96-14939. Decision That Nonconforming 1992 Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 12, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 29789-29791]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-14939]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    [Docket No. 95-66; Notice 2]
    
    
    Decision That Nonconforming 1992 Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan 
    Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of decision by NHTSA that nonconforming 1992 Volkswagen 
    Passat 4-Door Sedan passenger cars are eligible for importation.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the decision by NHTSA that 1992 
    Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan passenger cars not originally 
    manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety 
    standards are eligible for importation into the United States because 
    they are substantially similar to a vehicle originally manufactured for 
    importation into and sale in the United States and certified by its 
    manufacturer as complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-certified 
    version of the 1992 Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan), and they are 
    capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.
    
    DATES: This decision is effective as of July 12, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle 
    Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5306).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Under 49 U.S.C. Sec. 30141(a)(1)(A) (formerly section 
    108(c)(3)(A)(i) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act 
    (the Act)), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to 
    conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall 
    be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided 
    that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle 
    originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United 
    States, certified under 49 U.S.C. Sec. 30115 (formerly section 114 of 
    the Act), and of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle 
    to be compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to 
    all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either 
    manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 
    49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice 
    in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords 
    interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the 
    close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the 
    petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is 
    eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in 
    the Federal Register.
        Champagne Imports, Inc. of Lansdale, Pennsylvania (``Champagne'') 
    (Registered Importer 90-009) petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 1992 
    Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan passenger cars are eligible for 
    importation into the United States. NHTSA published notice of the 
    petition on August 25, 1995 (60 FR 44375) to afford an opportunity for 
    public comment. As stated in the notice of petition, the vehicle which 
    Champagne believes is substantially similar is the 1992 Volkswagen 
    Passat 4-Door Sedan that was manufactured for importation into, and 
    sale in, the United States and certified by its manufacturer, 
    Volkswagenwerke A.G., as conforming to all applicable Federal motor 
    vehicle safety standards.
    
    [[Page 29790]]
    
