94-14679. Temporary Flight Restrictions; Proposed Rule DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 115 (Thursday, June 16, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-14679]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: June 16, 1994]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part XII
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Transportation
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    14 CFR Part 91
    
    
    
    
    Temporary Flight Restrictions; Proposed Rule
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 91
    
    [Docket No. 26605; Notice No. 91-14]
    RIN 2120-AD-55
    
     
    Temporary Flight Restrictions
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document withdraws a proposal to amend the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations to require the operator of an aircraft used in 
    conducting authorized news-gathering operations in an area covered by 
    temporary flight restrictions (TFR) to contact the official in charge 
    of the on-scene emergency response activities for the purpose of 
    obtaining information about current and forecasted disaster relief 
    aircraft activities. The objective of the NPRM was to increase the 
    level of safety afforded aircraft used in conducting rescue or disaster 
    relief operations. The FAA has carefully considered all of the comments 
    received in response to the NPRM and as a result has concluded that 
    safety in TFR's can be increased through procedural versus regulatory 
    means. Accordingly, the NPRM is being withdrawn.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Ms. Ellen Crum, Air Traffic Rules Branch, ATP-230, Airspace-Rules and 
    Aeronautical Information Division, Air Traffic Rules and Procedures 
    Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-8783.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    Background
    
        On July 24, 1991, the FAA published Notice No. 91-14 (56 FR 34000). 
    The NPRM proposed amending Sec. 91.137(c)(5) of the Federal Aviation 
    Regulations (FAR) to require that: (1) All pilots of aircraft carrying 
    properly accredited media personnel initially contact the official in 
    charge of on-scene emergency response activities to ascertain the 
    routes, altitudes, and operating areas in use by disaster relief 
    aircraft; and (2) the aircraft be operated clear of all disaster relief 
    aircraft operations identified by the official in charge. Currently, 
    when TFR's are established for the purpose of providing a safe 
    environment for the operation of disaster relief aircraft, aircraft 
    carrying properly accredited newspeople may enter the prescribed area 
    without prior approval, provided a flight plan has been filed. However, 
    the aircraft must be operated above the altitude(s) being used by 
    rescue or disaster relief aircraft. The process a pilot uses to 
    determine which altitudes are being utilized is not prescribed in the 
    current regulation.
    
    Discussion of Comments
    
        Thirty-one comments were received in response to the NPRM (the 
    comment period closed September 23, 1991). Most commenters supported 
    the goal of the NPRM to promote increased air traffic safety in TFR's; 
    however, the best means to accomplish this was disputed.
        Several commenters recommended that a common disaster frequency be 
    established for all aircraft. Other commenters expressed concern over 
    the potential inability of media aircraft to communicate with emergency 
    ground officials, suggesting that on-scene ground officials be required 
    to possess an aircraft compatible two-way radio. Suggestions were made 
    to require pilot monitoring of the frequency while in the disaster 
    area. Finally, suggestions were made to incorporate this proposed rule 
    into the Airman's Information Manual rather than add it to the FAR.
        The FAA recognizes the potential merit of this proposal and 
    acknowledges the validity of the express concerns. Since this NPRM was 
    published, the FAA has been reviewing regulations and procedures 
    currently utilized for temporary flight restrictions.
        In addition to aircraft carrying news media encountering 
    difficulties in determining the altitude being used by disaster relief 
    aircraft, other TFR problems have been cited. These problems include 
    pilots being unable to receive the location of a TFR area in a timely 
    manner; aircraft on instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plans and 
    military aircraft on IFR training routes intruding into the TFR; the 
    large number of aircraft in TFR's implemented for an incident or event 
    generating a high degree of public interest; and the untimely process 
    used to put TFR's in place, particularly when they involve critical 
    situations such as toxic spills. In addition, of the 13 documented 
    incidents in TFR's, only 2 were confirmed to be aircraft carrying news 
    media. The other incidents involved general aviation aircraft or 
    military aircraft that inadvertently penetrated the TFR's. The reason 
    most often given was lack of information about the existence of the TFR 
    and the inability to positively identify the TFR location.
    
    Reasons for Withdrawal
    
        Based on the comments received in response to Notice No. 94-14, and 
    the additional data as stated above, the FAA has determined that there 
    is inadequate justification to pursue further this regulatory action. 
    The FAA has determined that additional study of current TFR procedures, 
    which may include parts of Notice No. 91-14, is necessary. Therefore, 
    it is in the best interest of all concerned to withdraw Notice No. 91-
    14.
    
    The Decision and Withdrawal
    
        Accordingly, the FAA concludes that further rulemaking on Notice 
    No. 91-14 should not proceed at this time. Therefore, Notice No. 91-14 
    is withdrawn. This action does not preclude the FAA from considering 
    similar proposals in the future or commit it to any further or future 
    course of action on this subject.
        The authority citation for part 91 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 1301(7), 1303, 1344, 1348, 1352 through 
    1355, 1401, 1421 through 1431, 1471, 1472, 1502, 1510, 1522, and 
    2121 through 2125; Articles 12, 29, 31, and 31(a) of the Convention 
    on International Civil Aviation (61 Stat. 1180); 42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
    seq: E.O. 11514; 49 U.S.C. 106(g) (Revised Pub. L. 97-449, January 
    12, 1983).
    
        Issued in Washington DC on June 8, 1994.
    Harold W. Becker,
    Acting Director, Air Traffic, Rules and Procedures Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-14679 Filed 6-15-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/16/1994
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal.
Document Number:
94-14679
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: June 16, 1994
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 91