96-14866. Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc RB211-535E4 and -535E4- B Series Turbofan Engines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 29697-29699]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-14866]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-ANE-09]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc RB211-535E4 and -535E4-
    B Series Turbofan Engines
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to Rolls-Royce plc RB211-535E4 and -
    535E4-B series turbofan engines. This proposal would require 
    installation of an improved fuel flow governor that incorporates 
    revised minimum compressor discharge P4 stop settings. This proposal is 
    prompted by reports of engine rundowns during low idle descent during 
    icing conditions. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended 
    to prevent compressor stall and subsequent engine rundown on one or 
    both engines.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by August 12, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-ANE-09, 12 New England 
    Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299. Comments may also be 
    submitted to the Rules Docket by using the following Internet address: 
    epd-adcomments@mail.hq.faa.gov''. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31, Moor Lane, Derby, DE248BJ, 
    United Kingdom; telephone 1332-249428, fax 1332-249423. This 
    information may be examined at the FAA, New England Region, Office of 
    the Assistant Chief Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 
    MA.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Kerman, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (617) 
    238-7130, fax (617) 238-7199.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 96-ANE-09.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-ANE-09, 12 New England Executive Park, 
    Burlington, MA 01803-5299.
    
    [[Page 29698]]
    
    Discussion
    
        The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), which is the airworthiness 
    authority for the United Kingdom, recently notified the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA) that an unsafe condition may exist on 
    Rolls-Royce plc (R-R) RB211-535 series turbofan engines. The CAA 
    advises that they have reports of seven engine rundown events on the R-
    R RB211-535E4 and -535E4-B engines installed on Boeing 757-200 series 
    aircraft since January 1992. All of the events occurred within a narrow 
    band of altitude between 25,000 and 29,000 feet. In four of the seven 
    events, the second engine installed on the aircraft surged and 
    recovered. In six of the seven events, the engine rundowns occurred 
    approximately 3 to 5 seconds following selection of inlet cowl anti-ice 
    during the descent phase of flight. Selection of cowl inlet anti-ice 
    results in an engine acceleration from low idle to high idle thrust, 
    which can cause liberation of accreted ice within the engine core. In 
    one event, the rundown occurred following an auto-throttle initiated 
    acceleration.
        Rolls-Royce plc has performed extensive analysis and testing and 
    has concluded that the engine rundown is due to the following: (1) Ice 
    accretion at the inlet to the Intermediate Pressure Compressor (IPC) 
    induces a rotating compressor stall during descent, which leads to a 
    High Pressure Compressor (HPC) surge on acceleration; and (2) Ice 
    accretion at the inlet to the IPC during descent is released into the 
    core engine, which in turn causes an HPC surge. This condition, if not 
    corrected, could result in compressor stall and subsequent engine 
    rundown on one or both engines.
        The manufacturer has determined that the proposed solution for 
    preventing engine rundown is to raise the minimum compressor discharge 
    P4 stop setting in the fuel flow governor (FFG), which will increase 
    the low idle schedule above the engine idle conditions experienced 
    during all of the prior engine rundown events. This schedule increase 
    will result in a substantial increase in IPC stall margin, a moderate 
    increase in HPC stall margin, as well as provide the additional benefit 
    of increased ice accretion tolerance due to increased compressor 
    airflow.
        Rolls-Royce plc has issued Mandatory (SB) No. RB.211-73-B869, 
    Revision 1, dated May 24, 1996, that specifies installation of an 
    improved FFG, which incorporates an increased minimum compressor 
    discharge pressure P4 stop setting, which will result in increased 
    engine idle speeds.
        The FAA Transport Airplane Directorate issued AD 96-04- 11, 
    Amendment 39-9523, (61 FR 6935, February 23, 1996) applicable to Boeing 
    757-200 series airplanes equipped with R-R Model RB211-535E4 and -
    535E4-B engines, that requires revision of the limitations section of 
    the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to require the flight 
    crew to activate engine inlet cowl thermal anti-ice systems on both 
    engines prior to descent. Installation of the improved FFG on both 
    engines for each aircraft would constitute terminating action to the 
    AFM revision requirements of AD 96- 04-11.
        This engine model is manufactured in the United Kingdom and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    Section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the CAA has kept the FAA informed of 
    the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the 
    CAA, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action 
    is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for 
    operation in the United States.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other engines of the same type design registered in 
    the United States, the proposed AD would require installation of 
    improved FFGs that incorporate revised minimum compressor discharge P4 
    stop settings. This revised setting will raise the steady state low 
    idle schedule above the idle conditions experienced during any of the 
    prior engine rundown events. This schedule increase will result in a 
    substantial increase in IPC stall margin, a moderate increase in HPC 
    stall margin, as well as provide the additional benefit of increased 
    ice accretion tolerance due to increased compressor airflow. This 
    proposed action must be accomplished at the next shop visit, or within 
    9 calendar months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 
    first. The FAA has determined the calendar end-date based on the time 
    interval required for fleet modification. The actions would be required 
    to be accomplished in accordance with SB described previously.
        There are approximately 770 engines of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 381 engines installed on 
    aircraft of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD, that 
    it would take approximately 3 work hours per engine to accomplish the 
    proposed actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. 
    The affected FFGs would be modified to incorporate the changes required 
    by this proposed AD on a free-of-charge basis per engine. Based on 
    these figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. 
    operators is estimated to be $68,580.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13   [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Rolls-Royce plc: Docket No. 96-ANE-09.
    
        Applicability: Rolls-Royce plc. (R-R) Models RB211- 535E4 and -
    535E4-B turbofan engines installed on Boeing 757- 200 series 
    aircraft.
    
    
    [[Page 29699]]
    
    
        Note: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine 
    identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of 
    whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area 
    subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been 
    modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the 
    requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the 
    authority provided in paragraph (d) to request approval from the 
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). This approval may address 
    either no action, if the current configuration eliminates the unsafe 
    condition, or different actions necessary to address the unsafe 
    condition described in this AD. Such a request should include an 
    assessment of the effect of the changed configuration on the unsafe 
    condition addressed by this AD. In no case does the presence of any 
    modification, alteration, or repair remove any engine from the 
    applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent compressor stall and subsequent engine rundown on one 
    or both engines, accomplish the following:
        (a) At the next shop visit, but no later than 9 calendar months 
    after the effective date of this AD, install a fuel flow governor 
    (FFG) that incorporates a revised minimum compressor discharge P4 
    stop setting, in accordance with R-R Mandatory Service Bulletin (SB) 
    No. RB.211-73-B869, Revision 1, dated May 24, 1996.
        (b) Installation of improved FFG's on both engines for each 
    Boeing 757 aircraft in accordance with paragraph (a) of this AD 
    constitutes terminating action to the requirements of AD 96-04-11.
        (c) For the purpose of this AD, a shop visit is defined as 
    removal of the engine from the aircraft for maintenance.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office. The 
    request should be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Engine Certification Office.
    
        Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, 
    if any, may be obtained from the Engine Certification Office.
    
        Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 22, 1996.
    Robert E. Guyotte,
    Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
    Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-14866 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/12/1996
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
96-14866
Dates:
Comments must be received by August 12, 1996.
Pages:
29697-29699 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-ANE-09
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
96-14866.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13