94-14693. Public and Private Nonprofit Organizations in Support of International Educational and Cultural ActivitiesProfessional Development in English Language Teaching: Israel, et al.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 115 (Thursday, June 16, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-14693]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: June 16, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY
     
    
    Public and Private Nonprofit Organizations in Support of 
    International Educational and Cultural Activities--Professional 
    Development in English Language Teaching: Israel, et al.
    
    ACTION: Notice--request for proposals.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Office of Citizen Exchanges (E/P) of the United States 
    Information Agency's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs 
    announces a competitive grant program for nonprofit organizations to 
    conduct a project for enhancing professional development in English 
    language teaching at the secondary level in Israel (both Arab and 
    Jewish communities), Gaza, and the West Bank. Participants will be 
    professionals responsible for developing effective English language 
    teaching programs; emphasis will be on curriculum development, teaching 
    methodology, production of classroom-appropriate material, and 
    organizing professional associations and networks.
        A second, underlying, agenda of this project is to convene, on an 
    egalitarian basis and on neutral territory, a group of Israeli Jews, 
    Israeli Arabs, and Palestinians who will work together within a 
    professional discipline--in this case, English language teaching--and 
    who will, upon returning to their own communities, both maintain 
    professional, mutually supportive contact and represent, within those 
    communities, the feasibility of collegial relationships between Jews, 
    Israeli Arabs, and Palestinians.
        The program will be conducted in English.
        Interested applicants are urged to read the complete Federal 
    Register announcement before addressing inquiries to the Office of 
    Citizen Exchanges or submitting their proposals. After the RFP 
    deadline, the Office of Citizen Exchanges may not discuss this 
    competition in any way with applicants until the final decisions are 
    made.
    
    ANNOUNCEMENT NAME AND NUMBER: All communications with USIA concerning 
    this announcement should refer to the above title and reference number 
    E/P-94-31.
    
    DATES: Deadline for Proposals: All copies must be received at the U.S. 
    Information Agency by 5 p.m., Washington, DC time on August 2, 1994. 
    Faxed documents will not be accepted, nor will documents postmarked 
    August 2, 1994 but received at a later date. It is the responsibility 
    of each grant applicant to ensure that proposals are received by this 
    deadline.
    
    ADDRESSES: The original and 14 copies of the completed application and 
    required forms should be submitted by the deadline to: U.S. Information 
    Agency, Ref: E/P-94-31, Office of Grants Management (E/XE), 301 Fourth 
    Street SW.--room 336, Washington, DC 20547.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Interested organizations/institutions should contact the Office of 
    Citizen Exchanges (E/P), room 224, USIA, 301 Fourth Street SW., 
    Washington, DC 20547, fax (202) 619-4350, tel. (202) 619-5319, to 
    request detailed application packages which include all necessary forms 
    and guidelines for proposals, including specific budget preparation. 
    Please specify the name of USIA Program Specialist Thomas Johnston on 
    all inquiries and correspondence.
    
    Background/Objectives of This Program
    
        There is a strong need and desire among educational professionals 
    in Gaza, the West Bank, Israeli Arab communities, and selected Israeli 
    Jewish communities for assistance in the development of an effective, 
    comprehensive program of English language teaching at the secondary 
    level. Concomitantly, there is an even greater imperative for members 
    of the diverse communities within Israel and for Palestinians from both 
    Gaza and the West Bank to meet and work together in a professional, 
    non-politically charged context.
        One goal of this project is to prepare Israeli and Palestinian 
    participants--individuals active in setting the agenda for high school 
    and/or community-based English Language teaching programs--to implement 
    state-of-the-art TESOL curriculum design, teaching methodology, and 
    material/text development in an effort to enhance English teaching and 
    learning in their respective communities.
        The second goal is to develop a situation in which professionals 
    from the diverse communities may meet and work together in an 
    egalitarian, mutually supportive way.
        American organizations are invited to submit proposals for a 
    project to bring 12 English teaching professionals to the United States 
    for a period of four or five weeks.
        Participants should become thoroughly conversant with state-of-the-
    art theory and practice of teaching English as a second language. They 
    should observe and participate in classroom and language lab 
    instruction, become involved in the complexities of curriculum 
    development, and produce guidelines for and examples of classroom-
    appropriate teaching material. In addition, they should be introduced 
    to professional associations and networks of teachers, curriculum 
    developers, and education officials, providing them models of 
    professional cooperation and information exchange which will be useful 
    in establishing cross-cultural professional linkages in the region.
        The second phase of the project should take place over a period of 
    approximately six months and should entail the travel at approximately 
    eight-to-ten-week intervals, of four American specialists/consultants. 
    Each specialist will conduct a series of two-to-three-day workshops on 
    one or more of the key issues addressed in the initial phase of the 
    exchange (e.g., curriculum development; teaching methodology; in-
    service training), in each of the locations in Israel, Gaza, and the 
    West Bank from which participants in the original phase were drawn.
    
