94-14586. Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Revision in Container Regulations  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 15, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-14586]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: June 15, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 922
    
    [Docket No. FV94-922-11FR]
    
     
    
    Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Revision in 
    Container Regulations
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule revises container regulations for apricots shipped 
    to fresh market outlets under Marketing Order No. 922. This rule gives 
    handlers greater flexibility in selecting containers to meet their 
    packaging needs by eliminating the inside dimension requirements on 
    each type of container that has a minimum apricot net weight 
    requirement. The rule eliminates reference to the obsolete lidded four-
    basket crate, and replaces the term ``closed L.A. lugs and equivalent 
    cartons'' with the term ``closed containers'' to simplify wording and 
    improve clarity. This rule also includes a correction to the container 
    regulations which had previously appeared in the Federal Register as a 
    final rule, but did not appear in the annual Code of Federal 
    Regulations.
    
    DATES: This interim final rule becomes effective: June 15, 1994. 
    Comments which are received by July 15, 1994, will be considered prior 
    to any finalization of the interim final rule.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning this rule. Comments must be sent in triplicate to the Docket 
    Clerk, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, P.O. Box 
    96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456 or by FAX at (202) 720-5698. All 
    comments should reference the docket number and the date and page 
    number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made available 
    for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular 
    business hours.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark J. Kreaggor, Marketing Order 
    Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Agricultural 
    Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, room 2523-S, P.O. 
    Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-5127; or 
    Teresa Hutchinson, Northwest Marketing Field Office, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW. Third Avenue, room 369, 
    Portland, OR 97204; telephone: (503) 326-2724.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This interim final rule is issued under 
    Marketing Order No. 922 [7 CFR part 922], regulating the handling of 
    apricots grown in designated counties in Washington, hereinafter 
    referred to as the order. The order is effective under the Agricultural 
    Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended [7 U.S.C. 601-674], 
    hereinafter referred to as the Act.
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, Civil 
    Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This rule will not preempt any state or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing the Secretary will rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has a principal 
    place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review the Secretary's 
    ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is filed not later 
    than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service 
    (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this action on small 
    entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 55 handlers of Washington apricots that are 
    subject to regulation under the marketing order. In addition, there are 
    approximately 400 producers in the regulated area. Small agricultural 
    service firms, which include producers of Washington apricots, have 
    been defined by the Small Business Administration [13 CFR 121.601] as 
    those whose annual receipts are less than $3,500,000, and small 
    agricultural producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are 
    less than $500,000. A majority of these handlers and producers may be 
    classified as small entities.
        Section 922.52 [7 CFR 922.52] authorizes the issuance of 
    regulations for grade, size, quality, maturity, pack, markings, and 
    container for any variety or varieties of apricots grown in any 
    district or districts of the production area. Section 922.53 [7 CFR 
    922.53] authorizes the modification, suspension, or termination of 
    regulations issued under section 922.52.
        Container regulations are currently in effect under section 
    922.306. This rule eliminates references to inside dimensions for each 
    type of container that has a minimum apricot net weight requirement. 
    This rule also removes references to the obsolete lidded four-basket 
    crate and replaces the term ``closed L.A. lugs and equivalent cartons'' 
    with the term ``closed containers.''
        This rule was recommended by the Washington Apricot Marketing 
    Committee (committee), which works with the Department in administering 
    the marketing order.
        The committee met on December 15, 1993, and unanimously recommended 
    elimination of inside dimension requirements for each type of container 
    that has a minimum apricot net weight requirement. The committee also 
    unanimously recommended deleting reference in the container regulation 
    to the lidded four-basket crate, and that the term ``closed L.A. lugs 
    and equivalent cartons'' be replaced with the term ``closed 
    containers.''
        Handlers have experienced difficulty in packing many of the new, 
    larger varieties of apricots, particularly in row-faced and tray-packed 
    containers because of the inside dimension requirements in effect. 
    Container height limits, for example, can cause a higher incidence of 
    compression damage in large apricots that are row-faced or tray-packed. 
    In addition, the inside dimension requirements have prevented handlers 
    from using many generic containers used in other fruit and vegetable 
    industries.
        This rule deletes references to designated container dimensions for 
    each type of container that has a minimum apricot net weight 
    requirement. The committee believes that continued standardization of 
    the minimum net weight requirements of the authorized containers is 
    needed to prevent market confusion resulting from the use of deceptive 
    containers.
        This rule will allow handlers greater flexibility in packaging. By 
    allowing different container dimensions, as long as the minimum weight 
    requirements are met, handlers will have the flexibility to use 
    containers commonly used in other fruit and vegetable industries, to 
    use different containers for different varieties of apricots, and to 
    develop new containers.
        This rule will remove authority for the use of the obsolete lidded 
    four-basket crate. The rule will also remove reference in the 
    regulation to the term ``closed L.A. lugs and equivalent cartons'' 
    replacing it with the term, ``closed containers.'' This change is 
    intended only to simplify wording and improve clarity.
        This rule also corrects the container regulations in the Code of 
    Federal Regulations for Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in 
    Washington [7 CFR Part 922]. Changes to the container requirements 
    appeared in the Federal Register [44 FR 37598, June 28, 1979] [Apricot 
    Regulation 6, Amendment 4], but did not correspondingly appear in the 
    annual Code of Federal Regulations.
        Based on the above information, the Administrator of the AMS has 
    determined that this interim final rule will not have a significant 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities and that the action 
    set forth herein will benefit producers and handlers of apricots grown 
    in designated counties in Washington State.
        After consideration of all available information, it is found that 
    the revision of the container regulations, as hereinafter set forth, 
    will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined, upon 
    good cause, that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the 
    public interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule 
    into effect, and that good cause exists for not postponing the 
    effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the 
    Federal Register because: (1) The 1993-94 marketing year begins June 1, 
    1994, and the container regulations established herein should apply to 
    all apricots produced in the production area and need to be in place 
    before the beginning of the marketing year; (2) handlers are aware of 
    this rule, which was recommended at an open committee meeting, and need 
    no additional time to comply with these regulations which are a 
    relaxation; and (3) the rule provides a 30-day comment period, and any 
    comments timely received will be considered prior to finalization of 
    this interim final rule.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
    
