01-15081. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Current Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations for Medicated Feeds

AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:

Notice.

SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that the proposed collection of information listed below has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA).

DATES:

Submit written comments on the collection of information by July 16, 2001.

ADDRESSES:

Submit written comments on the collection of information to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, New Executive Office Bldg., 725 17th St. NW., rm 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Attn: Wendy Taylor, Desk Officer for FDA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Denver Presley, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1472.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance.

Current Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations for Medicated Feeds—21 CFR Part 225 (OMB Control No. 0910-0152)—Extension

Under section 501 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 351) FDA has the statutory authority to issue current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) regulations for drugs, including medicated feeds. Medicated feeds are administered to animals for the prevention, cure, mitigation or treatment of disease or for growth promotion and feed efficiency. Statutory requirements for CGMPs have been codified in part 225 (21 CFR part 225). Medicated feeds that are not manufactured in accordance with these regulations are considered adulterated under section 501(a)(2)(B) of the act. Under part 225, a manufacturer is required to establish, maintain, and retain records for a medicated feed, including records to document procedures required during the manufacturing process to assure that proper quality control is maintained. Such records would, for example, contain information concerning receipt and inventory of drug components, batch production, laboratory assay results (i.e., batch and stability testing), labels, and product distribution. This information is needed so that FDA can monitor drug usage and possible misformulation of medicated feeds, to investigate violative drug residues in products from treated animals and investigate product defects when a drug is recalled. In addition, FDA will use the CGMP criteria in part 225 to determine whether or not the systems and procedures used by manufacturers of medicated feeds are adequate to assure that their feeds meet the requirements of the act as to safety and also meet their claimed identity, strength, quality, and purity, as required by section 501(a)(2)(B) of the act.

A license is required when the manufacturer of a medicated feed involves the use of a drug or drugs, which FDA has determined requires more control because of the need for a withdrawal period before slaughter or carcinogenic concerns. Conversely, for those medicated feeds for which FDA has determined that the drugs used in their manufacture need less control, a license is not required and the recordkeeping requirements are less demanding. Respondents to this collection of information are commercial feed mills and mixer-feeders.

FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows:

Table 1.—Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden (Registered Licensed Commercial Feed Mills)¹

21 CFR Section	No. of Recordkeepers	Annual Frequency ­per ­Recordkeeping	Total Annual Records	Hours ­per ­Recordkeeper	Total Hours
225.42(b)(5) through (b)(8)	1,150	260	299,000	1	299,000
225.58© and (d)	1,150	45	51,750	.5	25,875
225.80(b)(2)	1,150	1,600	1,840,000	.12	220,800
225.102(b)(1)	1,150	7,800	8,970,000	.08	717,600
225.110(b)(1) and (b)(2)	1,150	7,800	8,970,000	0.15	134,550
225.115(b)(1) and (b)(2)	1,150	5	5,750	.12	690
Total					1,398,515
1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

Table 2.—Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden (Registered Licensed Mixer-Feeders)¹

21 CFR Section	No. of Recordkeepers	Annual Frequency ­per ­­Recordkeeping	Total Annual Records	Hours ­per ­Recordkeeper	Total Hours
225.42(b)(5) through (b)(8)	100	260	26,000	.15	3,900
225.58© and (d)	100	36	3,600	.5	1,800
225.80(b)(2)	100	48	4,800	.12	576
225.102(b)(1) through (b)(5)	100	260	26,000	.4	10,400
Total					16,676
1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

Table 3.—Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden (Nonregistered Unlicensed Commercial Feed Mills)¹

21 CFR Section	No. of Recordkeepers	Annual Frequency ­per ­Recordkeeping	Total ­Annual ­Records	Hours ­per ­Recordkeeper	Total Hours
225.142	8,000	4	32,000	1	32,000
225.158	8,000	1	8,000	4	32,000
225.180	8,000	96	768,000	.12	92,160
225.202	8,000	260	2,080,000	.65	1,352,000
Total					1,508,160
1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

Table 4.—Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden (Nonregistered Unlicensed Mixer-Feeders)¹

21 CFR Section	No. of Recordkeepers	Annual Frequency per ­Recordkeeping	Total Annual Records	Hours per Recordkeeper	Total Hours
225.142	45,000	4	180,000	1	180,000
225.158	45,000	1	45,000	4	180,000
225.180	45,000	32	1,440,000	.12	172,800
225.202	45,000	260	11,700,000	.33	3,861,000
Total					4,393,800
1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

The estimate of the time required for record preparation and maintenance is based on agency communications with industry. Other information needed to calculate the total burden hours (i.e., number of recordkeepers, number of medicated feeds being manufactured, etc.) is derived from agency records and experience.

Dated: June 8, 2001.

Margaret M. Dotzel,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.