    Participants
    
        Participants' professional titles will vary from community to 
    community, given the independent development of educational 
    supervisory/oversight institutions in Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank. 
    They might be drawn from the Ministry of Education, the ranks of 
    consultants to the educational establishment, teachers' unions, 
    professional committees, or teacher training institutions. All will be 
    responsible, in some capacity, for the development of effective English 
    language teaching programs. Participants will be selected by United 
    States Information Service officers (The United States Information 
    Agency's overseas contingent is officially called the United States 
    Information Service) serving in the American Embassy in Tel Aviv and 
    the American Consulate in Jerusalem. Individuals may also be 
    recommended for participation by the grantee institution, but selection 
    will be made only in close consultation with USIS officers. American 
    consultants who will travel abroad during the second phase of this 
    exchange program will be selected by the grantee institution in 
    consultation with USIA.
        USIA officers in participating countries will facilitate the 
    issuance of visas and other program-related material.
    
    Programmatice Considerations
    
        Thematically, the project should:
    --Consider the current status of English Language instruction in the 
    communities represented by the participants and determine, in 
    conjunction with USIS posts in Israel and Jerusalem and with the 
    educators selected as participants, the needs to be addressed by the 
    project;
    --Provide the participants both a general and specific overview of 
    English Language education--focussing specifically on teaching English 
    as a second language--as it is practiced in the United States, in the 
    context of a socially diverse country;
    --Be organized, to the extent possible, around open seminar/
    discussions, participant observation, and hands-on, experiential 
    learning;
    --Introduce participants to the organization and workings of 
    professional associations of educators and other means of information 
    exchange, such as internet, which would provide continued access to 
    diverse ideas, publications, etc.;
    --And include, if feasible, attendance at the TESOL international 
    convention in Long Beach, California, March 28-April 1, 1995.
    
        Pursuant to the legislation authorizing the Bureau of Educational 
    and Cultural Affairs, programs must maintain a nonpolitical character 
    and should be balanced and representative of the diversity of American 
    political, social, and cultural life.
        Beyond the immediate goals of this program, USIA is interested in 
    supporting programs which will lay the groundwork for new and 
    continuing links among American, Israeli, and Palestinian institutions 
    and professional organizations and which will encourage the further 
    growth and development of democratic structures.
        The grantee will be responsible for most arrangements associated 
    with this program. These include organizing a coherent progression of 
    activities, providing international and domestic travel arrangements 
    for all participants, making lodging and local transportation 
    arrangements for visitors, orienting and debriefing participants, 
    preparing any necessary support material, and working with host 
    institutions and individuals to achieve maximum program effectiveness.
        To prepare the foreign educators for this project prior to their 
    arrival in the United States, E/P encourages the grantee organization 
    to develop material that would be sent to USIS offices overseas for 
    distribution to participants. This material might include a tentative 
    project outline and suggested goals and objectives, relevant background 
    information, and information about American institutions and 
    individuals involved in the project.
        At the beginning of the program, the grantee organization should 
    conduct an orientation session for the visiting participants which 
    addresses administrative details of the program and provides general 
    information about American society and culture which will facilitate 
    the participants' understanding of and adjustment to daily life in the 
    United States.
        At the conclusion of the program, the group should meet in a 
    symposium to review what has been presented to and experienced by the 
    participants and to consider how that which has been learned can most 
    effectively be applied upon the participants' return to their home 
    countries.
    
    Additional Guidelines
    
        Program monitoring and oversight will be provided by appropriate 
    USIA elements. Per Diem support from host institutions during an 
    internship component is strongly encouraged. However, for all programs 
    which include internships, a nonprofit grantee institution which 
    receives funds from corporate or other co-sponsors should then use 
    those funds to provide food, lodging, and pocket money for the 
    participants. In no case could the intern receive a wage or ``be 
    hired'' by the sponsoring institution.
        Internships should also have an American studies/values orientation 
    component at the beginning of the program. The American grantee 
    institutions should try to maximize cost-sharing in all facets of the 
    program, and to stimulate U.S. private sector (foundation and 
    corporate) support.
        Proposals incorporating internships will be more competitive if 
    letters committing prospective host institutions to support these 
    efforts are provided.
    
