99-15103. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation; Receipt of Petition for Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 15, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 32071-32072]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-15103]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410 and License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69]
    
    
    Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation; Receipt of Petition for 
    Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206
    
        Notice is hereby given that by Petition dated April 5, 1999, Mr. 
    Robert Norway (the Petitioner) has requested that the U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission (NRC) take action with regard to Nine Mile Point 
    Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2. The Petitioner requests that the NRC 
    (1) take enforcement action against Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 
    (NMPC) and its senior nuclear and corporate management and, as a 
    minimum, against three named individuals for submitting an altered 1994 
    employee record to the NRC at an enforcement conference on May 10, 
    1996; (2) take enforcement action against these same parties for 
    presenting at this enforcement conference a false written record of the 
    Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ's) determination in the Department of 
    Labor proceeding in Case No. 95-ERA-005; (3) take enforcement action 
    against these same parties for the placement of confidential employee 
    information into the public record in violation of 10 CFR 2.790; and 
    (4) take enforcement action against these same parties for an 
    additional act of discrimination, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.7, for 
    destroying the Petitioner's credibility and reputation in the nuclear 
    industry. In addition, the Petitioner requested that the NRC forward 
    these issues to the Department of Justice for consideration of criminal 
    prosecution.
        Finally, in addition to these requests for enforcement actions, the 
    Petitioner also requested that various other actions be implemented. 
    These actions include the following: (1) that the agency perform an 
    independent review of all NMPC's docketed files associated with the 
    individuals who committed the alleged fraud; (2) that the NRC forward a 
    complaint to the Office of the Inspector General for investigation of 
    possible deliberate misconduct on the part of the NRC staff; (3) that 
    an Independent Oversight Group be established to provide oversight of 
    the NMPC Human Resources Department and Employee Concerns Program; (4) 
    that a public meeting be held to obtain public comments pertaining to a 
    number of issues, including discrimination and the placement of 
    fraudulent documentation into public records; and (5) that the NRC 
    publicly post NMPC's Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Residual Heat Removal (RHR) 
    Alternate Shutdown Cooling Safety Evaluation 96-091 to make it 
    available for public comment or require NMPC to re-perform this safety 
    evaluation.
        As a basis for all of the Petitioner's requests, he alleged that 
    NMPC deliberately created a false employee record and fraudulently 
    submitted this record, as well as a false written record of an ALJ 
    decision, into the public record, under false pretenses and perjury, 
    during a 1996 enforcement conference with the NRC. Regarding the 
    alleged false written record of an ALJ decision, correspondence from 
    Mr. James Lieberman, Director of the Office of Enforcement, to the 
    Petitioner, dated May 3, 1999, stated that the NRC staff had reviewed 
    the transcript of the enforcement conference and had determined that 
    the NRC staff understood that the document represented the position of 
    NMPC management and not that of the ALJ. Therefore, the submittal of 
    such a document cannot be the basis for taking enforcement action 
    against NMPC. In addition, the Petitioner also submitted a technical 
    concern about his continued efforts to address RHR alternate shutdown 
    cooling safety.
        The remaining issues in the Petition are being treated pursuant to 
    10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission's regulations and have been referred to 
    the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. As provided 
    by Section 2.206, appropriate action will be taken on this Petition 
    within a reasonable time.
        By letter dated June 9, 1999, the Director acknowledged receipt of 
    the Petition. A copy of the Petition is available for inspection at the 
    Commission's Public Document Room at 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, 
    D.C. 20555-0001.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of June 1999.
    
    
    [[Page 32072]]
    
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Roy P. Zimmerman,
    Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 99-15103 Filed 6-14-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/15/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-15103
Pages:
32071-32072 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410 and License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69
PDF File:
99-15103.pdf