        Apricots, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 922 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 922--APRICOTS GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 922 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
        2. Section 922.306 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 922.306  Apricot Regulation 6.
    
        (a) No handler shall handle any apricots unless such apricots are:
        (1) In open containers or telescope fiberboard cartons and the net 
    weight of the apricots is not less than 28 pounds; or
        (2) In closed containers containing not less than 14 pounds, net 
    weight, of apricots: Provided, That when the apricots are packed in 
    such containers they are row-faced or tray-packed; or
        (3) In closed containers that are marked ``12 pounds net weight'' 
    and contain not less than 12 pounds, net weight, of apricots which are 
    of random size and are not row-faced; or
        (4) In closed containers in which the apricots are row-faced or 
    tray-packed: Provided, That apricots may be packed loose in such 
    containers if a top pad is used and the net weight of the apricots 
    therein is not less than 24 pounds; or
        (5) If exported to Canada, in any of the containers specified in 
    this paragraph (a) or in containers having inside dimensions of 16\1/8\ 
    x 11\1/2\ inches with 4\3/4\-inch end pieces and 3\3/4\-inch side 
    pieces.
        (b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, any 
    individual shipment of apricots which, in the aggregate, does not 
    exceed 500 pounds, net weight, may be handled without regard to the 
    requirements specified in this section or in Secs. 922.41 or 922.55.
        (c) All apricots handled are also subject to all applicable grade, 
    size, quality, maturity and pack regulations which are in effect 
    pursuant to this part.
        (d) The terms ``handler'', ``handle'' and ``apricots'' shall have 
    the same meaning as when used in the amended marketing agreement and 
    order.
    
        Dated: June 9, 1994.
    Eric M. Forman,
    Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 94-14586 Filed 6-14-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/15/1994
Published:
06/15/1994
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Interim final rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
94-14586
Dates:
This interim final rule becomes effective: June 15, 1994. Comments which are received by July 15, 1994, will be considered prior to any finalization of the interim final rule.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: June 15, 1994, Docket No. FV94-922-11FR
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 922.306