98-15589. Executive Office for Immigration Review; Board of Immigration Appeals: En Banc Procedures  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 31889-31890]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-15589]
    
    
    
    [[Page 31889]]
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    
    8 CFR Part 3
    
    [EOIR No. 120F; AG Order No. 2163-98]
    RIN 125-AA21
    
    
    Executive Office for Immigration Review; Board of Immigration 
    Appeals: En Banc Procedures
    
    AGENCY: Executive Office for Immigration Review; Department of Justice.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This final rule amends 8 CFR part 3 by revising the en banc 
    decision procedures of the Board of Immigration Appeals. This rule 
    streamlines the Board's en banc process by permitting a majority of 
    permanent Board Members or the Chairman to designate en banc cases to 
    be heard by nine-member, limited en banc panels.
    
    DATES: This final rule is effective June 11, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret M. Philbin, General Counsel, 
    Executive Office for Immigration Review, Suite 2400, 5107 Leesburg 
    Pike, Falls Church, Virginia 22041, (703) 305-0470.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This regulation revises and streamlines the 
    en banc procedures of the Board of Immigration Appeals. The current 
    regulation requires that the entire 15-member Board decide each en banc 
    case. While this system has served the Board well in the past by 
    promoting thoughtful decision-making and permitting each Board Member 
    to participate in important precedent setting decisions, with the 
    expansion of the Board to 12 members and most recently to 15 members, 
    this procedure has become cumbersome and time-consuming.
        This rule streamlines the Board's en banc process by permitting a 
    majority of permanent Board Members or the Chairman to designate en 
    banc cases to be heard by nine-members, limited en banc panels. Each 
    limited en banc panel shall contain the Chairman or Vice Chairman (as 
    decided by the Chairman). If the Chairman and Vice Chairman are both 
    disqualified in a particular case, then the most senior remaining 
    permanent Board Member who is not disqualified shall sit on the limited 
    en banc panel as the Presiding Board Member. If the Chairman and Vice 
    Chairman are both unavailable in a particular case for reasons other 
    than disqualification, then the Chairman shall designate a Presiding 
    Board Member to sit on the limited en banc panel. If the Chairman is 
    unavailable and disqualified, then the Vice Chairman, if unavailable 
    and not disqualified, shall designate a presiding Board Member to sit 
    on the limited en banc panel. If the case was considered or decided by 
    a three-member panel, the limited en banc panel shall also contain all 
    available Board Members who considered or decided that case as part of 
    a three-member panel. The remaining members of each limited en banc 
    panel will be randomly selected from among the permanent Board Members. 
    In light of the Board's increasing membership and caseload, these 
    changes are necessary to maintain an effective, efficient system of 
    appellate adjudication.
        Generally, each limited en banc panel would consider an individual 
    case. However, the Chairman could refer a group of cases to the same 
    limited en banc panel. It is expected that such authority would be used 
    when the Board has a group of cases with related issues pending before 
    it. To maintain consistency and uniformity among limited en banc panel 
    decisions, the rule provides for referral of any limited en banc panel 
    decision to the full Board en banc upon a majority vote of the 
    permanent Board Members or by direction of the Chairman. This rule does 
    not change the requirement of a majority vote of the permanent Board 
    Members to designate a decision of the Board as a published precedent. 
    The rule also makes certain technical and administrative changes, such 
    as recognizing the existing position of Vice Chairman of the Board and 
    designating retired Board Members, retired Immigration Judges, and 
    Administrative Law Judges as persons eligible to serve as temporary 
    Board Members. Currently, only sitting Immigration Judges can serve in 
    this capacity. These temporary appointments are intended to assist the 
    Board when extenuating circumstances arise, or in the absence of 
    permanent Members or in other situations in which the temporary 
    appointment of qualified and experienced adjudicators will allow the 
    Board to efficiently and effectively handle its caseload.
        Compliance with 5 U.S.C. 553 as to notice of proposed rulemaking 
    and delayed effective date is not necessary because this rule relates 
    to internal agency procedure and practice.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Attorney General certifies 
    that this rule affects only individuals in immigration proceedings 
    before the Executive Office for Immigration Review whose appeals are 
    decided by the Board of Immigration Appeals. Therefore, this rule does 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
    
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    
        This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and 
    tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 
    million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or 
    uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed 
    necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
    1995.
    
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
    
        This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule 
    will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or 
    more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse 
    effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, 
    innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to 
    compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with 
    Executive Order 12866, Sec. 1(b), Principles of Regulation. This rule 
    falls within a category of actions that the Office of Management and 
    Budget has determined not to constitute ``significant regulatory 
    actions'' under Sec. 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning 
    and Review, and, accordingly, it has not been reviewed by OMB.
    
    Executive Order 12612
    
        This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the 
    States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
    States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
    various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 
    of Executive Order 12612, the Department of Justice has determined that 
    this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        The rule meets the applicable standards provided in sections 3(a) 
    and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988.
    