        The petitioner claimed that it carefully compared the non- U.S. 
    certified 1992 Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan to its U.S. certified 
    counterpart, and found the two vehicles to be substantially similar 
    with respect to compliance with most Federal motor vehicle safety 
    standards.
        Champagne submitted information with its petition intended to 
    demonstrate that the non-U.S. certified 1992 Volkswagen Passat 4-Door 
    Sedan, as originally manufactured, conforms to many Federal motor 
    vehicle safety standards in the same manner as its U.S. certified 
    counterpart, or is capable of being readily altered to conform to those 
    standards.
        Specifically, the petitioner claimed that the non-U.S. certified 
    1992 Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan is identical to its U.S. certified 
    counterpart with respect to compliance with Standards Nos. 102  
    Transmission Shift Lever Sequence * * *., 103 Defrosting and Defogging 
    Systems, 104  Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 105  Hydraulic 
    Brake Systems, 106  Brake Hoses, 107  Reflecting Surfaces, 109  New 
    Pneumatic Tires, 113  Hood Latch Systems, 116  Brake Fluid, 124  
    Accelerator Control Systems, 201  Occupant Protection in Interior 
    Impact, 202  Head Restraints, 203  Impact Protection for the Driver 
    From the Steering Control System, 204  Steering Control Rearward 
    Displacement, 205  Glazing Materials, 206  Door Locks and Door 
    Retention Components, 207  Seating Systems, 209  Seat Belt Assemblies, 
    210  Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 211  Wheel Nuts, Wheel Discs and 
    Hubcaps, 212  Windshield Retention, 216  Roof Crush Resistance, 219  
    Windshield Zone Intrusion, and 302  Flammability of Interior Materials.
        Additionally, the petitioner stated that the non-U.S. certified 
    1992 Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan complies with the Bumper Standard 
    found in 49 CFR Part 581.
        Petitioner also contended that the vehicle is capable of being 
    readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner 
    indicated:
        Standard No. 101  Controls and Displays: (a) Substitution of a lens 
    marked ``Brake'' for a lens with an ECE symbol on the brake failure 
    indicator lamp; (b) installation of a seat belt warning lamp; (c) 
    recalibration of the speedometer/odometer from kilometers to miles per 
    hour.
        Standard No. 108  Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated 
    Equipment: (a) Installation of U.S.-model headlamp assemblies which 
    incorporate sealed beam headlamps; (b) installation of U.S.-model front 
    and rear sidemarker/reflector assemblies; (c) installation of U.S.-
    model taillamp assemblies; (d) installation of a high-mounted stop 
    lamp.
        Standard No. 110  Tire Selection and Rims: Installation of a tire 
    information placard.
        Standard No. 111  Rearview Mirror: Replacement of the passenger 
    side rearview mirror with a U.S.-model component.
        Standard No. 114  Theft Protection: Installation of a warning 
    buzzer microswitch and a warning buzzer in the steering lock assembly.
        Standard No. 115  Vehicle Identification Number: Installation of a 
    VIN plate that can be read from outside the left windshield pillar, and 
    a VIN reference label on the edge of the door or latch post nearest the 
    driver.
        Standard No. 118  Power Window Systems: Rewiring of the power 
    window system so that the window transport is inoperative when the 
    ignition is switched off.
        Standard No. 208  Occupant Crash Protection: (a) Installation of a 
    U.S.-model seat belt in the driver's position, or a belt webbing-
    actuated microswitch inside the driver's seat belt retractor; (b) 
    installation of an ignition switch-actuated seat belt warning lamp and 
    buzzer; (c) installation of a passive restraint system consisting of 
    driver's and passenger's side automatic seat belts, knee bolsters, and 
    associated hardware that have identical part numbers to those found on 
    the vehicle's U.S. certified counterpart. The petitioner stated that 
    the vehicle is equipped at its rear outboard seating positions with 
    combination lap and shoulder restraints that release by means of a 
    single push button, and with a lap belt at its center seating position.
        Standard No. 214  Side Impact Protection: Installation of 
    reinforcing beams.
        Standard No. 301  Fuel System Integrity: Installation of a rollover 
    valve in the fuel tank vent line between the fuel tank and the 
    evaporative emissions collection canister.
        One comment was received in response to the notice of petition, 
    from Volkswagen of America, Inc. (``Volkswagen''), the United States 
    representative of Volkswagen AG, the vehicle's manufacturer. In its 
    comment, Volkswagen stated that the petition accurately reflected the 
    modifications needed to conform the non-U.S. certified 1992 Volkswagen 
    Passat 4-Door Sedan to the requirements of Standard Nos. 101, 108, 110, 
    111, 114, 115, and 118. Volkswagen contended that the petition 
    inaccurately characterized the modifications that are necessary to 
    conform the vehicle to Standard Nos. 208, 210, 214, 301, and the Bumper 
    Standard found in 49 CFR Part 581.
        Volkswagen claimed that the modifications that were described in 
    the petition as necessary to conform the vehicle to Standard Nos. 208 
    and 210 are ``relatively complex'' because the vehicle is equipped with 
    a motorized automatic belt system. Volkswagen notes that it has 
    conducted Standard No. 208 crash tests only on 1992 Passats equipped 
    with the 16- valve 4-cylinder engine and the VR6 that are sold in the 
    United States market, as opposed to the 2 liter, 4-cylinder engine that 
    is found on the subject vehicle. Volkswagen observed that the petition 
    failed to note that the vehicle's U.S. certified counterpart is 
    equipped at both front outboard seating positions with manual lap belts 
    in addition to motorized automatic shoulder belts, and that the inboard 
    seat tracks for the U.S. certified vehicle differ from those on the 
    European model to assure compliance with Standard No. 208 crash tests 
    and Standard No. 210 seat belt anchorage strength requirements. The 
    company characterized these differences as critical because the manual 
    lap belt anchorages and the retractor for the motorized shoulder belt 
    are attached to the seat. Volkswagen contended that replacement of the 
    inboard seat tracks, which requires welding, and the addition of 
    reinforced tracks for the motorized automatic belt system in the A-
    pillar and roof rail are necessary to assure compliance with the 
    Standard No. 208 crash test and the Standard No. 210 seat belt 
    anchorage strength requirements.
        Additionally, the company contended that a substantial amount of 
    wiring and a number of electrical switches and relays must be installed 
    for the motorized automatic belt system to work properly and safely. 
    Volkswagen also claimed that the steering wheel on the U.S. certified 
    1992 Passat differs from that on its European counterpart in that its 
    hub has a ``deep dish design'' to assure compliance with Standard 208 
    crash test injury criteria.
        Noting that the European version of the 1992 Passat is equipped 
    with reinforcing beams that are required for compliance with the static 
    crush test requirements of Standard 214, Volkswagen challenged the 
    petition's claim that the vehicle must be modified to include this 
    equipment.
        Volkswagen also noted that it has only crash tested vehicles with 
    engines and fuel systems sold in the United States for compliance with 
    Standard 301, and that such testing, or least a
    
    [[Page 29791]]
    
