94-14512. Samantha Smith Memorial Exchange ProgramYouth Exchanges  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 115 (Thursday, June 16, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-14512]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: June 16, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY
     
    
    Samantha Smith Memorial Exchange Program--Youth Exchanges
    
    ACTION: Request for proposals.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The United States Information Agency (USIA) invites 
    applications from U.S. educational, cultural, and other not-for-profit 
    institutions to conduct exchanges of youth under the age of 21 with 
    Central and Eastern Europe: Albania, Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia-
    Hercegovina, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, 
    Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and The Former Yugoslav Republic 
    of Macdeonia, or the Newly Independent States (NIS) of Armenia, 
    Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, 
    Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. Proposals may 
    address more than one country in each area but cannot combine NIS 
    countries with those of Central and Eastern Europe. However, 
    organizations may submit two different proposals for these two 
    geographic areas. These exchanges represent part of the activities of 
    the Samantha Smith Memorial Exchange Program and are subject to the 
    availability of funding for the Fiscal Year 1995 program. A request for 
    proposals in support of exchanges of college and university 
    undergraduate students under the AEGIS of the Samantha Smith program 
    will be published separately by the office of Academic Exchanges.
    
    DATES: Deadline for proposals: All copies must be received at the U.S. 
    Information Agency in Washington, DC by 5 p.m. EST on Friday, September 
    2, 1994. Faxed documents will not be accepted, nor will documents 
    postmarked on a September 2 but received at a later date. It is the 
    responsibility of each grant applicant to ensure that complete 
    proposals are received by the above deadline. Grant funds are unlikely 
    to be available before February 1, 1995.
    
    ANNOUNCEMENT NUMBER: This Announcement number is E/P-95-03. Please 
    refer to this number in all correspondence or telephone calls to USIA.
    
    ADDRESSES: One complete signed original, three complete, fully tabbed 
    copies, and ten partial copies (parts A through D only), not bound, 
    must be submitted before the deadline to: U.S. Information Agency, Ref: 
    E/P-95-03, Office of Grants Management, E/XE, room 336, 301 4th St. 
    SW., Washington, DC, 20547.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Interested organizations and 
    institutions should write or fax: U.S. Information Agency, Office of 
    Citizen Exchanges, E/PY, room 314, 301 4th St., SW., Washington, DC 
    20547, FAX for NIS (202) 619-5311, for Central and Eastern Europe FAX 
    (202) 619-4350 to request detailed application packages, which include 
    award criteria additional to this announcement, all necessary forms, 
    and guidelines for preparing proposals, including specific budget 
    preparation information. Questions may be directed to E/PY (202) 619-
    6299 (NIS) or E/PN (202) 619-5348 (Central and Eastern Europe).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing 
    legislation, programs must maintain a non-political character and 
    should be balanced and representative of the diversity of American 
    political, social, and cultural life. Overall authority for these 
    programs is contained in the Mutual Education and Cultural Exchanges 
    Act of 1961, as amended, Public Law 87-256 (Fulbright-Hays Act).
    
    Overview
    
        Grant funding is intended to promote the exchange of young people 
    21 years of age or younger between the U.S. and the Newly Independent 
    States (NIS) or Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, 
    Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and 
    Uzbekistan, and the Central and Eastern European countries of Albania, 
    Bosnia-Hercegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, 
    Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, and 
    the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Proposals may address more 
    than one country in each area, for example, a project with Bulgaria, 
    Latvia, and Slovenia, or Belarus, Moldova, and Kyrgyzstan. Proposals 
    cannot combine NIS countries with those of Central and Eastern Europe. 
    The Agency's main objective is to foster interaction between American 
    and foreign youth. Consequently, extensive interaction is a 
    requirement. Proposals should demonstrate how American and foreign 
    youth will interact in a way that encourages the exchange of ideas, 
    values, culture, and information.
        This competition will give priority consideration to projects 
    taking place in Russia in areas other than Moscow and St. Petersburg, 
    and to projects taking place outside of capital cities in all the 
    eligible countries.
        Twenty-five percent (25%) of the available funds will be reserved 
    for organizations that have not received Samantha Smith grants in the 
    past year. Grants are awarded to expand or enhance existing exchange 
    programs or to encourage the development of new exchanges. Programs may 
    involve the U.S. organization in a partnership with organizations in 
    one or more countries. The minimum length of stay in country for a 
    project should be three weeks.
        Two categories of grants are being offered.
    
    Category A--School-to-School Exchanges
    
        A school-to-school exchange is one that involves a direct linkage 
    between a U.S. and a Central and Eastern European or NIS elementary, 
    middle, or high school, or a two-year college. (4-year colleges and 
    universities are not eligible under this competition). An applicant 
    must be a school, school district, or two-year college. The maximum 
    grant for this category is $15,000. The exchange program activity 
    should be reciprocal and permit students to live in each other's 
    countries during the academic year when schools are in session. (This 
    would include officially-sponsored summer school sessions). The 
    proposal should provide detailed information on the classroom and other 
    activities in both the U.S. and the partner country. The duration of 
    the projects may be one academic year, one semester, or short-term 
    (generally understood to mean three to eight weeks). Organizations 
    which are receiving funding under other USIA grants for youth exchanges 
    must insure that proposals submitted under this solicitation do not 
    duplicate or overlap with programs already being funded by USIA.
    
