96-14694. Airworthiness Directives: Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Model PC-6 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 29500-29502]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-14694]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 29501]]
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-CE-85-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives: Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Model PC-6 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) that would apply to Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Model PC-6 
    airplanes. The proposed action would require inspecting for loose or 
    sheared rivets in the hinge brackets on the horizontal stabilizer and 
    inspecting for incorrect spacing tolerance of the hinge brackets. If 
    the rivets are found loose or sheared, the proposed AD would require 
    replacing the rivets and also re-positioning the hinge brackets, if 
    found incorrectly spaced. Several reports of rivets shearing on the 
    hinge brackets prompted the proposed action. The actions specified in 
    this proposed AD are intended to prevent structural failure of the 
    hinge bracket on the horizontal stabilizer, which could result in 
    partial or complete loss of control of the horizontal stabilizer and 
    loss of control of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 14, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-85-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., CH-6370 Stans, Switzerland. This 
    information also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the address 
    above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Roman T. Gabrys, Project Officer, 
    Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, FAA, 1201 
    Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 426-
    6932; facsimile (816) 426-2169.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 95-CE-85-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-85-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Federal Office for Civil Aviation (FOCA), which is the 
    airworthiness authority for Switzerland, recently notified the FAA that 
    an unsafe condition may exist on certain Pilatus Model PC-6 airplanes. 
    The FOCA has received several reports of sheared or loose rivets in the 
    hinge bracket that attaches the horizontal stabilizer to the fuselage. 
    Investigation reveals that pre-loads in the hinge bracket flanges may 
    exist due to tightness of the fit of the spacer, or in certain 
    instances, the hinge bracket is not positioned or spaced correctly. 
    This condition can substantially affect the load carrying capability of 
    these brackets, thus causing the rivets to shear or loosen, which could 
    lead to structural failure of the horizontal stabilizer.
        Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. has issued service bulletin (SB) PC-6 165, 
    dated February 7, 1994, which specifies procedures for inspecting for 
    sheared or loose rivets, replacing any sheared or loose rivets with new 
    rivets, and checking the spacing tolerance of the hinge brackets.
        FOCA classified this service bulletin as mandatory and has issued 
    airworthiness directive (AD) HB 94-086, dated June 4, 1994, in order to 
    ensure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in Switzerland.
        This airplane model is manufactured in Switzerland and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the 
    applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement between Switzerland and 
    the United States. Pursuant to this bilateral airworthiness agreement, 
    the Switzerland FOCA has kept the FAA informed of the situation 
    described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the Switzerland 
    FOCA, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action 
    is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for 
    operation in the United States.
        After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available 
    information related to the incidents described above, the FAA has 
    determined that AD action should be taken to prevent a reduction in the 
    structural integrity of the hinge bracket and tailplane, which could 
    result in partial or complete loss of control of the horizontal 
    stabilizer and loss of control of the airplane.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other Pilatus Model PC-6 airplanes of the same type 
    design registered in the United States, the proposed AD would require 
    the following:
    
    --Inspecting the hinge brackets attached to the fuselage for loose or 
    sheared rivets,
    --Inspecting the hinge brackets for correct spacing tolerance and 
    positioning,
    --Removing the brackets and adjusting any incorrect spacing or 
    positioning, and
    --Replacing any loose or sheared rivets with new rivets.
    
        The FAA estimates that one airplane in the U.S. registry would be 
    affected by the proposed AD, that it would take less than 1 workhour 
    per airplane to accomplish the proposed actions, and that the average 
    labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Based on these figures, the 
    total cost impact of the proposed AD for the only U.S. operator is 
    estimated to be $60. This is the cost of the inspection only and does 
    not include the cost for replacing any loose rivets, if found. This 
    figure is based on the assumption that the affected owner/
    
    [[Page 29502]]
    
    operator of the affected airplane has not performed the inspection or 
    modification.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. 95-CE-85-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model PC-6 Airplanes (serial numbers 825 through 
    892).
    
        Note 1:  This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required within the next 75 hours time-in-service 
    (TIS), after the effective date of this AD, unless already 
    accomplished.
    
        Note 2: The compliance time required in this AD takes precedence 
    over the compliance time in Pilatus Service Bulletin PC-6 165, dated 
    February 7, 1994.
    
        To prevent structural failure of the hinge bracket on the 
    horizontal stabilizer, which could result in partial or complete 
    loss of control of the horizontal stabilizer and loss of control of 
    the airplane, accomplish the following:
        (a) Inspect the hinge brackets on the horizontal stabilizer for 
    sheared or loose rivets in accordance with paragraph 2.A. in the 
    ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of Pilatus Service Bulletin (SB) 
    PC-6 165, dated February 7, 1994.
        (b) Inspect the spacing tolerance of the hinge bracket in 
    accordance with paragraph 2.C. in the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS 
    section of Pilatus SB PC-6 165, dated February 7, 1994.
        (c) If there are loose or sheared rivets or if the bracket 
    spacing is out of the spacing tolerance, prior to further flight, 
    modify the position and space tolerance of the hinge brackets and 
    replace any loose or sheared rivets in accordance with paragraph 
    2.D. in the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of Pilatus SB PC-6 
    165, dated February 7, 1994.
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviations Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Small Airplane Directorate. The request 
    shall be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Small Airplane 
    Directorate.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Small Airplane Directorate.
    
        (f) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of 
    the document referred to herein upon request to Pilatus Aircraft 
    Ltd., CH-6370 Stans, Switzerland; or may examine this document at 
    the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 
    1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri.
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on June 4, 1996.
    Henry A. Armstrong,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-14694 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/11/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
96-14694
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before August 14, 1996.
Pages:
29500-29502 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-CE-85-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
96-14694.pdf
CFR: (2)
14 CFR 21.29
14 CFR 39.13