    Funding
    
        Competition for USIA funding support is keen. The final selection 
    of a grantee institution will depend on assessment of proposals 
    according to the review criteria delineated below.
        The amount requested from USIA for this program should not exceed 
    $135,000. However, organizations with less than four years of 
    successful experience in managing international exchange programs are 
    limited to $60,000.
        While applicants must provide an all-inclusive budget with the 
    proposal, they are also encouraged to include separate sub-budgets for 
    each program component, phase, location or activity.
        The recipient's proposal shall include the cost of an audit that: 
    (1) Complies with the requirements of OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of 
    Institutions of Higher Education and Other Nonprofit Institutions; (2) 
    complies with the requirements of American Institute of Certified 
    Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) No. 92-9; and 
    (3) includes review by the recipient's independent auditor of a 
    recipient-prepared supplemental schedule of indirect cost rate 
    computation, if such a rate is being proposed.
        The audit costs shall be identified separately for: (1) Preparation 
    of basic financial statements and other accounting services; and (2) 
    preparation of the supplemental reports and schedules required by OMB 
    Circular No. A-133, AICPA SOP 92-9, and the review of the supplemental 
    schedule of indirect cost rate computation.
        USIA will consider funding the following project costs:
        1. International and domestic air fares; visas; transit costs 
    (e.g., airport taxes); ground transportation costs.
        2. Per diem: For the U.S. program, organizations have the option of 
    using a flat $140/day for international participants or the published 
    Federal Travel Regulations per diem rates for individual American 
    cities.
    
        Note: U.S. escorting staff must use the published federal per 
    diem rates, not the flat rate. For activities in the Middle East the 
    Standard Government Travel Regulations per diem rates must be used.
    
        3. Book and cultural allowance: Participants are entitled to a one-
    time cultural allowance of $150 per person, plus a participant book 
    allowance of $50. Escorts are reimbursed for actual expenses up to 
    $150. U.S. staff do not get these benefits.
        4. Consultants: May be used to provide specialized expertise or to 
    make presentations. Honoraria should not exceed $250 per day. 
    Subcontracting organizations may also be used, in which case the 
    written contract(s) must be included in the proposal.
        5. Room rental (for meeting or conference rooms): Generally should 
    not exceed $250 per day.
        6. Material development: Proposals may contain costs to purchase, 
    develop and translate material for participants. USIA reserves the 
    rights to this material for future use.
        7. One working meal per project: Per capita cost may not exceed $5-
    8 per lunch and $14-20 per dinner, excluding room rental. The number of 
    invited guests may not exceed the number of participants by a factor of 
    more than two to one.
        8. Return travel allowance: $70 for each participant which is to be 
    used for incidental expenditures incurred during international travel.
        9. Other costs necessary for the effective administration of the 
    program, including salaries for grant organization employees, benefits, 
    and other direct and indirect costs per detailed instructions in 
    application package.
    
        Note: the 22% limitation of ``administrative costs'' included in 
    previous announcements does NOT apply to this RFP.
    
        E/P encourages cost-sharing, which may be in the form of allowable 
    direct or indirect costs. E/P would be especially interested in 
    proposals which demonstrate a program vision which goes well beyond 
    that which can be supported by the requested USIA grant and which would 
    try to use a USIA grant to leverage additional funding from other 
    sources to support elements of the broader program plan.
        The Recipient must maintain written records to support all 
    allowable costs which are claimed as being its contribution to cost 
    participation, as well as costs to be paid by the Federal Government. 
    Such records are subject to audit. The basis for determining the value 
    of cash and in-kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB 
    Circular A-110, Attachment E, ``Cost-sharing and Matching,'' and should 
    be described in the proposal. In the event the Recipient does not meet 
    the minimum amount of cost-sharing as stipulated in the Recipient's 
    budget, the Agency's contribution will be reduced in proportion to the 
    Recipient's contribution.
    
        Please Note all delegates will be covered under the terms of a 
    USIA-sponsored health insurance policy. The premium is paid by USIA 
    directly to the insurance company.
    
    Application Requirements
    
        Proposals must be structured in accordance with the instructions 
    contained in the Application Package. Confirmation letters from U.S. 
    and foreign co-sponsors noting their intention to participate in the 
    program will enhance a proposal.
    