    Category B--General Youth Exchange
    
        This category includes all other projects, which will be eligible 
    for grants of up to $75,000. Semester and year-long high school or two-
    year college study programs conducted by exchange organizations may 
    fall within this category, as may projects involving the annual 
    exchange of groups of students and teachers among several linked 
    schools for short-term stays during the academic year. (4-year colleges 
    and universities are not eligible under this competition). For short-
    term (3-8 weeks) exchanges, preference is given to projects with a 
    thematic focus. Eligible foci may include, but are not limited to: The 
    arts (theater, dance, music, fine arts, literature, folklore, and film/
    video); language and culture; science, technology, and mathematics; 
    conservation and the environment; historic preservation; museum 
    training; social, political, and economic issues; agriculture; business 
    and administration/management (including enterprise promotion). While a 
    thematic focus is not an absolute requirement, care should be taken to 
    avoid proposing a program which is too heavily weighted toward 
    ``touristic'' activities and lacking in substance. Projects requesting 
    support for tours of performing arts groups or sports teams are 
    eligible if the primary purpose of the program is interaction among 
    international participants and their hosts. Tours of performing arts 
    groups or sports groups where the primary activity is performance or 
    competition are not eligible.
        Reciprocity is not a requirement for this category, but in general, 
    USIA gives preference to proposals for reciprocal exchanges. The 
    proposal should provide detailed information on the activities in both 
    the U.S. and the partner country. The number of U.S. and foreign 
    participants should be roughly equal. Such proposals must provide 
    written evidence of the commitment of a counterpart organization in the 
    partner country willing and able to engage in the proposed activities. 
    In most cases the counterpart organization should assume a significant 
    portion of the cost of hosting the American participants in the 
    reciprocal portion of the program.
    
    Guidelines
    
        All categories of proposals must include: Participant selection 
    criteria and a description of the selection process. All participants 
    must be under the age of 21 at the time they begin the program. In all 
    cases, selection should be merit-based. Selection criteria should 
    include actual or potential leadership qualities, and may also include 
    some or all of the following: maturity, academic achievement, interest 
    in the program, motivation, recommendations of teachers, and language 
    ability, although no participant should be chosen solely on the basis 
    of language ability. As far as possible, participants should reflect 
    the diversity of the communities from which they come. Ability to pay 
    should not be a determining factor for either American or foreign 
    participants.
    
    Description of Orientation Programs
    
        There should be ample introduction to the program theme, 
    administrative procedures, basic historical, cultural, and social 
    information, and substantive issues likely to be raised by their U.S. 
    or foreign counterparts. The orientation program should help minimize 
    the ``culture shock'' of the participants when they are in the partner 
    country.
    
    Information Concerning Stays in the Host Country
    
        Preference is generally given to longer stays in-country. The 
    proposal should describe in detail the selection and orientation 
    processes for both U.S. and host families and institutions. 
    Consideration will be given to those projects which for reasons or 
    requirements of the partner country(ies) are of short duration, but the 
    length of stay in country should be a minimum of three weeks.
    
    Information Concerning Language Qualifications
    
        Speaking ability in the language of the host country for both 
    American and foreign participants is preferred, but not required. It is 
    recognized that relatively few American young people will speak the 
    languages of the host countries, given the fact that relatively few 
    American schools teach these languages. Ideally, some participants in 
    each incoming delegation should be conversant in English, and some 
    participants in each outgoing delegation should be conversant in the 
    host country language. However, no participant should be selected 
    solely on the basis of his or her language ability.
    
    Details on Planning
    
        The proposal should show evidence of adequate lead/planning time to 
    ensure a successful exchange program. A proposed time frame should also 
    be included, as should provisions for monitoring and evaluating the 
    program.
    
    Proposed Budget
    
        Organizations must submit a comprehensive line item budget for 
    which specific details are available in the application packet.
        Grants awarded to eligible organizations with less than four years 
    of experience in conducting international exchange programs will be 
    limited to $60,000. Organizations should be familiar with grant 
    regulations described in OMB circulars A110, A122, and A133.
        Cost sharing is encouraged. Cost sharing may be in the form of 
    allowable direct or indirect costs. The grant recipient must maintain 
    written records to support all allowable costs which are claimed as 
    being its contribution to cost participation, as well as cost to be 
    paid by the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The 
    basis for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must 
    be in accordance with OMB Circular A110, Attachment E--Cost Sharing and 
    Matching, and should be described in the proposal. In the event the 
    recipient does not provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as 
    stipulated in the recipient's budget, the Agency's contribution will be 
    reduced in proportion to the recipient's contribution.
    
