minutes of the Fedwire day. NYCHA 
    believes such a restriction would facilitate reserve management by 
    allowing banks to anticipate more fully last minute payment flows from 
    and into their account at a Reserve Bank. In particular, NYCHA believes 
    that because respondent banks are able to use the entire Fedwire 
    settlement period (6:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.) to move funds into and out 
    of accounts at their correspondents, the correspondents cannot know 
    their reserve positions with certainty until Fedwire has 
    closed.3 This uncertainty in late-day funds movements adds 
    to the difficulty of reserve management for large money center 
    correspondents.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ NYCHA members have indicated that their concerns relate 
    primarily to late-in-the-day transfers on behalf of foreign 
    respondent banks, and that transfers on behalf of domestic 
    respondent banks are generally not performed after 6:15 p.m.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In October 1989, the Board requested comment on a similar proposal 
    to segment the settlement period for the Fedwire funds transfer service 
    (54 FR 41681, October 11, 1989). Overall, commenters were divided as to 
    the benefits of this earlier proposal. Several commenters indicated 
    that there were no significant benefits to a segmented settlement 
    period and that restricting receipt of transfers by affiliates and 
    respondent banks during the last fifteen minutes would further impede 
    their ability to manage their accounts. Other commenters believed that 
    a segmented settlement period would unnecessarily complicate the 
    processing of funds transfers because new edit criteria and type codes 
    might be needed to monitor and restrict respondent transfers, requiring 
    changes to programs and operating procedures for both banks and Reserve 
    Banks. Commenters supporting this proposal noted that, in contrast to 
    transfers sent or received on its own behalf, a correspondent bank may 
    not be able to predict accurately transfers involving its respondent 
    accounts, thereby complicating management of its reserve position.
        At that time, the Board did not adopt a segmented settlement period 
    given the concerns expressed by commenters and the lack of strong 
    industry support (55 FR 18755, May 4, 1990). The Board, however, 
    indicated that it would monitor developments with regard to reserve 
    account management and determine whether segmenting the settlement 
    period should be reconsidered at a later date.
        NYCHA, in its February 5, 1998, letter to the Board, argues that 
    several developments have occurred since 1990 that make it more 
    difficult for banks to manage their reserve positions. These 
    developments include: (1) a significant reduction in reserve balances 
    resulting from reductions in reserve requirements in 1990 and 1992 and 
    the use of sweep accounts starting in 1994; and (2) a reduction in the 
    pool of available buyers of federal funds due to consolidation in the 
    banking industry. The unexpected receipt of funds for a respondent bank 
    very late in the day could result in the correspondent bank having more 
    reserves than planned, which may be difficult to invest late in the 
    day. Likewise, a late-in-the-day request to pay out funds on behalf of 
    a respondent bank may result in a reserve deficiency at the 
    correspondent bank that may be costly and difficult for the 
    correspondent to fund. NYCHA argues that unanticipated excess or 
    deficit reserve positions create uncertainty and volatility in the 
    federal funds market. NYCHA believes that a segmented
    
    [[Page 31778]]
    