    detailed analysis is necessary to support the petitioner's claim that 
    the subject vehicle, which is equipped with a 2 liter, 4-cylinder 
    engine that was not certified for the United States, can be modified to 
    comply with the standard.
        Volkswagen finally disagreed with the petitioner's claim that the 
    non-U.S. certified 1992 Passat complies with the Bumper Standard. The 
    company contended that critical attachment hardware components and the 
    bumper beam differ in the vehicle's U.S. certified counterpart, and 
    that these parts would have to be installed for the European version of 
    the vehicle to achieve compliance with the standard.
        NHTSA accorded Champagne an opportunity to respond to Volkswagen's 
    comments. In its response, Champagne noted that it has been conforming 
    vehicles to Standard Nos. 208 and 210 for over twelve years, and that 
    although the systems that must be installed to achieve such compliance 
    are ``relatively complex,'' their installation is well within 
    Champagne's area of expertise and technical ability. Champagne further 
    noted that NHTSA has not denied import eligibility to a vehicle in the 
    past on the basis that it is equipped with a different size engine from 
    that found on its U.S. certified counterpart. Champagne acknowledged 
    that its petition omitted the fact that the non-U.S. certified 1992 
    Passat is equipped with manual seat belts at both front outboard 
    seating positions, and asserted that these belts are identical to those 
    found on the vehicle's U.S. certified counterpart. Champagne disputed 
    Volkswagen's contention that it is necessary to change the inboard seat 
    tracks and add reinforced motorized automatic belt system tracks in the 
    A-pillar and roof rail to conform the non-U.S. certified 1992 Passat to 
    Standard Nos. 208 and 210. Champagne asserted that the vehicle is 
    equipped with inboard seat tracks that are identical to, and have the 
    same part number as those found on its U.S. certified counterpart. 
    Moreover, Champagne contended that the vehicle is equipped with 
    reinforced tracks in the A-pillar and with mounting points for the seat 
    belt rail which must be installed to complete the automatic restraint 
    system. Champagne also disputed Volkswagen's contention that welding is 
    necessary to accomplish these modifications. Champagne acknowledged 
    that it must replace the steering wheel on the non-U.S. certified 1992 
    Passat with one identical to that found on the vehicle's U.S.- 
    certified counterpart.
        Champagne also acknowledged that the petition erroneously stated 
    that reinforcing beams would have to be installed to conform the 
    vehicle to Standard No. 214.
        With respect to the Standard No. 301 compliance issues raised by 
    Volkswagen, Champagne observed that Volkswagen applies the same good 
    engineering judgment in the design and installation of the fuel system 
    in its 2 liter engine as it does for those installed in U.S. certified 
    models. Because the body crash characteristics do not differ between 
    U.S. and non-U.S. certified versions of the 1992 Passat, Champagne 
    stated that it can be reasonably assumed that fuel system integrity 
    characteristics are the same as well.
        With respect to the Bumper Standard issues raised by Volkswagen, 
    Champagne reiterated its belief that the non-U.S. certified 1992 Passat 
    is equipped with a bumper system identical to that found on its U.S. 
    certified counterpart. However, to eliminate any doubts regarding this 
    matter, Champagne stated that it would reinforce the existing bumper 
    structure and replace the bumper attachment hardware with that found on 
    the vehicle's U.S. certified counterpart.
        NHTSA accorded Volkswagen an opportunity to respond to Champagne's 
    comments. In its response, Volkswagen noted that its original comments 
    were based on information provided by the vehicle's manufacturer, and 
    that ``[w]ith worldwide production and increasing efforts to harmonize 
    parts, it is possible that the factory made a production change and 
    installed the U.S. versions of the seat tracks in the European 
    vehicle.'' Volkswagen reiterated that the installation of a motorized 
    automatic belt system requires ``significant electrical and mechanical 
    work to assure proper and safe performance,'' and left to NHTSA's 
    discretion the matter of whether this work should be inspected before 
    the vehicle is released.
        NHTSA has reviewed each of the issues that Volkswagen has raised 
    regarding Champagne's petition. NHTSA believes that Champagne's 
    responses adequately address each of those issues. NHTSA further notes 
    that the modifications described by Champagne to conform the vehicle to 
    Standard No. 301 and the Bumper Standard have been performed with 
    relative ease on thousands of nonconforming vehicles imported over the 
    years, and would not preclude the non-U.S. certified 1992 Volkswagen 
    Passat 4-Door Sedan from being found ``capable of being readily 
    modified to comply with all Federal motor vehicle safety standards.'' 
    Additionally, the modifications described by Champagne to conform the 
    vehicle to Standard Nos. 208 and 210 would not preclude such a finding, 
    in view of the fact that numerous vehicles have been so modified by 
    Champagne and other registered importers in recent years, and that such 
    modifications are well within the expertise of those registered 
    importers. NHTSA has accordingly decided to grant the petition.
    
    Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject Vehicles
    
        The importer of a vehicle admissible under any final decision must 
    indicate on the form HS-7 accompanying entry the appropriate vehicle 
    eligibility number indicating that the vehicle is eligible for entry. 
    VSP-148 is the vehicle eligibility number assigned to vehicles 
    admissible under this decision.
    
    Final Determination
    
        Accordingly, on the basis of the foregoing, NHTSA hereby decides 
    that a 1992 Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan not originally manufactured 
    to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards is 
    substantially similar to a 1992 Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan 
    originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United 
    States and certified under 49 U.S.C. Sec. 30115, and is capable of 
    being readily altered to conform to all applicable Federal motor 
    vehicle safety standards.
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; 
    delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
    
        Issued on: June 6, 1996.
    Clive Van Orden,
    Chief of Equipment and Imports Division, Office of Vehicle Safety 
    Compliance.
    [FR Doc. 96-14939 Filed 6-11-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/12/1996
Published:
06/12/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of decision by NHTSA that nonconforming 1992 Volkswagen Passat 4-Door Sedan passenger cars are eligible for importation.
Document Number:
96-14939
Dates:
This decision is effective as of July 12, 1996.
Pages:
29789-29791 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-66, Notice 2
PDF File:
96-14939.pdf