    Allowable Costs
    
        Grant-funded expenditures will generally be limited to the 
    following categories:
    
    --In-country travel and per diem; i.e., lodging, meals, clothing, 
    maintenance, and incidentals, or stipends.
    --Orientation, honoraria, or preparation costs; briefing materials. 
    Honoraria is limited to $150/day/speaker.
    --Educational and cultural enrichment activities up to a limit of $150 
    per program youth participant.
    --Tuition, conference/seminar registration fees, and other program 
    admission fees.
    --International travel, normally limited to partial support for 
    Americans traveling to the NIS, Baltic Republics, or Central and East 
    Europe, and Central and East Europeans traveling to the U.S. The 
    American participants and/or the American organization should be 
    encouraged to fund a portion of the Americans' travel costs, although 
    full funding of participants from economically disadvantaged 
    backgrounds is encouraged. The NIS partner organizations should also be 
    encouraged to make a contribution toward international travel, but in 
    this regard one should avoid a situation in which participants are 
    chosen largely or wholly on the basis of their ability to pay, thus 
    creating an unrepresentative group. In some cases 100% of the travel 
    costs for NIS participants will be paid from USIA funds.
    --Proposals should demonstrate substantial cost sharing in both program 
    and administrative expenses.
    
    Review Process
    
        USIA will acknowledge receipt of all proposals and will review them 
    for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they 
    do not adhere to the guidelines established herein and in the 
    application package. Eligible proposals will be forwarded to panels of 
    USIA officers for advisory review. All eligible proposals will also be 
    reviewed by the appropriate geographic area office, and the budget and 
    contracts offices. Proposals may also be reviewed by the Agency's 
    Office of General Counsel. Funding decisions are at the discretion of 
    the Associate Director for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final 
    technical authority for grant awards resides with the USIA's grants 
    officer.
    
    Review Criteria
    
        Technically eligible applications will be reviewed according to the 
    following criteria in addition to what has been outlined already in 
    this RFP:
    
    1. Quality of Program Idea
    
        Quality of the program plan and adherence of proposed activities to 
    the criteria and conditions described above.
    
    2. Reasonable, Feasible, and Flexible Objectives
    
        Proposals should clearly demonstrate how the institution will meet 
    the program's objectives and plan.
    
    3. Multiplier Effect/Impact
    
        Proposed programs should strengthen long-term mutual understanding, 
    to include maximum sharing of information and establishment of long-
    term institutional and individual linkages. A program is also 
    considered to have a strong ``multiplier effect'' if it affects a 
    significant number of persons in addition to the actual program 
    participants. For example, a group of high school students may have 
    extensive interaction with community groups.
    
    4. Value to U.S.--Partner Country Relations
    
        Assessments by USIA's geographic area desk, and overseas officers 
    of the need, potential, impact, and significance in the partner 
    country(ies).
    
    5. Cost Effectiveness
    
        The overhead and administrative components of grants, as well as 
    salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. Proposals 
    which utilize grant funds for program rather than administrative costs 
    will, in general, be more favorably reviewed. All other items should be 
    necessary and appropriate. Proposals should to the extent possible 
    maximize cost-sharing through other private sector support as well as 
    institutional direct funding contributions. Other things being equal, a 
    proposal with a low cost per participant and/or a low cost per 
    participant program day will have an advantage.
    
    6. Institutional Capacity
    
        Proposed personnel and institutional resources should be adequate 
    and appropriate to achieve the program or project's goals.
    
    7. Institution's Track Record/Ability
    
        Proposals should demonstrate potential for program excellence and/
    or the track record of applicant institution. The Agency will consider 
    the past performance of prior grantees and the demonstrated potential 
    of new applicants. A documented record of successful exchange programs, 
    whether USIA financed or not, is one way in which an applicant may 
    demonstrate strength in this area.
    
    8. Follow-on Activities
    
        Proposals should provide a plan for continued follow-on activity 
    (without USIA support) which insures that USIA supported programs are 
    not isolated events.
    
    9. Evaluation Plan
    
        Proposals should provide a plan for evaluation of the program by 
    the grantee institution.
    
    10. Participant Diversity
    
        Programs should strive for a diversity among participants and 
    include members of underrepresented groups; e.g., racial and ethnic 
    minorities and persons with disabilities.
    
    Notice
    
        The terms and conditions published in this RFP are binding and may 
    not be modified by any USIA representative. Explanatory information 
    provided by the Agency that contradicts published language will not be 
    binding. Issuance of the RFP does not constitute an award commitment on 
    the part of the Government. Final awards cannot be made until funds 
    have been fully appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed 
    through internal USIA procedures.
    
    Notification
    
        All applicants will be notified of the results of the review 
    process by February, 1995. Awarded grants will be subject to periodic 
    reporting and evaluation requirements.
    
        Dated: June 8, 1994.
    John P. Loiello,
    Associate Director, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 94-14512 Filed 6-15-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/16/1994
Department:
United States Information Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Request for proposals.
Document Number:
94-14512
Dates:
Deadline for proposals: All copies must be received at the U.S. Information Agency in Washington, DC by 5 p.m. EST on Friday, September 2, 1994. Faxed documents will not be accepted, nor will documents postmarked on a September 2 but received at a later date. It is the responsibility of each grant applicant to ensure that complete proposals are received by the above deadline. Grant funds are unlikely to be available before February 1, 1995.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: June 16, 1994