98-15759. Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 32207-32208]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-15759]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    [ER-FRL-5492-6]
    
    
    Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
    EPA Comments
    
        Availability of EPA comments prepared May 25, 1998 Through May 29, 
    1998 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section 
    309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National 
    Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA 
    comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202) 
    564-7167.
        An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
    impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 10, 1998 (63 
    FR 17856).
    
    Draft EISs
    
        ERP No. D-MMS-G02007-TX Rating LO, Western Planning Area, Proposed 
    Western Gulf of Mexico 1997-2002 (5-Year Program) Outer Continental 
    Shelf Oil and Gas Sales 171, 174, 177 and 180, Lease Offering, Offshore 
    Marine Environmental and Coastal Counties/Parishes of Texas and 
    Louisiana.
        Summary: EPA had no objections to the selection of the preferred 
    alternative. EPA encourages MMS to continue the practice of applying 
    those stipulations
    
    [[Page 32208]]
    
    provided to previous lease sales for the OCS to the proposed sales of 
    1997 to 2002.
        ERP No. D-NOA-L90027-AK Rating *LO, Kackhemak Bay National 
    Estuarine Research Reserve (KBNERR) Management Plan, Operations and 
    Development, Southcentral, AK.
        Summary: EPA Region 10 used a screening tool to conduct a limited 
    review of this action. Based upon the screen, EPA does not foresee 
    having any environmental objections to the proposed project. Therefore, 
    EPA will not be conducting a detailed review.
    
    Final EISs
    
        ERP No. F-AFS-K65201-CA Liberty Forest Health Improvement Project, 
    Implementation, Tahoe National Forests, Sierraville Ranger District, 
    Sierra and Nevada Counties, CA.
        Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No 
    formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
        ERP No. F-FHW-E40751-NC US 70 Goldsboro Bypass Construction, US 70 
    in the vicinity of NC-1237 to US 70 in the vicinity of NC-1731, Funding 
    and COE Permits, Wayne County, NC.
        Summary: EPA continues to be concerned regarding impact related to 
    noise, relocations, and flood plain impacts.
        ERP No. F-FHW-K50011-CA Carquinez Bridge Project, Replace/Retrofit 
    the westbound I-80 between Cummings Skyway and CA-29, Funding, US Coast 
    Guard and COE Section 10 and 404 Funding, Contra Costa and Solano 
    Counties, CA.
        Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No 
    formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
    
        Dated: June 9, 1998.
    Ken Mittelholtz,
    Environmental Specialist, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
    Activities.
    [FR Doc. 98-15759 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/12/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-15759
Pages:
32207-32208 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
ER-FRL-5492-6
PDF File:
98-15759.pdf