    Fedwire funds transfer settlement period would allow each bank to 
    calculate its reserve position with greater precision and facilitate a 
    more efficient interbank funding market.
        If a segmented settlement period were adopted, it might be 
    implemented through one of several approaches. Under one approach, if a 
    bank received an unanticipated respondent transfer after 6:15 p.m., it 
    could return the funds the same day. If this was not possible prior to 
    the final close of Fedwire, it could return the funds the next day and 
    request compensation from the sender (if the sender and receiver had a 
    compensation agreement) and/or request that the Federal Reserve 
    function an as-of adjustment to its reserve position and the reserve 
    position of the sending bank.4 5  As-of 
    adjustments may not have value for some receiving banks or provide a 
    disincentive to some sending banks. In particular, a receiving bank 
    with low reserve requirements that maintains balances at a Reserve Bank 
    primarily for payment clearing purposes would likely receive little 
    economic value from an as-of adjustment. Likewise, a sending bank with 
    a low reserve requirement may not consider an as-of adjustment to be a 
    sufficient incentive to stop sending respondent transfers after 6:15 
    p.m. Alternatively, compensation for respondent transfers processed 
    after a 6:15 p.m. deadline might be handled by private agreement 
    between the sending and receiving banks. For example, NYCHA has rules 
    governing the settlement of claims for compensation between NYCHA 
    member banks that arise from interbank funds payments.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ As-of adjustments are adjustments made at the discretion of 
    the Reserve Bank to the amount of calculated required reserves that 
    sending and receiving banks must maintain during a two-week reserve 
    maintenance period. As-of adjustments do not affect the actual level 
    of balances held by a bank at its Reserve Bank, but rather the level 
    of required reserves a bank must hold during a maintenance period.
        \5\ This is similar to the process used to compensate banks for 
    third-party customer transfers sent after 6:00 p.m. as type code 16 
    messages. In this case, the Reserve Banks will function as-of 
    adjustments to the sending and receiving banks when the receiving 
    bank notifies the Reserve Bank of such a transfer. The use of as-of 
    adjustments for this purpose, however, occurs infrequently.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Under another approach, the Fedwire funds transfer system might be 
    modified to incorporate new edit criteria to detect and reject type 
    code 16 funds transfers received after 6:15 p.m. that contain 
    respondent information in the beneficiary or originator message field 
    tags. Alternatively, a new funds transfer message type code to identify 
    two-party bank-to-bank transfers could be established by modifying the 
    Fedwire funds transfer system. If a transfer received after the 
    respondent transfer cut-off time (6:15 p.m.) did not bear the 
    appropriate type code, it would be rejected by the Fedwire funds 
    transfer system. This approach would likely require changes to banks' 
    internal systems in order to process a new message type code and may 
    require significant modifications to the Fedwire funds transfer system.
        If a segmented settlement period is desirable, Fedwire restrictions 
    on respondent transfers sent after 6:15 p.m. may only need to be 
    applied to transfers sent by the Federal Reserve to a bank for credit 
    to its respondent bank's account. Correspondent banks could set their 
    own cutoff times for originating transfers on behalf of a respondent 
    bank customer, but they are unable to set similar controls over the 
    receipt of transfers for the benefit of their respondent customers. The 
    receipt of transfers for the benefit of a respondent bank customer, 
    therefore, may require Fedwire restrictions to assist the receiving 
    correspondent bank in managing its reserve position toward the end of 
    the day.
        If a segmented settlement period were adopted, the Board proposes 
    that the Reserve Banks' procedures for granting an extension of Fedwire 
    deadlines be modified in order to preserve a thirty-minute settlement 
    period at the end of the Fedwire day, divided into two fifteen-minute 
    intervals--the first period for all types of settlement transfers and 
    the second period exclusively for settlement transfers sent and 
    received for banks' own accounts. Today, extensions of the third-party 
    customer transfer deadline past 6:00 p.m. generally result in a 
    fifteen-minute, rather than thirty-minute, settlement period. For 
    example, of the fifty-six extensions of the 6:00 p.m. third-party 
    customer deadline in 1997, fifty resulted in a compressed fifteen-
    minute settlement period. If a segmented settlement period were 
    adopted, any extension of the third-party deadline may require an 
    extension of the final closing time in order to preserve a thirty 
    minute settlement period at the end of the day--fifteen minutes for all 
    settlement transfers and fifteen minutes exclusively for settlement 
    transfers for banks' own accounts.
        Finally, if a segmented settlement period were adopted, operational 
    changes to banks' internal systems, and possibly to the Fedwire funds 
    transfer system, may be required in order to preclude respondent 
    transfers after 6:15 p.m. These potential system changes raise a 
    question of the appropriate timing for implementation given the Reserve 
    Banks' and banks' ongoing year 2000 readiness efforts and their desire 
    to limit the number of system changes prior to the millennium cutover.
        The Board requests comment on whether the establishment of a 
    segmented settlement period at the end of the Fedwire operating day in 
    which respondent transfers would not be permitted during the last 
    fifteen minutes would enhance banks' ability to manage their reserve 
    positions late in the day. The Board requests comment on the following 
    questions:
        1. What are the benefits of a 15-minute period from 6:15 p.m. to 
    6:30 p.m. during which respondent transfers would be prohibited? To 
    whom would these benefits likely accrue? Are there any significant 
    costs or other drawbacks to a segmented settlement period?
        2. Because correspondent banks could manage unexpected outflows of 
    funds over Fedwire by setting their own internal cut-off time for 
    originating transfers on behalf of respondent bank customers, should 
    the Federal Reserve impose restrictions only on settlement transfers 
    where a respondent bank is the beneficiary bank?
        3. How liquid is the fed funds market after 6:15 p.m.? Is the 
    liquidity in the fed funds market at that time of day sufficient to 
    allow the correspondent bank to invest any large inflows or cover any 
    outflows of funds received over Fedwire late in the day?
        4. How would restrictions on respondent banks' ability to request 
    or receive Fedwire funds transfers late in the day affect their ability 
    to manage their reserve position?
        5. If the Board were to adopt a segmented settlement period, what 
    responsibilities and/or penalties, if any, should be placed on the 
    sending bank if it does not comply with the 6:15 p.m. deadline? Should 
    the receiving bank have the ability to request an as-of adjustment with 
    a corresponding adjustment to the sending bank if a respondent transfer 
    is received after the 6:15 p.m. deadline? Will as-of adjustments 
    provide sufficient incentive for the sending bank to police its release 
    of respondent transfers after 6:15 p.m? Would there be a significant 
    cost or drawback to the receiving bank if as-of adjustments were not 
    functioned for these types of transactions?
        6. Would it be preferable for the Federal Reserve to modify the 
    Fedwire funds transfer system by implementing a new message type code 
    or edit criteria to reject automatically transfers sent after the 6:15 
    p.m. that contain respondent bank information in the originator and/or 
    beneficiary fields? What costs or other burdens would such
    
    [[Page 31779]]
    
    operational modifications impose on Fedwire participants?
        7. If the Fedwire 6:00 p.m. deadline for third-party customer 
    transfers is extended on a particular day, should a thirty-minute 
    settlement period be maintained at the end of the day, with the last 
    fifteen minutes of the settlement period reserved for settlement 
    transfers between banks for their own accounts?
        8. If a segmented settlement period is approved, what is the 
    appropriate timeframe for its implementation, given banks' ongoing year 
    2000 readiness efforts?
        9. Are there any other alternatives that could be implemented to 
    address this issue? For example, instead of Fedwire changes, could the 
    originating bank and/or receiving bank implement internal controls, 
    customer agreements, or other changes (e.g., industry agreements 
    regarding a deadline for respondent transfers) to restrict respondent 
    transfers toward the end of the Fedwire operating day?
    
        By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
    System, June 5, 1998.
    Jennifer J. Johnson,
    Secretary of the Board.
    [FR Doc. 98-15407 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/10/1998
Department:
Federal Reserve System
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Request for comment.
Document Number:
98-15407
Dates:
Comments must be submitted on or before August 12, 1998.
Pages:
31777-31779 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket R-1014
PDF File:
98-15407.pdf