    [[Page 31890]]
    
    List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 3
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Immigration, Lawyers, 
    Organizations and functions (Government agencies), Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
    PART 3--EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
    
        1. The authority citation for part 3 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1252 note, 1252b, 1324b, 
    1362; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 1746; sec. 2, Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1950, 3 
    CFR, 1949-1953 Comp., p. 1002.
    
        2. Section 3.1 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) and adding 
    paragraphs (a) (4), (5) and (6) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 3.1  General authorities.
    
        (a)(1) Organization. There shall be in the Department of Justice a 
    Board of Immigration Appeals, subject to the general supervision of the 
    Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review. The Board shall 
    consist of a Chairman, a Vice Chairman, and thirteen other members. The 
    Board Members shall exercise their independent judgment and discretion 
    in the cases coming before the Board. A vacancy, or the absence or 
    unavailability of a Board Member, shall not impair the right of the 
    remaining members to exercise all the powers of the Board. The Director 
    may in his discretion designate Immigration Judges, retired Board 
    Members, retired Immigration Judges, and Administrative Law Judges 
    employed within EOIR to act as temporary, additional Board Members for 
    terms not to exceed six months. The Chairman may divide the Board into 
    three-member panels and designate a Presiding Member of each panel. The 
    Chairman may from time to time make changes in the composition of such 
    panels and of Presiding Members. Each panel shall be empowered to 
    decide cases by majority vote. A majority of the number of Board 
    Members authorized to constitute a panel shall constitute a quorum for 
    such panel. Each three-member panel may exercise the appropriate 
    authority of the Board as set out in part 3 that is necessary for the 
    adjudication of cases before it. In the case of an unopposed motion or 
    a motion to withdraw an appeal pending before the Board, a single Board 
    Member or the Chief Attorney Examiner may exercise the appropriate 
    authority of the Board as set out in part 3 that is necessary for the 
    adjudication of such motions before it.
    * * * * *
        (4) En banc Process--(i) Full Board en Banc. A majority of the 
    permanent Board Members shall constitute a quorum of the Board for 
    purposes of convening the full Board en banc. The Board may on its own 
    motion, by a majority vote of the permanent Board Members, or by 
    direction of the Chairman, consider any case as the full Board en banc, 
    or reconsider as the full Board en banc any case that has been 
    considered or decided by a three-member panel or by a limited en banc 
    panel.
        (ii) Limited en banc panels. The Board may on its own motion, by a 
    majority vote of the permanent Board Members, or by direction of the 
    Chairman, assign a case or group of cases for consideration by a 
    limited en banc panel, or assign a case that has been considered or 
    decided by a three-member panel for reconsideration by a limited en 
    banc panel. Each limited en banc panel shall consist of nine members. 
    Each limited en banc panel shall contain the Chairman or Vice Chairman 
    (as decided by the Chairman). If the Chairman and Vice Chairman are 
    both disqualified in a particular case, then the most senior permanent 
    Board Member who is not disqualified shall sit on the limited en banc 
    panel as the Presiding Board Member. If the Chairman and Vice Chairman 
    are both unavailable to hear a case that has been assigned to a limited 
    en banc panel, but the Chairman is not disqualified, then the Chairman 
    shall designate a Presiding Board Member to sit on the limited en banc 
    panel. If the Chairman is unavailable and disqualified, then the Vice 
    Chairman, if unavailable and not disqualified, shall designate a 
    presiding Board Member to sit on the limited en banc panel. Where a 
    case that has been considered or decided by a three-member panel is 
    assigned for review by a limited en banc panel, the en banc panel shall 
    contain all available permanent Board Members who considered or decided 
    that case as part of a three-member panel. The remaining members of 
    each limited en banc panel will be randomly selected from among the 
    permanent Board Members. The decision reached by a limited en banc 
    panel shall be considered as the final decision of the Board in the 
    case, unless the Chairman or a majority of the permanent Board Members 
    vote to decide to assign the case to a full en banc panel for 
    reconsideration in accordance with paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section.
        (5) Precedents. By majority vote of the permanent Board Members, a 
    decision of the Board, whether rendered by a three-member panel, a 
    limited en banc panel, or by the entire Board sitting en banc, may be 
    designated to serve as a Board precedent pursuant to paragraph (g) of 
    this section.
        (6) Board staff. There shall also be attached to the Board such 
    number of attorneys and other employees as the Deputy Attorney General, 
    upon recommendation of the Director, shall from time to time direct.
    * * * * *
        Dated: June 5, 1998.
    Janet Reno,
    Attorney General.
    [FR Doc. 98-15589 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4410-30-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/11/1998
Published:
06/11/1998
Department:
Justice Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-15589
Dates:
This final rule is effective June 11, 1998.
Pages:
31889-31890 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
EOIR No. 120F, AG Order No. 2163-98
PDF File:
98-15589.pdf
CFR: (1)
8 CFR 3.1