[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 112 (Wednesday, June 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31821-31822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-15282]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 972-3187]
Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or
practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to
Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft
complaint that accompanies the consent agreement and the terms of the
consent order--embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle
these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 11, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary,
Room 159, 6th St. and Pa. Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Medine, Federal Trade
Commission, S-4429, 6th and Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20580. (202) 326-3224. Paul Block, Boston Regional Office, Federal
Trade Commission, 101 Merrimac Street, Suite 810, Boston, MA 02114-
4719. (617) 424-5960.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46, and Section 2.34 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 2.34), notice is hereby
given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent
order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject
to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public
record for a period of sixty (60) days. The following Analysis to Aid
Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the
allegations in the accompanying complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained from the
Commission Actions section of the FTC Home Page (for June 4, 1997), on
the World Wide Web, at ``http://www.ftc.gov/os/actions/htm.'' A paper
copy can be obtained from the FTC Public Reference Room, Room H-130,
Sixth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580, either
in person or by calling (202) 326-3627. Public comment is invited. Such
comments or views will be considered by the Commission and will be
available for inspection and copying at its principal office in
accordance with Section 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice (16 CFR 4.9(b)(6)(ii)).
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has accepted an agreement to a
proposed consent order from Sears, Roebuck and Co. The proposed
respondent is a large national retailer that sells a wide variety of
products and services.
The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for
sixty (60) days for reception of comments by interested persons.
Comments received during this period will become part of the public
record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the
agreement and the comments received and will decide whether it should
withdraw from the agreement and take other appropriate action or make
final the agreement's proposed order.
The Commission's complaint alleges several unfair or deceptive acts
or practices related to the proposed respondent's policy of inducing
consumers who have filed for bankruptcy protection to sign agreements
reaffirming debts owed to proposed respondent prior to the filing of
the bankruptcy petition. The complaint charges that the proposed
respondent: falsely represented to consumers that signed reaffirmation
agreements would be filed with the bankruptcy courts, as required by
the United States Bankruptcy Code; falsely represented to consumers
that debts associated with unfiled reaffirmation agreements, or
agreements that were filed but not approved by the bankruptcy courts,
were legally binding on the consumers; and unfairly collected debts
that it was not permitted by law to collect. The proposed consent order
contains provisions designed to remedy the violations charged and to
prevent the proposed respondent from engaging in similar acts in the
future.
The proposed consent order preserves the Commission's right to seek
consumer redress if the Commission determines that redress to consumers
provided through related named and unnamed legal actions is not
adequate.
Part I of the proposed order prohibits the proposed respondent from
misrepresenting to consumers who have filed petitions for bankruptcy
protection under the United States Bankruptcy Code that (A)
Reaffirmation agreements will be filed in bankruptcy court; or (B) any
reaffirmation agreement is legally binding on the consumer. Part I.C of
the proposed order prohibits the proposed respondent from collecting
any debt (including any interest, fee, charge, or expense incidental to
the principal obligation) that has been legally discharged in
bankruptcy proceedings and that the proposed respondent is not
permitted by law to collect. Part II of the proposed order prohibits
the proposed respondent from making any material misrepresentation in
the collection of any debt subject to a pending bankruptcy proceeding.
Part III of the proposed order contains record keeping requirements
for materials that demonstrate the compliance of the proposed
respondent with the proposed order. Part IV requires distribution of a
copy of the consent decree to certain current and future principals,
officers, directors, managers, and representatives.
Part V provides for Commission notification upon any change in the
corporate respondent affecting compliance obligations arising under the
order. Part VI requires the proposed respondent to notify the
Commission of proposed settlement terms in related actions filed by
various named and unnamed parties. Part VII requires the filing of
compliance report(s). Finally, Part VIII provides for the termination
of
[[Page 31822]]
the order after twenty years under certain circumstances.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
proposed order, and it is not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the agreement and proposed order or to modify in any
way their terms.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-15282 Filed 6-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