    Review Process
    
        USIA will acknowledge receipt of all proposals and will review them 
    for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they 
    do not fully adhere to the guidelines established herein and in the 
    Application Package.
        Eligible proposals will be forwarded to panels of USIA officers for 
    advisory review. Proposals will be reviewed by USIS posts and by USIA's 
    Office of Near Eastern, North African, and South Asian Affairs. 
    Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel or 
    other Agency elements. Funding is at the discretion of the Associate 
    Director for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical 
    authority for granting awards resides with USIA's contracting officer. 
    The awarding of any grant is subject to availability of funds.
        The U.S. Government reserves the right to reject any or all 
    applications received. USIA will not pay for design and development 
    costs associated with submitting a proposal. Applications are submitted 
    at the risk of the applicant; should circumstances prevent the awarding 
    of a grant, all preparation and submission costs are at the applicant's 
    expense. USIA will not award funds for activities conducted prior to 
    the actual grant award.
    
    Review Criteria
    
        USIA will consider proposals based on the following criteria:
    
    1. Quality of Program Idea
    
        Proposals should exhibit substance, originality, rigor, and 
    relevance to the Agency mission. They should demonstrate the matching 
    of U.S. resources to a clearly defined need.
    
    2. Institutional Reputation/Ability
    
        Institutions should demonstrate their potential for effective 
    program design and implementation and provide, if available, evidence 
    of having conducted successful programs. If an applicant has previously 
    received a USIA grant, responsible fiscal management and full 
    compliance with all reporting requirements for past Agency grants, as 
    determined by USIA's Office of Contracts (M/KG), will be considered. 
    Evaluations of previous projects may also be considered in this 
    assessment.
    
    3. Project Personnel
    
        Information provided regarding the thematic and logistical 
    expertise of project personnel should be relevant to the proposal at 
    hand. In addition to English teaching specialists, applicants for this 
    grant should have involved, on a consultative basis, individuals with 
    Middle Eastern and conflict resolution expertise. Resumes or C.V.s 
    should be summaries appropriate to the specific proposal and should not 
    exceed two pages each.
    
    4. Program Planning
    
        A detailed agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate 
    substantive rigor and logistical capacity.
    
    5. Thematic Expertise
    
        The proposal should demonstrate the organization's expertise in the 
    subject area and its ability to share information effectively.
    
    6. Cross-Cultural Sensitivity/Area Expertise
    
        Evidence should be provided of sensitivity to historical, 
    linguistic, religious, and other cross-cultural factors, as well as 
    relevant knowledge of the target geographic area/country.
    
    7. Ability To Achieve Program Objectives
    
        Objectives should be realistic and feasible. The proposal should 
    clearly demonstrate how the grantee institution will meet program 
    objectives.
    
    8. Multiplier Effect
    
        Proposed programs should strengthen mutual understanding and should 
    contribute to maximum sharing of information and the establishment of 
    long-term institutional and individual ties.
    
    9. Cost-Effectiveness
    
        Costs to USIA per exchange participant (American and foreign) 
    should be kept to a minimum, and all items proposed for USIA funding 
    should be necessary and appropriate to achieve the program's 
    objectives.
    
    10. Cost-Sharing
    
        Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through private sector 
    support as well as through direct funding contributions and/or in-kind 
    support from the prospective grantee organization and its partners.
    
    11. Follow-On Activities
    
        Proposals should provide a plan for continued exchange activity 
    (without USIA support) which ensures that USIA-supported programs are 
    not isolated events.
    
    12. Project Evaluation
    
        Proposals should include a plan to evaluate the project. USIA 
    recommends that the applicant discuss the evaluation methodology chosen 
    and the techniques which will be employed to assess the effectiveness 
    of the project and the correspondence between observable outcomes and 
    original project objectives. Grantees will be expected to submit 
    intermediate reports after each project component is concluded or 
    quarterly, whichever is less frequent.
    
    Notice
    
        The terms and conditions published in this RFP are binding and may 
    not be modified by any USIA representative.
        Explanatory information provided by the Agency which contradicts 
    published language will not be binding. Issuance of the RFP does not 
    constitute an award commitment on the part of the American Government. 
    Awards cannot be made until funds have been fully appropriated by 
    Congress and allocated and committed through internal USIA procedures.
    
    Notification
    
        All applicants will be notified of the results of the review 
    process on or about September 16, 1994. Awarded grants will be subject 
    to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements.
    
        Dated: June 11, 1994.
    Barry Fulton,
    Deputy Associate Director, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 94-14693 Filed 6-15-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/16/1994
Department:
United States Information Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice--request for proposals.
Document Number:
94-14693
Dates:
Deadline for Proposals: All copies must be received at the U.S. Information Agency by 5 p.m., Washington, DC time on August 2, 1994. Faxed documents will not be accepted, nor will documents postmarked August 2, 1994 but received at a later date. It is the responsibility of each grant applicant to ensure that proposals are received by this deadline.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: June 16, 1994